Characterization of Biomarkers of Thrombo-Inflammation in Patients with First-Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation.

Patients with first-diagnosed atrial fibrillation (FDAF) exhibit major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) during follow-up. Preclinical models have demonstrated that thrombo-inflammation mediates adverse cardiac remodeling and atherothrombotic events. We have hypothesized that thrombin activity (FIIa) links coagulation with inflammation and cardiac fibrosis/dysfunction. Surrogate markers of the thrombo-inflammatory response in plasma have not been characterized in FDAF. In this prospective longitudinal study, patients presenting with FDAF (n = 80), and 20 matched controls, were included. FIIa generation and activity in plasma were increased in the patients with early AF compared to the patients with chronic cardiovascular disease without AF (controls; p < 0.0001). This increase was accompanied by elevated biomarkers (ELISA) of platelet and endothelial activation in plasma. Pro-inflammatory peripheral immune cells (TNF-α+ or IL-6+) that expressed FIIa-activated protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) (flow cytometry) circulated more frequently in patients with FDAF compared to the controls (p < 0.0001). FIIa activity correlated with cardiac fibrosis (collagen turnover) and cardiac dysfunction (NT-pro ANP/NT-pro BNP) surrogate markers. FIIa activity in plasma was higher in patients with FDAF who experienced MACE. Signaling via FIIa might be a presumed link between the coagulation system (tissue factor-FXa/FIIa-PAR1 axis), inflammation, and pro-fibrotic pathways (thrombo-inflammation) in FDAF.

Initial therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban compared to prophylactic therapy with heparins in moderate to severe COVID-19: results of the COVID-PREVENT randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is associated with a prothrombotic state. Current guidelines recommend prophylactic anticoagulation upon hospitalization. METHODS: COVID-PREVENT, an open-label, multicenter, randomized, clinical trial enrolled patients (≥ 18 years) with moderate to severe COVID-19 and age-adjusted D-dimers > 1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN). The participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily or thromboprophylaxis with a heparin (SOC) for at least 7 days followed by prophylactic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for 28 days or no thromboprophylaxis. The primary efficacy outcome was the D-dimer level and the co-primary efficacy outcome the 7-category ordinal COVID-19 scale by WHO at 7 days post randomization. The secondary outcome was time to the composite event of either venous or arterial thromboembolism, new myocardial infarction, non-hemorrhagic stroke, all-cause death or progression to intubation and invasive ventilation up to 35 days post randomization. RESULTS: The primary efficacy outcome D-dimer at 7 days was not different between patients assigned to therapeutic (n = 55) or prophylactic anticoagulation (n = 56) (1.21 mg/L [0.79, 1.86] vs 1.27 mg/L [0.79, 2.04], p = 0.78). In the whole study population D-dimer was significantly lower at 7 days compared to baseline (1.05 mg/L [0.75, 1.48] vs 1.57 mg/L [1.13, 2.19], p < 0.0001). Therapy with rivaroxaban compared to SOC was not associated an improvement on the WHO 7-category ordinal scale at 7 days (p = 0.085). Rivaroxaban improved the clinical outcome measured by the score in patients with a higher baseline D-dimer > 2.0 ULN (exploratory analysis; 0.632 [0.516, 0.748], p = 0.026). The secondary endpoint occurred in 6 patients (10.9%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 12 (21.4%) in the SOC group (time-to-first occurrence of the components of the secondary outcome: HR 0.5; 95% CI 0.15-1.67; p = 0.264). There was no difference in fatal or non-fatal major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban compared to prophylactic anticoagulation with a heparin did not improve surrogates of clinical outcome in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. Whether initial rivaroxaban at therapeutic doses might be superior to thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19 and a high risk as defined by D-dimer > 2 ULN needs confirmation in further studies.

Cardiovascular disease biomarkers derived from circulating cell-free DNA methylation.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a major cause of worldwide mortality. The syndrome occurs when blood flow to the heart muscle is decreased or blocked, causing muscle tissues to die or malfunction. There are three main types of ACS: Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and unstable angina. The treatment depends on the type of ACS, and this is decided by a combination of clinical findings, such as electrocardiogram and plasma biomarkers. Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) is proposed as an additional marker for ACS since the damaged tissues can release DNA to the bloodstream. We used ccfDNA methylation profiles for differentiating between the ACS types and provided computational tools to repeat similar analysis for other diseases. We leveraged cell type specificity of DNA methylation to deconvolute the ccfDNA cell types of origin and to find methylation-based biomarkers that stratify patients. We identified hundreds of methylation markers associated with ACS types and validated them in an independent cohort. Many such markers were associated with genes involved in cardiovascular conditions and inflammation. ccfDNA methylation showed promise as a non-invasive diagnostic for acute coronary events. These methods are not limited to acute events, and may be used for chronic cardiovascular diseases as well.

