Minimal disseminated disease evaluation and outcome in trilateral retinoblastoma.

Trilateral retinoblastoma (TRb) presents a management challenge, since intracranial tumours are seldom times resectable and quickly disseminate. However, there are no risk factors to predict the final outcome in each patient. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate minimal disseminated disease (MDD) in the bone marrow (BM) and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at diagnosis and during follow-up and reviewing its potential impact in the outcome of patients with TRb. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We evaluated MDD in five patients with TRb, detecting the mRNA of CRX and/or GD2, in samples from BM and CSF, obtained at diagnosis, follow-up and relapse. RESULTS: Treatment involved intensive systemic chemotherapy in four patients, one did not receive this treatment and died of progression of the disease. Two patients underwent stem cell rescue. Three patients had leptomeningeal relapse and died. One patient remains disease-free for 84 months. RB1 mutations were identified in the five patients, all of them were null mutations. At diagnosis, one patient had tumour cells in the CSF, and none had the BM involved. Only one case of four presented MDD during follow-up in the CSF, without concomitant detection in the BM. On leptomeningeal relapse, no case had MDD in the BM. In all these cases, cells in the CSF were positive for GD2 and/or CRX. CONCLUSION: CSF dissemination always concluded in the death of the patient, without concomitant systemic dissemination denoting the importance of increasing treatment directed to the CSF compartment. The MDD presence could indicate a forthcoming relapse.

Growth of Uveal Melanoma following Intravitreal Bevacizumab.

PURPOSE: Typically treatment of large melanomas (by Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study criteria) is restricted to enucleation, due to size constraints for plaque brachytherapy. Because primary and metastatic uveal melanoma cells are inhibited by bevacizumab (an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor), this prospective study evaluated the impact of intravitreal bevacizumab on large uveal melanomas that were destined for enucleation. Size reduction by bevacizumab would potentially salvage these eyes by making them eligible for treatment with plaque brachytherapy. PROCEDURES: Two patients with large uveal melanoma were each treated with one intravitreous injection of bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL). RESULTS: Both tumors displayed paradoxical growth 1 week following the injection, with confirmed growth 1 week later (increase from baseline of 1.1 mm in one eye and 3.1 mm in the other eye). Both eyes were enucleated and monosomy 3 and vasculogenic mimicry patterns were identified in both tumors. At 9 years follow-up, both patients were alive and metastasis free. CONCLUSION: These patients demonstrate that neoadjuvant intravitreous bevacizumab does not decrease the size of large uveal melanomas and may, in fact, result in their paradoxical growth. This observation supports a cautious approach in the use of intravitreous bevacizumab for uveal melanoma, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting.

Retinoblastoma Vitreous Seed Clouds (Class 3): A Comparison of Treatment with Ophthalmic Artery Chemosurgery with or without Intravitreous and Periocular Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of treating class 3 retinoblastoma vitreous seeds with ophthalmic artery chemosurgery (OAC) alone versus OAC with intravitreous chemotherapy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Forty eyes containing clouds (class 3 vitreous seeds) of 40 retinoblastoma patients (19 treated with OAC alone and 21 treated with OAC plus intravitreous and periocular chemotherapy). METHODS: Ocular survival, disease-free survival and time to regression of seeds were estimated with Kaplan-Meier estimates. Ocular toxicity was evaluated by clinical findings and electroretinography: 30-Hz flicker responses were compared at baseline and last follow-up visit. Continuous variables were compared with Student t test, and categorical variables were compared with the Fisher exact test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ocular survival, disease-free survival, and time to regression of seeds. RESULTS: There were no disease- or treatment-related deaths and no patient demonstrated externalization of tumor or metastatic disease. There was no significant difference in the age, laterality, disease, or disease status (treatment naïve vs. previously treated) between the 2 groups. The time to regression of seeds was significantly shorter for eyes treated with OAC plus intravitreous chemotherapy (5.7 months) compared with eyes treated with OAC alone (14.6 months; P < 0.001). The 18-month Kaplan-Meier estimates of disease-free survival were significantly worse for the OAC alone group: 67.1% (95% confidence interval, 40.9%-83.6%) versus 94.1% (95% confidence interval, 65%-99.1%) for the OAC plus intravitreous chemotherapy group (P = 0.05). The 36-month Kaplan-Meier estimates of ocular survival were 83.3% (95% confidence interval, 56.7%-94.3%) for the OAC alone group and 100% for the OAC plus intravitreous chemotherapy group (P = 0.16). The mean change in electroretinography responses was not significantly different between groups, decreasing by 11 µV for the OAC alone group and 22 µV for the OAC plus intravitreous chemotherapy group (P = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Treating vitreous seed clouds with OAC and intravitreous and periocular chemotherapy, compared with OAC alone, resulted in a shorter time to regression and was associated with fewer recurrences requiring additional treatment and fewer enucleations. The toxicity to the retina does not seem to be significantly worse in the OAC plus intravitreous chemotherapy group.

Intraocular Pressure Changes Following Intravitreal Melphalan and Topotecan for the Treatment of Retinoblastoma With Vitreous Seeding.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of intravitreal chemotherapy on intraocular pressure (IOP) in children with retinoblastoma. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 10 eyes of 10 patients with retinoblastoma (7 males, 3 females, mean age: 33.6 ± 9.4 months) with vitreous seeding injected with intravitreal melphalan and topotecan. IOP was measured with Tonopen (Reichert, Inc., Buffalo, NY) at baseline prior to injecting and then repeatedly following each intravitreal injection. RESULTS: Mean pre-injection IOP was 8.2 ± 2.3 mm Hg (range: 4 to 12 mm Hg). Mean IOP 1 to 30 seconds after intravitreal melphalan (first injection) was 45.4 ± 14.3 mm Hg. The IOP of 89.5% of patients declined to 29 mm Hg or less in a mean 153.3 ± 97.5 seconds. Mean IOP 1 to 30 seconds after intravitreal topotecan (second injection) was 44.5 ± 11.0 mm Hg, which decreased to 31.0 ± 5.0 mm Hg by 150 seconds after injection. No significant relationship was found between age and post-injection IOP elevation. IOP exceeded the calculated mean arterial perfusion pressure in four encounters. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal chemotherapy caused a transient rise in IOP. Post-injection IOP elevations can reach levels that may exceed mean arterial pressure. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2017;54(3):185-190.].