Association of the risk of obstructive sleep apnoea with the severity of COVID-19.

Patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) have a worse prognosis than COVID-19 patients without OSA. This study aimed to examine the relationship between OSA risk and the severity of COVID-19 in patients undiagnosed with OSA. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and hospitalized or admitted to a community hotel were recruited for the study after recovery during a clinic check-up visit 6-8 weeks after discharge. At this visit, they answered the Epworth Sleeping Scale (ESS) and Berlin questionnaire. Demographic and clinical details were collected from electronic medical records. OSA risk was observed in 37 of 119 included patients (31.1%). Patients with high OSA risk were male, significantly older, had a higher body mass index (BMI), and had higher rates of hypertension and snoring than patients with low OSA risk. Moreover, OSA risk was associated with COVID-19 severity; 48.6% of patients with high risk for OSA suffered from severe COVID-19 compared to 22% of patients with low risk for OSA (p = 0.007). The duration of hospitalization for patients with a high OSA risk was 10.97±9.43 days, while that for those with a low OSA risk was 4.71±6.86 days (p = 0.001). After adjusting for BMI, age, hypertension, and chronic disease, the odds ratio was 4.3 (95%CI, 1.2-16, p = 0.029). A high OSA risk was associated with severe COVID-19 and longer hospitalization. Thus, we recommend that the Berlin and ESS questionnaires be completed for every COVID-19-infected patient at hospitalization, especially in the presence of comorbidities.

Clinical Use of an Exposure, Symptom, and Spirometry Algorithm to Stratify Smokers into COPD Risk Phenotypes: A Case Finding Study Combined with Smoking Cessation Counseling.

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) case-finding aims to detect airflow obstruction in symptomatic smokers and ex-smokers. We used a clinical algorithm including smoking, symptoms, and spirometry to classify smokers into COPD risk phenotypes. In addition, we evaluated the acceptability and effectiveness of including smoking cessation advice in the case-finding intervention. Methods: Smoking, symptoms, and spirometry abnormalities (airflow obstruction: forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] to forced vital capacity [FVC] <0.7 or preserved-ratio spirometry (FEV1<80% of predicted value and FEV1/FVC ratio ≥ 0.7)] were assessed in a group of 864 smokers aged ≥ 30 years. The combination of these parameters allowed the identification of 4 phenotypes: Phenotype A (no symptoms, normal spirometry; reference), Phenotype B (symptoms; normal spirometry; possible COPD), Phenotype C (no symptoms; abnormal spirometry; possible COPD), and Phenotype D (symptoms; abnormal spirometry; probable COPD). We assessed phenotype differences in clinical variables and modeled the trend from phenotype A to phenotype D. Smoking cessation advice based on spirometry was provided. Follow-up was done by telephone 3 months later. Results: Using smokers without symptoms or abnormal spirometry (phenotype A; n=212 [24.5%]) as a reference, smokers were classified into possible COPD (phenotype B;n=332 [38.4%]; and C: n=81 [9.4%]) and probable COPD (phenotype D: n=239 [27.2%]). The trend from baseline phenotype A to probable COPD phenotype D was significant for the number of cigarettes/day and the number of years of smoking (p=0.0001). At follow-up, 58 (7.7%) of the respondents (n=749) reported that they had quit smoking. Conclusions: Our clinical algorithm allowed us to classify smokers into COPD phenotypes whose manifestations were associated with smoking intensity and to significantly increase the number of smokers screened for COPD. Smoking cessation advice was well accepted, resulting in a low but clinically significant quit rate.

Prevalence and Persistence of Symptoms in Adult COVID-19 Survivors 3 and 18 Months after Discharge from Hospital or Corona Hotels.

COVID-19 is characterized by persistent symptoms beyond acute illness. In this prospective cohort study of patients with COVID-19, we sought to characterize the prevalence and persistence of symptoms up to 18 months after diagnosis. We followed 166 patients and assessed their symptoms during acute illness, and at 3 and 18 months after disease onset. The mean number of symptoms per patient during acute disease was 2.3 (SD:1.2), dropping to 1.8 (SD:1.1) at 3 months after recovery and to 0.6 (SD:0.9) at 18 months after recovery. However, this decrease was not unidirectional. Between acute illness and 3 months, the frequency of symptoms decreased for cough (64.5%→24.7%), ageusia (21.7% to6%), anosmia (17.5%→5.4%), and generalized pain (10.8% to 5.4%) but increased for dyspnea (53%→57.2%) weakness (47%→54.8%), and brain fog (3%→8.4%). Between 3 and 18 months, the frequency of symptoms decreased for all symptoms but remained relatively high for dyspnea (15.8%), weakness (21.2%), and brain fog (7.3%). Symptoms may persist for at least 18 months after acute COVID-19 infection. During the medium- to long-term recovery period, the prevalence of some symptoms may decrease or remain stable, and the prevalence of others may increase before slowly decreasing thereafter. These data should be considered when planning post-acute care for these patients.

Varenicline for Gradual Versus Abrupt Smoking Cessation in Poorly Motivated Smokers With COPD: A Prematurely Terminated Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Although smoking is the leading cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), many patients with COPD smoke, highlighting the need for effective smoking cessation interventions in this population. This study examined the efficacy and safety of varenicline in increasing smoking cessation rates through "gradual" versus "abrupt" cessation in COPD patients with low motivation to quit smoking. Methods: A randomized, open label, 30-week, controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02894957) was conducted between January 2019 and October 2020 at a center in Israel. Smokers with COPD, poorly motivated to quit, were randomized to 6 weeks of varenicline for smoking reduction and a target quit day (TQD) at the end of week 6 (gradual cessation group) or ad libitum smoking for 5 weeks, 1 week of varenicline, and a TQD at the end of week 6 (abrupt cessation group). After the pre-quit phase, both groups received 12-week regular varenicline treatment and 12-week follow-up. Primary outcome was biochemically-validated continuous abstinence for weeks 6-30. Secondary outcomes were: (1) biochemically-confirmed7-day point prevalence abstinence for weeks 4-30, (2) efficient smoking reduction (≥50% in number of cigarettes/day) in the pre-quit phase; and (3) number of cigarettes/day, motivation to quit, and changes in respiratory symptoms and spirometry from baseline through week 30. Results: A drug recall issued by the study sponsor stopped the study after 70/242 (28.9%) patients had been enrolled. The gradual cessation group (n=29) had significantly higher continuous abstinence rates from TQD through week 30 versus the abrupt cessation group (n=41): 20.7% versus 4.9% (odds ratio [OR]=5.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-29.17; p=0.048) and higher 7-day point prevalence abstinence levels at all time points but week 18 (p=0.027 at week 6, 0.056 at week 7, and 0.096 at week 9). Motivation to quit increased (p=0.002) and the number of cigarettes/day decreased (p=0.002) over time in both groups. Respiratory symptoms, but not spirometry, improved in both groups at week 30. Treatment was safe and well tolerated. Conclusion: In poorly motivated smokers with COPD, using varenicline for a 6-week gradual smoking cessation before TQD, compared with abrupt cessation, significantly increased quit rates up to 6 months. Results were not affected by the smaller-than-expected sample size. Further studies are needed to confirm these data.

Homeopathic Treatment for COVID-19-Related Symptoms: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome due to coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) is a novel infectious disease, which has quickly developed into a pandemic. The spectrum of COVID-19 symptoms is broad, ranging from a mild, self-limiting respiratory tract illness to severe progressive pneumonia, multi-organ failure and possible death. Despite much effort and multiple clinical trials, there are, to date, no specific therapeutic agents to treat or cure the coronavirus infection. CASE REPORTS: The present paper presents 5 cases of patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 infections, 2 of them hospitalized in the intensive care unit, who were successfully treated with homeopathy. RESULTS: All 5 patients responded to homeopathic treatment in an unexpectedly short time span, improving both physically and mentally. CONCLUSION: The present case series emphasizes the rapidity of response among moderate to severely ill patients to homeopathic treatment, when conventional medical options have been unable to relieve or shorten the disease. The observations described should encourage use of homeopathy in treating patients with COVID-19 during the acute phase of the disease.

Effect of Endobronchial Coils on Exercise Tolerance and Lung Functions in Patients with Severe Emphysema - A Retrospective Cohort Study of 48 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction with endobronchial coils treatment (ECT), for patients with severe emphysema, has shown modest improvement in exercise capacity and lung functions in clinical trials, yet the benefit of this procedure is still unclear. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study including all patients who underwent ECT in Israel and a propensity score matched control group of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that were treated with usual care. The primary outcome was six-minute walk test distance (6MWTD), secondary outcomes were lung function tests and patient survival. RESULTS: Overall, 46 patients were included in the ECT group. Their mean 6MWTD at baseline and at 6 and at 24 months post procedure was 331.0±101.4, 372.9±76.8 and 338.8±104.8, respectively (overall P=0.04, pairwise comparison: baseline to 6 months (P=0.1), baseline to 24 months (P=1.0)). Mean FEV1 values at baseline and at 6 and at 24 months post procedure were 0.86±0.38, 0.92±0.37 and 0.82±0.36 liters, respectively (overall P=0.003, pairwise comparison: baseline to 6 months (P=0.04), baseline to 24 months (P=0.75)). The median 6MWTD for the ECT and control groups at 24 months were 333.0 (262.5-390) and 280 (210-405), respectively (P=0.16). There was no difference in overall survival (P=0.84). Heterogenous emphysema was a significant predictor of treatment success in univariate analysis (p=0.004). CONCLUSION: Lung volume reduction with endobronchial coils may improve the exercise capacity and FEV1 of COPD patients. However, the majority of the effect was diminished after 24 months. The current state of evidence does not support regulatory approval of ECT and warrant its use only after consideration of the benefit-harm ratio in a highly selected patient population.

Diffuse pulmonary calcifications: A case series and review of literature.

Pulmonary calcifications are usually incidental asymptomatic findings discovered on x-rays or computed tomography scans that can be easily overlooked, and their significance undermined, especially in a seemingly asymptomatic person. Calcifications can be a marker of chronicity or disease severity, and thus have diagnostic value. Rarely, calcification can be the direct cause of morbidity. Calcifications can be either localized or diffuse. Many diseases, in particular infectious diseases, can cause localized calcifications. Diffuse calcifications are less common and usually secondary to a handful of conditions such as dystrophic pulmonary calcifications, metastatic pulmonary calcifications, disseminated pulmonary ossifications and pulmonary alveolar microlithiasis. We describe three cases of diffuse pulmonary calcifications, review the different causes of diffuse pulmonary calcifications and provide some indicators on how to differentiate between them. Differentiating between the different types of pulmonary calcifications has significant implications on the management and prognosis of the patients, and thus it is important to distinguish between them.

Early Detection of COPD: An Opportunistic Case Finding Study in Smokers and Ex-Smokers Visiting a Medical Centre.

BACKGROUND: Different case finding approaches have been used to identify early COPD. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and the yield of opportunistic early COPD case finding in visitors to a large medical centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From May 2014 to June 2017, we consecutively recruited adults aged ≥ 18 years visiting the Shaare Zedek Medical Center, in Jerusalem. Our 3-step intervention included: a) pre-screening for symptoms with the 5-item "Could it be COPD?" questionnaire (score= 0-5 pts); b) pre-BD spirometry; and c) referral to a caregiver. Airflow obstruction was defined by a FEV1/FVC < 0.7. Spirometry results were used as an incentive to promote smoking cessation and quit rates were verified by phone survey 3 months after the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 1001 subjects (956 smokers; 45 ex-smokers) were recruited. Mean (SD) age was 48.3 years (13.5). Airflow obstruction was detected in 180 (18%) subjects of whom 142 (78.9%) were unaware of it, including 27 subjects with severe (50% ≥ FEV1 ≤ 30% predicted) (n=25) or very severe (FEV1 < 30% predicted) (n=2) obstruction. Multiple logistic regression analysis found that age, BMI, cigarette smoking (p.y.) and a "Could it be COPD?" questionnaire score ≥ 3 points correctly classified 83.3% of cases of airflow obstruction. At follow-up, 54.5% of participants reported smoking as usual, 30.9% reduced smoking [mean (SD) = 10.1 ± 7.8 cigarettes/day], 7.4% increased smoking [mean (SD) = 9.2 ± 6.3 cigarettes/day] and 7.2% claimed smoking cessation. Among obstructed subjects, 38.7% had visited a physician because of COPD, while 20.7% were taking a new respiratory medication. CONCLUSION: Early COPD case finding was feasible and effective in identifying undiagnosed airflow obstruction among visitors to a medical centre. Smoking cessation counselling based on spirometry promoted a small but clinically meaningful cessation rate.

[TREATMENT OF A PATIENT IN A TERMINAL CONDITION].

INTRODUCTION: It is generally understood that Jewish law requires every effort to be made to extend the life of a terminally ill patient using routine treatments, whether he is conscious or not, and whether he wants his life prolonged or is opposed to it. The "Law for Patients Wishing to Die" proposes this approach with slight variations. This article discusses the patient who wishes to die from a Jewish viewpoint, illustrating that this is not the only Jewish approach. The role of the doctor is to cure and not to extend a life of suffering in any case. If the doctor cannot cure him, he should respect the wishes of the patient who does not wish to continue to suffer, by stopping life-prolonging treatment and providing only pain-reducing treatment. This law is correct not only in cases where the patient is aware of his situation but also in cases where the patient is comatose and has no realistic chance of returning to life. Ideas from the Talmud, from the Shulchan Aruch, and from the rulings of many poskim (rabbis) confirm that Judaism places great emphasis on personal autonomy and on limiting medical intervention to situations of need. The authors of the article call for the law to be changed in this respect.

[DIAPHRAGMATIC PARALYSIS].

INTRODUCTION: One-sided diaphragmatic paralysis is a common phenomenon which is usually a-symptomatic. In case of acute onset or if there is an underlying lung disease, the phenomenon may be symptomatic and even limiting. In this article, we present a patient who arrived with subacute shortness of breath when lying down. She underwent thorough investigations but, as happens in most cases, the cause of the paralysis was not identified and it remains idiopathic. The authors present an overview of the etiology, differential diagnosis and treatment of diaphragmatic paralysis.

Influence of language skills on the choice of terms used to describe lung sounds in a language other than English: a cross-sectional survey of staff physicians, residents and medical students.

INTRODUCTION: The value of chest auscultation would be enhanced by the use of a standardised terminology. To that end, the recommended English terminology must be transferred to a language other than English (LOTE) without distortion. OBJECTIVE: To examine the transfer to Hebrew-taken as a model of LOTE-of the recommended terminology in English. DESIGN/SETTING: Cross-sectional study; university-based hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 143 caregivers, including 31 staff physicians, 65 residents and 47 medical students. METHODS: Observers provided uninstructed descriptions in Hebrew and English of audio recordings of five common sounds, namely, normal breath sound (NBS), wheezes, crackles, stridor and pleural friction rub (PFR). OUTCOMES: (a) Rates of correct/incorrect classification; (b) correspondence between Hebrew and recommended English terms; c) language and auscultation skills, assessed by crossing the responses in the two languages with each other and with the classification of the audio recordings validated by computer analysis. RESULTS: Range (%) of correct rating was as follows: NBS=11.3-20, wheezes=79.7-87.2, crackles=58.6-69.8, stridor=67.4-96.3 and PFR=2.7-28.6. Of 60 Hebrew terms, 11 were correct, and 5 matched the recommended English terms. Many Hebrew terms were adaptations or transliterations of inadequate English terms. Of 687 evaluations, good dual-language and single-language skills were found in 586 (85.3%) and 41 (6%), respectively. However, in 325 (47.3%) evaluations, good language skills were associated with poor auscultation skills. CONCLUSION: Poor auscultation skills surpassed poor language skills as a factor hampering the transfer to Hebrew (LOTE) of the recommended English terminology. Improved education in auscultation emerged as the main factor to promote the use of standardised lung sound terminology. Using our data, a strategy was devised to encourage the use of standardised terminology in non-native English-speaking countries.

Validation of Lung EpiCheck, a novel methylation-based blood assay, for the detection of lung cancer in European and Chinese high-risk individuals.

