Rheumatoid arthritis related interstitial lung disease - improving outcomes over 25 years: a large multicentre UK study.

OBJECTIVE: This study explores whether the prognosis of interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis (RA-ILD) has improved over time and assesses the potential influence of drug therapy in a large multicentre UK network. METHODS: We analysed data from 18 UK centres on patients meeting criteria for both RA and ILD diagnosed over a 25-year period. Data included age, disease duration, outcome and cause of death. We compared all cause and respiratory mortality between RA controls and RA-ILD patients, assessing the influence of specific drugs on mortality in four quartiles based on year of diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 290 RA-ILD patients were identified. All cause (respiratory) mortality was increased at 30% (18%) compared with controls 21% (7%) (P =0.02). Overall, prognosis improved over quartiles with median age at death rising from 63 years to 78 years (P =0.01). No effect on mortality was detected as a result of DMARD use in RA-ILD. Relative risk (RR) of death from any cause was increased among patients who had received anti-TNF therapy [2.09 (1.1-4.0)] P =0.03, while RR was lower in those treated with rituximab [0.52(0.1-2.1)] or mycophenolate [0.65 (0.2-2.0)]. Patients receiving rituximab as their first biologic had longer three (92%), five (82%) and seven year (80%) survival than those whose first biologic was an anti-TNF agent (82%, 76% and 64%, respectively) (P =0.037). DISCUSSION: This large retrospective multicentre study demonstrates survival of patients with RA-ILD has improved. This may relate to the increasing use of specific immunosuppressive and biologic agents.

Effect of rituximab or tumour necrosis factor inhibitors on lung infection and survival in rheumatoid arthritis-associated bronchiectasis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate rituximab (RTX) in patients with RA-associated bronchiectasis (RA-BR) and compare 5-year respiratory survival between those treated with RTX and TNF inhibitors (TNFi). METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study of RA-BR in RTX or TNFi-treated RA patients from two UK centres over 10 years. BR was assessed using number of infective exacerbation/year. Respiratory survival was measured from therapy initiation to discontinuation either due to lung exacerbation or lung-related deaths. RESULTS: Of 800 RTX-treated RA patients, 68 had RA-BR (prevalence 8.5%). Post-RTX, new BR was diagnosed in 3/735 patients (incidence 0.4%). At 12 months post-Cycle 1 RTX, 21/68 (31%) patients had fewer exacerbations than the year pre-RTX, 36/68 (53%) remained stable and 11/68 (16%) had increased exacerbations. The rates of exacerbation improved after Cycle 2 and stabilized up to 5 cycles. Of patients who received ≥2 RTX cycles (n = 60), increased exacerbations occurred in 7/60 (12%) and were associated with low IgG, aspergillosis and concurrent alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency. Overall, 8/68 (11.8%) patients discontinued RTX while 15/46 (32.6%) discontinued TNFi due to respiratory causes. The adjusted 5-year respiratory survival was better in RTX-treated compared with TNFi-treated RA-BR patients; HR 0.40 (95% CI 0.17, 0.96); P =0.041. CONCLUSION: The majority of RTX-treated RA-BR patients had stable/improved pulmonary symptoms in this long-term follow-up. In isolated cases, worsening of exacerbation had definable causes. Rates of discontinuation due to adverse lung outcomes were better for RTX than a matched TNFi cohort. RTX is an acceptable therapeutic choice for RA-BR if a biologic is needed.

Potential Pharmacologic Targets for the Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) immunopathology starts many years before clinical disease manifests. An early event is the breakdown in B-cell tolerance and the emergence of autoantibodies. Some years later, the autoantibody response matures, with epitope spreading and isotype switching suggesting more focused T-cell involvement. Circulating proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines appear concurrently, marking a phase of preclinical inflammation. Eventually individuals develop musculoskeletal symptoms and fatigue, heralding the imminent onset of synovitis. The prevention of RA can be aligned to these disease stages, which may simplistically be viewed as breach of tolerance, maturation of autoimmunity, and subclinical inflammation. At each stage, an "ethical" balance must be struck between the potential for benefit versus harm, in large part determined by the likelihood of progression to RA. In particular, tolerogenic interventions should be favored during asymptomatic disease, providing long-lasting, possibly lifelong, benefit from a short-term intervention. During the breach-of-tolerance phase, tolerogenic interventions might involve the administration of autoantigenic peptides in an attempt to shut down autoreactive B cells. The peptides may be "naked," encapsulated in nanoparticles or loaded into autologous tolerogenic dendritic cells. It may also be possible to interfere with antigen generation and presentation, such as via peptidyl arginine deiminase inhibition. Attempts to interfere with B cells via depletion, differentiation, or intracellular signaling are also logical at this stage, if deemed sufficiently well tolerated. These interventions remain relevant during maturation of autoimmunity, but targeted T-cell interventions also become relevant, such as co-stimulation blockade and, potentially, interventions that target intracellular signaling pathways within T cells. Targeting of interleukin 23 during this phase may interfere with maturation of the autoantibody response by modulating autoantibody glycosylation, as well as by inhibiting T-helper 17 differentiation. During the phase of subclinical inflammation, targeting cytokines and chemokines could conceivably prevent progression to RA. Furthermore, tolerance induction is opposed by systemic inflammation and, during this phase, it may be necessary to consider therapeutic combinations of tolerogenic and antiinflammatory interventions.

