Estimation of post-therapeutic liver reserve capacity using 99mTc-GSA scintigraphy prior to carbon-ion radiotherapy for liver tumors.

BACKGROUND: There is currently no established imaging method for assessing liver reserve capacity prior to carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for liver tumors. In order to perform safe CIRT, it is essential to estimate the post-therapeutic residual reserve capacity of the liver. PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of pre-treatment 99mTc-galactosyl human serum albumin (99mTc-GSA) scintigraphy to accurately estimate the residual liver reserve capacity in patients treated with CIRT for liver tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated patients who were performed CIRT for liver tumors between December 2018 and September 2020 and underwent 99mTc-GSA scintigraphy before and 3 months after CIRT, and gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI within 1 month before CIRT were evaluated. The maximal removal rate of 99mTc-GSA (GSA-Rmax) was analyzed for the evaluation of pre-treatment liver reserve capacity. Then, the GSA-Rmax of the estimated residual liver (GSA-RL) was calculated using liver SPECT images fused with the Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. GSA-RL before CIRT and GSA-Rmax at 3 months after CIRT were compared using non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 50 patients were included (mean age ± standard deviation, 73 years ± 11; range, 29-89 years, 35 men). The median GSA-RL was 0.393 [range, 0.057-0.729] mg/min, and the median GSA-Rmax after CIRT was 0.369 [range, 0.037-0.780] mg/min (P = .40). The linear regression equation representing the relationship between the GSA-RL and GSA-Rmax after CIRT was y = 0.05 + 0.84x (R2 = 0.67, P < .0001). There was a linear relationship between the estimated and actual post-treatment values for all patients, as well as in the group with impaired liver reserve capacity (y = - 0.02 + 1.09x (R2 = 0.62, P = .0005)). CONCLUSIONS: 99mTc-GSA scintigraphy has potential clinical utility for estimating the residual liver reserve capacity in patients undergoing carbon-ion radiotherapy for liver tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000038328, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000043545 .

Correction method for the physical dose calculated using Clarkson integration at the center of the spread-out Bragg peak for asymmetric field in carbon-ion radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: We previously proposed a calculation method using Clarkson integration to obtain the physical dose at the center of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) for a treatment beam, the measurement point of which agrees with the isocenter [Tajiri et al. Med. Phys. 2013; 40: 071733-1-5]. However, at the measurement point which does not agree with the isocenter, the physical dose calculated by this method might have a large error. For this error, we propose a correction method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To confirm whether the error can be corrected using in-air off axis ratio (OAR), we measured the physical dose at the center of an asymmetric square field and a symmetric square field and in-air OAR. For beams of which the measurement point does not agree with the isocenter, as applied to prostate cancer patients, the physical dose calculated using Clarkson integration was corrected with in-air OAR. RESULTS: The maximum difference between the physical dose measured at the center of an asymmetric square field and the product of in-air OAR and the physical dose at the center of a symmetric square field was - 0.12%. For beams as applied to prostate cancer patients, the differences between the measured physical doses and the physical doses corrected using in-air OAR were -0.17 ± 0.23%. CONCLUSIONS: The physical dose at the measurement point which does not agree with the isocenter, can be obtained from in-air OAR at the isocenter plane and the physical dose at the center of the SOBP on the beam axis.

First experience of carbon-ion radiotherapy for early breast cancer.

Breast cancer is increasingly being detected at earlier stages, and partial breast irradiation for patients with low-risk-group tumor has come to be applied in the US and Europe as an alternative to whole-breast irradiation. Based on those experiences, some institutes have tried using particle beams for partial breast irradiation for postoperative or radical intent for early breast cancer, but technical difficulties have hindered its progress. The National Institute of Radiological Sciences has been preparing for carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) with radical intent for stage I breast cancer since 2011, and we carried out the first treatment in April 2013. In this case report, we explain our first experience of C-ion RT as a treatment procedure for breast tumor and present the radiation techniques and preliminary treatment results as a reference for other institutes trying to perform the same kind of treatment.

Calculation method using Clarkson integration for the physical dose at the center of the spread-out Bragg peak in carbon-ion radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: In broad-beam carbon-ion radiotherapy performed using the heavy-ion medical accelerator in Chiba, the number of monitor units is determined by measuring the physical dose at the center of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) for the treatment beam. The total measurement time increases as the number of treatment beams increases, which hinders the treatment of an increased number of patients. Hence, Kusano et al. [Jpn. J. Med. Phys. 23(Suppl. 2), 65-68 (2003)] proposed a method to calculate the physical dose at the center of the SOBP for a treatment beam. Based on a recent study, the authors here propose a more accurate calculation method. METHODS: The authors measured the physical dose at the center of the SOBP while varying the circular field size and range-shifter thickness. The authors obtained the physical dose at the center of the SOBP for an irregularly shaped beam using Clarkson integration based on these measurements. RESULTS: The difference between the calculated and measured physical doses at the center of the SOBP varied with a change in the central angle of the sector segment. The differences between the calculated and measured physical doses at the center of the SOBP were within ± 1% for all irregularly shaped beams that were used to validate the calculation method. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of the proposed method depends on both the number of angular intervals used for Clarkson integration and the fineness of the basic data used for calculations: sampling numbers for the field size and thickness of the range shifter. If those parameters are properly chosen, the authors can obtain a calculated monitor unit number with high accuracy sufficient for clinical applications.

Evaluation of beam wobbling methods for heavy-ion radiotherapy.

The National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) has extensively studied carbon-ion radiotherapy at the Heavy-Ion Medical Accelerator in Chiba (HIMAC) with some positive outcomes, and has established its efficacy. Therefore, efforts to distribute the therapy to the general public should be made, for which it is essential to enable direct application of clinical and technological experiences obtained at NIRS. For widespread use, it is very important to reduce the cost through facility downsizing with minimal acceleration energy to deliver the HIMAC-equivalent clinical beams. For the beam delivery system, the requirement of miniaturization is translated to reduction in length while maintaining the clinically available field size and penetration range for range-modulated uniform broad beams of regular fields that are either circular or square for simplicity. In this paper, we evaluate the various wobbling methods including original improvements, especially for application to the compact facilities through the experimental and computational studies. The single-ring wobbling method used at HIMAC is the best one including a lot of experience at HIMAC but the residual range is a fatal problem in the case of a compact facility. On the other hand, uniform wobbling methods such as the spiral and zigzag wobbling methods are effective and suitable for a compact facility. Furthermore, these methods can be applied for treatment with passive range modulation including respiratory gated irradiation. In theory, the choice between the spiral and zigzag wobbling methods depends on the shape of the required irradiation field. However, we found that it is better to use the zigzag wobbling method with transformation of the wobbling pattern even when a circular uniform irradiation field is required, because it is difficult to maintain the stability of the wobbler magnet due to the rapid change of the wobbler current in the spiral wobbling method. The regulated wobbling method, which is our improvement, can well expand the uniform irradiation field and lead to reducing the power requirement of the wobbler magnets. Our evaluations showed that the regulated zigzag wobbling method is the most suitable method for use in currently designed compact carbon-therapy facilities.