A Review of Meta-Analyses in Plastic Surgery: Need for Adequate Assessment of Publication Bias.

INTRODUCTION: Publication bias describes a phenomenon in which significant positive results have a higher likelihood of being published compared to negative or nonsignificant results. Publication bias can confound the estimated therapeutic effect in meta-analyses and needs to be adequately assessed in the surgical literature. METHODS: A review of meta-analyses published in five plastic surgery journals from 2002 to 2022 was conducted. The inclusion criteria for meta-analyses were factors that demonstrated an obligation to assess publication bias, such as interventions with comparable treatment groups and enough power for statistical analysis. Acknowledgment of publication bias risk, quality of bias assessment, methods used in assessment, and individual article factors were analyzed. RESULTS: 318 unique meta-analyses were identified in literature search, and after full-text reviews, 143 met the inclusion criteria for obligation to assess publication bias. 64% of eligible meta-analyses acknowledged the confounding potential of publication bias, and only 46% conducted a formal assessment. Of those who conducted an assessment, 49% used subjective inspection of funnel plots alone, while 47% used any statistical testing in analysis. Overall, only 9/143 (6.3%) assessed publication bias and attempted to correct for its effect. Journals with a higher average impact factor were associated with mention and assessment of publication bias, but more recent publication year and higher number of primary articles analyzed were not. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified low rates of proper publication bias assessment in meta-analyses published in five major plastic surgery journals. Assessment of publication bias using objective statistical testing is necessary to ensure quality literature within surgical disciplines.

An initiative to assess and improve the resources and patient care processes used among Chest Wall Injury Society collaborative centers study (CWIS-CC2).

BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, the acute management of rib fractures has changed significantly. In 2021, the Chest Wall injury Society (CWIS) began recognizing centers that epitomize their mission as CWIS Collaborative Centers. The primary aim of this study was to determine the resources, surgical expertise, access to care, and institutional support that are present among centers. METHODS: A survey was performed including all CWIS Collaborative Centers evaluating the resources available at their hospital for the treatment of patients with chest wall injury. Data about each chest wall injury center care process, availability of resources, institutional support, research support, and educational offerings were recorded. RESULTS: Data were collected from 20 trauma centers resulting in an 80% response rate. These trauma centers were made up of 5 international and 15 US-based trauma centers. Eighty percent (16 of 20) have dedicated care team members for the evaluation and management of rib fractures. Twenty-five percent (5 of 20) have a dedicated rib fracture service with a separate call schedule. Staffing for chest wall injury clinics consists of a multidisciplinary team: with attending surgeons in all clinics, 80% (8 of 10) with advanced practice providers and 70% (7 of 10) with care coordinators. Forty percent (8 of 20) of centers have dedicated rib fracture research support, and 35% (7 of 20) have surgical stabilization of rib fracture (SSRF)-related grants. Forty percent (8 of 20) of centers have marketing support, and 30% (8 of 20) have a web page support to bring awareness to their center. At these trauma centers, a median of 4 (1-9) surgeons perform SSRFs. In the majority of trauma centers, the trauma surgeons perform SSRF. CONCLUSION: Considerable similarities and differences exist within these CWIS collaborative centers. These differences in resources are hypothesis generating in determining the optimal chest wall injury center. These findings may generate several patient care and team process questions to optimize patient care, patient experience, provider satisfaction, research productivity, education, and outreach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.

Incidence of surgical rib fixation at chest wall injury society collaborative centers and a guide for expected number of cases (CWIS-CC1).

PURPOSE: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) improves outcomes in certain patient populations. The Chest Wall Injury Society (CWIS) began a new initiative to recognize centers who epitomize their mission as CWIS Collaborative Centers (CWIS-CC). We sought to describe incidence and epidemiology of SSRF at our institutions. METHODS: A retrospective registry evaluation of all patients (age > 15 years) treated at international trauma centers from 1/1/20 to 7/30/2021 was performed. Variables included: age, gender, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, abbreviated injury severity score (AIS), emergency department disposition, length of stay, presence of rib/sternal fractures, and surgical stabilization of rib/sternal fractures. Classification and regression tree analysis (CART) was used for analysis. RESULTS: Data were collected from 9 centers, 26,084 patient encounters. Rib fractures were present in 24% (n = 6294). Overall, 2% of all patients underwent SSRF and 8% of patients with rib fractures underwent SSRF. CART analysis of SSRF by AIS-Chest demonstrated a difference in management by age group. AIS-Chest 3 had an SSRF rate of 3.7, 7.3, and 12.9% based on the age ranges (16-19; 80-110), (20-49; 70-79), and (50-69), respectively (p = 0.003). AIS-Chest > 3 demonstrated an SSRF rate of 9.6, 23.3, and 39.3% for age ranges (16-39; 90-99), (40-49; 80-89), and (50-79), respectively (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Anticipated rate of SSRF can be calculated based on number of rib fractures, AIS-Chest, and age. The disproportionate rate of SSRF in patients age 50-69 with AIS-Chest 3 and age 50-79 with AIS-Chest > 3 should be further investigated, as lower frequency of SSRF in the other age ranges may lead to care inequalities.

Surgical Fellowships Demonstrate Variable Improvement in Gender Representation Despite Greater Female Enrollment in General Surgery Residencies.

OBJECTIVE: Despite increasing female representation in General Surgery (GS) residency training programs, proportional improvement of female enrollment in surgical fellowships has yet to be quantified. We aimed to assess if female enrollment in surgical fellowships has improved at an equivalent rate in 7 different surgical fellowship options after GS. DESIGN AND SETTING: Data were collected from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) resources which disclosed active resident and fellow characteristics. Gender identification was self-reported by residents to ACGME. Gender data collected for GS programs and surgical fellowships including Surgical Critical Care, Colon, and Rectal Surgery, Pediatric Surgery, Plastic Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Thoracic Surgery, and Vascular Surgery from annual reports. Pearson Chi-squared analysis was conducted between GS residencies and fellowship programs in their corresponding years using Stata15 software. RESULTS: In all years examined, fellowships in Vascular, Thoracic, and Plastic Surgery had significantly lower female enrollment in proportion to the number of female GS residents (p = <0.02). In all years examined, Surgical Oncology, Pediatric, Colon and Rectal, and Surgical Critical Care had female enrollment that was, at minimum, proportional to female enrollment in GS residency, indicating equitable gender representation. Surgical Oncology (2016), Pediatric (2020) and Surgical Critical Care (2016) fellowships each had 1 year where female enrollment was significantly higher than General Surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The enrollment of female surgeons in Plastic, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery fellowships has not improved proportionally despite an increase in female GS residents. These results suggest the possibility of persistent factors that deter female enrollment in Vascular, Thoracic and Plastic Surgery fellowships that are not present to the same degree in fields with equitable fellowship female enrollment. Female representation in surgical fellowships is vital to improving gender diversity in all disciplines of surgery, particularly academic surgery.

Operative management of immune checkpoint colitis following in-transit melanoma: Case report.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly used as powerful anti-neoplastic therapies in the setting of melanoma. Colitis is a known complication of immune checkpoint inhibitors that if often medically managed. We present a patient with stage IV melanoma with demonstrated in-transit disease undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The patient subsequently developed recalcitrant severe colitis that necessitated operative intervention and bowel resection. The association of immune check point inhibitors and immune related adverse effects are discussed as well as treatments of advanced colitis, including the possibility of surgical management in the setting of severe colitis with complications.

A method for identifying the learning curve for the surgical stabilization of rib fractures.

