Vinorelbine After Prior Treatment With Eribulin for Advanced Breast Cancer: A Single-Centre Experience Suggesting Cross-Resistance.

INTRODUCTION: The tubulin inhibitor, eribulin, improves survival for previously treated advanced breast cancer (ABC) compared to chemotherapy of physician's choice, including vinorelbine, an older anti-tubulin. Vinorelbine is commonly still used after eribulin, but potentially risks cross-resistance and its efficacy in this setting is unproven. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients who received vinorelbine after prior eribulin (VAE) 2011-2015 and a parallel cohort of consecutive patients who received vinorelbine without prior eribulin (VWE) for previously treated ABC between 2005 and 2011. Patient demographics, histopathological features, treatment duration and responses were recorded. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival from date of first vinorelbine for each cohort. Secondary endpoints included radiological response rate, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Thirty-five VAE and 103 VWE patients were identified, all female, 71.4% and 78.6% were ER positive/HER2 negative, 8.6% and 6.8% HER2 positive, and 20.0% and 14.6% triple negative for VAE and VWE cohorts, respectively. The median number of lines of chemotherapy lines prior to vinorelbine was 4 (range 2-6) and 2 (range 0-4), respectively. Fifteen VAE patients (42.9%) received ≥1 line of chemotherapy between eribulin and vinorelbine. VAE and WWE Patients received a median of 3 cycles of vinorelbine (range 1-9 and 1-12, respectively). The median progression-free survival for VAE patients was 2.1 months and 2.0 months for VWE patients. No VAE patients were progression-free at 24 weeks, compared to 15.5% of VWE patients. Median OS from commencing vinorelbine was 4.3 months for VAE and 6.4 months for VWE patients. CONCLUSION: Vinorelbine was of limited benefit after prior eribulin in our study, suggesting cross-resistance. Even without prior eribulin, only 15% of patients experienced clinical benefit from vinorelbine monotherapy.

Clinical outcomes in patients with triple negative or HER2 positive lobular breast cancer: a single institution experience.

PURPOSE: Invasive lobular carcinomas (ILC) are characterised by loss of the cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin. Approximately 15% of ILC are ER negative at the time of breast cancer diagnosis, or at relapse due to loss of ER expression. Less than 5% of classical ILC but up to 35% of pleomorphic ILC are HER2 positive (HER2+). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinic-pathological data from patients with Triple negative (TN) or HER2+ ILC diagnosed 2004-2014 at the Royal Marsden Hospital. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic disease. Secondary endpoints included response rate to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), median disease-free interval (DFI) and OS for patients with early disease. RESULTS: Three of 16 patients with early TN ILC and 7/33 with early HER2+ ILC received NAC with pCR rates of 0/3 and 3/5 patients who underwent surgery, respectively. Median DFI was 28.5 months [95% Confidence interval (95%CI) 15-78.8] for TN ILC and not reached (NR) (111.2-NR) for HER2+ early ILC. Five-year OS was 52% (95%CI 23-74%) and 77% (95%CI 58-88%), respectively. Twenty-three patients with advanced TN ILC and 14 patients with advanced HER2+ ILC were identified. Median OS was 18.3 months (95%CI 13.0-32.8 months) and 30.4 months (95%CI 8.8-NR), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our institution we report a high relapse rate after treatment for early TN ILC, but median OS from metastatic disease is similar to that expected from TN IDC. Outcomes for patients with advanced HER2+ ILC were less favourable than those expected for IDC, possibly reflecting incomplete exposure to anti-HER2 therapies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ROLo (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03620643), ROSALINE (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04551495).

Impact of timing of adjuvant chemothapy for early breast cancer: the Royal Marsden Hospital experience.

