Effects of C-terminal Truncation of Chaperonin GroEL on the Yield of In-cage Folding of the Green Fluorescent Protein.

Chaperonin GroEL from Escherichia coli consists of two heptameric rings stacked back-to-back to form a cagelike structure. It assists in the folding of substrate proteins in concert with the co-chaperonin GroES by incorporating them into its large cavity. The mechanism underlying the incorporation of substrate proteins currently remains unclear. The flexible C-terminal residues of GroEL, which are invisible in the x-ray crystal structure, have recently been suggested to play a key role in the efficient encapsulation of substrates. These C-terminal regions have also been suggested to separate the double rings of GroEL at the bottom of the cavity. To elucidate the role of the C-terminal regions of GroEL on the efficient encapsulation of substrate proteins, we herein investigated the effects of C-terminal truncation on GroE-mediated folding using the green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a substrate. We demonstrated that the yield of in-cage folding mediated by a single ring GroEL (SR1) was markedly decreased by truncation, whereas that mediated by a double ring football-shaped complex was not affected. These results suggest that the C-terminal region of GroEL functions as a barrier between rings, preventing the leakage of GFP through the bottom space of the cage. We also found that once GFP folded into its native conformation within the cavity of SR1 it never escaped even in the absence of the C-terminal tails. This suggests that GFP molecules escaped through the pore only when they adopted a denatured conformation. Therefore, the folding and escape of GFP from C-terminally truncated SR1·GroES appeared to be competing with each other.

Evaluation of the stability of an SR398/GroES chaperonin complex.

The stability of an SR398/GroES chaperonin complex was examined. As was expected, based on the finding of previous studies, the SR398/GroES complex was extremely stable in the presence of an excess amount of free adenosine 5'-[γ-thio]triphosphate (ATPγS) or adenosine 5'-(ß,γ-imido)triphosphate (AMPPNP). However, the complex was not stable in the absence of nucleotides. These results indicate that ATPγS and AMPPNP repeatedly associated to and dissociated from the complex in a non-cooperative manner. This nucleotide exchange did not induce the dissociation of GroES and substrate from SR398, suggesting the importance of the cooperative dissociation of nucleotides from the cis-ring to release GroES and substrate proteins in the GroEL/GroES reaction cycle.