AIM: Lung cancer screening reduces mortality. We aim to validate the performance of Lung EpiCheck, a six-marker panel methylation-based plasma test, in the detection of lung cancer in European and Chinese samples. METHODS: A case-control European training set (n=102 lung cancer cases, n=265 controls) was used to define the panel and algorithm. Two cut-offs were selected, low cut-off (LCO) for high sensitivity and high cut-off (HCO) for high specificity. The performance was validated in case-control European and Chinese validation sets (cases/controls 179/137 and 30/15, respectively). RESULTS: The European and Chinese validation sets achieved AUCs of 0.882 and 0.899, respectively. The sensitivities/specificities with LCO were 87.2%/64.2% and 76.7%/93.3%, and with HCO they were 74.3%/90.5% and 56.7%/100.0%, respectively. Stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) sensitivity in European and Chinese samples with LCO was 78.4% and 70.0% and with HCO was 62.2% and 30.0%, respectively. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) was represented only in the European set and sensitivities with LCO and HCO were 100.0% and 93.3%, respectively. In multivariable analyses of the European validation set, the assay's ability to predict lung cancer was independent of established risk factors (age, smoking, COPD), and overall AUC was 0.942. CONCLUSIONS: Lung EpiCheck demonstrated strong performance in lung cancer prediction in case-control European and Chinese samples, detecting high proportions of early-stage NSCLC and SCLC and significantly improving predictive accuracy when added to established risk factors. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings. Utilising such a simple and inexpensive blood test has the potential to improve compliance and broaden access to screening for at-risk populations.

To Fly Or Not To Fly? Aviation and Respiratory Diseases.

BACKGROUND: For most passengers, even those with respiratory disease, air travel is safe and comfortable. Some travelers may experience hypoxia at sea level but may not need supplemental oxygen during air travel in a hypobaric hypoxic environment. For some individuals compensatory pulmonary mechanisms may be inadequate, causing profound hypoxia. In addition, venous thromboembolism/pulmonary emboli may occur, especially during long haul flights. With adequate screening, patients at risk can be identified, therapeutic solutions can be proposed for the flight, and most can travel can continue safely with supplemental oxygen and other preventive measures.

Medical Cannabis in Asthmatic Patients.

BACKGROUND: With the increased use of cannabis in the medicinal and recreational domains, it is becoming more important for physicians to better understand its harmful and beneficial effects. Although medical cannabis comes in several forms, the preferred route of administration is smoking or inhalation. After caring for three asthmatic patients who were treated with medical cannabis and who reported improvement in their symptoms, we decided to review the available data on the effects of medical cannabis on asthmatic patients. OBJECTIVES: To review the known effects of medical cannabis on asthmatic patients. METHODS: A thorough search was conducted of the MEDLINE and PubMed databases as well as the internet for publications about the effects of medical cannabis on asthmatic patients. RESULTS: Cannabis has a bronchodilator effect on the airways and might have an anti-inflammatory effect on asthmatic patients. However, harmful effects on the lungs are mainly attributed to smoking and include airway irritation and the development of chronic bronchitis symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Cannabis has some benefit, yet there are many harmful effects on the lungs. Additional research is needed to determine the harmful effects of vaporizers as well as inhalers.

Influence of observer preferences and auscultatory skill on the choice of terms to describe lung sounds: a survey of staff physicians, residents and medical students.

BACKGROUND: In contrast with the technical progress of the stethoscope, lung sound terminology has remained confused, weakening the usefulness of auscultation. We examined how observer preferences regarding terminology and auscultatory skill influenced the choice of terms used to describe lung sounds. METHODS: Thirty-one staff physicians (SP), 65 residents (R) and 47 medical students (MS) spontaneously described the audio recordings of 5 lung sounds classified acoustically as: (1) normal breath sound; (2) wheezes; (3) crackles; (4) stridor and (5) pleural friction rub. A rating was considered correct if a correct term or synonym was used to describe it (term use ascribed to preference). The use of any incorrect terms was ascribed to deficient auscultatory skill. RESULTS: Rates of correct sound identification were: (i) normal breath sound: SP=21.4%; R=11.6%; MS=17.1%; (ii) wheezes: SP=82.8%; R=85.2%; MS=86.4%; (iii) crackles: SP=63%; R=68.5%; MS=70.7%; (iv) stridor: SP=92.8%; R=90%; MS=72.1% and (v) pleural friction rub: SP=35.7%; R=6.2%; MS=3.2%. The 3 groups used 66 descriptive terms: 17 were ascribed to preferences regarding terminology, and 49 to deficient auscultatory skill. Three-group agreement on use of a term occurred on 107 occasions: 70 involved correct terms (65.4%) and 37 (34.6%) incorrect ones. Rate of use of recommended terms, rather than accepted synonyms, was 100% for the wheezes and the stridor, 55% for the normal breath sound, 22% for the crackles and 14% for the pleural friction rub. CONCLUSIONS: The observers' ability to describe lung sounds was high for the wheezes and the stridor, fair for the crackles and poor for the normal breath sound and the pleural friction rub. Lack of auscultatory skill largely surpassed observer preference as a factor determining the choice of terminology. Wide dissemination of educational programs on lung auscultation (eg, self-learning via computer-assisted learning tools) is urgently needed to promote use of standardised lung sound terminology.

Extending varenicline preloading to 6 weeks facilitates smoking cessation: A single-site, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Initiating varenicline use 4 weeks before the target quit date (TQD) reduces smoking in the run-in phase and increases end-treatment cessation rates; however, the lack of a smoke intake plateau suggests longer preloading periods are required. This study assessed whether varenicline preloading for 6 weeks reduced pre-quit smoke intake and enhanced 6-month abstinence outcomes compared with the standard 1-week preloading. METHODS: In this randomised single-centre controlled trial, (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02634281), conducted between February 2016 and July 2018 in Israel, daily smokers (n = 242) aged ≥ 18 years were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive varenicline preloading for 6 weeks (n = 121) or a placebo for 5 weeks followed by varenicline for 1 week (n = 121) before the TQD. Participants and researchers were masked to both group assignment and treatment allocation. Both groups received standard 12-week post-TQD varenicline treatment. The primary outcome was the 24-week biochemically verified continuous abstinence rate (CAR) from weeks 6 (TQD)-30. Secondary outcomes included the 23-week CAR from 1-week post-TQD (week 7) to week 30, and the 7-day point-prevalence (PP) abstinence at week 30. Other measures included pre- and post-quit rewards, smoking urges, nausea, aversion, and markers of cigarette consumption. FINDINGS: By intention-to-treat, the 24-week CAR, weeks 6-30 with extended preloading was significantly higher than with standard preloading (23·1% vs. 4·1%; risk reduction [RR]: -0·19 [95% confidence interval [CI]:-0·10-0·24]; p < 0·001). Extended preloading also showed better secondary outcomes. Extended preloading significantly decreased pre-quit rewards, urges, and smoke intake, including unsolicited smoking abstinence. Post-quit urges remained remarkably lower with extended preloading. Participants receiving extended preloading reported more nausea at week 4 (39.6% vs 11.5%) and abnormal dreams at week 6 (7.7% vs. 0%). Participants receiving standard preloading reported more constipation at week 7 (7.6% vs. 0%) and dizziness at weeks 7 (12.1% vs. 2.5%) and 12 (10.7% vs 1.4%). INTERPRETATION: Extended preloading reduced ad lib smoking, enhanced cessation rates at 3 and 6 months, and decreased pre- and post-quit rewards and smoking drive in a pattern compatible with a reinforcement-reduction mechanism. These data substantiate extending the standard pre-treatment period, and suggest that targeting pre-quit smoking sensations should be a treatment priority, although confirmatory evidence is needed from larger clinical trials. FUNDING: This study was funded by a 2013 Global Research Award for Nicotine Dependence (GRAND) supported by Pfizer, Inc. (#WI182915).

