Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Respir Med Res ; 81: 100898, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35526320

RESUMEN

The therapeutic management strategy is based on the regular evaluation of the control of asthmatic disease, with an effective minimum dose research and the assessment of environmental factors, not to mention the important place of therapeutic education. These professional recommendations relate to the management and follow-up of adult and adolescent asthma patients aged 12 and over. The recommendations answer the following questions: 1. How to make the initial diagnosis of asthma? 2. What allergological check-up should be done in asthmatics 3. How to manage an asthma exacerbation? 4. How to manage difficult asthma? 5. What therapeutic strategies? 6. How to manage a woman's asthma during pregnancy? 7. Environmental factors in asthma management review.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Neumología , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/terapia , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Embarazo , Sociedades
2.
Respir Med Res ; 80: 100864, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34773824

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of epidemiological data on asthma classified by disease severity in France. The ASTHMAPOP cross-sectional study aimed to review the prevalence and current management of asthma in people aged ≥18 years in France. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to 19 676 people representative of the French population in age, gender, region, and socio-economic status. Asthma was classified by treatment steps per the 2017 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) report, according to prescribed treatments. Analyses were mostly descriptive. RESULTS: The questionnaire return rate was 81.7% (n = 16 083), and 15 587 questionnaires were analyzed. The prevalence of lifetime asthma was 12.8% (95% confidence interval (CI):12.3-13.3%; n = 1 989) in 2018. The prevalence of current asthma (i.e., 12 months before the survey) was 6.4% (95% CI: 6.0-6.8%; n = 993); most of these respondents (95.3% [n = 946]) were receiving asthma treatment, and 49.4% (n = 491) were treated for mild asthma (GINA step 1 or 2). Of people with current asthma, 47.6% reported ≥1 asthma exacerbation in the past 12 months-defined as episodes (several days) during which symptoms (cough, sputum, and dyspnea) were worse than usual; 14.3% had ≥1 emergency visit, and 3.1% had ≥1 hospitalization due to asthma. Of those taking continuous asthma controller medications who answered all Morisky Medication Adherence Scale questions (n = 501), 46.4% were adherent (score=4) to their treatment regimen. Based on the 6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire scores, asthma was partially controlled or uncontrolled in 47.7% of 969 people. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of asthma in France has remained stable since 2006, but levels of asthma control and treatment adherence continue to be relatively poor. Asthma management in France requires improvement.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Prevalencia , Autoinforme , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Eur Respir J ; 56(1)2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32457198
4.
Eur Respir J ; 52(4)2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30262574

RESUMEN

The anti-tumour and anti-metastatic properties of heparins have not been tested in patients with early stage cancer. Whether adjuvant low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) tinzaparin impacts the survival of patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was investigated.Patients with completely resected stage I, II or IIIA NSCLC were randomly allocated to receive subcutaneous tinzaparin 100 IU·kg-1 once a day for 12 weeks or no treatment in addition to standard of care. The trial was open-label with blinded central adjudication of study outcomes. The primary outcome was overall survival.In 549 patients randomised to tinzaparin (n=269) or control (n=280), mean±sd age was 61.6±8.9 years, 190 (34.6%) patients had stage II-III disease, and 220 (40.1%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 5.7 years. There was no significant difference in overall survival between groups (hazard ratio (HR) 1.24, 95% CI 0.92-1.68; p=0.17). There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of recurrence between groups (subdistribution HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.68-1.30; p=0.70).Adjuvant tinzaparin had no detectable impact on overall and recurrence-free survival of patients with completely resected stage I-IIIA NSCLC. These results do not support further clinical evaluation of LMWHs as anti-tumour agents.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tinzaparina/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...