Capturing parents' and health professionals' experiences of stillbirth bereavement photography: A systematic review and meta-synthesis.

PROBLEM: Evidence-informed, best-practice recommendations concerning bereavement photography following stillbirth have yet to be proposed. BACKGROUND: Previous research has highlighted the general importance of memory-making following pregnancy loss; however, scarce studies have specifically examined bereavement photography experiences. AIM: To examine parents', healthcare professionals' and photographers' perspectives and experiences of stillbirth bereavement photography. METHODS: Guided by JBI Collaboration methods, we conducted a systematic review and meta-synthesis (using a meta-aggregative approach) of 12 peer-reviewed studies conducted predominantly in high-income countries FINDINGS: Two overarching synthesised findings were generated: Bereavement photography as a helpful tool for the present and Bereavement photography as a helpful tool for the future. The proactive recommendation of memory-making influenced parents' decisions, and some parents not offered bereavement photography post-stillbirth expressed their desire for this opportunity retrospectively. Most parents who utilised bereavement photography were positive about their experiences. In the acute stages of loss, photographs supported meaningful introductions of the baby to their sibling(s) and validated parents' loss. Longer-term, the photographs validated the stillborn child's life, maintained memories and enabled parents to share their child's life with others. DISCUSSION: Bereavement photography appeared beneficial, even though some parents felt conflicted about it. Parental views about photography appeared to fluctuate; many parents who rejected the offer of stillbirth photography described regret about their decision later. Conversely, parents who reluctantly accepted photographs were grateful. CONCLUSION: Our review shows compelling evidence that bereavement photography should be normalised and offered to parents in the wake of stillbirth, with tactful, personalised approaches needed to assist with bereavement.

Health Professionals' Experiences Supporting People With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Who Deliberately Restrict and/or Omit Insulin for Weight, Shape, and/or Appearance: A Meta-synthesis.

OBJECTIVES: It has been reported that health professionals currently lack the required empathy, understanding, and knowledge about the deliberate restriction and/or omission of insulin to influence weight and/or shape, which may impact the quality of care provided. We sought to synthesize existing qualitative research pertaining to health professionals' experiences supporting individuals within this unique population. METHODS: We conducted a meta-synthesis using a meta-aggregative approach. We searched 5 electronic databases. Eligible articles were qualitative or mixed-methods empirical studies with primary data reporting health professionals' experiences supporting people with type 1 diabetes restricting and/or omitting insulin for weight and/or shape control, written in English, from database inception to March 2022. RESULTS: A final sample of 4 primary studies were included. The analysis indicated that in the absence of standardized screening and diagnostic tools, health professionals found it challenging to decide when behaviour became clinically significant. Health professionals were also challenged by complex perceptions and behaviours relating to their illness management and features of broader health-care systems and organizational factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings have widespread multidisciplinary implications for health professionals and the broader health-care systems in which they work. We provide evidence-based clinical recommendations and suggestions for vital future research.