Routine musculoskeletal ultrasound findings impact diagnostic decisions maximally in autoantibody-seronegative early arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE: The diagnostic value added by musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) over standard clinical and laboratory parameters has proved difficult to quantify. The additive contribution to diagnostic classification of a pragmatic, 15 min MSUS protocol was appraised in a large, unselected cohort of early arthritis clinic attendees. METHODS: Detailed baseline characteristics were recorded. Semi-quantitative MSUS scoring of the most symptomatic wrist, second/third MCPs and PIPs and second/fifth MTPs was recorded, along with the sonographer's scan impression (definitely inflammatory, possibly inflammatory or non-inflammatory). MSUS findings were available to rheumatologist diagnosticians during subsequent consultations. Persistent inflammatory arthritis (PIA) was classified only where patients were started on ≥1 DMARD. Multivariate and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to identify independent discriminators of PIA, and the added value of MSUS parameters. RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty-one patients were enrolled, of whom 31.3% acquired a PIA diagnosis. Swollen joint count, CRP, age and ACPA status were non-redundant clinical/laboratory predictors of a PIA diagnosis by consulting rheumatologists, with good discriminatory utility (area under the ROC curve, AUROC, 0.88). While the additive contribution of summed parameters from the seven-joint MSUS protocol to this model was statistically significant (P = 0.004), it was numerically small (ΔAUROC 0.02). However, the additive contribution to diagnostic outcome of sonographer's scan impression over clinical parameters alone became substantial in the sub-cohort of ACPA-negative patients, increasing the AUROC by 9% from 0.81 to 0.90 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The clinical utility of a 15-min MSUS screen for diagnosing PIA requiring DMARDs is most evident among ACPA-negative patients attending an early arthritis clinic.

Mortality in patients with interstitial lung disease treated with rituximab or TNFi as a first biologic.

OBJECTIVES: Guidelines cautioned prescribing of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) to patients with rheumatoid arthritis and interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) after reports of new or worsening of ILD. Less is known about outcomes among patients with RA-ILD who receive rituximab (RTX). This study compares mortality in patients with RA-ILD who received RTX or TNFi as their first biologic. METHODS: Participants with RA-ILD recruited to the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for RA were included. Death rates were calculated and risk comparisons were made using Cox regression. Causes of death, including the frequency in which ILD was recorded on death certificates were examined. RESULTS: 43 patients on RTX and 309 on TNFi were included. RTX recipients had shorter disease duration and less disability. Death rates were 94.8 (95%CI: 74.4 to 118.7) and 53.0 (22.9 to 104.6) per 1000 person years, respectively. The adjusted mortality risk was halved in the RTX cohort, but the difference was not statistically significant (HR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.26 to 1.10). ILD was the underlying cause of death in 1 of 7 RTX deaths (14%) and 12 of 76 TNFi deaths (16%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA-ILD who received RTX had lower mortality rates compared to TNFi. The absence of information on ILD severity or subtype prevents conclusions of which drug represents the best choice in patients with RA-ILD and active arthritis.

Lung involvement in inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

This chapter describes the involvement of the lung in systemic inflammatory joint disease (IJD) with a particular focus on rheumatoid arthritis, although the topics of pulmonary involvement in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis are also addressed. Interstitial lung disease is the most lethal pulmonary complication of IJD and the chapter describes recent advances in both our understanding of this complication and the therapeutic options that offer real hope for improved outcomes. Although less well recognised, airways disease is just as common and its association with IJD is described in some detail, with a section devoted to the recent surge in interest in bronchiectasis. Acute pulmonary infection is common in IJD and its management is reviewed in some detail. Although pleural disease is less common than it once was, its treatment is explored. We conclude by reviewing the relationship between the drug therapies employed in IJD and their effects on the lung.

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a perspective review.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease affecting 0.5-1% of the worldwide population. Whilst predominantly causing chronic pain and inflammation in synovial joints, it is also associated with significant extra-articular manifestations in a large proportion of patients. Among the various pulmonary manifestations, interstitial lung disease (ILD), a progressive fibrotic disease of the lung parenchyma, is the commonest and most important, contributing significantly to increased morbidity and mortality. The most frequent patterns of RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD) are usual interstitial pneumonia and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. New insights during the past several years have highlighted the epidemiological impact of RA-ILD and have begun to identify factors contributing to its pathogenesis. Risk factors include smoking, male sex, human leukocyte antigen haplotype, rheumatoid factor and anticyclic citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs). Combined with clinical information, chest examination and pulmonary function testing, high-resolution computed tomography of the chest forms the basis of investigation and allows assessment of subtype and disease extent. The management of RA-ILD is a challenge. Several therapeutic agents have been suggested in the literature but as yet no large randomized controlled trials have been undertaken to guide clinical management. Therapy is further complicated by commonly prescribed drugs of proven articular benefit such as methotrexate, leflunomide (LEF) and anti-tumour necrosis factor α agents having been implicated in both ex novo occurrence and acceleration of existing ILD. Agents that offer promise include immunomodulators such as mycophenolate and rituximab as well as newly studied antifibrotic agents. In this review, we discuss the current literature to evaluate recommendations for the management of RA-ILD and discuss key gaps in our knowledge of this important disease.