Comparison of Prophylactic Effects between Localized Biomimetic Minocycline and Systematic Amoxicillin on Implants Placed Immediately in Infected Sockets.

This study evaluated the prophylactic effect of localized biomimetic minocycline and systemic amoxicillin on immediate implant placement at infected extraction sites. Twelve mongrels with six implants each were randomly assigned to five groups: uninfected negative control (Group N); infected with oral complex bacteria (Group P); infected and treated with amoxicillin one hour before implant placement (Group A); infected and treated with minocycline during implant placement (Group B); and infected and treated with amoxicillin one hour before implant placement and with minocycline during implant placement (Group C). Radiographic bone level, gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD), papillary bleeding index (PBI), and removal torque (RT) were recorded. There was no significant difference between Groups A, B, and C for bone loss. Group A showed the highest RT, the lowest PBI, and significantly lower GI and PD values than Group P. Group B exhibited significantly higher RT value than Group N and significantly smaller PD value than Group P at 6 w postoperatively. Localized minocycline could improve implant success by reducing bone loss and increasing RT and systemic amoxicillin could maintain the stability of the peri-implant soft tissue. However, combined use of these two antibiotics did not augment the prophylactic effect.

In Vitro Evaluation of Implant Surface Decontamination Methods Based on Removal and Regrowth of Microorganisms.

PURPOSE: The efficiency of bacterial removal using mechanical and chemical methods and recurrence rates was evaluated based on infected implant surface removal modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprises two main parts: in vitro bacterial removal (n = 49) and regrowth (n = 42) suppression tests on implant surfaces. Microorganisms were attached to each implant, and various methods were applied to clean the infected implants. The groups were allocated as follows: (1) no treatment, (2) cotton + saline, (3) brush, (4) scaler, (5) brush + scaler, (6) cotton + 3% H2O2, and (7) brush + 3% H2O2. All groups were further divided into two subgroups of mechanical treatment (3, 4, 5) vs mechanical + chemical treatment (2, 6, 7). After treatment for each group, immunofluorescence analysis and measurement using an ultraviolet-visible light spectrophotometer were performed. RESULTS: In the mechanical treatment group, the brush, scaler, and brush + scaler groups, all of which had strong polishing abilities, exhibited superior removal efficiency compared with the other groups (P < .001). In the regrowth experiment, 3% H2O2 effectively restrained biofilm formation. In particular, the brush + 3% H2O2 group exhibited significant differences from the mechanical treatment group (vs brush: P < .001, vs scaler: P = .023, vs brush + scaler: P = .005). CONCLUSION: Mechanical methods, including brushes and scalers, effectively removed bacteria. Biofilm formation was effectively restrained by H2O2. In particular, the brush + H2O2 group exhibited a superior ability to suppress bacterial regrowth compared with the other groups.

Soft tissue expander for vertically atrophied alveolar ridges: Prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Conventional guided bone regeneration (GBR) limits the amount of bone graft due to limited soft tissue expansion. We hypothesize that the use of tissue expander will successfully augment soft tissue prior to bone graft, allowing for sufficient amount of grafting which will lead to a more stable and effective vertical bone graft. The authors aimed to evaluate effectiveness of the novel self-inflating tissue expander for vertical augmentation in terms of soft tissue expansion, clinical outcomes, and related complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial was performed on patients requiring vertical augmentation. For experimental group patients, the tissue expander was subperiosteally implanted and followed by a tunneling bone graft without full flap reflection. Control patients underwent conventional vertical GBR. Primary objectives were to evaluate the dimensional changes of soft tissue and radiographic vertical bone gain and retention. As a secondary outcome, clinical complications and thickness changes of expanded overlying tissue were assessed and analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients in each group were included. During a 4-week expansion, two of the experimental group showed over-expansion and one showed mucosal perforation associated with previous severe scars. The other patients showed uneventful expansion and mean tissue augmentation was 6.88 ± 1.64 mm vertically. Ultrasonographic measurements of overlying gingiva revealed no thinning after tissue expansion (p > .05). Significantly higher vertical bone gain was shown in the experimental group (5.12 ± 1.25 mm) compared with that in the control patients (4.22 ± 1.15 mm; p < .05). After a 6-month retention period, the mean vertical bone measurement of the controls had decreased to 1.90 mm (55.0% reduction), which was a significantly greater decrease than that in the experimental group (mean 3.55 mm, 30.7% reduction; p < .05). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated the effectiveness of tissue expanders followed by tunneling bone graft for vertical augmentation; however, studies comparing the two techniques without tissue expanders are needed to elucidate the net effect of tissue expansion.

Effect of erosive and abrasive stress on sealing ability of different desensitizers: In-vitro study.

This in vitro study examined the sealing ability of different desensitizing agents under a chemo-mechanical stress condition. For the study, a total of 144 extracted, caries-free human third molars were used to produce 1 mm-thick dentin discs. The specimens were divided randomly into four groups: Superseal (SS), Gluma (GL), Gluma Self-etch (GS), and Tooth Coat (TC). For each group, the permeability was measured before and after applying the desensitizer, after being exposed to Coca Cola for 5 minutes, and after 3150 strokes of a brushing abrasion. The decrease in permeability after the erosive and abrasive stress was analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. As a result, the dentin permeability decreased significantly for all desensitizers immediately after application (p < 0.05). SS and GS showed a significant difference in permeability reduction observed immediately after application and after acid action with Coca Cola (p < 0.05). After brushing abrasion, the permeability reduction decreased significantly for all desensitizers tested in this study (p < 0.05). TC showed the largest decrease in dentinal permeability compared to that of the other desensitizers and the differences were significant after brushing abrasion (p < 0.05). All tested desensitizers were effective in reducing dentin permeability. The behavioral characteristics under erosive and abrasive stress varied according to the products used. TC exhibited excellent sealing ability among the other desensitizers.