Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Water Res ; 201: 117318, 2021 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34134036

RESUMEN

Negatively charged electrically conductive ultrafiltration (UF) membranes have been intensively investigated for fouling mitigation and rejection enhancement in recent years. This study reports the novel approach of applying positive charge (+2.5 V cell potential) to a conductive membrane to induce electrosorption of negatively charged substances onto the membrane. Subsequently, desorption of negatively charged substances is achieved by changing the potential periodically (e.g., after 30 min) to negative charge (-2.5 V cell potential). For this purpose, sputter deposition of ultra-thin gold layers (40 nm) is used to generate electrically conductive gold-polymer-gold flat sheet membranes by coating the active and the support layer of two commercial polymer UF membranes (polyethersulfone UP150, polyamide M5). When M5 membrane was charged positively during filtration (+2.5 V), Suwannee River NOM, Hohloh lake NOM, humic acid and Brilliant Blue ionic dye showed removal rates of 70 %, 75% and 93% and 99%, respectively. Whereas, when no potential was applied (0 V) removal rates were only 1 - 5 %. When a positive potential was applied to the active membrane layer and a negative potential was applied to the support layer (cell potential 2.5 V), a significant increase of flux with 25 L/(m² h) was observed due to the induction of electro-osmosis. Electrosorption was only observed for M5 membrane (ζ: +13 mV, pH 7) and not with UP150 membrane (ζ: -29 mV, pH 7). Due to a low current density of 1.1 A/m² at a flux of 100 L/(m² h), the additional energy consumption of electrosorption and desorption process was low with 0.03 kWh per m³ of permeate. This study delivered the proof of concept for the novel process of electrosorptive UF with energy consumption between microfiltration and ultrafiltration but NOM removal rates of nanofiltration membranes.


Asunto(s)
Ultrafiltración , Purificación del Agua , Sustancias Húmicas/análisis , Membranas Artificiales , Agua
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA