Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg ; 112(10): 436-442, 2018 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30053187

RESUMEN

Background: Rapid diagnostic tests are frequently used in healthcare settings across Nigeria for diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria, which is the commonest form of malaria in the country. In this study, the performance of a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) was compared with expert microscopy using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the reference standard in a tertiary hospital in Jos, Nigeria. Methods: This study was a prospective, cross-sectional, hospital-based study. A total of 200 participants of all ages presenting to Jos University Teaching Hospital with a history of fever or an axillary temperature of >37.5°C were recruited. Blood specimens were collected and malaria testing was done using RDT, microscopy and PCR. Results: The prevalence of malaria in this study was 17%, 15% and 13% by PCR, microscopy and RDT, respectively. Compared with microscopy, RDT had lower sensitivity of 75% (95% CI: 56.60-88.54) vs 88.24% (95% CI: 72.55-96.70), lower specificity of 98.80% (95% CI: 95.72-99.85) vs 100.0% (95% CI: 97.80-100.0), lower positive predictive value 92.31 (95% CI: 74.89-97.97) vs 100 (95% CI: 98.0-100.0), and lower negative predictive value 95.35 (95% CI: 91.83-97.39) versus 97.65 (95% CI: 94.30-99.05). Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of expert microscopy was better than RDT in the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Quality assurance procedures such as using expert microscopy to cross-check a proportion of RDT negative results in patients with clinical features of malaria is desirable.


Asunto(s)
Fiebre/diagnóstico , Malaria Falciparum/diagnóstico , Microscopía , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Fiebre/parasitología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Malaria Falciparum/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nigeria/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Estándares de Referencia , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
2.
PLoS One ; 13(5): e0196224, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29742119

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Disseminated histoplasmosis is an AIDS-defining illness. Histoplasmosis is commonly misdiagnosed as tuberculosis. Nigeria has the second highest number of people living with HIV/AIDS in Africa. The present study was carried out to investigate the prevalence of skin sensitivity amongst Nigerians to histoplasmin. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted in six centres across five geopolitical zones of Nigeria. METHODS: We recruited both healthy non-HIV and HIV-positive adults with CD4 count ≥ 350 cells/mm3 regardless of their ART status from March to May 2017. Skin tests were performed intradermally; induration ≥5 mm were considered to be histoplasmin positive. RESULTS: 750 participants were recruited from Lagos (n = 52), Yola (n = 156), Ilorin (n = 125), Calabar (n = 120), Ibadan (n = 202) and Benin (n = 95). 467 (62.3%) were HIV negative, 247 (32.9%) were HIV positive and 36 (4.8%) did not know their HIV status. A total of 32/735 (4.4%) participants had a positive skin test. Study centre (p<0.001), education (p = 0.002) and age (p = 0.005) appeared to be significantly associated with positive skin reactivity at the 0.5% significance level, while sex (p = 0.031) and occupation (p = 0.031) would have been significant at the 5% significance level. Males had a higher rate of reactivity than females (p = 0.031, 7% vs 3%). The highest positive rates were recorded from Benin City (13/86 (15%)) and Calabar (7/120 (6%)) and no positives were recorded in Lagos (p<0.001). HIV status was not statistically significant (p = 0.70). CONCLUSION: Histoplasmosis diagnostics should be included in the Nigerian HIV guidelines. Epidemiological vigilance of progressive disseminated histoplasmosis should be considered by local health authorities.


Asunto(s)
Histoplasmina/análisis , Histoplasmosis/diagnóstico , Histoplasmosis/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nigeria , Pruebas Cutáneas , Adulto Joven
3.
PLoS One ; 11(10): e0165242, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27776162

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infections are common complications in critically ill patients with associated significant morbidity and mortality. AIM: This study determined the prevalence, risk factors, clinical outcome and microbiological profile of hospital-acquired infections in the intensive care unit of a Nigerian tertiary hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study, patients were recruited and followed up between September 2011 and July 2012 until they were either discharged from the ICU or died. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates was done using CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were recruited with a 45% healthcare associated infection rate representing an incidence rate of 79/1000 patient-days in the intensive care unit. Bloodstream infections (BSI) 49.0% (22/71) and urinary tract infections (UTI) 35.6% (16/71) were the most common infections with incidence rates of 162.9/1000 patient-days and 161.6/1000 patient-days respectively. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common cause of BSIs, responsible for 18.2% of cases, while Candida spp. was the commonest cause of urinary tract infections, contributing 25.0% of cases. Eighty percent (8/10) of the Staphylococcus isolates were methicillin-resistant. Gram-negative multidrug bacteria accounted for 57.1% of organisms isolated though they were not ESBL-producing. Use of antibiotics (OR = 2.98; p = 0.03) and surgery (OR = 3.15, p< 0.05) in the month preceding ICU admission as well as urethral catheterization (OR = 5.38; p<0.05) and endotracheal intubation (OR = 5.78; p< 0.05) were risk factors for infection. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that healthcare associated infections is a significant risk factor for ICU-mortality and morbidity even after adjusting for APACHE II score.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Hospitales Universitarios/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/patología , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Humanos , Incidencia , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Nigeria , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...