Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Surg ; 9: 1065466, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36589625

RESUMEN

Purpose: The role of surgery in managing perianal abscesses in the pediatric population is debatable, and data on recurrence risk is rare. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of surgery for a perianal abscess in children and identify parameters that predict recurrence. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all children younger than age 14 requiring surgery for a perianal abscess from 2000 to 2018. Results: Out of 103 enrolled patients, 27 (26%) had recurrent perianal disease. Recurrences appeared after a median of 5 months (range: 1-18 months), in 12 cases as perianal abscess and 15 cases as fistula in ano. Anal fistula probing was performed in 33% of all patients, of which 16 (15%) underwent fistulotomy. In univariate analysis, older age (p = 0.034), fistula probing (p = 0.006) and fistulotomy (p = 0.009) was associated with treatment success. History of perianal abscess, multilocal occurrence, and the presence of enteric flora in wound swabs was associated with treatment failure (p = 0.002, OR = 0.032). In multivariate analysis, anal fistula probing was independently associated with treatment success (p = 0.019, OR = 22.08), while the history of perianal abscess was associated with treatment failure (p = 0.002, OR = 0.032). Conclusion: Our study identified probing for fistula as a predictor of therapy success, while the history of perianal abscess was identified as a predictor of treatment failure. Therefore, in all children with perianal abscess, fistula probing and if present, fistulotomy should be performed.

2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 19(9)2018 Aug 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30200215

RESUMEN

Colon cancer (CC) and rectal cancer (RC) are synonymously called colorectal cancer (CRC). Based on our experience in basic and clinical research as well as routine work in the field, the term CRC should be abandoned. We analyzed the available data from the literature and results from our multicenter Research Group Oncology of Gastrointestinal Tumors termed FOGT to confirm or reject this hypothesis. Anatomically, the risk of developing RC is four times higher than CC, while physical activity helps to prevent CC but not RC. Obvious differences exist in molecular carcinogenesis, pathology, surgical topography and procedures, and multimodal treatment. Therefore, we conclude that CC is not the same as RC. The term "CRC" should no longer be used as a single entity in basic and clinical research as well as other areas of classification.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Colon/genética , Neoplasias del Colon/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Especificidad de Órganos , Neoplasias del Recto/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Recto/genética , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...