Impact of EGFR genotype on the efficacy of osimertinib in EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective observational study.

Purpose: A T790M of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is the most frequently encountered mutation conferring acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to assess the differential clinical outcomes of osimertinib therapy in NSCLC patients with T790M according to the type of activating EGFR mutation, ie, exon 19 deletion or L858R point mutation. Patients and methods: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in patients with a major EGFR mutation and T790M-positive advanced NSCLC who had disease progression after first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. The efficacy of osimertinib was evaluated according to the type of EGFR mutation. Results: A total of 51 patients were included in this study. An objective response was obtained in 29 patients, indicating an objective response rate of 58.8%. The response rate was 69.7% in patients with exon 19 deletion and 38.9% in patients with L858R point mutation, indicating a statistically significant difference (P=0.033). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the entire patient population were 7.8 and 15.5 months, respectively. The median PFS in the exon 19 deletion and L858R point mutation groups was 8.0 months and 5.2 months, respectively, indicating a statistically significant difference (P=0.045). Median OS in the exon 19 deletion and L858R point mutation groups was significantly different at 19.8 months and 12.9 months, respectively (P=0.0015). Multivariate analysis identified the exon 19 deletion as a favorable independent predictor of PFS and OS. Conclusion: Investigators should consider the proportions of sensitive EGFR mutation types as a stratification factor in designing or reviewing clinical studies involving osimertinib.

Prognostic differences between oligometastatic and polymetastatic extensive disease-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Oligometastasis is a state in which cancer patients have a limited number of metastatic tumors; patients with oligometastases survive longer than those with polymetastases. Extensive disease (ED)-small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is considered a systemic disease and a poor survival. This study investigated whether the concept of oligometastases is prognostic factor also applicable to patients with ED-SCLC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 141 consecutive patients with ED-SCLC between 2008 and 2016. The patients were divided into four subgroups: group 1; patients with solitary metastatic site in one organ (n = 31), group 2; patients with 2-5 metastatic sites in one organ (n = 18), group 3; patients with over 6 metastases in one organ (n = 15), and group 4; patients with 2 or more metastatic organs (n = 77). RESULTS: It was identified that 49 patients with ED-SCLC had oligometastases (groups 1 + 2) and 92 had polymetastases (groups 3 + 4). The prognoses of patients with ED-SCLC and oligometastases, defined as ≤5 metastases in a single organ, were significantly superior to those of patients with polymetastases [16.0 (95% CI, 11.0-21.0) months vs. 6.9 (95% CI, 6.0-7.8) months; p<0.001]. 43 of 49 patients with ED-SCLC and oligometastases were relapsed after initial chemotherapy, and 38 (88%) experienced local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ED-SCLC and oligometastases may have improved survival than those with polymetastases. As oligometastatic ED-SCLC tends to recur locally, local therapy combined with systemic chemotherapy may be a treatment option.

Evaluation of osimertinib efficacy according to body surface area and body mass index in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring an EGFR mutation: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is recommended for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation; however, it is unclear whether body size variables affect the efficacy of osimertinib in such patients. This study assessed the potential effect of body surface area (BSA) and body mass index (BMI) on osimertinib chemotherapy in patients with T790M-positive advanced NSCLC who progress on prior EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study. Median BSA and BMI were used as cut-off values to evaluate the impact of body size variables on osimertinib chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median BSA and BMI of 47 patients were 1.50 m2 and 21.5 kg/m2 , respectively. Clinical outcomes did not significantly differ between the high and low BSA groups, with response rates of 59.1% and 56.0% (P = 0.83) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.6 and 9.1 months (P = 0.69), respectively. Similarly, there were no significant differences between the high and low BMI groups relative to response rates, which were 60.8% and 54.1% (P = 0.64), respectively, and PFS, which was 7.6 months in both groups (P = 0.38). No significant differences were observed among toxicity profiles in relation to BSA or BMI. Multivariate analysis identified better performance status, young age, and EGFR exon 19 deletion as independent favorable predictors of PFS. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of osimertinib does not significantly vary relative to body size variables of patients with T790M-positive NSCLC who progress on prior EGFR-TKIs.