Galectin-3 as a Marker for Increased Thrombogenicity in COVID-19.

Galectin-3 is a beta-galactoside-binding lectin involved in inflammation and lung fibrosis and postulated to enhance thrombosis. In COVID-19, it is considered to be a prognostic marker of severity. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether galectin-3 is associated with thrombogenicity in COVID-19. Patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 (COVpos; n = 55) and patients with acute respiratory diseases, but without COVID-19 (COVneg; n = 35), were included in the study. We measured the amount of galectin-3, as well as other platelet and coagulation markers, and correlated galectin-3 levels with these markers of thrombogenicity and with the SOFA Score values. We found that galectin-3 levels, as well as von Willebrand Factor (vWF), antithrombin and tissue plasminogen activator levels, were higher in the COVpos than they were in the COVneg cohort. Galectin-3 correlated positively with vWF, antithrombin and D-dimer in the COVpos cohort, but not in the COVneg cohort. Moreover, galactin-3 correlated also with clinical disease severity, as measured by the SOFA Score. In patients with acute respiratory diseases, galectin-3 can be considered as a marker not only for disease severity, but also for increased hypercoagulability. Whether galectin-3 might be a useful therapeutic target in COVID-19 needs to be assessed in future studies.

The Role of NETosis and Complement Activation in COVID-19-Associated Coagulopathies.

Inflammation-induced coagulopathy is a common complication associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aim to evaluate the association of NETosis and complement markers with each other as well as their association with thrombogenicity and disease severity in COVID-19. The study included hospitalized patients with an acute respiratory infection: patients with SARS-CoV2 infection (COVpos, n = 47) or either pneumonia or infection-triggered acute exacerbated COPD (COVneg, n = 36). Our results show that NETosis, coagulation, and platelets, as well as complement markers, were significantly increased in COVpos patients, especially in severely ill COVpos patients. NETosis marker MPO/DNA complexes correlated with coagulation, platelet, and complement markers only in COVpos. Severely ill COVpos patients showed an association between complement C3 and SOFA (R = 0.48; p ≤ 0.028), C5 and SOFA (R = 0.46; p ≤ 0.038), and C5b-9 and SOFA (R = 0.44; p ≤ 0.046). This study provides further evidence that NETosis and the complement system are key players in COVID-19 inflammation and clinical severity. Unlike previous studies that found NETosis and complement markers to be elevated in COVID-19 patients compared to healthy controls, our findings show that this characteristic distinguishes COVID-19 from other pulmonary infectious diseases. Based on our results, we propose that COVID-19 patients at high risk for immunothrombosis could be identified via elevated complement markers such as C5.

Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction and Microbial Translocation in Patients with First-Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: According to the leaky gut concept, microbial products (e.g., lipopolysaccharide, LPS) enter the circulation and mediate pro-inflammatory immunological responses. Higher plasma LPS levels have been reported in patients with various cardiovascular diseases, but not specifically during early atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We studied data and blood samples from patients presenting with first-diagnosed AF (FDAF) (n = 80) and 20 controls. RESULTS: Circulating biomarkers that are suggestive of mucosal inflammation (zonulin, mucosal adhesion molecule MAdCAM-1) and intestinal epithelium damage (intestinal fatty acid binding protein, IFABP) were increased in the plasma of patients with FDAF when compared to patients with chronic cardiovascular diseases but without AF. Surrogate plasma markers of increased intestinal permeability (LPS, CD14, LPS-binding protein, gut-derived LPS-neutralising IgA antibodies, EndoCAbs) were detected during early AF. A reduced ratio of IgG/IgM EndoCAbs titres indicated chronic endotoxaemia. Collagen turnover biomarkers, which corresponded to the LPS values, suggested an association of gut-derived low-grade endotoxaemia with adverse structural remodelling. The LPS concentrations were higher in FDAF patients who experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event. CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal barrier dysfunction and microbial translocation accompany FDAF. Improving gut permeability and low-grade endotoxaemia might be a potential therapeutic approach to reducing the disease progression and cardiovascular complications in FDAF.

Being Overweight or Obese Is Associated with an Increased Platelet Reactivity Despite Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Aspirin and Clopidogrel.

PURPOSE: Obese patients exhibit an overall increased platelet reactivity and a reduced sensitivity to antiplatelet therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the platelet reactivity measured by impedance aggregometry in overweight and obese patients and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) that were treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). METHODS: Platelet aggregation was assessed by impedance aggregometry in patients with CCS receiving DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel). We compared the platelet reactivity in patients with a normal weight versus overweight or obese patients. Furthermore, the correlation between the body mass index (BMI) and adenosine diphosphate- (ADP-) or thrombin receptor-activating peptide- (TRAP-) dependent platelet aggregation was analyzed. RESULTS: 64 patients were included in the study of which 35.9% were patients with normal weight. A higher ADP- and TRAP-dependent platelet reactivity was observed in overweight and obese patients (ADP: median 27 units (U) [IQR 13-39.5] vs. 7 U [6-15], p < 0.001 and TRAP: 97 U [73-118.5] vs. 85 U [36-103], p = 0.035). Significant positive correlations were observed between agonist-induced platelet reactivity and BMI. CONCLUSION: Despite the use of DAPT, a higher platelet reactivity was found in overweight and obese patients with CCS. If these patients will benefit from treatment with more potent platelet inhibitors, it needs to be evaluated in future clinical trials.

Disease Severity in Moderate-to-Severe COVID-19 Is Associated With Platelet Hyperreactivity and Innate Immune Activation.

Background: Hemostasis and inflammation are both dysregulated in patients with moderate-to-severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Yet, both processes can also be disturbed in patients with other respiratory diseases, and the interactions between coagulation, inflammation, and disease severity specific to COVID-19 are still vague. Methods: Hospitalized patients with acute respiratory symptoms and with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2)-positive (COVpos) and SARS-CoV2-negative (COVneg) status were included. We assessed adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-, thrombin receptor activator peptide 6 (TRAP)-, and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet reactivity by impedance aggregometry, as well as leukocyte subtype spectrum and platelet-leukocyte aggregates by flow cytometry and inflammatory cytokines by cytometric bead array. Results: ADP-, TRAP-, and AA-induced platelet reactivity was significantly higher in COVpos than in COVneg patients. Disease severity, assessed by sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, was higher in COVpos than in COVneg patients and again higher in deceased COVpos patients than in surviving COVpos. The SOFA score correlated significantly with the mean platelet volume and TRAP-induced platelet aggregability. A larger percentage of classical and intermediate monocytes, and of CD4pos T cells (TH) aggregated with platelets in COVpos than in COVneg patients. Interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist (RA) and IL-6 levels were higher in COVpos than in COVneg patients and again higher in deceased COVpos patients than in surviving COVpos. IL-1RA and IL-6 levels correlated with the SOFA score in COVpos but not in COVneg patients. In both respiratory disease groups, absolute levels of B-cell-platelet aggregates and NK-cell-platelet aggregates were correlated with ex vivo platelet aggegation upon stimulation with AA and ADP, respectively, indicating a universal, but not a COVID-19-specific mechanism. Conclusion: In moderate-to-severe COVID-19, but not in other respiratory diseases, disease severity was associated with platelet hyperreactivity and a typical inflammatory signature. In addition to a severe inflammatory response, platelet hyperreactivity associated to a worse clinical outcome in patients with COVID-19, pointing to the importance of antithrombotic therapy for reducing disease severity.

Cytotoxic CD8+ T Cells Are Involved in the Thrombo-Inflammatory Response during First-Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial myopathy and atrial fibrillation (AF) accompany thrombo-inflammation. This facilitates disease progression and promotes major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Thrombin receptor (protease-activated receptor 1, PAR1) signalling is central in mediating thrombo-inflammation. We hypothesised that PAR1 signalling links coagulation and inflammation through cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes in patients presenting with first-diagnosed AF (FDAF). METHODS: A total of 210 patients were studied. We included data and blood samples from patients presenting with FDAF (n = 160), cardiac tissue from patients with paroxysmal AF (n = 32) and 20 controls. RESULTS: During early AF, a pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic subset of T lymphocytes (CD8+) circulated more frequently when compared to patients with chronic cardiovascular disease but without AF, accompanied by elevated plasma levels of CD8+ effector molecules, which corresponded to biomarkers of adverse cardiac remodelling and atrial dysfunction. Activation of tissue factor (TF) and PAR1 was associated with pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic effector functions. PAR1-related CD8+ cell activation was more frequent in FDAF patients that experienced a MACE. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with FDAF, the TF-factor Xa-factor IIa-axis contributes to thrombo-inflammation via PAR1 in CD8+ T cells. Intervening in this cascade might be a promising synergistic approach to reducing disease progression and the vascular complications of AF.

Pleiotropic Effects of the Protease-Activated Receptor 1 (PAR1) Inhibitor, Vorapaxar, on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) and toll-like receptors (TLRs) are inflammatory mediators contributing to atherogenesis and atherothrombosis. Vorapaxar, which selectively antagonizes PAR1-signaling, is an approved, add-on antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention. The non-hemostatic, platelet-independent, pleiotropic effects of vorapaxar have not yet been studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cellular targets of PAR1 signaling in the vasculature were identified in three patient cohorts with atherosclerotic disease. Evaluation of plasma biomarkers (n = 190) and gene expression in endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) (n = 12) revealed that PAR1 expression correlated with endothelial activation and vascular inflammation. PAR1 colocalized with TLR2/4 in human carotid plaques and was associated with TLR2/4 gene transcription in EMBs. In addition, vorapaxar reduced atherosclerotic lesion size in apolipoprotein E-knock out (ApoEko) mice. This reduction was associated with reduced expression of vascular adhesion molecules and TLR2/4 presence, both in isolated murine endothelial cells and the aorta. Thrombin-induced uptake of oxLDL was augmented by additional TLR2/4 stimulation and abrogated by vorapaxar. Plaque-infiltrating pro-inflammatory cells were reduced in vorapaxar-treated ApoEko mice. A shift toward M2 macrophages paralleled a decreased transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. CONCLUSIONS: PAR1 inhibition with vorapaxar may be effective in reducing residual thrombo-inflammatory event risk in patients with atherosclerosis independent of its effect on platelets.

Metformin Is Associated with Reduced Tissue Factor Procoagulant Activity in Patients with Poorly Controlled Diabetes.

PURPOSE: Metformin is the first-line antidiabetic drug and shown to reduce cardiovascular risk independent from its glucose lowering action. Particularly in poorly controlled diabetes, tissue factor (TF) is expressed in the vasculature and accounts for thromboembolic complications. Here, we aimed to assess the effect of metformin on TF activity and markers of vascular inflammation in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In a cohort of patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (glycosylated hemoglobin 8.39 ± 0.24%, 68.1 ± 2.6 mmol/mol, n = 46) of whom half of the individuals were treated with metformin and the other half did not receive metformin as part of an anti-diabetic combination therapy, we assessed TF activity and markers of vascular inflammation. In vitro, human monocytic cells (THP-1) were exposed to metformin and TF expression measured in the presence and absence of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activator 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside (AICAR) or the AMPK inhibitor compound C. RESULTS: In the patients, metformin treatment was associated with lower levels of TF protein (241.5 ± 19 vs. 315.4 ± 25 pg/mL, p = 0.03) and reduced TF activity (408.9 ± 49 vs. 643.8 ± 47 U/mL, p = 0.001) compared with controls. Moreover, the patients on metformin showed lower levels of vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)1 (26.6 ± 1.4 vs. 35.03 ± 3.1 ng/mL, p = 0.014) and higher expression of miR-126-3p/U6sno (11.39 ± 2.8 vs. 4.26 ± 0.9, p = 0.006), a known post-transcriptional down regulator of TF and VCAM1. In vitro, metformin dose-dependently reduced lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TF expression in THP-1 cells. The AMPK activator AICAR alone lowered TF expression in THP-1, while the AMPK inhibitor compound C abrogated the metformin-dependent reduction in TF expression. CONCLUSIONS: Our data are the first to report that metformin is associated with reduced plasma TF procoagulant activity possibly explaining-at least in part-the vasculoprotective properties of metformin.