Prevalence of Masked versus Unmasked Blepharoptosis in Subjects Seeking for Blepharoplasty and or Eyebrow Lift.

PURPOSE: To report the prevalence of unmasked versus masked in subjects seeking for eyelid and eyebrow rejuvenation. METHODS: This retrospective study included subjects (>18 years) who were seeking for blepharoplasty and/or eyebrow lift procedures in the year 2020. They were either having No ptosis, Unmasked or Exposed ptosis (complaining of simultaneous droopy eyelid, which was confirmed on examination), or Masked or Hidden ptosis (not complaining of simultaneous droopy eyelid, but its presence was revealed on the examination). Margin reflex distance 1 (MRD1) and levator function (LF) were recorded. Associated ptosis was defined as MRD1 of ≤3 mm and regarded as mild (3 and 2.5 mm), moderate (2 and 1.5 mm), and severe (≤1 mm). RESULTS: Included were 1401 subjects with a mean age of 47.2 years. The prevalence of masked and unmasked ptosis was 31% (90% unilateral) and 15.6% (59% bilateral), respectively. A significantly younger mean age (45.6 vs. 59.7 years), higher MRD1 (2.6 vs. 1.9 mm), and better LF (13.3 vs. 11.3 mm) were observed in the masked vs. unmasked ptosis group. More than 80% of the subjects with masked ptosis presented with indirect signs. A majority of both groups (68.8% of masked and 63.5% of unmasked ptosis) were mild to moderate. CONCLUSION: Almost half of the subjects seeking for eyelid and eyebrow rejuvenation had either masked (2/3) or unmasked (1/3) associated ptosis. Masked ptosis was mostly unilateral and presenting with indirect signs of ptosis.

Changes in Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Photorefractive Keratectomy, Using a Noncontact Tonometer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare early corneal biomechanical changes after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: The study comprised 74 patients eligible for refractive surgery, equally allocated to PRK (37 patients) and SMILE (37 patients). Corneal biomechanical properties were recorded and compared between the 2 groups at preoperatively and 3 months after surgery using a dynamic ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug camera equipped with a noncontact tonometer. RESULTS: Both procedures significantly affected corneal biomechanical properties at 3 months after surgery. Patients in the PRK group showed significantly better results for deformation amplitude ratio (DA ratio) ( P = 0.03), maximum inverse radius (InvRadMax) ( P = 0.02), and A2 time ( P = 0.03). The mean changes in DA ratio, HC radius, InvRadMax, and Ambrosio relational thickness were significantly higher in the SMILE group in comparison with those of the PRK group (all, P < 0.05). In both groups, change in CCT was significantly correlated with changes in DA ratio and InvRadMax ( P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONSS: Both SMILE and PRK refractive surgeries significantly altered corneal biomechanical properties but the changes were more prominent after SMILE.

Long-term Results of Palpebral Fissure Transfer With No Lower Eyelid Spacer in Chronic Progressive External Ophthalmoplegia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of the palpebral fissure transfer (PFT) technique without lower eyelid spacer in patients with chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO). DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series. METHODS: Consecutive patients with CPEO with PFT surgery (2006-2017) and a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included. The PFT included simultaneous levator resection or frontalis sling (based on the levator function and Bell's phenomenon) and lower eyelid retractor recession without spacer. Primary outcome measures included the change in margin reflex distance 1 (MRD-1), MRD-2, and palpebral fissure height (PFH) in the course of time. Potential predictors of keratopathy were also explored. RESULTS: There were 32 patients (64 eyelids) with the mean age and follow-up of 34.1 years (range 15-56 years) and 37.9 months (range 24-72 months), respectively. Mean MRD-1 significantly increased from -0.9 mm to 3.4 mm in postoperative weeks 1 and 2 and 1.8 mm at the last follow-up. Mean MRD-2 significantly decreased from 5.6 mm to 3.7 mm in postoperative weeks 1 and 2 and 5 mm at the last follow-up. Eyes with frank lower eyelid retraction (MRD-2 >5 mm) gained more reduction in MRD-2 compared with those with no sclera show (-0.9 mm vs -0.3 mm, P < .001). Reoperation was performed in 9 eyelids for under- (n = 5) and overcorrection (n = 4). Persistent keratopathy was observed in 3 eyes (4.5%). CONCLUSION: Lower eyelid retractor recession without spacer yields significant protective corneal coverage at the critical early postoperative period when the risk of keratopathy is highest.

Evaluation of early postoperative ocular pain after photorefractive keratectomy and corneal crosslinking.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare early postoperative pain after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal crosslinking (CXL). SETTING: Khatam-al-Anbia Eye Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: The PRK group included patients with simple refractive errors whereas the CXL group included patients with clinical keratoconus. The groups were compared regarding the level of pain based on the visual analogue scale (VAS), verbal rating scale (VRS), and Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale immediately after surgery, 6 hours postoperatively, and 1, 3, and 7 days postoperatively. The epithelial defect size was measured at 6 hours after surgery and 1 day and 3 days after surgery in both groups. RESULTS: The study comprised 68 patients (34 patients in the PRK group and 34 patients in the CXL group). The epithelial defect size was significantly smaller in the CXL group than in the PRK group (P < .001); however, the amount of pain was significantly higher after CXL than after PRK based on VAS and VRS (P = .04 and P = .019, respectively). In the FACES scaling system, the pain score was also higher in the CXL group than in the PRK group. However, the difference was not statistically significant. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The epithelial defect healing rate was statistically significantly faster in the CXL group than in the PRK group. However, the level of pain was greater in the CXL group, suggesting that postsurgical pain might be influenced by other factors than the epithelial defect.