Questionnaire survey on patient awareness of invasive rebiopsy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment strategies for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) depend on various factors including physical condition, complications, tumor histology, and molecular profiling. Even if initial chemotherapy is efficacious, almost all patients develop treatment resistance. Invasive rebiopsy from sites of recurrence might provide insight into resistance mechanisms and aid in the selection of suitable sequential antitumor drugs. However, invasive rebiopsy might be challenging because of limited tissue availability and patient burden. Therefore, this study aimed to assess awareness of invasive rebiopsy among non-small cell lung cancer patients. METHODS: This prospective questionnaire survey was performed between June 2015 and March 2016 in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The survey was carried out at two time points: before starting first-line chemotherapy (cohort 1), and at the time of disease progression after initial chemotherapy, but before second-line chemotherapy (cohort 2). RESULTS: In this study, 50 and 30 patients were enrolled in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. In cohort 1, 37 (74%) patients agreed to rebiopsy, if disease progression occurred, whereas 18 (60%) patients in cohort 2 agreed to invasive rebiopsy at disease progression. The primary reasons for rebiopsy rejection were poor physical condition and patient burden related to the initial biopsy. Seven patients answered the survey questions during the treatment course, and the acceptance rate was lower among patients who agreed to rebiopsy at disease progression than before treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive rebiopsy can lead to distress in some patients. To improve the consent rate for tissue rebiopsy, treatment strategies including rebiopsy should be discussed with patients during the early treatment phase.

Activity of Nivolumab and Utility of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictive Biomarker for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: The immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab is entering routine oncologic practice. We investigated the safety and efficacy of nivolumab in the real world and alternative predictive factors for survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study to evaluate the activity of nivolumab treatment for chemotherapy-refractory NSCLC. Patients were treated with nivolumab once every 2 weeks, and the efficacy was assessed every 8 ± 2 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled after nivolumab approval in Japan. These patients received a median of 4 (range, 1-43) cycles of nivolumab. Overall objective response was observed in 12 patients (23.1%). Median progression-free survival was 2.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.2) months, and 1-year overall survival rate was 59.9%. A total of 23 immune-related adverse events occurred in 20 patients, as follows: 7 cases of pneumonitis, 6 of oral mucositis, 5 of hypothyroidism, 2 of colitis, 2 of liver dysfunction, and 1 of arthritis. All patients recovered after appropriate management. A pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of ≥ 5 was significantly associated with poor prognosis compared to NLR < 5 (hazard ratio, 4.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.84-11.14; P = .013), independently. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab showed promising activity with a manageable safety profile in clinical practice, consistent with effects of previous clinical trials. This drug could affect a specific population of patients with advanced NSCLC, and pretreatment NLR was a candidate for surrogate markers for survival benefit of patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab.

Prognostic significance of the 8th edition of the TNM classification for patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is typically categorized according to disease extent as limited or extensive, and utility of the 8th TNM classification, recommended for lung cancer staging, which demonstrates a strong association with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management, remains unclear. METHODS: This retrospective study included 277 consecutive SCLC patients treated at a single institution between 2008 and 2016. RESULTS: According to the currently used two-stage system, 186 (65.7%) of the patients were classified as having extensive disease (ED)-SCLC. Among the ED-SCLC patients, ten (5.3%), 38 (20.4%), 32 (17.2%), and 106 (57.0%) were categorized into stages M0, M1a, M1b, and M1c, respectively, according to the 8th TNM classification. There was a significant difference in overall survival based on the M descriptors: 15.8 (95% CI 9.4-22.2) months in the M1b group vs 7.3 (95% CI 5.7-8.9) months in the M1c group (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that in addition to the known prognostic factors such as performance status, serum albumin, and lactate dehydrogenase, M descriptor was a prognostic factor (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.38-2.77; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The 8th TNM classification has a prognostic value in SCLC. Similarly to NSCLC, treatment approaches should be considered on the basis of the 8th TNM classification, especially stage IVA separate from stage IVB in ED-SCLC patients.

