Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 30(2): e13366, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33174657

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Skin neoplasms are the most frequent malignant lesions, increasing patient's morbidity when associated with skin field cancerisation. There is a need to understand the current therapies, both clinical and surgical. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guideline, registered in PROSPERO: CRD42018114826, including studies from 2012 to 2019. RESULTS: Seven hundred and eighty-two studies were found, of which 21 were included. Of these, 8 primary studies were randomised controlled trials: fractional CO2 laser-assisted photodynamic therapy (PDT) vs. PDT (no significance), daylight PDT vs. PDT (no significance, daylight PDT had less adverse effects), trichloroacetic acid peel vs. 5-aminolaevulinic acid PDT (clinical improvement of aminolaevulinic acid PDT), 5-Fluorouracil 0.5%/Salicylic Acid 10% vs. vehicle (clinical improvement of 5-Fluorouracil 0.5%/Salicylic Acid 10%), photolyase vs. sun filters (no significance), sunscreens vs. sunscreens plus DNA repair enzymes (DNA Repair Enzymes was more effective in reducing field cancerisation). Only one systematic review was included in which there was effectiveness of daylight PDT in the treatment of actinic keratoses. The other 12 included studies had a lower level of evidence including surgical studies. CONCLUSION: Clinical studies are more relevant in the treatment of the field cancerisation. There is a lack of surgical studies.


Asunto(s)
Queratosis Actínica , Fotoquimioterapia , Ácido Aminolevulínico/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Queratosis Actínica/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/uso terapéutico , Protectores Solares , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Australas J Dermatol ; 56(3): e77-9, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25715880

RESUMEN

The ear is one of the most common sites of keloid formation, usually associated with the wearing of earrings. However, although this is a small perforating lesion that is equal on both sides, keloids are bigger and more prevalent on the posterior surface. In this study, 141 keloids were evaluated, most of which were located on the posterior surface of the earlobe and caused by the piercing of the ear. Most of the earrings and piercing jewellery used had metallic backs. The more frequent occurrence of earlobe keloids on the posterior surface of the ear therefore may be associated with the exacerbation of local neurogenic inflammation caused by the metallic backs.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Oído/etiología , Joyas/efectos adversos , Queloide/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Perforación del Cuerpo/efectos adversos , Niño , Oído Externo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA