Use of colchicine in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Colchicine is an anti-inflammatory agent used in the treatment of several rheumatological conditions. The use of colchicine in pregnancy is controversial. The current study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyse the existing data in the literature regarding the safety of colchicine in pregnancy. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out using six electronic databases, identifying all relevant studies where colchicine was administered to pregnant women, and where pregnancy-related outcomes were measured. The primary endpoints were miscarriage and major foetal malformation. Secondary endpoints included birthweight and gestational age at birth. RESULTS: Four studies were included for meta-analysis. Use of colchicine throughout pregnancy was not associated with an increased incidence of miscarriage or major foetal malformations. The incidence of miscarriage was significantly lower in women who took colchicine compared with those that did not. In women with FMF who took colchicine throughout the pregnancy, there was no significant difference in birthweight or gestational age compared with those who did not take colchicine. When not limited to FMF, colchicine use was associated with a significantly lower birthweight and gestational age compared with a control group including healthy women who did not take colchicine. CONCLUSIONS: Colchicine therapy did not significantly increase the incidence of foetal malformations or miscarriage when taken during pregnancy. Colchicine therapy for FMF should not be withheld on this basis during pregnancy.

Understanding the dose-response relationship of allopurinol: predicting the optimal dosage.

AIMS: The aim of the study was to identify and quantify factors that control the plasma concentrations of urate during allopurinol treatment and to predict optimal doses of allopurinol. METHODS: Plasma concentrations of urate and creatinine (112 samples, 46 patients) before and during treatment with various doses of allopurinol (50-600 mg daily) were monitored. Non-linear and multiple linear regression equations were used to examine the relationships between allopurinol dose (D), creatinine clearance (CLcr) and plasma concentrations of urate before (UP) and during treatment with allopurinol (UT). RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of urate achieved during allopurinol therapy were dependent on the daily dose of allopurinol and the plasma concentration of urate pre-treatment. The non-linear equation: UT = (1 - D/(ID50 + D)) × (UP - UR) + UR , fitted the data well (r(2) = 0.74, P < 0.0001). The parameters and their best fit values were: daily dose of allopurinol reducing the inhibitable plasma urate by 50% (ID50 = 226 mg, 95% CI 167, 303 mg), apparent resistant plasma urate (UR = 0.20 mmol l(-1), 95 % CI 0.14, 0.25 mmol l(-1)). Incorporation of CLcr did not significantly improve the fit (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: A high baseline plasma urate concentration requires a high dose of allopurinol to reduce plasma urate below recommended concentrations. This dose is dependent on only the pre-treatment plasma urate concentration and is not influenced by CLcr .

Fractional clearance of urate: validation of measurement in spot-urine samples in healthy subjects and gouty patients.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperuricemia is the greatest risk factor for gout and is caused by an overproduction and/or inefficient renal clearance of urate. The fractional renal clearance of urate (FCU, renal clearance of urate/renal clearance of creatinine) has been proposed as a tool to identify subjects who manifest inefficient clearance of urate. The aim of the present studies was to validate the measurement of FCU by using spot-urine samples as a reliable indicator of the efficiency of the kidney to remove urate and to explore its distribution in healthy subjects and gouty patients. METHODS: Timed (spot, 2-hour, 4-hour, 6-hour, 12-hour, and 24-hour) urine collections were used to derive FCU in 12 healthy subjects. FCUs from spot-urine samples were then determined in 13 healthy subjects twice a day, repeated on 3 nonconsecutive days. The effect of allopurinol, probenecid, and the combination on FCU was explored in 11 healthy subjects. FCU was determined in 36 patients with gout being treated with allopurinol. The distribution of FCU was examined in 118 healthy subjects and compared with that from the 36 patients with gout. RESULTS: No substantive or statistically significant differences were observed between the FCUs derived from spot and 24-hour urine collections. Coefficients of variation (CVs) were both 28%. No significant variation in the spot FCU was obtained either within or between days, with mean intrasubject CV of 16.4%. FCU increased with probenecid (P < 0.05), whereas allopurinol did not change the FCU in healthy or gouty subjects. FCUs of patients with gout were lower than the FCUs of healthy subjects (4.8% versus 6.9%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The present studies indicate that the spot-FCU is a convenient, valid, and reliable indicator of the efficiency of the kidney in removing urate from the blood and thus from tissues. Spot-FCU determinations may provide useful correlates in studies investigating molecular mechanisms underpinning the observed range of efficiencies of the kidneys in clearing urate from the blood. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12611000743965.

Intra-operative cystoscopy in gynaecological surgery: a brief overview.

Recent studies using universal cystoscopy have demonstrated a higher rate of urinary tract injury at major gynaecological procedures than previously thought. These injuries are associated with significant medical and medico-legal implications. The sensitivity of visual inspection is low and cystoscopic screening with intravenous dye improves detection. We review the evidence for intra-operative cystoscopy in gynaecology, with emphasis on rates of urinary tract injury and the use of intravenous contrast dye.

A proposal for identifying the low renal uric acid clearance phenotype.

Investigation of the genetic basis of hyperuricaemia is a subject of intense interest. However, clinical studies commonly include hyperuricaemic patients without distinguishing between 'over-producers' or 'under-excretors' of urate. The statistical power of studies of genetic polymorphisms of genes encoding renal urate transporters is diluted if 'over-producers' of uric acid are included. We propose that lower than normal fractional renal clearance of urate is a better inclusion criterion for these studies. We also propose that a single daytime spot urine sample for calculation of fractional renal clearance of urate should be preferred to calculation from 24-hour urine collections.