OculoMotor & Vestibular Endurance Screening (MoVES) Normative, Repeatability, and Reliability Data.

This study aims to assess oculomotor and vestibular endurance by utilizing the Oculomotor and Vestibular Endurance Screening (MoVES) assessment in athletes' pre-season and post-season and after a suspected head injury to detect impairment. Athletes (N = 311, 19.4 ± 1.3 years) were recruited to perform the following seven tasks: (1) horizontal saccades, (2) vertical saccades, (3) vergence jumps, (4) horizontal vestibular-oculomotor reflex (VOR), (5) vertical VOR, (6) amplitude of accommodation (AoA), and (7) near point of convergence (NPC). At pre-season, the observed number of eye movements in 60 s are horizontal saccades (74 ± 13 initial 30 s; 67 ± 11 latter 30 s), vertical saccades (70 ± 13; 66 ± 10), vergence jumps (48 ± 12; 45 ± 13), horizontal VOR (38 ± 11; 38 ± 11), and vertical VOR (8 ± 11; 38 ± 11). These results establish a normative database for eye movements within the MoVES assessment and show consistency in the number of movements from pre-season to post-season. The initial results show a trending decrease in the number of eye movements in the initial days post-head injury, which improves to pre-season measures 14-21 days post-injury. This foundation can be used by future studies to explore the extent of binocular and vestibular endurance dysfunctions caused by head injuries that subside within two weeks.

Altered Large-Scale Resting-State Functional Network Connectivity in Convergence Insufficiency Young Adults Compared With Binocularly Normal Controls.

Purpose: To investigate the underlying resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) of symptomatic convergence insufficiency (CI) compared with binocularly normal controls (BNC) using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) under The Convergence Insufficiency Neuro­mechanism Adult Population Study (NCT03593031). Methods: A total of 101 participants were eligible for this study. After removing datasets with motion artifacts, 49 CI and 47 BNC resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging datasets were analyzed. CI was diagnosed with the following signs: (1) receded near point of convergence of 6 cm or greater, (2) decreased positive fusional vergence of less than 15∆ or failing Sheard's criteria of twice the near phoria, (3) near phoria of at least 4∆ more exophoric compared with the distance phoria, and (4) symptoms using the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (score of ≥21). RSFC was assessed using a group-level independent components analysis and dual regression. A behavioral correlation analysis using linear regression method was performed between clinical measures and RSFC using the significant difference between the CI and BNC. Results: On average, a decreased RSFC was observed within the frontoparietal network, default mode network and visual network in patients with CI, compared with the participants with BNC (P < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons). The default mode network RSFC strength was significantly correlated with the PFV, near point of convergence, and difference between the horizontal phoria at near compared with far (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Results support altered RSFC in patients with CI compared with participants with BNC and suggest that these differences in underlying neurophysiology may in part be in connection with the differences in optometric visual function used to diagnose CI.

The consideration of post-exercise impact on SCAT3 scores in athletes immediately following a head injury.

METHODS: Symptoms were assessed immediately following completion of a rugby match (median 60 minutes). Players removed from the match for assessment due to a head hit were classified as head injured. Controls completed match without head hit. RESULTS: 209 players (67 female; 33 ± 13 years) participated with 80 experiencing a head injury. Symptom severity was significantly greater in head injured (26.2 ± 17.6) compared with controls (8.9 ± 11.5, P < 0.001). 21% of control players reporting >16 symptom severity, misclassifying them as suspected concussion. There were no significant sex differences. Factor analysis produced four symptom clusters of which Headache was most discriminatory between the head injured (median = 1.7) and controls (median = 0.0). CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that exercise and contact during a game affect symptom assessment, increasing the likelihood of misclassifying players with suspected concussion. Factor characterization of symptoms associated with head injury using an exercised comparison group provides more useful discrimination. These results highlight the necessity for objective measures to diagnose concussions outside of symptom self-report.