The eponymous Dr James Marion Sims MD, LLD (1813-1883).

Dr James Marion Sims was born in 1813 in Lancaster County, South Carolina. It was while pioneering numerous surgical procedures in Alabama that in 1849 he achieved the outstanding landmark in medical history of successfully, and consistently, repairing vesicovaginal fistulae. Sims soon developed a reputation as a fine surgeon, with new operations and techniques, using novel surgical instruments and his innovative approaches frequently published. Moving to New York City in 1853, he further established hospitals devoted entirely to women's health. Sims was controversial, with flamboyant descriptions of self-confident success, yet they were tempered with sober reflection of failure and loss. Today we remain with the Sims speculum and Sims position, eponymous tributes to his accomplishments as the 'Father of Gynaecology'.

The impact of maternal age over forty years on the caesarean section rate: six year experience at a busy district general hospital.

A retrospective study over a 6-year period was undertaken to determine the trend in age at booking for antenatal care at West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust and to investigate the relationship between maternal age at booking for antenatal care and mode of delivery. Between 2006 and 2011, there was an 80% increase in the number of women over the age of 40 years booking for antenatal care. The overall caesarean section rate in this cohort of women increased from 34.6% in 2006 to 53.7% in 2011, comprising of an increase in both elective and emergency caesarean sections. It appears that increasing maternal age may explain a significant proportion of the rising caesarean section rate in our unit.

Hydatoxi lualba: the worm that wasn't!

Pre-eclampsia is a disorder that occurs only during pregnancy and the postpartum period and affects both the mother and the unborn child. Affecting at least 5-8% of all pregnancies, it can be a rapidly progressive condition characterised by hypertension and proteinuria. Oedema, sudden weight gain, headaches and changes in vision are important symptoms. However, some women with rapidly advancing disease report few symptoms.

Ovarian ectopic pregnancy: aetiology, diagnosis, and challenges in surgical management.

Primary ovarian ectopic pregnancy (OEP) remains a rare but important type of ectopic pregnancy which is normally diagnosed at surgery. The aetiology is unknown. We have found fertility treatments (18.1%) and intrauterine contraceptive devices (19.3%) remain important associated risk factors. We undertook a world literature review of all cases since 1995. We found that 52% of cases were managed laparoscopically, which is less than the reported UK rate of all ectopics, of 85.9%. Over that time period, eight patients were treated medically with a success rate of 50%. While the original 1878 Spiegelberg's criterion still holds for the diagnosis, the addition of modern ultrasound scanning has made a radiological diagnosis possible. In a few cases, the management of OEP remains similar to that of a tubal ectopic pregnancy with the same challenges. Laparoscopy with ovarian sparing in the stable woman is today the surgical treatment of choice.

Reporting rates of ectopic pregnancy: are we any closer to achieving consensus?

Calculating rates of ectopic pregnancy in a reliable and reproducible way can be challenging. To date, there is no consensus as to which denominators to use but the authors suggest using the total number of deliveries as a benchmark. In many developing countries where ectopic pregnancy is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, standardisation of epidemiological data is arguably even more important. Using the number of deliveries is probably the most pragmatic and reliable way of quoting ectopic pregnancy rates in developing countries, as structures are usually already in place to record births/deliveries. This would ensure greater consistency and allow more meaningful comparisons to be made, both within individual units over time as well as globally. Using additional denominators is more labour intensive and lends itself to inaccuracy but may nevertheless be useful depending on the issues being addressed. Ultimately, the correct denominator(s) to use should be determined by the clinical question(s) of interest. The authors acknowledge that the statistical analysis used in this paper is based on one retrospective study alone and that further work is required in this area before definitive conclusions can be made.

An 'epidemic' of ectopic pregnancy in West Hertfordshire, UK?

Our clinical impression is that the incidence of ectopic pregnancy in West Hertfordshire in the UK has been steadily rising to almost 'epidemic' proportions. On the basis of our clinical suspicion, a retrospective study was performed looking at the ectopic pregnancy rates in the region from 1993 to 2007. All histologically proven ectopic pregnancies were obtained using the hospital histology database and all deliveries (live births and stillbirths) were obtained using the Ciconia Maternity information System (CMiS). The numbers of legal terminations of pregnancy (NHS and non-NHS) as well as women of reproductive age were obtained using the databases from the Office for National Statistics and Department of Health. In terms of absolute numbers of histologically proven ectopic pregnancies, there were 38 cases in 1993, rising to a peak of 68 cases in 1998 and 59 cases in 2007. This equates to 6.5/1,000 deliveries in 1993, 11/1,000 deliveries in 1998 and 10.7/1,000 deliveries in 2007. Although there have been fluctuations in ectopic pregnancy rates over 15 years, this did not reach statistical significance. Therefore, contrary to our clinical suspicion, the incidence of ectopic pregnancy in West Hertfordshire has remained stable.