Amrubicin monotherapy for elderly patients with relapsed extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown amrubicin (AMR) to be an effective second-line treatment option for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the efficacy of AMR in elderly patients with relapsed SCLC has not been sufficiently evaluated. METHODS: The medical records of elderly patients with relapsed SCLC who received AMR as second-line chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed, and their treatment outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with a median age of 72 years (22 patients with sensitive relapse and 9 with refractory relapse) were analyzed. The median number of treatment cycles was four (range: 1-10), and the response rate was 29%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.4 and 11.6 months, respectively. The OS of 22 patients who received third-line chemotherapy was 15.5 months. The PFS (6.2 vs. 3.2 months; P = 0.002) and OS (14.8 vs. 5.7 months; P = 0.004) were significantly longer in patients with sensitive relapse than those with refractory relapse. The frequency of grade 3 or higher neutropenia was high (n = 18, 58%), while febrile neutropenia was only observed in five patients (16%). Non-hematological toxic effects were relatively mild, and pneumonitis and treatment-related deaths were not observed. CONCLUSION: AMR may be a feasible and effective regimen for elderly patients with relapsed SCLC.

Evaluation of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC according to EGFR mutation status.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). However, the efficacy and safety of this treatment has not been compared between patients who possess epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and patients with wild-type EGFR. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the presence of EGFR gene mutations in patients with LA-NSCLC receiving cCRT. Between January 2007 and December 2013, the records of 64 patients were reviewed retrospectively. The data were statistically analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of cCRT according to EGFR mutation status. In total, 15/64 were revealed to possess EGFR mutations, 23%, and comprised the mutant EGFR group. The progression-free survival time was significantly shorter in the mutant EGFR group compared with the patient group with tumors exhibiting wild-type EGFR, 6.3 and 9.5 months, respectively (P<0.001). The overall survival rate was longer in the mutant EGFR group compared with the wild-type EGFR group, although the difference was not statistically significant, 37.1 and 21.1 months, respectively (P=0.26). The disease recurred in all of the patients of the mutant EGFR group, whilst the recurrence rate in the wild-type EGFR group was 89%. The frequency of distant metastasis was significantly higher in the mutant EGFR group compared with the wild-type EGFR group. In conclusion, these data suggest that additional studies are required to identify strategies for reinforcing the efficacy of cCRT, with a focus on the potential use of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients exhibiting an EGFR mutation.

Phase II study of Amrubicin monotherapy in elderly or poor-risk patients with extensive disease of small cell lung cancer.

Background Previous study indicated that an optional anti-cancer drug for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is amrubicin. However, no prospective studies have evaluated amrubicin in chemo-naive elderly or poor-risk patients with SCLC. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of amrubicin as first-line chemotherapy for elderly or poor-risk patients with extensive-disease SCLC (ES-SCLC). Methods Patients with chemotherapy-naive ES-SCLC received multiple cycles of 40 mg/m2 amrubicin for 3 consecutive days every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results Between March 2011 and August 2015, 36 patients were enrolled in this study. Each patient received a median of four treatment cycles (range, 1-6 cycles). ORR was 52.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 37-69%]. The median PFS and OS periods were 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.4-6.6 months) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 5.2-13.6 months), respectively. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event (69.4%), with febrile neutropenia developing in 13.9% of patients. No treatment-related death occurred. At the time of starting second-line chemotherapy, 19 of 22 patients (86%) had significantly improved or maintained their performance status (PS) relative to their PS at the time of starting amrubicin monotherapy as first-line chemotherapy (P = 0.027). Conclusions The results of the present study suggest that amrubicin could be considered as a viable treatment option for chemotherapy-naive elderly or poor-risk patients with ES-SCLC (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000011055 www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

Correlation between the efficacy of amrubicin and the previous chemotherapy regimen for relapsed small cell lung cancer.

