Is self-inflicted amputation to the upper extremity a contraindication to replantation?

PURPOSE: Contraindications to replantation include severe medical or psychiatric comorbidities. Recently, authors have suggested that due to the improving therapeutic options for patients with psychiatric decompensation, this should no longer be listed as a contraindication to replantation. Despite this, authors continue to list severe psychiatric comorbidities as a contraindication to replantation. This case series and review of the literature discusses this complex topic and provides recommendations regarding the management of patients following upper extremity self-inflicted amputations. METHODS: The authors present two cases of self-inflicted upper extremity amputations. The cases depict the acute management and the outcomes of these patients. The authors also reviewed the literature to present the available literature on this topic. RESULTS: The first case is a 64-year-old male who deliberately amputated his left hand with a table saw while suffering postictal psychosis. He underwent replantation. The patient was co-managed by the surgical and psychiatric team postoperatively. The patient expressed gratitude for his replantation after being treated for his psychoneurological condition. The second case is that of a 25-year-old male who deliberately amputated his left forearm using a Samurai sword. The patient's limb was successfully replanted. In the post-anesthesia care unit, the patient experienced extreme agitation, and during this event, he reinjured the left forearm. He was again taken urgently to the operating room to revise the replantation. Once psychiatrically stabilized, the patient was thankful for the care he received. CONCLUSION: The management of upper extremity self-inflicted amputations is controversial and difficult to establish as this presentation is rare. We present two cases which illustrate some of the nuances in the care of these patients. Our review suggests that psychiatric diagnosis be viewed as a comorbidity and not a contraindication to replantation. Thus, an informed consent discussion should be performed with the patients and, as needed, a member of the psychiatric team in order to decide whether to replant or not.

Evidence-based postoperative replantation protocols.

Postoperative care is essential to upper extremity replantation success and includes careful and frequent monitoring of the replanted part. During this period, pharmacologic agents such as antithrombotic and anticoagulants may prevent complications such as arterial thrombosis and venous congestion. Dressings and therapy can also impact short- and long-term outcomes following replantation. This article reviews the literature to provide guidance for postoperative protocols following upper extremity replantation.

Management of Self-Inflicted Nonaccidental Amputations of the Upper Extremity: Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Clinicians assessing patients with deliberate self-inflicted amputations face a problem of whether or not to replant. The objective of this study was to summarize the literature on this topic and provide recommendations regarding the acute management of patients following self-inflicted amputations in the upper extremity. METHODS: Two reviewers searched four databases using the keywords "Upper extremity," "Amputation," and "Self-Inflicted." The reviewers systematically screened and collected data on publications reporting cases of self-inflicted upper-extremity amputations. The findings then were summarized in a narrative fashion. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included. Twenty-nine cases of self-inflicted upper-extremity amputations were reported. There were 25 unilateral and four bilateral extremity amputations. Amputations were most commonly at the hand/wrist (18 patients) and forearm level (6 patients). The amputations were most commonly performed with a saw (9 patients) or a knife (8 patients). Reasons for amputation included psychosis (10 cases), suicide attempt (7 cases), depression (5 cases), and body integrity identity disorder (four cases). Fifteen replantations were performed; all were successful. Reasons for not pursuing replantation were related to injury factors (ie, multilevel injury, prolonged ischemia, damaged part) rather than patient-level factors. Two patients with replantable extremities declined replantation, both of whom had body integrity identity disorder. Of the patients who underwent replantation, none expressed regret. CONCLUSIONS: The literature shows that patients experiencing psychosis or depression committed self-harm during an acute psychiatric decompensation, and once medically and psychiatrically stabilized, expressed satisfaction with their replanted limb. Surgeons should not consider psychiatric decompensation a contraindication to replantation and should be aware of patients with body integrity identity disorder who consciously may elect to undergo revision amputation. When presented with patients experiencing psychiatric decompensation who refuse replantation/are not competent, surgeons should seek emergency assistance from the psychiatry team to determine the best management of a self-inflicted amputation. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy/Prevention/Etiology/Harm V.

The Iatrogenic Injury Potential of Self-adherent Elastic Bandages in Finger Injuries.

