Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39242015

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To rank commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing pain in osteoarthritis trials according to their assay sensitivity, defined as the ability of a PROM to distinguish an effective from a less effective intervention or placebo, proposing a hierarchy for PROM selection in trials and data-extraction in meta-analyses. DESIGN: Analysis of trials with placebo, sham, or non-intervention control that included ≥100 patients per arm with knee/hip osteoarthritis, reporting treatment effects on ≥2 pain PROMs. Treatment effects from all PROMs were standardized on a 0-100 scale. Negative mean differences indicated a larger effect of the experimental treatment compared to control. We ranked PROMs by assay sensitivity using a Bayesian multi-outcome synthesis random-effects model. RESULTS: 135 trials comprising 57,141 participants were included. The ranking of PROMs from highest to lowest assay sensitivity was as follows: pain overall, pain on stairs, pain at night, pain on walking, pain at rest, WOMAC pain, WOMAC global, Lequesne index. Pain overall, the highest-ranked PROM, had a pooled mean difference of -6.96 (95%CrI -7.94, -6.02), while WOMAC pain, the most reported PROM in our study, had a pooled mean difference of -4.90 (95%CrI -5.55, -4.26). The pooled ratio of mean differences between pain overall and WOMAC pain was 1.42 (95%CrI 1.30, 1.55), representing a 42% larger effect size with pain overall. CONCLUSIONS: Pain overall has better assay sensitivity than other pain PROMs. Investigators should consider the hierarchy proposed in this study to guide PROM selection in osteoarthritis clinical trials and data extraction in osteoarthritis meta-analyses.

2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39265924

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular interventions for knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) through a systematic review and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis. DESIGN: We searched CENTRAL and regulatory agency websites (inception-2023) for large, English-language, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (≥100 patients/group) examining any intra-articular intervention. PRIMARY OUTCOME: pain intensity. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: physical function and safety outcomes. Pain and function outcomes were analyzed at 2,6,12,24, and 52 weeks post-randomization, and presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs) (95% credible intervals, 95%CrI). The prespecified minimal clinically important between-group difference (MID) was -0.37 SMD. Safety outcomes were presented as odds ratios (OR) (95%CrI). FINDINGS: Among 57 RCTs (22,795 participants) examining 18 intra-articular interventions, usual care or placebo, treatment effects were larger in high-risk-of-bias trials (n = 35) than low/unclear-risk-of-bias trials (n = 22). In the main analysis (excluding high-risk-of-bias trials), triamcinolone had the highest probabilities of reaching the MID at weeks 2-6 (75.3% and 90%, respectively) with corresponding SMDs of -0.48 (95%CrI,-0.85 to -0.10) and -0.53 (95%CrI,-0.79 to -0.27) compared to placebo. Tr14/Ze14 homeopathic product showed therapeutic potential at week 6 compared to placebo (SMD:-0.42, 95%CrI,-0.71 to -0.11, 63.5% probability of reaching the MID). Hyaluronic acid had higher risk of dropouts due to adverse events (OR:2.01, 95%CrI,1.08 to 3.77) and serious adverse events (OR:1.86, 95%CrI,1.16 to 3.03) than placebo. CONCLUSION: Triamcinolone had the highest probabilities to have a treatment effect beyond the MID at weeks 2-6. Large RCTs with lower risk of bias do not support the notion that 16 other intra-articular interventions assessed improve pain or function beyond placebo effects in knee or hip OA. Lack of evidence of long-term effectiveness underscores the need for further research beyond 24-52 weeks.

