Multiple pregnancy, short cervix, part-time worker, steroid use, low educational level and male fetus are risk factors for preterm birth in Japan: a multicenter, prospective study.

AIM: To examine the relationship between preterm birth and socioeconomic factors, past history, cervical length, cervical interleukin-8, bacterial vaginosis, underlying diseases, use of medication, employment status, sex of the fetus and multiple pregnancy. METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective, observational study, 1810 Japanese women registering their future delivery were enrolled at 8⁺° to 12⁺6 weeks of gestation. Data on cervical length and delivery were obtained from 1365 pregnant women. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Short cervical length, steroid use, multiple pregnancy and male fetus were risk factors for preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation. Multiple pregnancy, low educational level, short cervical length and part-timer were risk factors for preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSION: Multiple pregnancy and cervical shortening at 20-24 weeks of gestation was a stronger risk factor for preterm birth. Any pregnant woman being part-time employee or low educational level, having a male fetus and requiring steroid treatment should be watched for the development of preterm birth.

Measurement of the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) of the primary tumor and CA125 are predictive of disease recurrence for patients with endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative measurements of the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the tumor marker CA125 are correlated with the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer. METHODS: The distribution of cases that scored positive for each of the biological parameters examined and the correlations with the ADCmin of the primary tumor and the serum tumor marker CA125 were examined for 111 patients with preoperative assessment of primary endometrial cancer. RESULTS: There were significant correlations between the ADCmin of the primary tumor and the FIGO stage (P=0.001), depth of myometrial invasion (P<0.001), cervical involvement (P=0.003), lymph node metastasis (P=0.027), ovarian metastasis (P<0.001), peritoneal cytology (P=0.027) and tumor maximum size (P<0.001). The disease-free survival (DFS) rate of patients with high serum CA125 was significantly lower than that of patients with low serum CA125 (P=0.0395). The DFS rate of patients with a low ADCmin of the primary tumor was significantly lower than that of patients with a high ADCmin of the primary tumor (P<0.001). In particular, the ADCmin of the primary tumor was an independent factor for disease recurrence in a multivariate analysis (P=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings indicate that a low preoperative ADCmin of the primary tumor is an important predictive factor for identifying endometrial cancer patients with a risk of disease recurrence.

Difference of carboplatin clearance estimated by the Cockroft-Gault, Jelliffe, Modified-Jelliffe, Wright or Chatelut formula.

OBJECTIVE: Although the Calvert formula is the standard method to calculate the dose of carboplatin, there is no consensus how to determine the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) without using [51Cr]-ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (51Cr-EDTA). Creatinine clearance (Ccr), calculated using the Cockroft-Gault, Jelliffe, Modified-Jelliffe or Wright formulae, has been used as a substitute for the GFR. In addition to these four formulae, the Chatelut formula has been proposed as a way to calculate carboplatin clearance. Among these formulae, Jelliffe formula does not include body surface area (BSA) or body weight to adjust the body size and thus may have greater bias than the other four formulae in estimating carboplatin clearance. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if these five formulae could equally estimate the carboplatin clearance. METHODS: : Carboplatin clearance was estimated in 253 patients with gynecologic cancer who received carboplatin-based chemotherapy between January 1996 and August 2004. Ccr was estimated using the Cockroft-Gault, Jelliffe, Modified-Jelliffe or Wright formulae. Carboplatin clearance was also calculated directly by using the Chatelut formula. The five estimations of carboplatin clearance were compared with each other using the post-hoc Wilcoxon signed rank test. The median percent error (MPE) and the median absolute percent error (MAPE) were evaluated by comparing carboplatin clearance. The relationships between BSA and ratios of estimated carboplatin clearance (Jelliffe/Cockroft-Gault, Jelliffe/Modified-Jelliffe, Jelliffe/Wright, Jelliffe/Chatelut) were evaluated by using simple regression. RESULTS: : The estimated carboplatin clearances were: Cockroft-Gault formula, 109.8 +/- 28.4; Jelliffe formula, 128.5 +/- 28.2; Modified-Jelliffe formula, 110.8 +/- 25.7; Wright formula, 112.2 +/- 24.3; Chatelut formula, 114.1 +/- 33.0. A statistically significant difference was observed between carboplatin clearance calculated using Jelliffe formula and that given by each of the other four formulae. Comparing the results of the Cockroft-Gault formula with the Jellife, Modified-Jelliffe, Wright and Chatelut formulae yielded MPEs of +19%, +2%, +3% and +3% and MAPEs of 27%, 5%, 6% and 6%, respectively. There was a significant correlation between BSA and ratio of estimated carboplatin clearance (Jelliffe/Cockroft-Gault, Jelliffe/Modified-Jelliffe, Jelliffe/Wright, Jelliffe/Chatelut), with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.928, 0.847, 0.965 and 0.839 respectively. As the BSA of patient became smaller, the differences between the carboplatin clearance calculated by the Jelliffe formula from other four formulas became larger. CONCLUSIONS: : Estimates of carboplatin clearance calculated by the Jelliffe formula tend to have greater positive bias compared to the other four formulae, particularly when the BSA of the patient is small. In order to conduct collaborative international studies, it may be necessary to standardize the formula used to estimate carboplatin clearance to perform international collaboration studies.