Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Schmerz ; 35(2): 124-129, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33447917

RESUMEN

Radiofrequency denervation has been established for many years as an important minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of chronic pain conditions. Positive experiences of many users for various indications are contrasted by a nonuniform evidence. With meticulous patient selection and correct assessment of the indications a longer term reduction of pain, a reduced need for analgesics and an improvement in the quality of life can be achieved. The aim of this interdisciplinary position paper is to present the value of radiofrequency denervation in the treatment of chronic pain. The summarized recommendations of the expert group are based on the available evidence and on the clinical experiences of Austrian centers that frequently implement the procedure. The position paper contains recommendations on patient selection and proven indications. We discribe safety aspects, complications, side effects and contraindications.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Articulación Cigapofisaria , Austria , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Desnervación , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Neuromodulation ; 17(2): 180-7, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24320718

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) for chronic low back pain (cLBP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter observational study, 118 patients were admitted to 11 centers throughout Austria and Switzerland. After a screening visit, all patients underwent a trial stimulation period of at least seven days before implantation of the permanent system. Leads were placed in the subcutaneous tissues of the lower back directly in the region of greatest pain. One hundred five patients were implanted with a permanent stimulating system. Patients' evaluation of pain and functional levels were completed before implantation and one, three, and six months after implantation. Adverse events, medication usage, and coverage of the painful area and predictive value of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) were monitored. RESULTS: All pain and quality-of-life measures showed statistically significant improvement during the treatment period. These included the average pain visual analog scale, the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, the Becks Depression Inventory, and the Short Form-12 item Health survey. Additionally, medication usage with opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and anti-convulsants showed a highly significant reduction. Complications requiring surgical intervention were reported in 9.6% of the patients. The degree of coverage of painful areas seems to be an important criterion for efficacy of PNFS, whereas TENS is presumably no predictor. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, multicenter study confirms that PNFS is an effective therapy for the management of cLBP. Significant improvements in many aspects of the pain condition were measured, and complications were minimal.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Pain Physician ; 16(6): 593-601, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24284844

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of chronic pain conditions has long been controversial. They have been reported to be relatively safe when prescribed with caution, but a brief and valid instrument to estimate a person's risk of addiction is still missing. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate a self-rating questionnaire allowing an estimation of a person's risk of addiction to opioid analgesics. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Four Austrian hospitals. METHODS: Seven hundred forty-one patients were interviewed. Of these, 634 patients were affected with chronic pain while 107 patients had a history of opioid addiction. Patients were interviewed about alcohol and nicotine consumption and family history of psychiatric disorders. Attitudes towards medication and the origin of pain were examined. We asked patients with an opioid addiction and patients suffering from chronic pain to complete a short questionnaire intended to help screen for addiction potential. RESULTS: Compared to the patients suffering from chronic pain, patients with an opioid addiction significantly more often had alcohol- and nicotine-related pathologies and psychiatric comorbidity. A family history of mental illness and developmental problems were significantly more frequent in this group. Compared to those not addicted, those with an opioid addiction had significantly higher expectations concerning the potential of medication to change one's mental state; they thought that psychological  factors might contribute to the pain they feel. LIMITATIONS: The main limitation of this study is the use of a self-rating instrument which reduces objectivity and introduces the possibility of misreporting. Also, the 2 groups differ in number and are not homogenous. CONCLUSION: We found differences in questionnaire responses between patients with an opioid addiction and patients suffering from chronic pain to be dependent upon the prevalence of current or former addiction, psychiatric history, attitudes towards medication, and ideas about the origin of pain. We believe these factors have predictive value in estimating a patient with pain's risk of addiction.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/psicología , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Pain Pract ; 10(4): 279-86, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20230450

RESUMEN

Stimulation of primary afferent neurons offers a new approach for the control of localized chronic pain. We describe the results with a new neurostimulation technique, subcutaneous target stimulation (STS), for the treatment of chronic focal noncancer pain. STS applies permanent electrical stimulation directly at the painful area via a percutaneous-placed subcutaneous lead. We reported the clinical outcomes of 111 patients with focal chronic, noncancer pain treated with STS in this first nationwide, multicenter retrospective analysis. The indications for STS were low back pain (n = 29) and failed back surgery syndrome (back pain with leg pain) (n = 37), cervical neck pain (n = 15), and postherpetic neuralgia (n = 12). Pain intensity was measured on a numerical rating scale (NRS) before and after implantation. Data on analgesic medication, stimulation systems, position, and type of leads and complications were obtained from the patients' records. After implantation, the mean pain intensity improved by more than 50% (mean NRS reduction from 8.2 to 4.0) in the entire patient group (P = 0.0009). This was accompanied by a sustained reduction in demand for analgesics. In all the patients, the STS leads were positioned directly at the site of maximum pain. Lead dislocation occurred in 14 patients (13%), infections in 7 (6%), and in 6 cases (5%), lead fractures were observed. The retrospective data analysis revealed that STS effectively provided pain relief in patients suffering from refractory focal chronic noncancer pain and that STS is an alternative treatment option. Prospective controlled studies are required to confirm these retrospective findings. This article presents a new minimally invasive technique for therapy-resistant focal pain.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Manejo del Dolor , Piel/inervación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Austria , Biofisica , Enfermedad Crónica , Electrodos Implantados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/clasificación , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Wien Med Wochenschr ; 160(3-4): 70-76, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20300922

