Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mol Biol (Mosk) ; 56(2): 320, 2022.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35403622

RESUMEN

The transcription factor p73 is a member of the p53 tumor suppressor gene family and one of the key regulators of apoptosis. TP73 gene encodes two protein isoforms classes with diverse functions, TAp73 and DNp73, and TAp73 expression in tumor tissues is altered. Unlike the TP53 gene, TP73 is not mutated in cancers. Here, we sought to explore the expression of p73 isoforms across eight major cancer types using the publicly available data deposited at the GDC data portal and the TSVdb database. Our results showed that TAp73α is overexpressed in breast invasive carcinoma, stomach adenocarcinoma, lung squamous cell carcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, and esophageal carcinoma tumors, whereas the expression of DNp73 isoforms is downregulated in breast invasive carcinoma (DNp73α,ß,γ), Prostate Adenocarcinoma (DNp73ß), Lung Adenocarcinoma (DNp73α), Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (DNp73α) tumors. In summary, this study revealed that TAp73α has higher expression than the DNp73 isoforms in several cancer types.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Proteínas Supresoras de Tumor , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/metabolismo , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Proteínas Nucleares/metabolismo , Isoformas de Proteínas/genética , Isoformas de Proteínas/metabolismo , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/genética , Proteínas Supresoras de Tumor/genética , Proteínas Supresoras de Tumor/metabolismo
2.
Psychiatr Clin North Am ; 26(2): 381-409, 2003 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12778840

RESUMEN

Given the heterogeneous nature of substance abuse, it is notable that several predictors of response are independent of the primary drug of abuse or the treatment setting [208]. Although the strength of the relationship of predictor to outcome varies, the following factors have been identified consistently: severity of dependence or withdrawal; psychiatric comorbidity; substance-related problems; motivation (abstinence commitment); length of treatment; negative affective states; cognitive factors; personality traits and disorders; coping skills; multiple substance abuse; contingency contracting or coercion; genetic factors; sleep architecture; urges and craving; self-efficacy; and economic and social factors. Although it is well known that severity of dependence (including polysubstance abuse), serious psychiatric comorbidity, and social problems are associated with poor treatment response, only recently has research examined the efficacy of intervention strategies that specifically address these problems. Adequate treatment of psychiatric comorbidity and improvement in social, economic, and family functioning lead to better treatment outcomes. The development of specific techniques to enhance self-efficacy, motivation, coping skills, and functioning in the community are concrete examples of how the identification of factors associated with positive outcomes has led to the development of new treatments. Despite significant accomplishments, the field is left with many unanswered questions. Although several biologic markers, such as neuroendocrine response and sleep architecture, show promise as outcome predictors, it is not known whether these are critical factors in the initiation of substance use or its progression to dependence. Determining whether biologic markers are epiphenomena reflecting the amount and duration of substance abuse or are fundamental to the pathophysiology of dependence is a matter of urgent concern. With some exceptions, identification of biologic predictors has not led to innovative therapies. One of these exceptions is the development of naltrexone for the treatment of alcoholism, which was based in a solid theoretical rationale and followed by hypothesis-driven experiments. Similar opportunities should emerge from current basic science and clinical research. The application of pharmacogenetic techniques to the field of addiction also holds great promise. As future studies are undertaken, researchers and clinicians must be mindful that differences in outcome predictors across drugs of abuse and treatments may emerge as subgroups of individuals with addictive disorders and new therapies are identified. There is already evidence that early onset alcoholism is associated with poor response under some circumstances, yet may be a predictor of response to targeted pharmacotherapy with ondansetron [64, 112]. As the ability to subtype disorders based on meaningful biologic differences grows, it is anticipated that several relevant outcome predictors that are specific for pharmacotherapy will emerge.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Biomarcadores , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Cognición , Electroencefalografía , Humanos , Neurotransmisores/metabolismo , Personalidad , Pronóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/fisiopatología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA