Simultaneous ipsilateral nephrectomy during kidney transplantation in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a matched pair analysis of 193 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND: In end-stage renal transplant recipients with autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), the imperative, optimal timing, and technique of native nephrectomy remains under discussion. The Freiburg Transplant Center routinely performs a simultaneous ipsilateral nephrectomy. METHODS: From April 1998 to May 2017, we retrospectively analyzed 193 consecutive ADPKD recipients, receiving per protocol simultaneous ipsilateral nephrectomy and compared morbidity, mortality, and outcome with 193 non-ADPKD recipients of a matched pair control. RESULTS: The incidence of surgical complications was similar with respect to severe medical, surgical, urological, vascular, and wound-related complications as well as reoperation rates and 30-day mortality. Intraoperative blood transfusions were required more often in the ADPKD (22.8%) compared with the control group (6.7%; p < 0.0001). Early postoperative urinary tract infections occurred more frequent (ADPKD 40.4%/control 29.0%; p = 0.0246). Time of surgery was prolonged by 30 min (ADPKD 169 min; 95%CI 159.8-175.6 min/control 139 min; 95%CI 131.4-145.0 min; p < 0.0001). One-year patient (ADPKD 96.4%/control 95.8%; p = 0.6537) and death-censored graft survival (ADPKD 94.8%/control 93.7%; p = 0.5479) were comparable between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to morbidity and mortality, per protocol, simultaneous native nephrectomy is a safe procedure. Especially in asymptomatic ADPKD KTx recipients, the number of total operations can be reduced and residual diuresis preserved up until transplantation. In living donation, even preemptive transplantation is possible.

Evidence of Interleukin-2-Receptor-Antibody Induction in Low-Risk Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: The recommended standard immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplant recipients comprises an initial induction therapy mainly with an interleukin-2-receptor antibody (IL2-RA) and a triple maintenance therapy. With tacrolimus and mycophenolate acid it is unknown whether IL2-RA application affects the short- and long-term results. This question is addressed in the present analysis. METHODS: From July 2007 to June 2019 a total of 127 living donor kidney transplant recipients meeting the center-specific definition of immunologic low risk situation (first transplantation, HLA-mismatch ≤3, panel reactive antibody ≤10%) were identified. In 83 recipients with a first-degree relationship to the donor we omitted the IL2-RA induction (IL2-RA-). The remaining 44 recipients, mostly not first-degree relatives, served as controls (IL2-RA+). Biopsy-proven acute rejection and long-term patient and graft survival rates were compared. RESULTS: Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates after 3 months were similar in both groups with 4.8% (IL2-RA-) vs 13.7% (IL2-RA+; P = .0937), including borderline rejection rates of 18.0% (IL2-RA-) vs 18.3% (IL2-RA+; P = 1.000), respectively. Ten-year long-term survival rates were comparable between the IL2-RA- and the IL2-RA+ group with 95.6% vs 93.5% (patient survival; P = .5465) and 92.1% vs 90.6% (death-censored graft survival; P = .8893). CONCLUSION: For low-risk living donor kidney transplant recipients with first-degree relationship to the donor, it is safe to omit induction therapy with IL2-RA.

Single cohort study: ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients have a higher risk of lymphocele formation.

PURPOSE: Since 2004, ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi KTx) became an established procedure to expand the living donor pool in Germany. Currently, ABOi KTx comprises > 20% of all living donor KTx. Up to September 2015, > 100 ABOi KTx were performed in Freiburg. Regarding lymphocele formation, only scarce data exist. METHODS: Between April 2004 and September 2015, 106 consecutive ABOi and 277 consecutive ABO-compatible kidney transplantations (ABOc KTx) were performed. Two ABOi and 117 ABOc recipients were excluded due to differences in immunosuppression. One hundred-four ABOi and 160 ABOc KTx patients were analyzed concerning lymphocele formation. RESULTS: The incidence of lymphoceles in ABOi KTx was 25.2% and 10.6% in ABOc KTx (p = 0.003). A major risk factor appeared the frequency of ≥ 8 preoperative immunoadsorption and/or plasmapheresis sessions (OR 5.61, 95% CI 2.31-13.61, p < 0.001). Particularly, these ABOi KTx recipients had a distinctly higher risk of developing lymphocele (40.0% vs. 19.2%, p = 0.044). IA/PE sessions on day of transplantation (no lymphocele 20.0% vs. lymphocele 28.6%, p = 0.362) or postoperative IA/PE sessions (no lymphocele 25.7% vs. lymphocele 24.1%, p = 1.0) showed no influence on formation of lymphoceles. CONCLUSION: In ABOi KTx, the incidence of lymphocele formation is significantly increased compared to ABOc KTx and leads to more frequent surgical reinterventions without having an impact on graft survival.