3.
Can J Diabetes ; 46(3): 269-276.e2, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35568428

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a common acute life-threatening complication of poorly controlled diabetes mellitus contributing to considerable mortality and morbidity. Use of standardized treatment protocols improves patient outcomes in the emergency department (ED) for many conditions, but variability in adult DKA treatment protocols has not been assessed across EDs. In this study, we compared DKA treatment protocols from adult EDs across Canada to highlight inconsistencies in recommended DKA management. METHODS: ED staff in Canada were solicited for their treatment protocols used to guide acute ED DKA management. Information regarding initial fluid resuscitation and maintenance fluid, potassium replacement, insulin therapy and bicarbonate administration was abstracted from each protocol, collated in a table and compared. RESULTS: Thirty-six unique protocols were obtained representing 85 institutions (40 urban and 45 rural, with a 65.1% response rate) across Canada, with no protocol use for 4 urban centres. Similarities in protocols included the intravenous insulin infusion rate and instructions for switching to subcutaneous insulin. Variability was noted in the rate, amount and type of fluid bolus given (0.5 to 2 L of normal saline or Ringer's lactate over 15 minutes to 2 hours), the criteria determining the amount, potassium supplementation at normo/hypokalemic ranges, when to add dextrose to maintenance fluid, insulin bolus inclusion and bicarbonate administration. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comparison of adult DKA treatment protocols in Canada. Although several common approaches were identified, variability was found in initial fluid boluses, initial insulin bolus and role of bicarbonate, necessitating further study to ensure local DKA protocols reflect current evidence-based best practices for optimal patient clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Cetoacidosis Diabética , Adulto , Bicarbonatos/uso terapéutico , Canadá/epidemiología , Protocolos Clínicos , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Cetoacidosis Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Cetoacidosis Diabética/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Potasio/uso terapéutico
4.
BMJ ; 375: n2321, 2021 10 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34642179

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of different preparations and doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, and paracetamol for knee and hip osteoarthritis pain and physical function to enable effective and safe use of these drugs at their lowest possible dose. DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, Embase, regulatory agency websites, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 28 June 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised trials published in English with ≥100 patients per group that evaluated NSAIDs, opioids, or paracetamol (acetaminophen) to treat osteoarthritis. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The prespecified primary outcome was pain. Physical function and safety outcomes were also assessed. REVIEW METHODS: Two reviewers independently extracted outcomes data and evaluated the risk of bias of included trials. Bayesian random effects models were used for network meta-analysis of all analyses. Effect estimates are comparisons between active treatments and oral placebo. RESULTS: 192 trials comprising 102 829 participants examined 90 different active preparations or doses (68 for NSAIDs, 19 for opioids, and three for paracetamol). Five oral preparations (diclofenac 150 mg/day, etoricoxib 60 and 90 mg/day, and rofecoxib 25 and 50 mg/day) had ≥99% probability of more pronounced treatment effects than the minimal clinically relevant reduction in pain. Topical diclofenac (70-81 and 140-160 mg/day) had ≥92.3% probability, and all opioids had ≤53% probability of more pronounced treatment effects than the minimal clinically relevant reduction in pain. 18.5%, 0%, and 83.3% of the oral NSAIDs, topical NSAIDs, and opioids, respectively, had an increased risk of dropouts due to adverse events. 29.8%, 0%, and 89.5% of oral NSAIDs, topical NSAIDs, and opioids, respectively, had an increased risk of any adverse event. Oxymorphone 80 mg/day had the highest risk of dropouts due to adverse events (51%) and any adverse event (88%). CONCLUSIONS: Etoricoxib 60 mg/day and diclofenac 150 mg/day seem to be the most effective oral NSAIDs for pain and function in patients with osteoarthritis. However, these treatments are probably not appropriate for patients with comorbidities or for long term use because of the slight increase in the risk of adverse events. Additionally, an increased risk of dropping out due to adverse events was found for diclofenac 150 mg/day. Topical diclofenac 70-81 mg/day seems to be effective and generally safer because of reduced systemic exposure and lower dose, and should be considered as first line pharmacological treatment for knee osteoarthritis. The clinical benefit of opioid treatment, regardless of preparation or dose, does not outweigh the harm it might cause in patients with osteoarthritis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO number CRD42020213656.


Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/tratamiento farmacológico , Acetaminofén/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Administración Tópica , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diferencia Mínima Clínicamente Importante , Metaanálisis en Red , Manejo del Dolor/métodos
5.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(18): e019918, 2021 09 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34514812

