Brain insulin infusion does not augment the counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia or glucoprivation.

Although high dosages of insulin can cause hypoglycemia, several studies suggest that increased insulin action in the head may paradoxically protect against severe hypoglycemia by augmenting the sympathoadrenal response to hypoglycemia. We hypothesized that a direct infusion of insulin into the third ventricle and/or the mediobasal hypothalamus (MBH) would amplify the sympathoadrenal response to hypoglycemia. Nine-week-old male rats had insulin (15 mU) or artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF, control) infused bilaterally into the MBH or directly into the third ventricle. During the final 2 hours of the brain insulin or aCSF infusions, the counterregulatory response to either a hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic (approximately 50 mg/dL) clamp or a 600-mg/kg intravenous bolus of 2-deoxyglucose (2DG) was measured. 2-Deoxyglucose was used to induce a glucoprivic response without peripheral insulin infusion. In response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia, epinephrine rose more than 60-fold, norepinephrine rose more than 4-fold, glucagon rose 8-fold, and corticosterone rose almost 2-fold; but these increments were not different in aCSF vs insulin treatment groups with either intracerebroventricular or bilateral MBH insulin protocols. Intracerebroventricular insulin infusion stimulated insulin signaling as noted by a 5-fold increase in AKT phosphorylation. In the absence of systemic insulin infusion, 2DG-induced glucopenia resulted in an equal counterregulatory response with brain aCSF and insulin infusions. Under the conditions studied, although insulin infusion acted to stimulate hypothalamic insulin signaling, neither intrahypothalamic nor intracerebroventricular insulin infusion augmented the counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia or to 2DG-induced glucoprivation. Therefore, it is proposed that the previously noted acute actions of insulin to augment the sympathoadrenal response to hypoglycemia are likely mediated via mechanisms exterior to the central nervous system.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy-associated rhabdomyolysis with ARF.

Intraoperative rhabdomyolysis with resultant acute renal failure is a rare complication seen, most commonly, with urologic surgical procedures. Since the early 1990s, the refinement of laparoscopic techniques has permitted their application more broadly. Among the procedures to benefit from these less invasive surgical methods has been radical nephrectomy. In general, this has resulted in less postoperative pain and shorter convalescence. Nonetheless, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy still represents major surgery and is not free from operative risks. To highlight one of these risks, we present a case of a young, obese man with renal cell carcinoma who underwent a hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy that was complicated by rhabdomyolsis resulting in acute renal failure (ARF). We discuss the clinical insults that contributed to the development of azotemia with particular attention paid to our current understanding of the pathogenesis of myoglobinuric ARF. In addition, we review the literature concerning surgery-associated, rhabdomyolytic ARF with the aim of providing clinicians guidance for the avoidance and early recognition of this rare, but very serious, surgical complication.