Ectopic pregnancy, the need for standardisation of rate.

Reported incidence of ectopic pregnancy (EP) varies widely in the literatures. Due to individual definition of the denominator used the incidence of EP, it has been expressed in various ways that are not easily comparable. Controversy has arisen over the best denominator in reporting the incidence of EP. The three commonly used denominators are the number of births, the number of pregnancies and the number of women of reproductive age (15-44 years). A reliable calculation of the incidence of EP is necessary to provide accurate information on the rate of this condition which is vital in planning health policies.

Surgical management of ectopic pregnancy in a district general hospital.

The mainstay of management of ectopic pregnancies is laparoscopic surgery. Other treatment options include open laparotomy, methotrexate or expectant approach. Recently the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) revised its guidelines regarding management of suspected ectopic pregnancies. We undertook a retrospective study looking at management of ectopic pregnancies over a defined 12-month period (1 October 2003 - 30 September 2004) in a district general hospital to the north of London and compared this with the recommended RCOG guidelines 2004. Cases of ectopic pregnancy were identified from the theatre, ward log, and cross-referenced with histopathological reports. The case notes of these women were reviewed and data extracted according to a drawn-up questionnaire. A total of 64 cases met the diagnostic criteria and were included in the study. Nine of the 64 cases were haemodynamically unstable and seven underwent rapid laparotomy. All of the stable 55 cases underwent laparoscopy, which was converted to open laparotomy in 13 cases (23.6%). Three patients were treated with methotrexate all of whom had been previously managed surgically. The majority of cases of ectopic pregnancy were managed according to the RCOG recommendations. Further changes in practice will be required to incorporate expectant and primary medical management as proposed by the recent guidelines (RCOG 2004). This study reveals progress achieved in management of ectopic pregnancies in UK with the introduction of RCOG guidelines 1999.

Declining incidence of ectopic pregnancy in a UK city health district between 1990 and 1999.

BACKGROUND: On the basis of clinical impression that the number of cases of ectopic pregnancy seen in the City and Hackney Health District, London, was changing, a retrospective study of the years between 1990 and 1999 was carried out. METHODS: From the histopathology databases, cases of ectopic pregnancy and early pregnancy failure were identified. The number of deliveries at The Homerton Hospital was obtained from the Labour Ward register; the number of terminations of pregnancy and the number of fertile women was obtained from the Office for National Statistics, UK. RESULTS: There were 73 cases of ectopic pregnancy in 1990 rising to 96 in 1991 and then a fall to 52 cases in 1999. In terms of ectopic pregnancy per 100 deliveries, per all known pregnancies and per 1000 fertile women per year, there was a peak in 1991 and a fall to 1999. With regard to relative incidence per deliveries and per all known pregnancies, these falls were significant (P < 0.05). In 1991, there were 2.4 ectopic pregnancies per 100 deliveries, falling to 1.6 in 1999, a 33% fall. The reasons for this large decline are uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: There has been no change in patient population, diagnostic aids used or management protocols for patients with ectopic pregnancies.

Trial of scar or elective repeat caesarean section at maternal request?

In a study between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 1998 at Watford General Hospital, we identified all women who booked having had a previous caesarean section. Data on age, social class and previous obstetric history was extracted from the notes, as was mode of delivery. Of the 718 patients identified, 497 were considered suitable for trial of scar. Of these 221 (44.5%) requested repeat caesarean section. Age, social class and indication for previous caesarean section could not predict those who accepted trial of scar. Of the 60 women who had had a previous successful trial of scar 59 (98.3%) underwent trial of scar and of the 48 who had had a vaginal delivery prior to caesarean section 37 (77.1%) underwent trial of scar (P < 0.01). Maternal request for caesarean section, without obstetric contraindication to trial of scar, accounted for 24.9% of all the elective caesarean sections undertaken in our unit.