BACKGROUND: The optimal time to deliver adjuvant chemotherapy has not been defined. METHODS: A retrospective study of consecutive patients receiving adjuvant anthracycline and/or taxane 1993-2010. Primary endpoint included 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) in patients commencing chemotherapy <31 versus ≥31 days after surgery. Secondary endpoints included 5-year overall survival (OS) and sub-group analysis by receptor status. RESULTS: We identified 2003 eligible patients: 1102 commenced chemotherapy <31 days and 901 ≥31 days after surgery. After a median follow-up of 115 months, there was no difference in 5-year DFS rate with chemotherapy <31 compared to ≥31 days after surgery in the overall population (81 versus 82% hazard ratio (HR) 1.15, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.92-1.43, p = 0.230). The 5-year OS rate was similar in patients who received chemotherapy <31 or ≥31 days after surgery (90 versus 91%, (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.89-1.64, p = 0.228). For 250 patients with triple-negative breast cancer OS was significantly worse in patients who received chemotherapy ≥31 versus <31 days (HR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.11-4.30, p = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Although adjuvant chemotherapy ≥31 days after surgery did not affect DFS or OS in the whole study population, in TN patients, chemotherapy ≥31 days after surgery significantly reduced 5-year OS; therefore, delays beyond 30 days in this sub-group should be avoided.

How to become a breast cancer specialist in 2018: The point of view of the second cohort of the Certificate of Competence in Breast Cancer (CCB2).

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cancer in women and the leading cause of cancer death in females worldwide. Rapid research advancements add to the complexity of treatment options for this disease. It is known that the quality of patients' care is deeply affected by healthcare professionals following these advancements. There is a growing need for academic education to increase clinical knowledge and skills of physicians treating BC patients. The certificate of Competence in Breast Cancer Program (CCB) is a Certificate in Advanced Studies (CAS) organized by the European School of Oncology in cooperation with Ulm University (Germany), which focuses on both the clinical and scientific competence required for improving quality in the management of BC patients. This paper describes the experience of the second CCB cohort (CCB2), which brought together 24 physicians from four continents who shared the common will to improve their competence and skills in BC treatment.

Development and responses of brain metastases during treatment with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for HER2 positive advanced breast cancer: A single institution experience.

Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate that does not cross an intact blood-brain barrier. In the EMILIA trial of T-DM1 vs capecitabine/lapatinib for HER2 positive advanced breast cancer, all patients had baseline brain imaging, and 9/450 (2%) of patients with negative baseline imaging developed new brain disease during T-DM1. We assessed the frequency of brain progression in clinical practice, without routine baseline imaging. We undertook a retrospective study of all patients treated with T-DM1 at the Royal Marsden Hospital from 2011 to 2016. Data collected included baseline characteristics, previous treatment for advanced breast cancer, sites of metastatic disease, duration of T-DM1, sites of progression, and treatment of CNS progression. Fifty-five patients were identified who had received a median of two prior lines of treatment (range 0-5). All were HER2 positive; 45 patients had IHC 3+ tumors and 10 were ISH positive. Patients received a median of 12 cycles of T-DM1 (range 1-34), and six remain on treatment at the time of analysis. Before commencing T-DM1, 16/55 (29%) had known brain metastases (treated with whole brain [9] stereotactic radiotherapy [6] or both [1]). Brain was the first site of progression in 56% (9/16) patients, with a median time to brain progression of 9.9 months (95% CI 3.9-12.2). In patients without known baseline brain metastases, 17.9% (7/39) developed new symptomatic brain disease during T-DM1, after a median of 7.5 months (95%CI 3.8-9.6). Brain progression was isolated, with control of extra-cranial disease in 4/7 patients. Only one patient was suitable for stereotactic radiotherapy. Median time to extra-cranial progression in all patients was 11.5 months (95% CI 9.1-17.7), and median OS in all patients was 17.8 months (95% CI 14.2-22). In patients not screened for brain metastases at baseline, the brain was the first site of progression in a significant proportion. Baseline brain imaging may have a role in standard practice for patients commencing T-DM1 therapy.