BACKGROUND: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is an accepted efficacious treatment modality for patients with severe chest wall injuries. Despite increased adoption of SSRF, surgical learning curves are unknown. We hypothesized intraoperative duration could define individual SSRF learning curves. METHODS: Consecutive SSRF operations between January 2017 and December 2021 at a single institution were reviewed. Operative time, as measured from incision until skin closure, was evaluated by cumulative sum methodology using a range of acceptable "missteps" to determine the learning curves. Misstep was defined by extrapolation of accumulated operative time data. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients underwent SSRF by three surgeons during this retrospective review. Average operative times ranged from 135 minutes for two plates to 247 minutes for seven plates. Using polynomial regression of average operative times, 75 minutes for general procedural requirements plus 35 minutes per plate were derived as the anticipated operative times per procedure. Cumulative sum analyses using 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% incident rates for not meeting expected operative times, or "missteps" were used. An institutional learning curve between 15 and 55 SSRF operations was identified assuming a 90% performance rate. An individual learning curve of 15 to 20 operations assuming a 90% performance rate was observed. After this period, operative times stabilized or decreased for surgeons A, B, and C. CONCLUSION: The institutional and individual surgeon learning curves for SSRF appears to steadily improve after 15 to 20 operations using operative time as a surrogate for performance. The implementation of SSRF programs by trauma/acute care surgeons is feasible with an attainable learning curve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Oxygenation and Respiratory System Compliance Associated With Pulmonary Contusion.

BACKGROUND: Blunt pulmonary contusions are associated with severe chest injuries and are independently associated with worse outcomes. Previous preclinical studies suggest that contusion progression precipitates poor pulmonary function; however, there are few current clinical data to corroborate this hypothesis. We examined pulmonary dynamics and oxygenation in subjects with pulmonary contusions to evaluate for impaired respiratory function. METHODS: A chest injury database was reviewed for pulmonary contusions over 5 years at an urban trauma center. This database was expanded to capture mechanical ventilation parameters for the first 7 days on all patients with pulmonary contusion and who were intubated. Daily [Formula: see text]:[Formula: see text], oxygenation indexes (OI), and dynamic compliances were calculated. Pulmonary contusions were stratified by severity. The Fisher exact and chi square tests were performed on categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were performed on continuous variables. Significance was assessed at a level of 0.05. RESULTS A TOTAL OF: 1,176 patients presented with pulmonary contusions, of whom, 301 subjects (25.6%) required intubation and had available invasive mechanical ventilation data. Of these, 144 (47.8%) had mild-moderate pulmonary contusion and 157 (52.2%) had severe pulmonary contusion. Overall injury severity score was high, with a median injury severity score of 29 (interquartile range, 22-38). The median duration of mechanical ventilation for mild-moderate pulmonary contusion was 7 d versus 10 d for severe pulmonary contusion (P = .048). All the subjects displayed moderate hypoxemia, which worsened until day 4-5 after intubation. Severe pulmonary contusion was associated with significantly worse early hypoxia on day 1 and day 2 versus mild-moderate pulmonary contusion. Severe pulmonary contusion also had a higher oxygenation index than mild-moderate pulmonary contusion. This trend persisted after adjustment for other factors, including transfusion and fluid administration. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary contusions played an important role in the course of subjects who were acutely injured and required mechanical ventilation. Contusions were associated with hypoxemia not fully characterized by [Formula: see text]: [Formula: see text], and severe contusions had durable elevations in the oxygenation index despite confounders.

Retrospective Evaluation of Intrapleural Tissue Plasminogen Activator With or Without Dornase Alfa for the Treatment of Traumatic Retained Hemothorax: A 6-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Intrapleural fibrinolytic instillation is second-line treatment for retained hemothorax. Dornase alfa (DNase) has demonstrated efficacy in parapneumonic effusion, but the lack of deoxyribonucleoproteins limits direct extrapolation to traumatic retained hemothorax treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effectiveness of intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) with and without DNase in the treatment of retained traumatic hemothorax. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 16 years and older admitted to a level 1 trauma center from January 2013 through July 2019 with retained hemothorax and one or more intrapleural tPA instillations. Exclusion criteria were tPA for other indications or concomitant empyema. The primary endpoint was treatment failure defined as the need for operative intervention. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included (tPA alone: 28; tPA with DNase: 22). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, including time to diagnosis (6.5 [interquartile range (IQR), 4-15.5] days vs 6 [IQR, 6.3-10.8] days, P = 0.52). Median tPA dose per treatment (6 [IQR, 6-6.4] mg vs 10 [IQR, 8.4-10] mg, P < 0.001) and cumulative tPA (18 [IQR, 6.5-24] mg vs 30 [IQR, 29.5-40], P < 0.001) dose were significantly lower in the tPA alone group. Treatment failure was similar between groups. Chest tube output, retained hemothorax reduction, and bleeding incidences were similar between groups. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated no significant risk factors for treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Dornase alfa added to tPA may not reduce the need for operation to treat retained hemothorax. Further studies should be directed at optimal tPA dose determination and economic impact of inappropriate DNase use.

Intercostal liposomal bupivacaine injection for rib fractures: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Blunt chest wall injury accounts for 15% of trauma admissions. Previous studies have shown that the number of rib fractures predicts inpatient opioid requirements, raising concerns for pharmacologic consequences, including hypotension, delirium, and opioid dependence. We hypothesized that intercostal injection of liposomal bupivacaine would reduce analgesia needs and improve spirometry metrics in trauma patients with rib fractures. METHODS: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized placebo-control study was conducted at a Level I trauma center as a Food and Drug Administration investigational new drug study. Enrollment criteria included patients 18 years or older admitted to the intensive care unit with blunt chest wall trauma who could not achieve greater than 50% goal inspiratory capacity. Patients were randomized to liposomal bupivacaine or saline injections in up to six intercostal spaces. Primary outcome was to examine pain scores and breakthrough pain medications for 96-hour duration. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the effects of analgesia on pulmonary physiology. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled, 50 per cohort, with similar demographics (Injury Severity Score, 17.9 bupivacaine 17.6 control) and comorbidities. Enrolled patients had a mean age of 60.5 years, and 47% were female. Rib fracture number, distribution, and targets for injection were similar between groups. While both groups displayed a decrease in opioid use over time, there was no change in mean daily pain scores. The bupivacaine group achieved higher incentive spirometry volumes over Days 1 and 2 (1095 mL, 1063 mL bupivacaine vs. 900 mL, 866 mL control). Hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay were similar and there were no differences in postinjection pneumonia, use of epidural catheters or adverse events bet ween groups. CONCLUSION: While intercostal liposomal bupivacaine injection is a safe method for rib fracture-related analgesia, it was not effective in reducing pain scores, opioid requirements, or hospital length of stay. Bupivacaine injection transiently improved incentive spirometry volumes, but without a reduction in the development of pneumonia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, Level II.

"Early results after initiation of a rib fixation programme: A propensity score matched analysis".

INTRODUCTION: Chest wall injuries are very common in blunt trauma and development of treatment protocols can significantly improve outcomes. Surgical stabilisation of rib fractures (SSRF) is an adjunct for the most severe chest injuries and can be used as a part of a comprehensive approach to chest injuries care. We hypothesized that implementation of a SSRF programme program would result in improved short-term outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The characteristics of the initial group of SSRF patients (Early-SSRF) were used to identify matching factors. Patients prior to SSRF protocol underwent a propensity score match, followed by screening for operative indications and contraindications. After exclusions, a non-operative (Non-Op) cohort was defined (n=36) resulting in an approximately 1:1 match. An overall operative cohort, inclusive of Early-SSRF and all subsequent operative patients, was defined (All- SSRF). A before-and-after analysis using chi-squared, Students T-tests, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to assess significance at the level of 0.05. RESULTS: Early-SSRF (n=22) and All-SSRF (n=45) were compared to Non-Op (n=36). The selection process resulted in well matched groups, and equally well-balanced operative indications between the groups. The Early-SSRF group demonstrated shortened duration of mechanical ventilation and a decreased frequency of being discharged a long-term acute care hospital. The All-SSRF group again demonstrated markedly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation compared to Non-Op (median 6 days vs 16 days, p < 0.01), more decrease discharge to a long-term acute care hospital (9% vs. 36%, p=0.01), and reduced risk for tracheostomy (8.9% vs. 33.3% respectively, p<0.01) CONCLUSION: The introduction of an operative rib fixation to a comprehensive chest wall injury protocol can produce improvements in clinical outcomes that decrease time on the ventilator and tracheostomy rates, and result in more patients being discharged to home. Creation and implementation of a chest wall injury protocol to include SSRF requires a multidisciplinary approach and thoughtful patient selection.

