Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Travel Med ; 27(6)2020 Sep 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32729905

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: More people on immunosuppression live in or wish to travel to yellow fever virus (YFV)-endemic areas. Data on the safety and immunogenicity of yellow fever vaccination (YFVV) during immunosuppression are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and immunogenicity of a primary YFVV between travellers on methotrexate and controls. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multi-centre controlled observational study from 2015 to 2017 in six Swiss travel clinics. 15 adults (nine with rheumatic diseases, five with dermatologic conditions and one with a gastroenterological disease) on low-dose methotrexate (≤20 mg/week) requiring a primary YFVV and 15 age and sex-matched controls received a YFVV. Solicited/unsolicited adverse reactions were recorded, YFV-RNA was measured in serum samples on Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 28 and neutralizing antibodies on Days 0, 7, 10, 14, 28. RESULTS: Patients´ and controls' median ages were 53 and 52 years; 9 patients and 10 controls were female. 43% of patients and 33% of controls showed local side effects (P = 0.71); 86% of patients and 66% of controls reported systemic reactions (P = 0.39). YFV-RNA was detected in patients and controls on Day 3-10 post-vaccination and was never of clinical significance. Slightly more patients developed YFV-RNAaemia (Day 3: n = 5 vs n = 2, Day 7: n = 9 vs n = 7, Day 10: n = 3 vs n = 2, all P > 0.39). No serious reactions occurred. On Day 10, a minority of vaccinees was seroprotected (patients: n = 2, controls: n = 6). On Day 28, all vaccinees were seroprotected. CONCLUSIONS: First-time YFVV was safe and immunogenic in travellers on low-dose methotrexate. Larger studies are needed to confirm these promising results.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Fiebre Amarilla , Fiebre Amarilla , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Vacunación , Fiebre Amarilla/prevención & control , Vacuna contra la Fiebre Amarilla/efectos adversos , Virus de la Fiebre Amarilla
2.
Pan Afr Med J ; 37: 176, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33447331

RESUMEN

Systematic studies on connective tissue disorders are scarce in sub-Saharan Africa. Our aim was to analyse the published clinical data on systemic sclerosis (SSc) in sub-Saharan Africa. A systematic review was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. We screened the Embase, PubMed and African Health Sciences databases for literature published until March 2018. Searches produced 1210 publications. After abstract and full-text screenings, 91 publications were analysed, and epidemiological information and clinical features extracted. Publications were mostly publications case reports (36%), cross-sectional studies (26%) and case series (23%) and came predominantly from South Africa (45%), Nigeria (15%) and Senegal (14%). A total of 1884 patients were reported, 66% of patients came from South Africa. The patients were between 4 and 77 years old; 83% of patients were female. Overall, 72% had diffuse SSc. Raynaud´s phenomenon was reported in 78% and skin ulcerations in 42% of patients. Focal skin hypopigmentation was common and telangiectasia not frequent. Interstitial lung involvement was reported in 50%, pulmonary hypertension in 30%, heart involvement in 28% of patients. Oesophageal reflux was observed in 70% and dysphagia in 37% of patients. Antinuclear antibodies were positive in 65% of patients. Anti-centromere autoantibodies (9.2%) and RNA polymerase 3 antibodies (7.1%) were rare and anti-fibrillarin most frequent (16.5%). SSc presentations in sub-Saharan Africa differ from those reported in Europe and America by a frequent diffuse skin involvement, focal skin hypopigmentation and a high prevalence of anti-fibrillarin autoantibodies.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antinucleares/inmunología , Autoanticuerpos/inmunología , Esclerodermia Sistémica/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Esclerodermia Sistémica/inmunología , Esclerodermia Sistémica/fisiopatología , Adulto Joven
3.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 58(9): 1585-1596, 2019 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30877773

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a diphtheria/tetanus vaccine booster dose in three different patient groups with rheumatic diseases on a variety of immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory medications compared with healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: We conducted a multi-centre prospective cohort study in Switzerland. We enrolled patients with RA, axial SpA/PsA, vasculitis (Behçet's disease, ANCA-associated vasculitis) and HCs. Diphtheria/tetanus vaccination was administered according to the Swiss vaccination recommendations. Blood samples were drawn before vaccination, and 1 month and 3 months afterwards. Antibody concentrations against vaccine antigens were measured by ELISA. Immunogenicity was compared between patient and medication groups. A mixed model was applied for multivariate analysis. Missing data were dealt with using multiple imputation. RESULTS: Between January 2014 and December 2015, we enrolled 284 patients with rheumatic diseases (131 RA, 114 SpA/PsA, 39 vasculitis) and 253 HCs. Of the patients, 89% were on immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory medication. Three months post-vaccination 100% of HCs vs 98% of patients were protected against tetanus and 84% vs 73% against diphtheria. HCs and SpA/PsA patients had significantly higher responses than RA and vasculitis patients. Assessing underlying diseases and medications in a multivariate model, rituximab was the only factor negatively influencing tetanus immunogenicity, whereas only MTX treatment had a negative influence on diphtheria antibody responses. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION: Diphtheria/tetanus booster vaccination was safe. Tetanus vaccination was immunogenic; the diphtheria component was less immunogenic. Vaccine responses were blunted by rituximab and MTX. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT01947465.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/biosíntesis , Vacuna contra Difteria y Tétanos/efectos adversos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Clostridium tetani/inmunología , Corynebacterium diphtheriae/inmunología , Difteria/prevención & control , Vacuna contra Difteria y Tétanos/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunización Secundaria , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal/inmunología , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Tétanos/prevención & control , Vacunación , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...