RESUMEN
Recent work suggests that learning perceptual classifications can be enhanced by combining single item classifications with adaptive comparisons triggered by each learner's confusions. Here, we asked whether learning might work equally well using all comparison trials. In a face identification paradigm, we tested single item classifications, paired comparisons, and dual instance classifications that resembled comparisons but required two identification responses. In initial results, the comparisons condition showed evidence of greater efficiency (learning gain divided by trials or time invested). We suspected that this effect may have been driven by easier attainment of mastery criteria in the comparisons condition, and a negatively accelerated learning curve. To test this idea, we fit learning curves and found data consistent with the same underlying learning rate in all conditions. These results suggest that paired comparison trials may be as effective in driving learning of multiple perceptual classifications as more demanding single item classifications.
