Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Colorectal Cancer ; 16(2): 158-163, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28237539

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether an anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR antibody with standard doublet chemotherapy is the optimal first-line treatment in patients with RAS (KRAS/NRAS) wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Here we outline the PARADIGM study (NCT02394795), designed to evaluate the superiority of panitumumab over bevacizumab, in combination with oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (mFOLFOX6) in patients with RAS wild-type chemotherapy-naïve mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients are aged 20 to 79 years with an ECOG performance status of 0-1 and histologically/cytologically confirmed RAS wild-type mCRC. A total of 800 patients are to be randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab (n = 400) or bevacizumab (n = 400) and stratified according to institution, age (20-64 vs. 65-79 years), and liver metastases (present vs. absent). Each treatment regimen includes oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, l-leucovorin 200 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) I.V. 400 mg/m2 on day 1; 5-FU continuous I.V. 2400 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3; and either panitumumab 6 mg/kg or bevacizumab 5 mg/kg on day 1 every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is overall survival forming the basis to detect a hazard ratio of 0.76 with a 1-sided type I error rate of 0.025 and 80% power. Secondary efficacy endpoints include progression-free survival, response rate, duration of response, and curative resection rate. A comprehensive biomarker analysis (NCT02394834) using archival tumor tissue and circulating tumor DNA samples collected at different time points (pretreatment and confirmed progressive disease) will investigate potential biomarkers related to primary and secondary resistance. The first patient was enrolled in May 2015 and the study is anticipated to complete in 2020.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Proyectos de Investigación , Proteínas ras/genética , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Panitumumab , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
2.
Int J Pharm ; 289(1-2): 69-77, 2005 Jan 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15652200

RESUMEN

Lansoprazole (LPZ) is a representative drug that shows a high inter-subject variation of bioavailability (BA). Solid preparation composed of surfactant, adsorbent and LPZ were prepared to improve the dissolution and absorption of LPZ, and the BA of LPZ was measured in rats and dogs. As surfactant, Tween 80, polyoxy 60 hydrogenated caster oil derivative (HCO-60) and PEG-8 caprylic/capric glycerides (Labrasol) were used. As adsorbant, porous silicon dioxide (Sylysia 550, 320), magnesium aluminometa silicate (Neusilin S2, NS2N, US2) and porous calcium silicate (Florite RE) were used. After small intestinal administration of LPZ, 5.0 mg/kg, solution with HCO-60 showed the highest plasma LPZ concentration versus time curve of which C(max) and AUC was 0.46+/-0.01 microg/mL and 0.73+/-0.03 microgh/mL. By comparing to that after i.v. injection of LPZ solution, 2.0 mg/kg, the BA of LPZ from HCO-60 solution was 39.0%, which was about seven times higher than that of LPZ powder. To solidify the LPZ solution with HCO-60, adsorbents were used and the obtained solid preparations were used for in vitro release experiment. Sylysia 320, Neusilin S2 and Neusilin NS2 showed the T50% of about 1h. To evaluate the BA of these solid preparations, absorption study was performed in rats. Sylysia 550 system showed the higher AUC than other systems, showing the BA of 28.1%. Sylysia 550 system was filled in an enteric capsule and was orally administered to dogs and BA was compared with enteric tablet. The AUC of Sylysia 550 system was 2.16+/-0.26 microgh/mL and was greater than enteric tablet and the BA of 71.7% was obtained. Solid system composed of LPZ, surfactant and adsorbent has suggested the possibility as a good tool to improve the BA of LPZ.


Asunto(s)
Absorción/efectos de los fármacos , Adsorción , Omeprazol/análogos & derivados , Tensoactivos/farmacocinética , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbencimidazoles , Administración Oral , Animales , Área Bajo la Curva , Disponibilidad Biológica , Perros , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Duodeno/efectos de los fármacos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Lansoprazol , Masculino , Omeprazol/sangre , Omeprazol/química , Omeprazol/farmacología , Polvos/administración & dosificación , Polvos/química , Polvos/farmacocinética , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Dióxido de Silicio/administración & dosificación , Dióxido de Silicio/farmacocinética , Soluciones/administración & dosificación , Soluciones/química , Soluciones/farmacocinética , Tensoactivos/química , Tensoactivos/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...