The Association Between Pulmonary Contusion Severity and Respiratory Failure.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary contusions (PCs) have historically been viewed as a serious complicating factor in thoracic injury. Recently, there has been conflicting evidence regarding the influence of PCs on outcomes; however, many studies do not stratify contusions by severity and may miss clinical associations. We sought to identify if contusion severity is associated with worse outcomes. METHODS: A previously published chest wall injury database at an urban Level I trauma center was retrospectively reviewed. All severely injured subjects (defined as Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥ 15) with moderate to severe thoracic injury (defined as a chest wall Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] ≥ 3) who required mechanical ventilation for > 24 h were stratified by contusion severity. Moderate to severe contusions were defined as AIS contusion ≥ 3 and Blunt Pulmonary Contusion 18 (BPC18) score ≥ 3. RESULTS: Over 5 y, 3,836 patients presented with chest wall injuries, of which 1,176 (30.6%) had concomitant contusions. When screened for inclusion criteria, 339 subjects with contusions and 211 subjects without contusions (no-PC) were identified. Of these, 234 had moderate to severe contusions defined by AIS contusion ≥ 3 (PC-A) and 230 had moderate to severe contusions by BPC18 ≥ 3 (PC-B). Compared to no-PC, both PC-A and PC-B groups had significantly lower mortality (17.9% and 17.4%, respectively, vs 28.9%); however, PC-A and PC-B groups had longer durations of mechanical ventilation (6 and 7 d, respectively, vs 5 d), longer ICU length of stay (10 and 10 vs 8 d), and longer overall hospital length of stay (15 and 15 vs 13 d). CONCLUSIONS: In severely injured polytrauma patients, PCs are seen with more severe chest injuries. Furthermore, moderate to severe contusions are associated with longer durations of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay. Despite practice pattern changes, contusions appear to contribute significantly to the clinical course of the blunt chest wall injured patients.

Rib Season: Temporal Variation in Chest Wall Injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma to the chest wall is one of the most common injuries suffered. Knowing whether there are regular and reproducible changes in frequency or severity of certain injury types may help resource allocation and improve prevention efforts or outcomes; however, no prior studies have evaluated seasonal variation in chest wall injuries (CWIs). We aimed to determine if CWIs vary annually in a consistent distinct temporal variation. METHODS: Using an established traumatic blunt CWI database at a single urban level 1 trauma center, patients with a moderate-to-severe (chest wall Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) ≥2) CWI were reviewed. A subpopulation of predominant chest wall injury (pCWI) was defined as those with a chest wall AIS ≥3 and no other anatomic region having a higher AIS. Demographics, injury patterns, mechanisms of injury, and AIS were collected in addition to date of injury over a 4-y period. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics as well as Poisson time-series regression for periodicity. Seasonal comparison of populations was performed using Student's t-tests and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with significance assessed at a level of P < 0.05. RESULTS: Over a 4-y period nearly 16,000 patients presented with injury, of which 3042 patients were found to have a blunt CWI. Total CWI patients per year from 2014 to 2017 ranged from 571 to 947. Over this period, August had the highest incidence for patients with any CWI, moderate-to-severe injuries, and pCWI. February had the lowest overall injury incidence as well as lowest moderate-to-severe injury incidence. January had the lowest pCWI incidence. Yearly changes followed a quadratic sinusoid model that predicted a peak between incidence, between June and October, and the low season. A low season was found to be December-April. Comparing low to high seasons of injured patient monthly means revealed significant differences: total injuries (69.94 versus 85.56, P = 0.04), moderate to severe (62.25 versus 78.19, P = 0.06), and pCWI (25.25 versus 34.44, P = 0.01). Analysis of injuries by mechanism revealed a concomitant increase in motorcycle collisions during this period. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a significant seasonal variation in the overall incidence of CWI as well as severe pCWI, with a high-volume injury season in summer months (June-October) and low-volume season in winter (December-April). Motorcycle accidents were the major blunt injury mechanism that changed with this seasonality. These findings may help guide resource utilization and injury prevention.