RESUMEN

Background This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in reducing the incidence of mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods and Results We conducted a Bayesian meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors with placebo. We used meta-regression to examine the association between treatment effects and control group event rates as measures of cardiovascular baseline risk. Fifty-three randomized controlled trials were included in our synthesis. Empagliflozin, canagliflozin, and dapagliflozin reduced the incidence of all-cause mortality (empagliflozin: rate ratio [RR], 0.79; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 0.63-0.97; canagliflozin: RR, 0.86; 95% CrI, 0.69-1.05; dapagliflozin: RR, 0.86; 95% CrI, 0.72-1.01) and cardiovascular mortality (empagliflozin: RR, 0.78; 95% CrI, 0.61-1.00; canagliflozin: RR, 0.83; 95% CrI, 0.63-1.05; dapagliflozin: RR, 0.88; 95% CrI, 0.71-1.08), with a 90.1% to 98.7% probability for the true RR to be <1.00 for both outcomes. There was little evidence for ertugliflozin and sotagliflozin versus placebo for reducing all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. There was no association between treatment effects for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and the control group event rates. There was evidence for a reduction in the incidence of heart failure for empagliflozin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and ertugliflozin versus placebo (probability RR <1.00 of ≥99.3%) and weaker, albeit positive, evidence for acute myocardial infarction for the first 3 agents (probability RR <1.00 of 89.0%-95.2%). There was little evidence of any agent except canagliflozin for reducing the incidence of stroke. Conclusions Empagliflozin, canagliflozin, and dapagliflozin reduced the incidence of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality versus placebo. Treatment effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors versus placebo do not vary by baseline risk.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Teorema de Bayes , Canagliflozina/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucosa , Humanos , Sodio
6.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 29(4): 1198-1209, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29436516

RESUMEN

Nonobstructive hydronephrosis, defined as dilatation of the renal pelvis with or without dilatation of the ureter, is the most common antenatal abnormality detected by fetal ultrasound. Yet, the etiology of nonobstructive hydronephrosis is poorly defined. We previously demonstrated that defective development of urinary tract pacemaker cells (utPMCs) expressing hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 3 (HCN3) and the stem cell marker cKIT causes abnormal ureteric peristalsis and nonobstructive hydronephrosis. However, further investigation of utPMC development and function is limited by lack of knowledge regarding the embryonic derivation, development, and molecular apparatus of these cells. Here, we used lineage tracing in mice to identify cells that give rise to utPMCs. Neural crest cells (NCCs) indelibly labeled with tdTomato expressed HCN3 and cKIT. Furthermore, purified HCN3+ and cKIT+ utPMCs were enriched in Sox10 and Tfap-2α, markers of NCCs. Sequencing of purified RNA from HCN3+ cells revealed enrichment of a small subset of RNAs, including RNA encoding protein kinase 2ß (PTK2ß), a Ca2+-dependent tyrosine kinase that regulates ion channel activity in neurons. Immunofluorescence analysis in situ revealed PTK2ß expression in NCCs as early as embryonic day 12.5 and in HCN3+ and cKIT+ utPMCs as early as embryonic day 15.5, with sustained expression in HCN3+ utPMCs until postnatal week 8. Pharmacologic inhibition of PTK2ß in murine pyeloureteral tissue explants inhibited contraction frequency. Together, these results demonstrate that utPMCs are derived from NCCs, identify new markers of utPMCs, and demonstrate a functional contribution of PTK2ß to utPMC function.


Asunto(s)
Quinasa 2 de Adhesión Focal/fisiología , Regulación del Desarrollo de la Expresión Génica , Células Intersticiales de Cajal/enzimología , Pelvis Renal/fisiología , Cresta Neural/enzimología , Peristaltismo/fisiología , Uréter/fisiología , Animales , Antígenos de Diferenciación/análisis , Quinasa 2 de Adhesión Focal/biosíntesis , Quinasa 2 de Adhesión Focal/genética , Genes Reporteros , Edad Gestacional , Hidronefrosis/enzimología , Hidronefrosis/fisiopatología , Canales Regulados por Nucleótidos Cíclicos Activados por Hiperpolarización/análisis , Células Intersticiales de Cajal/fisiología , Pelvis Renal/citología , Pelvis Renal/embriología , Pelvis Renal/crecimiento & desarrollo , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones Transgénicos , Cresta Neural/fisiología , Canales de Potasio/análisis , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-kit/análisis , ARN Mensajero/biosíntesis , Factores de Transcripción SOXE/análisis , Transducción de Señal , Factor de Transcripción AP-2/análisis , Uréter/citología , Uréter/embriología , Uréter/crecimiento & desarrollo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA