A Systematic Review of the Psychosocial Measures Used in Teenage and Young Adult Cancer.

Background: Teenagers and young adults (TYAs; ages 16-24 in the United Kingdom) with cancer have specific needs and experience worse physiological and psychological outcomes compared with pediatric and adult cancer. In the United Kingdom, psychosocial screening is a mandatory part of TYA care. However, there is a lack of age-appropriate and acceptable psychosocial measures for this population. This review aimed to (1) identify the psychosocial measures utilized and available for TYA cancer and (2) describe their psychometric properties. Methods: We searched five databases for studies meeting the eligibility criteria. We extracted data relevant to the review and assessed study quality using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines and the Hughes Quality Assessment Tool developed by the research team. Results: We identified 40 studies that included 105 psychosocial measures. The main constructs measured were distress, depression, and anxiety. The TYA age range varied widely. Reporting of psychosocial measures and their psychometric properties was poor, and most measures were not validated or developed for TYA cancer populations. Discussion: There is an urgent need for psychosocial measures that are designed for and validated in TYA cancer populations. Appropriate measures would enable clinicians to reliably identify and effectively support the psychosocial challenges faced by TYAs. The use of validated psychosocial measures enables earlier detection of difficulties, fosters patient-centered care, and is cost-effective since resources can be allocated to those most in need.

The Association of Resilience with Psychosocial Outcomes in Teenagers and Young Adults with Cancer.

Purpose: There is limited research on the psychological impact of cancer for teenagers and young adults (TYAs) and the role of protective factors such as resilience. This study investigated associations between resilience and psychosocial outcomes in this group. Methods: Data were collected from TYAs (aged 16-24) who attended the TYA cancer clinic at Guy's Hospital between 2013 and 2021. Participants (N = 63) completed psychosocial questionnaires within 4 weeks of their treatment start date (T1) and again between 9 and 15 months later (T2). We used separate multivariable linear regression models to analyze associations of resilience (Brief Resilience Questionnaire) with outcomes measured at T2, including symptoms of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ]-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD]-7), and subjective quality of life. Models were adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, and T1 outcome assessments. Results: Higher resilience at T1 was associated with increased anxiety (ß = 1.68; bootstrapped confidence interval [95% CI -0.28 to 3.19]), depression (ß = 1.24; [-0.85 to 2.90]), and quality of life (5.76; [-0.88 to 15.60]). In contrast, an increase in resilience over time was associated with decreases in the same period in anxiety (ß = -3.16; [-5.22 to -1.47]) and depression (ß = -2.36, [-4.41 to -0.58]), and an increase in quality of life (ß = 9.82, [-0.24 to 21.13]). Conclusion: Increases in resilience during cancer treatment were associated with reduced symptoms of depression and anxiety in TYAs. We discuss factors likely to influence these outcomes, the implications for psychosocial interventions in this population, and identify further research to explore the impact of other factors such as diagnosis and treatment type.