Amrubicin has been demonstrated to be beneficial in the treatment of patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether there is a significant difference in the efficacy of amrubicin between patients with relapsed SCLC who were previously treated with a platinum agent in combination with a topoisomerase I inhibitor, and those patients previously treated with a platinum agent in combination with a topoisomerase II inhibitor. The medical records of patients with SCLC, who were diagnosed as having relapsed following treatment with a platinum-based regimen and subsequently received amrubicin monotherapy, were retrospectively reviewed. Of a total of 48 patients with SCLC who were treated with amrubicin, the overall response rate, median progression-free survival (PFS) time and median survival time (MST) were determined to be 31.3%, 7.1 and 17.0 months, respectively. The response rate, PFS time and MST did not differ significantly between the patients treated previously with a platinum agent in combination with irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, (36.4%, 5.7 and 11.4 months, respectively) and those treated previously with a platinum agent in combination with etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor (30.0%, 4.7 and 14.8 months, respectively). The results indicate that amrubicin may be effective as a second-line chemotherapeutic agent for patients with SCLC, irrespective of which platinum agent and topoisomerase inhibitor-based chemotherapy regimen was previously administered.

EGFR Mutation Genotype Impact on the Efficacy of Pemetrexed in Patients with Nonsquamous Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed monotherapy has come to be recognized as one of the standard secondline therapies for advanced nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there have been no reports of studies that have evaluated the efficacy of pemetrexed according to type of active EGFR mutation, i.e., an exon 19 deletion or an L858R point mutation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of nonsquamous NSCLC patients harboring an EGFR mutation who received pemetrexed monotherapy as a second or later line of chemotherapy at Kitasato University Hospital between March 2010 and October 2015 were retrospectively reviewed, and the treatment outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall response rate and progressionfree survival time (PFS) of the 53 patients with nonsquamous NSCLC were 15.1% and 2.3 months, respectively. There were significant differences between the disease control rate (37.5% vs. 76.2%) and PFS time (1.8 months vs. 3.3 months) of the exon 19 deletion group and the L858R point mutation group, and a multivariate analysis identified type of EGFR mutation as well as performance status (PS) as independent predictors of PFS. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical data obtained in this study provided a valuable rationale for considering type of EGFR mutation as well as non squamous histology as predictors of the efficacy of pemetrexed monotherapy.

Successful oral desensitization against skin rash induced by alectinib in a patient with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive lung adenocarcinoma: A case report.

Alectinib has been approved for the treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In terms of adverse effects, the occurrence of a severe skin rash induced by alectinib is reportedly rare, compared with the occurrence of skin rash induced by epithelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). In the present case report, a 76-year-old woman with ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma experienced disease progression after undergoing first-line chemotherapy. Subsequently, alectinib was administered as a second-line therapy. However, she discontinued alectinib therapy after 11days because of the occurrence of an alectinib-induced skin rash. Since the skin rash improved within one week, we attempted to perform oral desensitization to alectinib. The patient has not shown any recurrence of the rash or disease progression for 7 months since the successful oral desensitization to alectinib. Here, we describe the first case of successful oral desensitization against a skin rash induced by alectinib in a patient with ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma. Desensitization to overcome adverse effects and to enable sustained treatment with alectinib should be considered in patients who develop alectinib sensitivities.

Prognostic factors affecting the risk of thoracic progression in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of combined modality therapy is evaluated for patients with extensive-stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study evaluated prognostic factors affecting the risk of thoracic progression in ES-SCLC patients likely to undergo thoracic radiotherapy combined chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective review of ES-SCLC patients who had received systemic chemotherapy at our hospital was performed. Tumor size, metastatic sites, and laboratory data at diagnosis were evaluated as potential prognostic factors. In ES-SCLC patients without pleural dissemination, the rate of thoracic progression after initial chemotherapy was assessed. RESULTS: Eighty-three of 96 consecutive ES-SCLC patients were analyzed. The overall response rate was 55 %, median progression free survival was 5.0 months (mo), and overall survival (OS) was 9.2 mo. Tumor size (19.4 mo for ≤3 cm vs. 8.5 mo for >3 cm, p = 0.017) and the number of metastatic sites (12.9 mo for single sites vs. 7.1 mo for multiple sites, p = 0.015) were prognostic factors, in addition to known prognostic factors such as performance status and the levels of LDH and sodium. Cox proportional hazard model showed that the OS was significantly worse in patients with large (>3 cm) primary tumor size {HR 2.44 [95 % confidential interval (CI) 1.05-5.68], p = 0.038} and multiple metastatic sites [HR 1.81 (95 % CI 1.08-3.04), p = 0.026]. In 51 cases without pleural dissemination, the number of metastatic sites was associated with thoracic progression after initial chemotherapy (65 % for single sites vs. 36 % for multiple sites, p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Large tumor size and multiple metastatic sites at diagnosis significantly predicted poor survival in ES-SCLC patients. Based on the high rate of thoracic progression in ES-SCLC patients with single site of distant metastasis, we should consider thoracic radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for this population.

Impact of Smoking History on the Efficacy of Gefitinib in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations.

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib treatment has come to be recognized as the standard therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, resistance to gefitinib has been observed in certain subpopulations of these patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of smoking status on the efficacy of gefitinib in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. METHODS: The records of NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations who were treated with gefitinib at Kitasato University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed, and the treatment outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: In 153 patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, the overall response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) were 66.7% and 9.0 months, respectively. PFS differed significantly among the current smokers and never-smokers/former light smokers (10.7 vs. 5.4 months, p=0.0002), and the response rate was significantly higher in the never-smokers/former light smokers than in the current smokers (72.3 vs. 55.8%, p=0.04). Multivariate analysis identified smoking status as an independent predictor of PFS. CONCLUSION: The clinical data obtained in this study provide a valuable rationale for considering smoking status as a predictor of the efficacy of gefitinib in patients with NSCLC harboring activating EGFR mutations.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of erlotinib administered in combination with amrubicin in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a phase I trial of erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with amrubicin, a topoisomerase II inhibitor. The aim was to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and the pharmacokinetics of this combination in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had received previous chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 9 patients with stage IV disease were treated at 3-week intervals with erlotinib once daily on days 1 through 21 plus a 5-minute intravenous injection of amrubicin on days 1 through 3. RESULTS: The dose levels evaluated were erlotinib (mg/body)/amrubicin (mg/m): 100/30 (n=3), 100/35 (n=3), and 150/30 (n=3). The maximum tolerated dose of erlotinib and amrubicin was 100 mg/body and 35 mg/m because 2 of the 3 patients experienced DLTs during the first cycle of treatment at the third dose level of 150 mg/body and 30 mg/m. Cessation of erlotinib administration for 8 days because of grade 3 leukopenia and grade 3 skin infection (erysipelas) were the DLTs. No drug-drug interactions between erlotinib and amrubicin were observed in this study. The overall response rate was 33%, including 3 partial responses, in the 9 patients. The median progression-free survival for all patients was quite long, 11.3 months, and the median overall survival has not yet been reached. CONCLUSIONS: Combined erlotinib plus amrubicin therapy seems to be highly effective, with acceptable toxicity, against non-small cell lung cancer. The recommended dose for phase II studies was erlotinib 100 mg once daily on days 1 through 21, and amrubicin 35 mg/m on days 1 through 3 administered every 21 days.

Successful chemotherapy with carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel for thymic large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A case report.

Thymic large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) are rare, and the optimal regimen for second and subsequent lines of chemotherapy for the treatment of LCNECs remains unknown. In the present case study, a 59-year-old male with post-operative recurrent thymic LCNEC was treated with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin every 4 weeks as third-line chemotherapy, and a partial response was achieved following 4 cycles of this regimen. The patient developed grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 leukopenia, but none of the other toxicities, including peripheral neuropathy, were severe. Therefore, the patient was able to tolerate this salvage chemotherapy. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first case demonstrating clinically meaningful antitumor activity by combination chemotherapy with carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel, resulting in a positive response in a patient with thymic LCNEC.

Evaluation of gefitinib efficacy according to body surface area in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring an EGFR mutation.

BACKGROUND: Exon 19 deletions and L858R point mutation are the most commonly encountered active epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and they predict greater efficacy of gefitinib therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether body surface area (BSA) affects the efficacy of gefitinib in patients with NSCLC harboring an active EGFR mutation. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC harboring an active EGFR mutation who received gefitinib monotherapy. The median BSA value was used as the cutoff value to evaluate the impact of BSA on the efficacy of gefitinib. RESULTS: The median BSA of the 103 NSCLC patients harboring an active EGFR mutation was 1.45 m(2). The overall response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and median survival time (MST) were 65.0 %, 11.3 months, and 26.2 months, respectively. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the high-BSA group (BSA ≥ 1.45 m(2)) and low-BSA group (BSA < 1.45 m(2)), i.e., the response rates was 60.0 % and 69.8 %, respectively (P = 0.20), and their MST was 24.7 and 26.2 months, respectively (P = 0.78). Although BSA was predictive of PFS between high-BSA group and low-BSA group in the univariate analysis (9.0 and 12.2 months, P = 0.04), the multivariate analysis identified only performance status and smoking status as independent predictors of PFS. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of gefitinib in patients with NSCLC harboring an EGFR mutation does not differ according to their BSA.

Successful chemotherapy with nab-Paclitaxel in a heavily treated non-small cell lung cancer patient: a case report.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the majority of all lung cancers. A 69-year-old female with postoperatively recurrent NSCLC was treated weekly with nanoparticle-albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) monotherapy every 4 weeks as a tenth line chemotherapy, and stable disease was achieved by seven cycles of this regimen. The patient developed grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 leukopenia, but none of the other toxicities, including febrile neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy, were severe, and thus she was able to tolerate this salvage chemotherapy. To our knowledge this is the first report of the efficacy of nab-paclitaxel monotherapy in a heavily treated NSCLC patient.

Comparison of the efficacy of gefitinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer according to the type of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation.

BACKGROUND: Exon 19 deletion and L858R point mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are the most commonly encountered EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and predict higher clinical outcomes following treatment with gefitinib. The objective of this study was to evaluate the differential clinical outcomes of gefitinib in patients with NSCLC according to the type of active EGFR mutation, i.e. exon 19 deletion or L858R point mutation. METHODS: We identified patients with advanced NSCLC harboring the exon 19 deletion or the L858R point mutation of EGFR who were on gefitinib treatment. The clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 124 patients with NSCLC harboring active EGFR mutations, the overall response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were 60.5%, 11.3 and 27.3 months, respectively, and did not differ significantly between patients with the exon 19 deletion (61.8%, 11.3 and 32.2 months, respectively) and those with the L858R point mutation (58.9%, 9.0 and 27.7 months, respectively). CONCLUSION: It may be considered that there is no difference in the clinical efficacy of gefitinib between NSCLC patients who harbor the exon 19 deletion and those with the L858R point mutation.

Successful chemotherapy with Carboplatin and s-1 for thymic carcinoma: a case report.

Thymic carcinoma is a rare but aggressive neoplasm. Although there is no clearly optimal first- or second-line chemotherapy regimen for thymic carcinoma, platinum-based chemotherapy has repeatedly been shown to be of benefit to patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. Some case reports have described S-1 as a novel agent with good activity against advanced thymic carcinoma. A 74-year-old female was diagnosed with thymic carcinoma complicated by pleural dissemination and pericardial effusion of carcinomatosa. She was treated with carboplatin on day 1 plus S-1 on days 1-14 in cycles repeated every 3 or 4 weeks. Four cycles of this regimen were administered, and a partial response was confirmed. There were no severe hematological or nonhematological toxicities, and no dose reduction was necessary. To our knowledge, this is the first report to demonstrate the efficacy of combination chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin and S-1 against thymic carcinoma.