BACKGROUND: The use of a self-adherent, elastic bandage is a practical way to dress finger injuries. Multiple reports describe iatrogenic injuries from elastic bandages, ranging from skin necrosis to finger gangrene, necessitating amputations. This study investigated whether elastic bandages can compromise digital perfusion by occluding arterial blood flow in healthy volunteers and evaluated the utility of pulse oximetry as a monitoring tool for digital perfusion. A technique for safe bandage application is proposed. METHODS: A commercially available elastic bandage was wrapped around the index finger of 20 healthy volunteers at varying degrees of stretch. Digital perfusion measurements were carried out using photoelectric pulse transduction, laser Doppler flowmetry, and pulse oximetry. Intracompartmental pressure measurements were recorded using a separate in vitro experimental model. RESULTS: Elastic bandages applied at maximum stretch did not change digital brachial index or pulse oximetry values, suggesting arterial blood flow was preserved distal to the bandage. Intracompartmental pressure measurements at maximum stretch remained below the systolic digital pressure. In contrast, superficial dermal perfusion fell to 32% of normal as measured by laser Doppler flow, at 100% bandage stretch. CONCLUSION: This study suggests a risk for iatrogenic injury when using elastic bandages for finger dressings. While arterial inflow was never compromised, pressures were high enough to occlude superficial venous outflow, which may begin at 20% bandage stretch. Pulse oximetry failed to detect changes distal to applied dressings, and we do not recommend it to detect digital vascular compromise in this setting.

The safety and accuracy of various carpal tunnel injection techniques.

PURPOSE: Carpal tunnel (CT) syndrome continues to be a commonly treated hand pathology. We aimed to evaluate several CT injection techniques for (1) spatial accuracy within the CT and (2) risk of median nerve (MN) injury. Our purpose was to evaluate for any significant differences in accuracy of needle placement within the carpal tunnel and final distance between the needle tip and the MN with each technique. METHODS: Fifteen fresh frozen cadaveric arms were used for this study. Six different injection techniques for CT injection were performed on each specimen, including palmaris longus, ulnar to flexor carpi radialis, trans-flexor carpi radialis, volar radial, volar ulnar, and direct through the palm techniques. After needle placement, a standard open CT release was performed to assess for accuracy of placement within the CT and measure needle position in relation to the MN and other anatomic structures. RESULTS: Accurate intra-CT needle placement was seen in 91% of injections. While there was no significant difference between injection techniques for distance to nearest tendon (p = 0.1531), the trans-flexor carpi radialis (tFCR), volar radial (VR), and volar ulnar (VU) techniques consistently provided the greatest intra-CT distance from needle tip to median nerve (p = 0.0019). The least incidence of intraneural needle placement was found with the tFCR and VR approaches. CONCLUSION: All six injection techniques reliably enter the CT space. The lowest risk to the MN was found with tFCR and VR techniques, and we recommend these techniques for safe and effective needle placement to avoid iatrogenic intraneural injection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V: Cadaveric Study.

Hand Call Practices and Satisfaction: Survey Results From Hand Surgeons in the United States.

PURPOSE: To describe current hand call practices in the United States (US) and identify aspects of call practices that lead to surgeon satisfaction. METHODS: An anonymous survey was administered to practicing members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand, and responses were filtered to US surgeons taking hand call. Hand call was considered: (A) hand-specific call including replantation or microvascular services or (B) hand-specific call without replantation or microvascular responsibilities. Data were collected pertaining to practices, compensation, assistance, frequency, and satisfaction. Descriptive analyses were performed and regionally subdivided. Pearson correlations were used to determine aspects of a call that influenced surgeon satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 662 US hand surgeons from 49 states responded. Among the respondents, 38% (251) participate in replantation or microvascular call, 34% (225) participate in hand-specific call excluding replantation, and 28% (186) do not participate in hand-specific call. Of those practicing hand call (476), 60% take 6 or fewer days of call per month, 62% have assistance with staffing consultations, 65% have assistance with surgical procedures, and 49% are financially incentivized to take call. More than half (51%) reported that they have a protected time for call aside from their elective practice, and 10% of the surgeons reported that they have a dedicated operating room (OR) time after a call to care for cases. Two percent reported that the day following call is free from clinical duties. Only 46% of the surgeons were satisfied with their call schedule, with the top concerns among unsatisfied respondents relating to pay, OR availability, and burnout. The factors correlating to surgeon satisfaction included less frequent call, assistance with performing consultations and surgery, pay for call, and OR availability. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of US hand surgeons are not satisfied with their current call practices, with frequent concerns relating to pay, OR availability, and burnout. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings may promote awareness regarding aspects of hand call that correlate with surgeon satisfaction and highlight practice patterns that may reduce burnout.

From Dr. Miller E. Preston (1879-1928) to the Department of Orthopaedics at Denver Health Medical Center in Denver, CO.