Identification of Asthma-COPD Overlap, Asthma, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Phenotypes in Patients with Airway Obstruction: Influence on Treatment Approach.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have described asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) among patients diagnosed with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but less so in broad populations of patients with chronic airway obstruction. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (i) examine the prevalence of ACO, asthma, and COPD phenotypes among subjects referred for pulmonary function testing (PFT), who had airway obstruction in spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]/forced vital capacity [FVC] <0.7); and (ii) delineate the therapeutic approach of each group. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of patients who were referred for PFT at the Rokach Institute, in Jerusalem. Working definitions were as follows: (a) COPD: post-bronchodilator (BD) FEV1/FVC <0.70; (b) asthma: physician-diagnosed asthma before age 40 and/or minimum post-BD increase in FEV1 or FVC of 12% and 200 mL; and (c) ACO: the combination of the 2. Demographics, smoking habits, episodes of exacerbation, health-related quality of life (HRQL), and respiratory medication utilization were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 3,669 referrals from January 1 to April 30, 2017, 1,220 had airway obstruction of which 215 were included. Of these, 82 (38.1%) had ACO, 49 (22.8%) asthma, and 84 (39.1%) COPD. ACO subjects tended to (a) be predominantly female; (b) be older than asthmatics, (c) be smokers; (d) have worse HRQL in the activity domain; and (d) have more exacerbations. Treatment of ACO and COPD patients differed from that of asthmatics, but not from each other, in the proportion of subjects on maintenance treatment, use of LABA, LAMA, and ICS, alone or in combination, and in the number of inhaler devices used by patients. CONCLUSION: ACO represented >1/3 of patients referred for PFT. Despite a clearly identifiable phenotype, ACO patients received treatment similar to COPD patients, suggesting poor ACO identification. Our data emphasize the need to raise the awareness of ACO among clinicians, in order to guide better recognition and appropriate treatment in individual patients.

Clinical Characteristics Of Patients With Asthma COPD Overlap (ACO) In Australian Primary Care.

Purpose: Many older adults with a history of smoking and asthma develop clinical features of both asthma and COPD, an entity sometimes called asthma-COPD overlap (ACO). Patients with ACO may be at higher risk of poor health outcomes than those with asthma or COPD alone. However, understanding of ACO is limited in the primary care setting and more information is needed to better inform patient management. We aimed to compare the characteristics of patients with ACO or COPD in Australian general practices. Patients and methods: Data were from the RADICALS (Review of Airway Dysfunction and Interdisciplinary Community-based care of Adult Long-term Smokers) trial, an intervention study of an interdisciplinary community-based model of care. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry, dyspnoea and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores were compared between 60 ACO patients and 212 with COPD alone. Results: Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (mean±SD 58.4±14.3 vs 67.5±20.1% predicted) and Forced Vital Capacity (mean 82.1±16.9 v 91.9±17.2% predicted) were significantly lower in the ACO group (p<0.001), but no difference was found in post-bronchodilator spirometry. Demographic and clinical characteristics, dyspnoea, quality of life, comorbidities and treatment prescribed did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion: This is the first study describing the clinical characteristics of ACO patients in Australian general practices. Our finding of lower pre-bronchodilator lung function in the ACO group compared to those with COPD reinforces the importance of spirometry in primary care to inform management. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12614001155684.

The Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Non-chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation has shown significant benefit for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The effect on non-COPD pulmonary patients is less well established. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether pulmonary rehabilitation is also beneficial for non-COPD pulmonary patients. METHODS: Clinical and demographic data on non-COPD pulmonary patients who participated in our institutional pulmonary rehabilitation program between January 2009 and December 2016 were collected. Participants engaged in a 60-minute, twice-weekly, ambulatory hospital-based program lasting 12 to 24 sessions. Sessions included both endurance and muscle training as well as healthy lifestyle educational activities. The six-minute walk test (6MWT) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were conducted before and after the rehabilitation program. RESULTS: We recruited 214 non-COPD patients, of whom 153 completed at least 12 sessions. Of these, 59 presented with interstitial lung disease (ILD), 18 with non-ILD restrictive lung defects, 25 with asthma, 30 with lung cancer, and 21 with other conditions (e.g., pulmonary hypertension, bronchiectasis) The groups demonstrated significant improvement in 6MWT and in SGRQ scores. Non-COPD patients gained a 61.9 meter (19%) improvement in the 6MWT (P < 0.0001) and 8.3 point reduction in their SGRQ score (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary rehabilitation is effective in non-COPD pulmonary patients. As such, it should be an integral part of the treatment armament provided to the vast majority of those suffering from chronic respiratory disease.