RESUMEN

Cancer disease is associated with a lot of very burdening symptoms. Pain is with dyspnea and emesis in the first time in a rate of about 50%, in the terminal stage up to 90% the most tormenting symptom. For more than 90% of patients the 3-step-WHO-regimen for cancer pain is able to relieve pain successfully. But a little group of cancer patients need invasive measures and methods to relieve pain sufficiently. This would be the 4th step, according to the enlarged WHO-regimen. Intravenous or intrathecal applications, eventually regional blockades should be considered. The following case-report shows the steps of a difficult cancer pain therapy in a regional general hospital. It is sometimes not evidence based, on the one hand because of necessary organizational, staff-related, or other makeshifts in daily clinical practice, on the other hand because of the lack of appropriate EBM-guidelines. The pressure to reduce the pain effectively and as simple as possible produces sometimes polypragmatic, retrospective not always satisfying measures.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Dolor Intratable/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/fisiopatología , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/secundario , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/fisiopatología , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/fisiopatología , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/fisiopatología , Neoplasias Uterinas/fisiopatología , Anciano , Analgesia Epidural , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Bombas de Infusión Implantables , Infusiones Intravenosas , Inyecciones Espinales , Bloqueo Nervioso , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico , Organización Mundial de la Salud
6.
Neuroradiology ; 50(9): 777-85, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18483728

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Oxygen-ozone nucleolysis (ONL) is a new, minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of discogenic low back pain with or without radicular symptoms. The aim of the present study was to determine associations between the morphology of the basic disease, patient-specific factors and the outcome of the treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred and twelve patients not responding to conservative therapy were divided into five groups (disc bulging, disc herniation, postoperative patients, osteochondrosis, others) and subjected to nucleolysis with ozone and to periradicular infiltration with steroids and local anaesthesia. The success of treatment was assessed by means of a visual analog pain scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULT: A significant reduction in the VAS was registered after 2 and 6 months (from 8.6 to 5.4 and 6.0; p < 0.001) in all patient groups; an excellent therapy response (VAS below 3.0) was achieved by about a third of the patients. A significant improvement in ODI was registered in all patients (46 to 31; p < 0.001), most pronounced in the herniation group (25.5, p = 0.015). Patients below 50 years had significantly better values in the VAS and ODI score 6 months after treatment. Final VAS and ODI scores for patients with a single diseased segment were 4.2 and 28.0, in two affected segments 6.5 and 32 and in three segments 6.7 and 38.5 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.051). CONCLUSION: ONL with periradicular steroid therapy might exert a functional and sustained analgesic effect in patients with degenerative changes in the lumbar spine not responding to conservative therapy and was most effective below 50 years with disc herniation in one segment.


Asunto(s)
Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Quimiólisis del Disco Intervertebral/métodos , Vértebras Lumbares , Oxidantes Fotoquímicos/administración & dosificación , Ozono/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
7.
Pain Pract ; 8(3): 164-70, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18384501

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal drug delivery using implantable pumps is an effective method to control stable chronic pain. However, the appropriate alleviation of unpredictable pain fluctuations remains challenging. A possible solution is the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) by means of a specific device--the personal therapy manager (PTM)--designed to be used with implanted programmable pumps. METHODS: A multicenter (n = 17), open-label registry recording 168 patients suffering from chronic pain with unsatisfactory control of pain episodes was initiated. While 79 patients (47%) (group A) already carried an implanted pump at enrollment, all other patients were implanted after being registered in the study (group B). Parameters assessed included pain relief (visual analog score, VAS), quality of life (EQ-5D), patient and physician satisfaction, medication use, PTM programming parameters and adverse events. Final follow-up was at 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, there was a significant reduction (29%) of the overall average VAS compared with baseline (P < 0.01) in patients with newly implanted devices (group B). All patients tended to decrease the concomitant pain medication and the quality of life tended to improve (10% on the EQ-5D scale). In total, 85% of patients were satisfied with the PTM. No serious adverse events related to the use of the PTM device were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-controlled analgesia using a PTM with a programmable, implantable pump system is an effective therapy for the treatment of chronic pain and allows patients to feel that they have more control over unpredictable pain fluctuations.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Controlada por el Paciente/instrumentación , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Bombas de Infusión Implantables , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Enfermedad Crónica , Quimioterapia Combinada , Diseño de Equipo , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Dimensión del Dolor , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Médicos/psicología , Calidad de Vida
8.
Wien Med Wochenschr ; 158(23-24): 729-34, 2008.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19165455