Dr. Miller Edwin Preston was a surgeon with a deep interest in trauma and orthopaedics who practiced in Denver in the early 1900s. Dr. Preston arrived in Denver shortly after the creation of Denver's first city hospital in 1860. This hospital would later be renamed to Denver General Hospital and then Denver Health Medical Center. It excels for the quality of its emergency medicine residency program, a very high survival rate for severely injured patients and the clinical pathways and algorithms pertinent to the management of haemodynamically unstable pelvic ring injuries among others. Today, Dr. Preston's legacy of excellence in the management of trauma patients is alive and well at Denver Health Medical Center, the city's only level-one safety net hospital and academic affiliate of the University of Colorado Medical School.

Postoperative Digit and Hand Replantation Protocols: A Review of the Literature.

Successful replantation and revascularization of the hand and digit require a skilled team with urgent access to an operating room with microsurgical capabilities. Although careful indications and surgical techniques contribute to success, postoperative management also plays a vital role in the survival of a replanted digit. Previous research has assessed surgical efficiency and techniques to conduct these procedures, but few studies evaluate postoperative protocols to care for patients undergoing these procedures. Because of the lack of high-level evidence specific to replantation, many common postoperative practices related to monitoring, anticoagulation, and diet have been inferred from elective microsurgical procedures, despite notable differences in operating conditions. The highest level of evidence pertaining to digital replantation was found with the use of peripheral nerve blockade, leeching/bleeding, and nicotine use. This review provides an in-depth evaluation of the literature and insight into the rationale and level of evidence that support each postoperative intervention. It highlights institutional variability and a paucity of high-level evidence pertaining to this topic while identifying the areas of future research.

Updates on and Controversies Related to Management of Radial Nerve Injuries.

Radial nerve injuries are among the most common major traumatic peripheral nerve injuries. Recent literature has updated our knowledge of aspects ranging from radial nerve anatomy to treatment options. Observation and tendon transfers were, and still are, the mainstays of management. However, the improved outcomes of nerve repair even 5 months after injury have changed the treatment algorithm. Nerve repair techniques using conduits, wraps, autograft, and allograft allow tension-free coaptations to improve success. Nerve transfers have evolved to allow a more anatomic recovery of function if used in a timely manner. This review offers an update on radial nerve injuries that reflects recent advances.

Evolution of plate design and material composition.

The evolution of plate fixation of fracture was accompanied by advances in metallurgy and improvement in understanding of the requirements for successful fracture healing. Locked internal fixation minimizes biologic damage and when used in conjunction with minimally invasive approaches may optimize fracture healing. Some current metal locked plate constructs may actually be too stiff, and various methods including screw modification, plate hole modification, and changes in plate material composition may provide a solution to optimize fracture healing. This paper reviews the evolution of plate design and describes the early clinical experience with the use of carbon fibre reinforced reinforced polyetheretherketone composite plates.

Management of the Pediatric Patient Following Upper Extremity Replantation or Revascularization: A Suggested Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic pediatric amputations of the hand and upper extremity can have long-term financial, psychological, developmental, and functional consequences that readily extend beyond the realm of that which is normally encountered in comparatively injured adults. These factors, along with a paucity of medical comorbidities, have guided a more liberal and aggressive approach to treating pediatric amputations in hopes of optimizing psychosocial, aesthetic, and developmental outcomes. Furthermore, advances in pharmacology and microsurgical replantation techniques have allowed what were otherwise exceedingly rare surgeries to become commonplace in hospitals all over the world. Despite these gains, vascular thrombosis remains the leading cause of failure in microvascular surgeries. A recent survey showed that 96% of reconstructive surgeons use some form of anticoagulation therapy in their treatment, but no consensus regarding pharmacologic agents, dosing, or efficacy exists. The risk of thrombosis is further complicated by the dynamic nature of vasculature in response to stressors such as sympathetic tone, decreased intravascular volume, and response to external temperature. Given the lack of a higher-level evidence to guide the replantation surgeon in postoperative orders, we created an inclusive protocol, outlining complete and proper management of the pediatric patient following revascularization or replantation surgery. METHODS: We reviewed the methods employed by our microvascular surgeons and consulted with board-certified pediatricians to produce a final document that was adopted ubiquitously among our providers. RESULTS: We do not have head-to-head data demonstrating improved outcomes with use of the protocol. Nonetheless, the original document has been modified and reproduced here for your consideration and use. CONCLUSIONS: Since initiating the protocol, we feel it has helped standardize our practice, avoid instances of incomplete or missed order sets, and facilitate interdisciplinary management through decreased gaps in communication, especially in those surgeries terminating in the middle of the night.

