Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Dig Liver Dis ; 44(6): 515-22, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22480969

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recommended strategies to screen for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer are not applied in daily practice and most of Lynch cases remain undiagnosed. AIMS: We investigated in routine conditions a strategy that uses simplified clinical criteria plus detection of MisMatch Repair deficiency in tumours to identify Lynch carriers. METHODS: Colorectal cancer patients that met at least one of three clinical criteria were included: (1) colorectal cancer before 50 years, (2) personal history of colorectal or endometrial cancer, (3) first-degree relative history of colorectal or endometrial cancer. All tumours underwent an MisMatch Repair test combining microsatellite instability analysis and MisMatch Repair immunohistochemistry. Patients with an MisMatch Repair-deficient tumour were offered germline testing. RESULTS: Of the 307 patients fulfilling the clinical criteria, 46 (15%) had a MisMatch Repair-deficient tumour. Amongst them 27 were identified as Lynch carriers (20 with germline mutation: 12 MLH1, 7 MSH2, 1 MSH6; 7 highly suspected cases despite failure of genetic testing). The simplified clinical criteria selected a population whose MisMatch Repair-deficient status was highly predictive (59%) of Lynch syndrome. CONCLUSION: This bio-clinical strategy based on simplified clinical criteria combined with an MisMatch Repair test efficiently detected LS cases and is easy to use in clinical practice, outside expert centres.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/genética , Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Pruebas Genéticas , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/genética , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Femenino , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Masculino , Inestabilidad de Microsatélites , Persona de Mediana Edad , Homólogo 1 de la Proteína MutL , Proteína 2 Homóloga a MutS/genética , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Selección de Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética
2.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol ; 28(6-7 Pt 1): 533-9, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15243385

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Recent guidelines on the management of patients chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection recommend the same anti-HCV therapy for active intravenous drug users and other patients, however some physicians are reluctant to treat active drug users. The aim of this study was to compare hepatitis C management practices and clinical outcome after treatment between active intravenous drug users and other patients. METHODS: Four hundred and thirty-five naive HCV seropositive patients were recruited from 1990 to 2000 and followed up for a mean period of 2.5 years (SD 1 Year). At the beginning of the study, 116 of the patients were active intravenous drug users. Social, clinical, biological and histological data were collected. The different steps of HCV management and responses to treatment were compared between active intravenous drug users and other patients. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in HCV management practices and compliance between active intravenous drug users and other patients: search for viral RNA (85% versus 67%), liver biopsy performed when indicated (82% versus 87%), initiation of anti-HCV treatment (33.6% versus 43.2%), loss to follow up during treatment (24% vs 16%). The rate of sustained viral response was not significantly different between active intravenous drug users and other patients (28% versus 21%). At multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with sustained viral response were female gender (OR=5.6 [1.02-41.2]), genotype 3 (OR=29.7 [1.4-61.7]), low viral load (OR=33.3 [2.25-100]), low fibrosis score (OR=1.4 [1.0-2.0]), elevated transaminase level (OR=12.7 [0.9-97.2]), and bitherapy protocol (OR=10 [1.18-85.3]). CONCLUSION: This study illustrates that active intravenous drug use does not affect either patient compliance with proposed management or viral response to treatment, but pluridisciplinary care should focus both on drug addiction and HCV infection.


Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Cooperación del Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...