Does chest wall Organ Injury Scale (OIS) or Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) predict outcomes? An analysis of 16,000 consecutive rib fractures.

BACKGROUND: Chest wall injuries have serious clinical consequences. It is presumed a higher severity of injury correlates with worse outcomes. The 2 most common chest wall injury severity scores, the Organ Injury Scale and the Abbreviated Injury Scale, are based on expert opinion with unknown clinical endpoints. Our aim was to determine if either the Organ Injury Scale or the Abbreviated Injury Scale are associated with clinical outcomes. METHODS: A single institution, 4-year retrospective study of all patients with rib or sternal fractures was conducted. All patients were assessed for both Organ Injury Scale and Abbreviated Injury Scale scores. Outcomes assessed included mortality, complications, tracheostomy, and readmissions. Receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve were calculated to measure discriminatory accuracy of scoring systems for outcomes in chest wall injury. RESULTS: Overall, 3,033 patients presented with a total of 16,055 rib fractures. The median chest wall scores were 2 for Organ Injury Scale and 3 for Abbreviated Injury Scale. Abbreviated Injury Scale scores for the same patients were greater than the Organ Injury Scale in 48.7%, equivalent in 46.7%, and lower in 4.6%. The receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve for in-hospital outcomes were weakly predictive for the Organ Injury Scale over the Abbreviated Injury Scale. The receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve for readmissions were very weakly predictive for the Abbreviated Injury Scale over the Organ Injury Scale. CONCLUSION: There is a very weak association between chest wall Organ Injury Scale score and in-hospital outcomes. The Abbreviated Injury Scale score outperformed the Organ Injury Scale, only being weakly predictive of readmission. Chest wall injury scoring systems may need revision for future outcomes-based research and practice improvements.

Readmission rates and associated factors following rib cage injury.

BACKGROUND: There remains a lack of knowledge about readmission characteristics after sustaining rib fractures. We aimed to determine rates, characteristics, and predictive/protective factors associated with unexpected reevaluation and readmission after rib cage injury. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed based on trauma patients evaluated at an urban Level I trauma center from January 2014 to December 2016. Adult patients sustaining blunt trauma with more than one rib fracture or a sternomanubrial fracture were defined as having moderate to severe rib cage injury. Exclusion criteria included penetrating injury, death during initial hospitalization, and only one rib fracture. Reevaluation was defined as presenting at a hospital within 90 days of discharge urgently or emergently. Demographics, injury characteristics, comorbidities, complications, imaging, and readmission data were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed with a significance of p less than 0.05. RESULTS: During the study period, 11,667 patients underwent trauma evaluation, of which 1,717 patients were found to have a moderate to severe rib cage injury. Within 90 days, 397 (23.1%) of patients underwent reevaluation, while 177 (10.3%) required readmission. One hundred forty-two (8.3%) patients were reevaluated specifically for chest-related complaints, and 55 (3.2%) required readmission. On univariate analysis, Injury Severity Score greater than 15, hospital length of stay longer than 7 days, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay longer than 3 days, a worsened chest x-ray at discharge, a psychiatric comorbidity, a smoking comorbidity, deep vein thrombosis, unplanned readmission to the ICU, and unplanned intubation were higher in the overall reevaluation cohort. On multivariate analysis, age of 15 years to 35 years, Risk Assessment Profile score greater than 8, hypertension, psychiatric comorbidity, current smoker, and unplanned return to the ICU on index admission were predictive of reevaluation of overall reevaluation. CONCLUSION: Moderate to severe rib cage injury is associated with high rates of reevaluation and readmission. Younger patients who smoke and required a return to the ICU are at greater risk for readmission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Prognostic and Epidemiologic.

What's in a Name? Provider Perception of Injured John Doe Patients.

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that unidentified aliased patients, John Doe's (DOEs), are one of the highest risk and most medically fragile populations of injured patients. Aliasing can result in misplaced information and confusion that must be overcome by health care professionals. DOE alias use is institutionally dependent and not uniform, which may lead to significant variation in perception of confusion and error. We sought to determine if health care practitioners experience confusion that may result in compromised care when caring for injured DOE patients. METHODS: After obtaining institutional review board approval, we surveyed critical care nurses, nurse practitioners, resident physicians, and surgeons who care for DOE patients at two academic level I trauma centers with separate DOE alias practices. Surveys asked whether caring for DOE patients created possible or actual confusion and possible or actual patient care errors. In one institution (Selective DOE), only unidentified patients were given an alias that was reconciled when information became available. At the other institution (All DOE), all trauma patients were admitted with an alias that was reconciled within 24 h. Respondents were invited to complete an anonymous questionnaire regarding the care for DOE patients. Results were analyzed with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and significance was assessed at a level of 0.05. RESULTS: Of 176 total respondents, 120 (68.2%) reported from Selective DOE and 56 (31.8%) from All DOE. Overall 53.1% reported that DOE use can cause serious confusion. Specifically, 31.3% reported experiencing actual confusion, although only 4% reported actual errors. Nurses had significantly higher perceived risk of confusion in the system of All DOE versus Selective DOE assignment (17.9% versus 4.2%, P < 0.01). Resident physicians reported significantly more frequent actual mistakes within the All DOE versus Selective DOE (24.1% versus 6.6%, P < 0.01), despite finding no significant difference in resident perception of confusion (21.4% versus 12.5%, respectively, P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Our study sheds light on clinical consequences of EMR use and aliases for end users. We show that nurses perceive that there are greater potential complications associated with DOE aliases use, and this varies depending on the system used for managing unidentified patients. Minimizing DOE alias use may help to minimize provider confusion, risk for error, and patient safety.

Medication Errors in Injured Patients.

Trauma patients are vulnerable to medication error given multiple handoffs throughout the hospital. The purpose of this study was to assess trends in medication errors in trauma patients and the role these errors play in patient outcomes. Injured adults admitted from 2009 to 2015 to a Level I trauma center were included. Medication errors were determined based on a nurse-driven, validated, and prospectively maintained database. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to control for differences between groups. Among 15,635 injured adults admitted during the study period, 132 patients experienced 243 errors. Patients who experienced errors had significantly worse injury severity, lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores and higher rates of hypotension on admission, and longer lengths of stay. Before adjustment, mortality was similar between groups but morbidity was higher in the medication error group. After risk adjustment, there were no significant differences in morbidity or mortality between the groups. Medication errors in trauma patients tend to occur in significantly injured patients with long hospital stays. Appropriate adjustment when studying the impact of medical errors on patient outcomes is important.

The Surgical Apgar Score in esophagectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The Surgical Apgar Score is a validated prognostic tool that is based on select intraoperative variables (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and blood loss). It has been shown to be a strong predictor of morbidity and mortality in a variety of surgical populations. Esophagectomy for malignancy represents a unique subset of patients at high risk for postoperative complications. This study assessed the ability of a modified esophagectomy Surgical Apgar Score (eSAS) to predict 30-day major morbidity. METHODS: A retrospective review included 168 patients who underwent elective esophagectomy for malignant disease at the University of Wisconsin from January 2009 through July 2013. Preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative details, and short-term outcomes were recorded. Primary outcome was 30-day major morbidity. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine associations between predictive variables, eSAS, and major morbidity. RESULTS: Major morbidity occurred in 35% of cases. Univariate analysis showed that eSAS of 6 or less was strongly associated with major morbidity (unadjusted odds ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.91; P = .005). Other risk factors included transhiatal technique, body mass index less than 20 or greater than 35 kg/m(2), and history of diabetes mellitus. In multivariate analysis, eSAS of 6 or less remained a strong predictor of postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio, 3.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.70-8.26; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The eSAS was strongly associated with 30-day major morbidity after esophagectomy. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether improved outcomes can be achieved with the eSAS for risk-stratified triage and postoperative care modification.