Smartphone-Based Thermal Imaging: A New Modality for Tissue Temperature Measurement in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Smartphone-based thermal imaging (SBTI) allows noninvasive temperature measurements. Its validity compared with a conventional infrared probe temperature scanner (IPTS) has not been studied. This study compares temperature measurements between the 2 technologies on human participants. METHODS: Bilateral index finger temperature measurements were obtained on 30 healthy participants using IPTS and SBTI devices. Dominant versus nondominant sides (side-to-side difference) and individual side measurements between the 2 methods were compared for repeatability (precision) and agreement. RESULTS: A total of 23 female and 7 male participants were tested. Based on nonoverlapping confidence intervals (CIs), intraclass correlation coefficient of repeatability was higher for SBTI than for IPTS measurements in side-to-side differences: 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99) versus 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82-0.95). The SBTI method recorded higher side-to-side difference and individual side measurements: 0.56°C (limits of agreement [LOA], -1.09°C to 2.20°C) and 2.64°C (LOA, 0.96°C-4.32°C), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to higher precision, SBTI offers added benefits of instantaneous acquisition of the temperature map of the entire hand, allowing quick comparisons of the uninjured and injured fingers. SBTI measurements consistently yielded higher temperature readings in the side-to-side difference as well as individual measurements. This suggested that both devices are not interchangeable for absolute temperature comparisons but are interchangeable in monitoring the changes in temperatures. This study suggests the potential for SBTI devices to be used in the clinical settings and may be of special benefit in telemedicine.

Prevalence and variation of sesamoid bones in the hand: a multi-center radiographic study.

There is rare studies with regard to sesamoid bone variations of the hand in addition to its prevalence and distribution. This study aims to assess both the prevalence and variation of sesamoid bones of the hand. A retrospective review of posteroanterior (PA) and oblique radiographs of 436 left and 414 right hands of 850 adult patients obtained from four hospitals was performed. All X-ray films were examined independently for existing sesamoid bones. The presence of sesamoid bones was confirmed if oblique views revealed a small oval bone volar to the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint or interphalangeal (IP) joint of the thumb or finger. The X-ray films consistently revealed two sesamoid bones at the MCP joint of the thumb, and 30.4% were identified with variation, which can be classified into three distinct types based upon the number of ossification centers and the shape of fusion lines seen on standard PA and oblique films. The prevalence of sesamoid bones was 60.8% for index finger MCP joint and 59.1% for small finger MCP joint. At the thumb IP joints, sesamoid bones were only seen in 15.9% hands. Two sesamoid bones were rarely seen in other joints of the hand except thumb MCP joints.

Mycobacterium chelonae infection of the hand presenting as a collar-button abscess.

Mycobacterial infections of the hand are extremely rare, with Mycobacterium chelonae being an especially uncommon source of infection. The following is a report of such an infection presenting as a collar-button abscess. The difficulty of isolating the organism, in addition to a low index of suspicion for it, resulted in a significant delay in appropriate treatment. The patient demonstrated an indolent course of infection and unresponsiveness to traditional treatments, both red flags that should raise concern for a mycobacterial cause. Eventually, repeated irrigation and debridement and a prolonged course of antibiotics resulted in the resolution of the patient's symptoms.

Severe mycosis as a rare infection after a corn auger injury of the hand: a case report.

Mucormycosis is a rare but serious infection that can be seen in immunocompetent individuals who experience traumatic injury. The authors report a case in a 28 year-old man who sustained a mangling hand injury in a corn augur accident. After initial aggressive debridement ongoing tissue necrosis was seen, and in subsequent biopsies invasive mucormycosis was diagnosed. The patient was successfully managed with immediate surgical debridement and antifungal medication and showed no sign of infection at six-month follow-up.

Current treatment concepts for "terrible triad" injuries of the elbow.

Elbow fracture-dislocations destabilize the elbow, preventing functional rehabilitation. If left untreated, they commonly result in functional compromise and poor outcomes. The "terrible triad" injury is classically described as a combination of a coronoid process and radial head fractures, as well as a posterolateral elbow dislocation. Surgical treatment to restore stable elbow range of motion has evolved in the past few decades based on increased understanding of elbow biomechanics and the anatomy of these injuries. This article highlights current concepts in the treatment of these complicated injuries.

Pirogoff amputation for a bilateral traumatic lower-extremity amputee: indication and technique.

Although only a small portion of all lower-extremity amputations in the United States are of traumatic origin, almost half of all living amputees have sustained traumatic amputations. This particular epidemiology is explained by the younger age, and thus longer life expectancy, of traumatic amputees. In this group especially, restoration and lifelong maintenance of ambulation and mobility is essential. The authors present the case of a bilateral traumatic lower-leg amputee whose management included a Pirogoff amputation. Although this amputation technique is not widely used, the authors believe it greatly facilitated stump and soft tissue management in this case and allowed for improved mobility. The indication for and technique of Pirogoff amputation are described, and a brief overview of amputation techniques in the foot is provided.