Undiagnosed Factor VII Deficiency in Cardiac Surgery Complicated by Bleeding: A Case Report.

Rare bleeding disorders in the perioperative period call for targeted resuscitation strategies. Factor VII deficiency, for instance, is often corrected with exogenous administration of recombinant factor VIIa. This activated clotting factor, initially designed for patients with hemophilia A or B with factor inhibitors, is gaining popularity as a salvage therapy for severe and persistent traumatic and surgical bleeding. This article describes the management of a cardiothoracic surgical patient with undiagnosed isolated factor VII deficiency who experienced significant postoperative bleeding which subsided after the administration of recombinant factor VIIa. In this case, EXTEM failed to detect a clotting factor deficiency.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Definition of Failure to Rescue Should Consider Including Cardiac Arrest.

BACKGROUND: Failure to rescue (FTR) is a new quality measure in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. The STS defines FTR as death after permanent stroke, renal failure, reoperation, or prolonged ventilation. Our objective was to assess whether cardiac arrest should be included in this definition. METHODS: Patients undergoing an STS index operation in a regional collaborative (2011-2021) were included. The performance of the STS definition of FTR was compared with a definition that included the STS complications plus cardiac arrest (STS+). Centers were grouped into FTR rate terciles using the STS and STS+ definitions of FTR, and changes in their relative performance rating were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 43,641 patients were included across 17 centers. Cardiac arrest was the most lethal complication: 55.0% of patients who experienced cardiac arrest died. FTR after any complication (13 total) occurred among 884 patients. The STS definition of FTR accounted for 83% (735 of 884) of all FTR. The addition of cardiac arrest to the STS definition significantly increased the proportion of overall FTR accounted for (92.2% [815 of 884]; P < .001). Choice of FTR definition led to substantial differences in center-level relative performance rating by FTR rate. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality after cardiac arrest is not completely captured by the STS definition of FTR and represents an important source of potentially preventable death after cardiac surgery. Future quality improvement efforts using the STS definition of FTR should account for this.

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Is Associated with Superior Survival Compared to Open Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has not been associated with a long-term survival advantage compared to open esophagectomy (OE). We investigated survival differences between MIE, including laparoscopic and robotic, and OE. METHODS: Patients undergoing esophagectomy from 2010 to 2014 with T1-4N0-3M0, adenocarcinoma or squamous cell histology, in middle or lower esophagus were queried from the National Cancer Database and stratified into groups based on their surgical procedure: robotic, laparoscopic, or OE. Propensity matching (1:1) was done between robotic and laparoscopic to produce an MIE group. The MIE group was matched to OE yielding a 1:1:2 matching of robotic:laparoscopic:OE. Postoperative outcomes and survival (Kaplan-Meier) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Prior to matching, 7,163 patients met inclusion criteria and a greater portion underwent OE (67.7%) than MIE (laparoscopic 24.9% and robotic 7.4%). Matching yielded similar groups (robotic = 527, laparoscopic = 527, and OE =1054). Compared to OE, MIE patients had a significantly greater number of nodes sampled and trended toward increased R0 resections (96.1% vs 94.3%, P = .053). OE was associated with a longer median postoperative stay (10 vs 9 days, P = .001). Mortality at 30 and 90 days was similar. However, postoperative survival for MIE was significantly greater than OE (P < .001). No survival difference existed between robotic and laparoscopic (P = .723). CONCLUSIONS: MIE is associated with increased number of nodes examined and a shorter postoperative length of stay. After propensity matching, patients undergoing MIE had better long but not short-term survival than OE. This benefit seems to be independent of the use of robotic technology.

Influence of Neoadjuvant Radiation Dose on Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy and Survival in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by resection is standard of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, however, a significant portion of these patients do not undergo surgical intervention. This study evaluates radiation dose and other factors associated with undergoing esophageal resection and their impact on outcomes including survival. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 2010 and 15 were queried from the National Cancer Database and stratified into low-dose radiation (41.4 Gy) (LDR) or high-dose radiation (50.0 or 50.4 Gy) (HDR) groups. Multivariable Logistic and Cox Regression analyses were performed to investigate the effect of multiple variables on the likelihood of undergoing esophagectomy and overall survival, respectively. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias between groups. RESULTS: A total of 3633 patients met study criteria with 3005 (82.7%) undergoing esophagectomy. A greater proportion received HDR (3163 (87.1%)) than LDR (470 (12.9%)). The use of LDR increased from 4.7% (n = 22) in 2010 to 20.7% (n = 154) in 2015. Factors associated with undergoing esophagectomy included LDR, adenocarcinoma histology, and younger age. Radiation dosage did not impact overall survival, but undergoing esophagectomy was associated with improved survival. After propensity matching, a greater portion of the LDR group underwent esophagectomy (87.0 vs 81.1%, p = 0.013). There was no difference in R0 3 resection (93.2 vs 92.4%, p = 0.678) or complete pathologic response (19.3 vs 21.5%, p = 0.442) between LDR and HDR groups. CONCLUSION: The use of LDR is increasing but still underutilized. LDR is associated with increased rates of esophagectomy without negatively impacting overall survival, R0 resection, or complete pathologic response.

Hospital readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate postoperative readmission rates and modifiable risk factors for readmission have yet to be defined for many operations. This systematic review and meta-analysis attempt to define these parameters for pancreaticoduodenectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The main outcomes were readmission rate, risk factors, and reasons for readmission. Meta-analyses were performed when data was homogeneous, otherwise, a qualitative review was performed. RESULTS: The 30-day, 90-day, and overall readmission rates were 17.63%, 26.14%, and 27.18%, respectively. In the meta-analysis, chronic pancreatitis (OR, 1.44, p = 0.04), operative length (MD, 26.1; p < 0.01), wound infection (OR, 1.9, p < 0.01), intra-abdominal abscess (OR, 3.79, p < 0.01), VTE (OR, 2.27, p = 0.01), and LOS (MD, 1.66, p < 0.01) where associated with readmission. CONCLUSION: Hospital readmission will continue to be a quality metric and will influence reimbursement models. Thirty and 60-day readmission data underestimate the true readmission rate. Chronic pancreatitis, operative length, and several post-operative complications were associated with greater readmission. More uniform reporting is necessary to identify modifiable risk factors associated with readmission.

Use of drug intoxicated donors for lung transplant: Impact on survival outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The number of increasing deaths due to the opioid epidemic has led to a potential greater supply of organ donors. There is hesitancy to use drug intoxicated donors, and we evaluated their impact on post-transplant survival. BACKGROUND: Patients ≥18 years of age undergoing lung transplantation and donors from whom at least one organ was donated between January 2005 and March 2015 were selected from the United Network of Organ Sharing database. Baseline characteristics and post-transplant survival were compared between drug intoxicated and all other donors. RESULTS: The utilization of drug intoxicated donors increased from 1.86% in 2005 to 6.23% in 2014. The 2 study groups had similar characteristics including age, gender, and Lung Allocation Score. As compared to all other donors, drug intoxicated donors were younger (29.1 ± 9.4 vs 34.6 ± 13.4 years, P < .0001), less likely to be male (52% vs 61%, P < .0001), and had a greater smoking history (14% vs 11%, P .04). There was no difference in post-lung transplant survival at 1, 3, and 5 years between drug intoxicated donors (85%, 64%, and 47%) and non-drug intoxicated donors (83%, 65%, and 51%). CONCLUSION: Transplantation utilizing drug intoxicated donor lungs has significantly increased over the past decade without significantly impacting post-transplant survival.

Changing demographics of heart donors: The impact of donor drug intoxication on posttransplant survival.

Recent reports have shown an increase in the number of organ donors from drug intoxication. The impact of donor drug use on survival after cardiac transplant remains unclear. The aim of our study was to illustrate changes in donor death mechanisms and assess the impact on posttransplant survival. We queried United Network of Organ Sharing thoracic transplant and deceased donor databases to identify patients undergoing heart transplantation between 2005 and 2015. We evaluated annual trends in donor death mechanisms. Recipients were propensity matched (drug-intoxicated-non-drug-intoxicated = 1:2) and posttransplant survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. In total, 19 384 donor hearts were used for transplant during the period (donor age 31.6 ± 11.8 years, 72% male). Use of drug-intoxicated donors increased from 2% (2005) to 13% (2015) and decreased from blunt injury (40%-30%) and intracranial hemorrhage (29%-25%). After propensity matching, posttransplant survival of drug-intoxicated donor hearts was 90%, 82%, and 76% at 1, 3, and 5 years, which was similar to non-drug-intoxicated. Heart transplants using drug-intoxicated donors have significantly increased; however, they have not adversely affected posttransplant survival. Hearts from drug-intoxicated donors should be carefully evaluated and considered for transplant.

The current state of left ventricular assist devices: challenges facing further development.

Heart failure is a clinical syndrome with significant morbidity and mortality. The use of left ventricular assist devices has improved outcomes for patients with advanced heart failure in the face of limited donor organs available for heart transplantation. This article describes current issues and limitations facing the left ventricular assist device field and explores how the field can be expanded in this setting.

Feasibility of Pump Speed Modulation for Restoring Vascular Pulsatility with Rotary Blood Pumps.

Continuous flow (CF) left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) diminish vascular pressure pulsatility, which may be associated with clinically reported adverse events including gastrointestinal bleeding, aortic valve insufficiency, and hemorrhagic stroke. Three candidate CF LVAD pump speed modulation algorithms designed to augment aortic pulsatility were evaluated in mock flow loop and ischemic heart failure (IHF) bovine models by quantifying hemodynamic performance as a function of mean pump speed, modulation amplitude, and timing. Asynchronous and synchronous copulsation (high revolutions per minute [RPM] during systole, low RPM during diastole) and counterpulsation (low RPM during systole, high RPM during diastole) algorithms were tested for defined modulation amplitudes (±300, ±500, ±800, and ±1,100 RPM) and frequencies (18.75, 37.5, and 60 cycles/minute) at low (2,900 RPM) and high (3,200 RPM) mean LVAD speeds. In the mock flow loop model, asynchronous, synchronous copulsation, and synchronous counterpulsation algorithms each increased pulse pressure (ΔP = 931%, 210%, and 98% and reduced left ventricular external work (LVEW = 20%, 22%, 16%). Similar improvements in vascular pulsatility (1,142%) and LVEW (40%) were observed in the IHF bovine model. Asynchronous modulation produces the largest vascular pulsatility with the advantage of not requiring sensor(s) for timing pump speed modulation, facilitating potential clinical implementation.

Early Outcomes With Marginal Donor Hearts Compared With Left Ventricular Assist Device Support in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of donor hearts has limited cardiac transplantation for end-stage heart failure, leading to the increased use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as bridge-to-transplant (BTT) and marginal donor hearts; however, outcomes have been mixed. This study examines differences in wait list survival of patients with continuous flow LVADs and post-transplantation survival of patients receiving a marginal donor heart. METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing database was retrospectively queried from January 2005 to June 2013 to identify adult patients listed for heart transplant. Marginal donor criteria included age greater than 55 years, hepatitis C positive, cocaine use, ejection fraction less than 0.45, or donor to recipient body mass index mismatch of greater than 20%. The primary endpoint was wait list survival of patients with LVADs compared with post-transplant survival of marginal donor heart recipients using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2,561 and 4,737 patients received LVAD support or a marginal donor heart, respectively. The 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year survival was 96%, 89%, and 85%, for patients with LVAD support on the waiting list and 97%, 89%, and 85%, respectively, for recipients of marginal donor hearts (p = 0.213). Recipients of marginal hearts had worse survival than non-marginal heart recipients at 3 years (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between waiting list survival of patients with LVAD support as BTT and post-transplant survival of recipients with marginal donor hearts. There could be clinical benefits for using LVAD support as BTT to allow time for better allocation of optimal donor hearts as opposed to transplantation with a marginal donor heart.

Flow modulation algorithms for intra-aortic rotary blood pumps to minimize coronary steal.

Intra-aortic rotary blood pumps (IARBPs) have been used for partial cardiac support during cardiogenic shock, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, and potentially viable for long-term circulatory support. Intra-aortic rotary blood pump support continuously removes volume from the aortic root, which lowers left ventricular preload, external work (LVEW), and improves end-organ perfusion. However, IARBP support diminishes aortic root pressure and coronary artery. It may also create "coronary steal," which may produce a myocardial hypoxic state adversely affecting patient outcomes. Our objective was to develop IARBP flow modulation algorithms to eliminate coronary steal and improve the myocardial supply-demand ratio without compromising the clinical benefits of restored end-organ perfusion and reduced LVEW. The hemodynamic responses of the native ventricle, coronary, and systemic vasculature to timing and synchronization of IARBP flow modulation (cyclic variation of pump flow) were investigated using a clinical heart failure (HF) computer simulation model. A total of more than 150 combinations of varying pulse widths and time-shifts to modulate IARBP flow were tested at mean IARBP flow rates of 2, 3, and 4 L/min, and compared with HF baseline values (no IARBP support). Increasing IARBP support augmented cardiac output and diminished LVEW. Nonmodulated IARBP support significantly diminished mean diastolic coronary flow (-49%) and myocardial supply-demand ratio (-12%) compared with HF baseline. Intra-aortic rotary blood pump flow modulation increased mean diastolic coronary flow (+17%) and myocardial supply-demand ratio (+24%) compared with nonmodulated IARBP (constant flow). Modulation and synchronization of IARBP support augmented coronary artery perfusion and myocardial supply-demand ratio in simulated clinical HF while also restoring end-organ perfusion and reducing LVEW. Implementation of IARBP support with flow modulation may prevent myocardial hypoxia and improve patient outcomes. However, even with flow modulation, IARBP support provides a smaller improvement in myocardial supply demand ratio compared to ventricular assist devices and intra-aortic balloon pumps.

Destination therapy: one-year outcomes in patients with a body mass index greater than 30.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are slowly gaining acceptance as the treatment of choice in appropriately selected patients with end-stage heart failure who are not transplant candidates. Obesity is a well-known risk factor for increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and frequently can be the reason some patients are turned down for heart transplantation. Because of this experience in transplant patients, many centers have also been reluctant to offer these patients an LVAD for destination therapy (DT). Subsequently, the 1-year outcomes of obese patients receiving LVADs for DT at our center were reviewed. Fifty-eight consecutive patients (83% men) were implanted with HeartMate XVE (n = 22) or HeartMate II (n = 36) LVAD. Patients were divided into normal (body mass index [BMI] or= 30 kg/m(2), n = 20) groups according to their BMI. Preoperatively, there were statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between normal and obese groups in age (65.9 years vs. 54.7 years), weight (72.9 kg vs. 107.5 kg), BMI (24.1 kg/m(2) vs. 35.2 kg/m(2)), and incidence of diabetes (37% vs. 60%). At 1-year follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.5) between normal and obese groups: creatinine levels (1.4 vs. 1.5), New York Heart Association classification (1.2 vs. 1.6), and survival (63% vs. 65%). Our initial results demonstrate that morbidly obese patients with end-stage heart failure with a contraindication for transplant may successfully undergo implantation of an LVAD for DT.