RESUMEN

This case report of a 54-year-old patient, with a metastasized non-small cell bronchial carcinoma, shows us the different ways in pain therapy alternatives. We report the possibility of using spinal delivery systems (especially epidural/intrathecal) in palliative therapy, if like in this case oral applicated opioids were not very successful. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this method and point out the possible side effects. Finally, we conclude that it has to be decided on a case per case basis, if this therapy is applicable or not.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/fisiopatología , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Broncogénico/fisiopatología , Catéteres de Permanencia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/fisiopatología , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Dolor Intratable/tratamiento farmacológico , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Anciano , Analgesia Epidural , Analgesia Controlada por el Paciente , Neoplasias Óseas/fisiopatología , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Humanos , Bombas de Infusión , Masculino , Bloqueo Nervioso
9.
Med Devices (Auckl) ; 1: 41-7, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22915907

RESUMEN

Intrathecal therapy represents an effective and well established treatment of nonmalignant as well as malignant pain. Devices available include mechanical constant flow pumps as well as electronic variable flow pumps with patient-controlled bolus release. The latter provide faster dose finding, individual pain control, and good acceptance by patients. New technologies such as membrane pumps and rechargeable devices are expected to be developed to clinical perfection. The available drugs for intrathecal therapy are listed according to the polyanalgesic consensus on intrathecal therapy. The integration of remote patient-controlled analgesia into electronic implantable devices, and the peptide analgesic ziconotide, have significantly improved intrathecal therapy. Complications include infections, catheter ruptures or disconnections, catheter granulomas, and technical dysfunctions. Further possibilities for optimizing intrathecal therapy include development of new drugs, drug side effects, catheter and pump technologies, and surgical techniques.

10.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 66(5): 697-9, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17204565

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To obtain data on the care received by individuals counselled during a public health awareness campaign on painful musculoskeletal conditions (MSC). METHODS: Easy non-formal access to rheumatologists/pain specialists was offered using a mobile unit (Rheuma-Bus) at widely accessible sites. Clients were asked to assess their severity of pain using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Age, gender, disease duration, diagnosis if known, current and previous treatment as well as tentative diagnoses assigned and recommendations given to each individual by the counselling physicians were recorded. RESULTS: Average (SD) VAS pain rating was 59 (20.6) mm. Approximately 40% of clients had never consulted a physician for their condition before, but had lower pain scores than those who had seen a physician. Patients with inflammatory MSC had higher pain scores than those with non-inflammatory conditions. More than 2% of the clients had a newly detected inflammatory rheumatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Many individuals having painful MSC seek medical help only when a very high threshold of pain is reached. Even while under treatment, the high mean pain scores suggest neglect of MSC that are not adequately recognised as important contributors to disability and decreased quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/psicología , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Anciano , Concienciación , Femenino , Educación en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Manejo del Dolor , Dimensión del Dolor , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Salud Pública , Enfermedades Reumáticas/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/psicología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/terapia
11.
Eur J Pain ; 7(5): 381-6, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12935789

RESUMEN

1. The management of chronic pain should be directed by the underlying cause of the pain. Whatever the cause, the primary goal of patient care should be symptom control. 2. Opioid treatment should be considered for both continuous neuropathic and nociceptive pain if other reasonable therapies fail to provide adequate analgesia within a reasonable timeframe. 3. The aim of opioid treatment is to relieve pain and improve the patient's quality of life. Both of these should be assessed during a trial period. 4. The prescribing physician should be familiar with the patient's psychosocial status. 5. The use of sustained-release opioids administered at regular intervals is recommended. 6. Treatment should be monitored. 7. A contract setting out the patient's rights and responsibilities may help to emphasize the importance of patient involvement. 8. Opioid treatment should not be considered a lifelong treatment.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Crónica , Esquema de Medicación , Humanos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...