Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 56(5): 911-918, 2019 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31079151

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The intermediate-term all-cause mortality rate of real-world patients with multivessel disease (MVD) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new-generation drug-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains unknown. We sought to compare the intermediate-term all-cause mortality rates of real-world patients with MVD including left main stem disease, treated with CABG or PCI. METHODS: All consecutive all-comer patients with MVD undergoing CABG or PCI with second/third generation drug-eluting stents from 2007 to 2015 in Harefield Hospital, UK were included in this study. The revascularization modality was based on heart team discussions. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Mean follow-up of the study was 3.3 years. Cox regression analysis and propensity matching were used. RESULTS: Of 6383 patients with MVD, 4230 underwent CABG, whereas 2153 had PCI with new-generation stents. In the CABG group, the mean age was 66.4 ± 10 years, whereas in the PCI group it was 65.3 ± 12.1 years (P < 0.001). Fewer female patients with MVD were treated with CABG than were treated with PCI (18.5% vs 20.5%; P = 0.026). There was a higher 5-year estimated survival rate among patients having CABG (88% vs 78.3%; Plog-rank < 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for PCI over CABG was 1.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-2.16; P < 0.001]. A total of 653 patients having CABG and 653 having PCI were included in the propensity-matched groups. At mean follow-up, PCI was associated with a higher adjusted HR for all-cause mortality (2.18, 95% CI 1.54-3.1; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary cohort of real-world patients with MVD, CABG was associated with increased intermediate-term survival compared to PCI with new-generation drug-eluting stents.


Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Anciano , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/instrumentación , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 39(4): 573-7, 2002 Feb 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11849853

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the in vivo endothelial function of the radial artery (RA) used as a coronary graft. BACKGROUND: The RA is becoming a recognized alternative coronary bypass conduit. In vivo endothelial function is a possible predictor of long-term performance. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG); all received RA and left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafts. Three weeks after CABG, 36 patients underwent angiography under basal conditions, during pacing and after intragraft injection of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). Angiography was repeated at six months in 20 patients. RESULTS: The estimated mean difference of 66 segments of the radial graft on the first QCA study was 0.170 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.101 to 0.258, p < 0.001) between baseline and pacing, and 0.310 mm (CI 0.225 to 0.401, p < 0.001) between baseline and GTN. At six months, the differences between baseline and pacing and baseline and GTN were 0.112 mm (CI 0.062 to 0.162, p < 0.001) and 0.274 (CI 0.192 to 0.353, p < 0.001), respectively. The difference between baseline values at three weeks and six months was 0.416 mm (CI 0.236 to 0.603, p < 0.001). In the LIMA segments, the difference between baseline and pacing and baseline and GTN were 0.206 mm (CI 0.136 to 0.278, p < 0.001) and 0.304 mm (CI 0.213 to 0.396, p < 0.001), respectively. At six months, the differences between baseline and pacing and baseline and GTN were 0.098 mm (CI 0.014 to 0.173, p < 0.001) and 0.218 mm (CI 0.130 to 0.298, p < 0.001). The difference between baseline values at three weeks and six months was 0.061 mm (CI 0.064 to 0.176, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In vivo flow-mediated dilation of the RA is comparable to that of pedicled LIMA. The increased dilation both at baseline and after pacing at six months represents a time-related improvement in the vasomotor function of the RA, which could have implications for its performance as a coronary conduit.


Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Endotelio Vascular/fisiopatología , Endotelio Vascular/trasplante , Arterias Mamarias/fisiopatología , Arterias Mamarias/trasplante , Arteria Radial/fisiopatología , Arteria Radial/trasplante , Anciano , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Endotelio Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Arterias Mamarias/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional/fisiología , Factores de Tiempo , Vasodilatación/fisiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...