Role of Selected Circulating Tumor Biomarkers in Patients with Skeletal Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

We investigated the diagnostic capacity of selected circulating biomarkers (CBMs) for the early detection of bone metastasis (BMets) in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs). A total of 115 patients with PanNENs and 40 controls were enrolled. We measured the serum levels of ferritin, cytokeratin 18 (CY18), CA19-9, CA125, AFP, CEA, and beta-2 microglobulin (B2M). A total of eight PanNEN patients developed BMets, and one hundred seven remained BMets-free. We observed a significantly higher level of CA125 and CY18 in BMets patients vs. non-BMets patients (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively). CA125, CY18, and B2M area under receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) analyses differentiated both patients groups; CA125 area under the curve (AUC) 0.77, p < 0.01; CY18 AUC data were 0.72, p = 0.03, and B2M AUC 0.67, p = 0.02. On the basis of CBM metrics in both subgroups, we reached a sensitivity/specificity for CA125 of 75/76%; for CY18 of 75/69%, for B2M of 100/50%, for CA125, and the CY18 combination of 93/90%, respectively. According to current results, CA125 and CY18 seem to have the potential capacity as fair biomarkers for BMets detection, despite the small number of cases. Further studies are warranted in the larger PanNEN patient group.

Association between Biomarkers (VEGF-R2, VEGF-R3, VCAM-1) and Treatment Duration in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Receiving Therapy with First-Generation Somatostatin Analogues.

Angiogenic factors (AF) promote vascular formation and may thus support neuroendocrine tumour (NET) development. This study aimed to assess AF serum level changes in NET patients treated with prolonged-acting somatostatin analogues (SSAs). The study enrolled 49 healthy volunteers (Group A) and 56 NET patients: treatment naïve (Group B) and after-SSA treatment in various periods (months): under 12 (Group C), 13-24 (Group D), 25-36 (Group E), 37-60 (Group F), and over 60 months (Group G). The serum vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 2, 3 (VEGF-R2, VEGF-R3), and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) concentrations were tested using the ELISA. We noted significant differences in the concentrations of VEGF-R2, VEGF-R3, and VCAM-1 depending on the SSA treatment duration (p < 0.001). In the studied AFs, the highest decreasing levels of VEGF-R2 were observed after two years of therapy. However, monitoring VEGF-R2, VEGF-R3, and VCAM-1 during SSA treatment did not allow for the identification of good responders for this kind of therapy. Therefore, these biomarker measurements were not helpful in assessing SSA treatment effectiveness in NET patients.

Assessment of VEGF and VEGF R1 serum levels in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms before and after treatment with first-generation somatostatin analogues.

INTRODUCTION: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a known promoter of angiogenesis that can support neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) development. The aim of the study was to evaluate the serum VEGF and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGF R1) concentration changes in patients with NEN treated with first-generation long-acting somatostatin analogues (SSA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study comprised 55 controls and 56 NEN patients before and after SSA treatment in various periods of time (months): 1-12 (n = 54), 13-24 (n = 46), 25-36 (n = 35), 37-60 (n = 26), and over 60 months (n = 22). An analysis of medical records and serum VEGF and VEGF R1 concentration measurements of NEN patients, by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were made. RESULTS: During SSA treatment time, a decrease of the VEGF and an increase of VEGF R1 concentrations was observed. We confirmed significant VEGF differences between 2 pairs of SSA-treated NEN patient subgroups: Group 1-12 vs. Group 37-60 (p = 0.039) and Group 1-12 vs. Group > 60 (p = 0.026). We did not note significant differences of VEGF R1 levels between SSA-treated NEN patient subgroups. Among the studied biomarkers, VEGF R1 exhibited the best performance in distinguishing between NEN patients with controls; area under the curve (AUC) = 1 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The examined angiogenesis factors (VEGF and VEGF R1) seem to have limited usage in the assessment of SSA treatment effectiveness in NEN. However, the assessment of serum levels of these factors may help in the differentiation of NEN patients and healthy controls; in particular, VEGF R1 seems to be a good diagnostic biomarker for NEN patients.

Gastroduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms including gastrinoma - update of the diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines (recommended by the Polish Network of Neuroendocrine Tumours) [Nowotwory neuroendokrynne zoladka i dwunastnicy z uwzglednieniem gastrinoma - uaktualnione zasady postepowania (rekomendowane przez Polska Siec Guzów Neuroendokrynnych)].

After another meeting of experts of the Polish Network of Neuroendocrine Tumours, updated recommendations for the management of patients with gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms, including gastrinoma, have been issued. As before, the epidemiology, pathogenesis and clinical symptoms of these neoplasms have been discussed, as well as the principles of diagnostic procedures, including biochemical and histopathological diagnostics and tumour localisation, highlighting the changes introduced in the recommendations. Updated principles of therapeutic management have also been presented, including endoscopic and surgical treatment, and the options of pharmacological and radioisotope treatment. The importance of monitoring patients with gastric and duodenal NENs, including gastrinoma, has also been emphasised.

Spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC) in evaluation of advanced neuroendocrine tumours.

INTRODUCTION: 4D Ultrasound technology merging the Power Doppler option called High-Definition Flow (HDF) with Spatio-Temporal Image Correlation (STIC) is used in gynaecology and obstetrics. It seems to be a promising tool in assessing tissue vascularisation. The aim of the paper was to assess whether HDF STIC technique could be a useful tool for the evaluation of gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (GEP-NEN) advancement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients [mean age 57.7 ± 10.3 years; male 40.9% (n = 18)] diagnosed with metastatic GEP-NENs were included in the analysis. All subjects were enrolled in the Department of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumours, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice. We analysed liver metastases. Patients with G3 grading or faintly vascularised lesions were excluded. HDF STIC volumes were acquired during USG examination. 4D indices [volumetric pulsatility index (vPI) and volumetric systolic/diastolic index (vS/D)] were calculated using dedicated software. RESULTS: There were no correlations between vS/D and Ki-67 [p = 0.67; r = -0.19; (-0.28-0.19)], CgA [p = 0.47; r = -0.11; (-0.38-0,19)], 5-HIAA [p = 0.52; r = -0.09 (-0.37-0.2)], serotonin [p = 0.83; r = -0.03 (-0.32-0.26)], and VCAM-1 (p = 0.62; r = 0.09 (-03-0.47)]. The were no correlations between vPI and Ki-67 [p = 0.29; r = -0.16 (-0.45-0.14)], CgA (p = 0.46; r = -0.11 (-0.39-0.19)], 5-HIAA [p = 0.52; r = -0.09 (-0.37-0.2)], serotonin [p = 0.82; r = -0.03 (-0.32-0.26)], and VCAM-1 (p = 0.62; r = -0.09 (-03-0.47)]. There was no significant difference between carcinoid versus non-carcinoid patients if compared by vS/D and vPI (p = 0.62, p = 0.61, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: HDF STIC seems not to be an efficient marker to assess advancement of NENs, due to lack of correlation with widely used and approved markers of progression.

Safety and feasibility of same-day early discharge after endovascular revascularization of lower extremities in elderly. SENIOR-ER registry.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess safety and feasibility of one-day early discharge (ODD) after endovascular revascularization (ER) of lower extremities in elderly. BACKGROUND: Safety and feasibility of ODD after ER have never been investigated in the elderly, despite the PAD rate has been rising in well-developed countries as their populations are getting older. METHODS: The consecutive data of 477 patients after ER who were intended to ODD were reviewed. The ER procedure (balloon angioplasty, atherectomy, stenting) was performed due to significant, angiographically confirmed arterial stenosis with at least Rutheford III claudication. The population was divided into two groups: ≥70 years old (y. o.) in which were 235 patients and 220 patients <70 y. o., the younger control cohort. The follow-up was performed 24 hr after (24FU) the procedure and 30 days (30FU) after discharge. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in the ratio of same-day discharge (99% vs 99.5%, P = 0.6) and the mean time to ambulation was 287.4 ± 43.4 min versus 285.8 ± 45.7 min (P = 0.603). The ODD was not applied in 2 patients ≥70 y. o. due to two pseudoaneurysms requiring surgical repairs and in one from the control group due to retroperitoneal bleeding. There was no MACE or creatinine increase at 24 hr in both groups. At 30 days, there was no incidence of MACE in the ≥70 y. o. group while 3 MACE occurred in the control. The ratio of access site complications was comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: The study allows for a hypothesis that the advantages of ODD could be safely extended to the patients ≥70 y. o.

Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Lower Extremity Arterial Interventions With Atherectomy vs. Balloon Angioplasty　- Propensity Score-Matched Registry.

BACKGROUND: The impact of endovascular revascularization of the lower extremity arteries with atherectomy (AT) compared with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is still unclear. Therefore, the aim of the study was to compare long-term outcomes after percutaneous PTA and AT in patients requiring endovascular revascularization.Methods and Results:This was a single-center, retrospective registry of obstructive and symptomatic PAD patients who underwent endovascular revascularization. PTA was performed in 215 patients, and AT in 204 (Silver Hawk, EV3, n=125; CSI 360°, n=66; Pathway Medical Technologies, n=13). There were no significant between-group differences in baseline characteristics except for increased CAD, dialysis and CLI prevalence in the PTA group. Following propensity score analysis 131 well-matched pairs were included in analysis. Bail-out stenting was more frequent in the reference group (PTA, 6.1% vs. AT, 0%; P=0.004). At 6- and 12-month follow-up there were no differences in TLR between the groups (PTA, 8.3% vs. AT, 5.3%; P=0.47; and PTA, 16.7% vs. AT, 13.7%; P=0.73, respectively). The difference was in favor of AT at 24-month follow-up (PTA, 29.0% vs. AT, 16.7%; P=0.05). No difference was observed in amputation rate (PTA, 0.7% vs AT, 1.5%; P=0.62). On Kaplan-Meier analysis there were no significant differences between groups in time to TLR, amputation or death. CONCLUSIONS: AT was associated with lower risk of TLR, and this should be confirmed in randomized controlled trials.