Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Headache Pain ; 25(1): 90, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825722

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have shown good efficacy in migraine prophylaxis. However, a subset of patients does not respond to the first mAb treatment and switches among the available mAbs. The goal of this study is to characterize the switching pattern of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP(-receptor, -R) mAbs, and to describe the headache burden of those who did not switch, switched once, and switched twice. METHODS: This study used real world data from the NeuroTransData Cohort, a registry of migraine patients treated at outpatient neurology clinics across Germany. Patients who had received at least one anti-CGRP(-R) mAb were included. Headache diaries were collected at baseline and during treatment, along with quality of life measures every three months. Results were summarized for the subgroups of patients who did not switch and those with one and two switches. RESULTS: Of the 655 eligible patients, 479 did not switch, 135 switched once, 35 twice, and 6 three or more times. The ≥ 50% response rates for monthly migraine days were 64.7%, 50.7%, and 25.0% for the no switch, one switch, and two switches groups in their last treatment cycles, respectively. Quality of life measures improved for the no switch and one switch groups, but not for the two switches group. CONCLUSION: Patients who switched among anti-CGRP(-R) mAbs during the course of their treatment still benefited overall but to a lesser extent than those who did not switch. Treatment response in patients who switched twice was markedly lower compared to the no switch and one switch subgroup.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina , Trastornos Migrañosos , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/inmunología , Femenino , Masculino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Alemania/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina/inmunología , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/administración & dosificación , Calidad de Vida , Sustitución de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Costo de Enfermedad , Receptores de Péptido Relacionado con el Gen de Calcitonina/inmunología , Receptores de Péptido Relacionado con el Gen de Calcitonina/metabolismo
2.
BMC Fam Pract ; 22(1): 54, 2021 03 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33743604

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Migraine affects 80.8 million people in Western Europe and is the first cause of disability among people between ages 15 and 49 worldwide. Despite being a highly prevalent and disabling condition, migraine remains under-diagnosed and poorly managed. METHODS: An international, online survey was conducted among 201 general practitioners (GPs) from 5 European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK) who are experienced in the management of headache disorders. RESULTS: The majority of GPs (82%) did not refer patients with chronic migraine (CM) to migraine specialists. Among those patients, the participants estimated that around 55% received preventive medication. Some differences between countries were observed regarding referral rate and prescription of preventive treatment. Most GPs (87%) reported a lack of training or the need to be updated on CM management. Accordingly, 95% of GPs considered that a migraine anamnesis guide could be of use. Overall, more than 95% of GPs favoured the use of a patient diary, a validated diagnostic tool and a validated scale to assess impact of migraine on patients' daily life. Similarly, 96% of the GPs considered that the inclusion of warning features (red flags) in an anamnesis guide would be useful and 90% favoured inclusion of referral recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this survey indicate that more education on diagnosis and management of CM is needed in primary care. Better knowledge on the recognition and management of migraine in primary care would improve both prognosis and diagnosis and reduce impact of migraine on patients' lives, healthcare utilization and societal burden.


Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Trastornos Migrañosos , Adolescente , Adulto , Francia , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
3.
BMC Neurol ; 21(1): 1, 2021 Jan 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33390161

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a prevalent and disabling headache disorder that affects more than 1.04 billion individuals world-wide. It can result in reduction in quality of life, increased disability, and high socio-economic burden. Nevertheless, and despite the availability of evidence-based national and international guidelines, the management of migraine patients often remains suboptimal, especially for chronic migraine (CM) patients. METHODS: My-LIFE anamnesis project surveyed 201 General practitioners (GPs) from 5 European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK) with the aim of understanding chronic migraine (CM) patients' management in the primary care setting. RESULTS: In our survey, GPs diagnosed episodic migraine (EM) more often than CM (87% vs 61%, p < 0.001). We found that many CM patients were not properly managed or referred to specialists, in contrast to guidelines recommendations. The main tools used by primary-care physicians included clinical interview, anamnesis guide, and patient diary. Tools used at the first visit differed from those used at follow-up visits. Up to 82% of GPs reported being responsible for management of patients diagnosed with disabling or CM and did not refer them to a specialist. Even when the GP had reported referring CM patients to a specialist, 97% of them were responsible for their follow-up. Moreover, the treatment prescribed, both acute and preventive, was not in accordance with local and international recommendations. GPs reported that they evaluated the efficacy of the treatment prescribed mainly through patient perception, and the frequency of follow-up visits was not clearly established in the primary care setting. These results suggest that CM is underdiagnosed and undertreated; thereby its management is suboptimal in the primary care. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need of guidance in the primary care setting to both leverage the management of CM patients and earlier referral to specialists, when appropriate.


Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adulto , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
4.
J Neurol ; 265(8): 1836-1843, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29948242

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Brain imaging is one of the most important diagnostic methods for evaluating headache during pregnancy. In this study, we aimed to identify anamnestic and clinical predictors for pathological brain imaging findings in pregnant women suffering from acute headache. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 151 pregnant women with acute headache between 2010 and 2016. We screened the medical records of these patients and analyzed radiological variables, including brain imaging frequency and modality, delay to imaging and imaging findings. In patients with brain imaging, we compared several anamnestic and clinical features between those with and without symptomatic pathological findings. RESULTS: Half of the patients (50.3%) underwent brain imaging, mainly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including venography (53.9%) or MRI including both venography and arteriography (31.6%). Symptomatic pathological results could be observed in 27.6% of the patients with a brain scan. Patients in the first trimester with acute headache had a statistically higher risk for a symptomatic pathological imaging finding (p = 0.024). Strong pain intensity, a reduced level of consciousness and seizures were significantly associated with a symptomatic pathological imaging outcome across all stages of pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Brain imaging may reveal a secondary headache etiology in more than 25% of pregnant women presenting with acute headache. In particular, when the acute headache is of severe intensity, and the headache is accompanied by seizures or a change in consciousness, brain imaging is required.


Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Cefalea/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Cefalea/complicaciones , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Case Rep Hematol ; 2013: 958704, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23984126

RESUMEN

Limbic encephalitis is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system characterized by diverse neurologic symptoms including mnestic disturbances, hallucinations, and seizures as well as behavioral symptoms like depression, personality changes, and acute confusional states resembling dementia. Several antibodies have been described in the pathogenesis of limbic encephalitis. It is often a paraneoplastic syndrome associated with small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, or Hodgkin's lymphoma among others. Here, we report a patient with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL), presenting with otherwise unexplained neurologic symptoms consistent with limbic encephalitis. Despite intensive diagnostic procedures, no causing agent could be identified. Pleocytosis consisting of T cells was detected in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). We initiated anti-B-cell therapy with Rituximab for B-CLL with quick and durable resolution of symptoms. We speculate that disruption of interaction between autoreactive T and malignant B cells is responsible for the therapeutic effect of Rituximab.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...