Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Surgery ; 172(5): 1478-1483, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36031450

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Conversion to open is a potentially serious intraoperative event associated with minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomy. However, the impact of institutional expertise on conversion to open has not been studied on a large scale. We used a nationally representative database to evaluate the association between hospital pulmonary lobectomy caseload and rates of conversion to open. METHODS: All adults who underwent minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomy were identified from the 2017 to 2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Annual institutional caseloads of open and minimally invasive lobectomy were independently tabulated. Restricted cubic splines were used to parametrize the relationship between conversion to open and hospital volumes. Furthermore, multivariable regression was used to examine the association of conversion to open with in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and hospitalization costs. RESULTS: Of an estimated 52,886 patients who met study criteria, 4.9% required conversion to open. Compared to others, conversion to open patients were slightly younger (66 vs 67 years) and more commonly male (52.2 vs 42.3%, P < .001). After adjustment, male sex (adjusted odds ratio 1.42), history of tobacco use (adjusted odds ratio 1.35), and prior radiation therapy (adjusted odds ratio 1.35, P < .001) were associated with increased odds of conversion to open. Increasing minimally invasive lobectomy volume was linked to lower risk-adjusted rates of conversion to open, whereas greater open lobectomy caseload was associated with higher rates. Despite no impact on mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.11, P = .73), conversion to open was associated with a 1.2-day increment in length of stay and $5,600 in attributable costs. CONCLUSION: The present study found institutional minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomy caseload to be associated with decreased rates of conversion to thoracotomy, emphasizing the relevance of minimally invasive training among surgeons and perioperative staff.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Cirujanos , Adulto , Humanos , Pulmón/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Masculino , Neumonectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video , Toracotomía
2.
Am J Surg ; 220(1): 197-202, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31812256

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the mortality, morbidity, and readmissions associated with management of grade 3 cholecystitis in the elderly, vulnerable population. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of non-elective admissions for acute cholecystitis from 2010 to 2015 using the nationwide readmissions database for adults ≥ 65 years with evidence of end-organ dysfunction (grade 3) who underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC), laparoscopic (LC) or open cholecystectomy (OC). Index and readmission outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression and inverse probability treatment weight analysis. RESULTS: Of the estimated 358,624 patients, 14.9% underwent PC, 15.7% OC, and 69.4% LC. PC had significantly higher odds of mortality (AOR 5.8, 95%CI 5.1-6.6), composite morbidity (AOR 3.8, 95%CI 3.5-4.1), early (AOR 1.9, 95%CI 1.7-2.0) and intermediate (AOR 2.2, 95%CI 2.0-2.5) readmission compared to LC and OC. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing cholecystostomy had higher mortality, complications, and readmission rates warranting revaluation of criteria for cholecystostomy at initial presentation.


Asunto(s)
Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Colecistostomía/métodos , Hospitalización/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Colecistitis Aguda/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Morbilidad/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Surgery ; 165(6): 1222-1227, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31072666

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although short-term outcomes of endovascular and open infrainguinal revascularization in patients with peripheral arterial disease have been previously reported, 30-day readmission and resource utilization after these procedures remain unknown. METHODS: We used the 2010-2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database and the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, to identify patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing either in-hospital endovascular or open infrainguinal revascularization. RESULTS: Of an estimated 574,201 hospitalized patients treated for peripheral arterial disease, 308,056 and 266,145 underwent lower limb endovascular and open infrainguinal revascularization, respectively. Compared with patients who underwent open revascularization, endovascular patients were more commonly female (44.8% vs 36.7%, P < .001) and older (69.5 vs 67.2 years, P < .001). Moreover, they had higher rates of 30-day readmission (15.6% vs 13.5%, P < .001), in-hospital complications (22.3% vs 20.9%, P < .001), and in-hospital index mortality (2.1% vs 1.8%, P < .001). In contrast, risk-adjusted multivariable analysis found open revascularization to be independently associated with increased odds of 30-day readmission (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.16), index complications (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval 1.20-1.27), and mortality (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.36) compared with those who underwent endovascular revascularization. Trend analysis revealed an overall decrease in the utilization of both endovascular and open revascularization procedures in the inpatient setting. CONCLUSION: Despite lower rates of adverse events compared to endovascular, open infrainguinal revascularization is independently associated with increased risk of short-term readmission, complications, and mortality. These findings should be considered in the selection of appropriate surgical therapy for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Injerto Vascular/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ajuste de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos
4.
Am J Cardiol ; 123(10): 1675-1680, 2019 05 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30850212

RESUMEN

Patients with autoimmune connective tissue disease (CTD) are at higher risk for developing aortic valve pathology, but the safety and value of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in this population has not been investigated. This study evaluated mortality, complication, and readmission rates along with length of stay and total costs after TAVI in patients with CTD. We retrospectively reviewed 47,216 patients who underwent TAVI from the National Readmissions Database between January 2011 and September 2015. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, rheumatoid arthritis, and other autoimmune CTD comprised the cohort. The primary outcome was mortality at index hospitalization. The 2,557 CTD patients (5.4%) had a higher Elixhauser co-morbidity index (7.1 vs 6.1, p <0.001) than non-CTD patients. CTD and non-CTD patients had similar mortality (2.8 vs 4.1%, p = 0.052), 30-day readmission (19.3 vs 17.0%, p = 0.077), length of stay (8.2 vs 8.3 days, p = 0.615), and total adjusted costs ($57,202 vs $58,309, p = 0.196), respectively. However, CTD patients were more frequently readmitted for postoperative infection (9.4 vs 5.6%, p = 0.042) and septicemia (8.2 vs 4.5%, p = 0.019). After multivariable adjustment, CTD patients faced lower mortality at index hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 0.56 [0.38 to 0.82], p = 0.003) but were more frequently readmitted for septicemia (OR = 1.95 [1.10 to 3.45], p = 0.023) and postoperative infection (OR = 3.10 [1.01 to 9.52], p = 0.048) relative to non-CTD patients. In conclusion, CTD is not a risk factor for in-hospital mortality but is an independent risk factor for infectious complications post-TAVI.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Tejido Conjuntivo/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/epidemiología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/etiología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Tejido Conjuntivo/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA