Maintenance interventions for overweight or obesity in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Childhood obesity is associated with significant health consequences. Although several intervention programmes for children result in weight loss or stabilization in the short-term, preventing relapse after treatment remains an important challenge. This systematic review summarizes the evidence about maintenance interventions after treatment in childhood obesity. Studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL and SocINDEX. The primary outcome measure for this review was body mass index standard deviation score (BMI-Z-score). Data were pooled using quality effect models. Eleven studies (1,532 participants, age 2-18 years) were included, covering a wide range of maintenance approaches. Included studies varied widely in methodological quality. Pooled analysis showed that the BMI-Z-score of maintenance intervention participants remained stable, whereas control participants experienced a slight increase. No differences were observed regarding intensity and duration of therapy. A slight preference for 'face-to-face' versus 'on distance' interventions was shown. In summary, this review shows that, although there is limited quality data to recommend one maintenance intervention over another, continued treatment does have a stabilizing effect on BMI-Z-score. Considering the magnitude of the problem of childhood obesity, this is an important finding that highlights the need for further research on weight loss maintenance.

Development of a Dutch intervention for obese young children.

The objective of this article is to provide insight in the five-step development process of the best evidence, best practice intervention for obese young children 'AanTafel!'. A set of requirements for intervention development was developed to guide the data inquiry: the use of theory, influencing factors, tailoring, multi-disciplinarity, duration/frequency and evaluation and monitoring. Step I retrieved evidence from clinical guidelines, followed by a systematic review with meta-analysis (Step II) and an extended literature review (Step III). Evidence was consistent with regard to parent-focus, targeting family level, including diet, physical activity and behaviour change techniques and tailoring to age. However, no evidence or inconsistent evidence emerged from the theory-basis, group-versus-individual sessions, face-to-face contact versus Internet-mediated contact, which disciplines to involve and how to involve them, as well as intervention duration and intensity. Hence, practice-based insights from parental interviews (Step IV) and involved therapists were added and subsequently integrated to the intervention 'AanTafel!' (Step V). 'AanTafel!' is a multi-component, multi-disciplinary, family-based, parent-focused, age-specific intervention, which is tailored to individual children and families with a duration of 1 year, and using a combination of individual and group sessions as well as a Web-based learning module. Changes in scientific working principles with regard to data collection, reporting and translation to guidelines are required. Practice and science may benefit from close collaboration in designing, implementing and evaluating interventions.

Quality of life in chronic illness: children, parents and paediatricians have different, but stable perceptions.

AIM: Quality of life assessments can be helpful to estimate the well-being of chronically ill children. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in perception of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among children, parents and paediatricians at the time of diagnosis and after initial treatment in four chronic diseases. METHODS: HRQoL was assessed with the Health Utilities Index mark 3 (HUI3). The HUI3 consists of eight attributes (vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition and pain). RESULTS: Nineteen paediatricians and 60 patients (aged 10-17 years) and their parents with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, asthma or with cystic fibrosis admitted for pneumonia participated in the study. Health and well-being perceptions were clearly different among paediatricians, parents and patients, both at diagnosis and after initial treatment. Perception differences were more prominent in the subjective attributes, emotion and pain. The agreement for these attributes was 23% and 5%, respectively. Paediatricians assessed the patients to have less pain than the patients and parents did. The reverse was true for the attribute emotion. At follow-up, the agreement was higher for the attributes ambulation and pain. CONCLUSION: At the onset of a chronic disease and after initial treatment, paediatricians, parents and children have different perceptions of the child's quality of life, particularly as to the subjective attributes pain and emotion. In view of these differences in perception among patients, their caregivers and paediatricians, this study suggests that whenever possible, multi-respondent assessment of HRQoL should be considered.

A difference in perception of quality of life in chronically ill children was found between parents and pediatricians.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Quality of life measurements can help to estimate the well-being of chronically ill patients, and disclose discrepancies in perception between physicians and patients that might otherwise interfere with the effectiveness of treatment. The objective was to investigate the differences in perception of quality of life between parents of chronically ill children and pediatricians. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in four tertiary pediatric care centers in The Netherlands. The Health Utilities Index mark 3 (HUI3) was used by 37 pediatricians and 279 parents of patients (children aged 1 to 17 years) with cystic fibrosis admitted either in daycare or for a pneumonia, or patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, or asthma. RESULTS: Differences in perception of quality of life between parents and pediatricians appeared to be dependent of the disease. In patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (OR 7.4; [95% CI 2.88-18.97], juvenile idiopathic arthritis (4.7; [95% CI 2.00-11.22]), and asthma (2.3; [95% CI 1.13-4.69]) a difference in perception was more likely to occur than in patients with cystic fibrosis admitted in daycare. CONCLUSION: At the onset of a chronic disease, the parents of pediatric patients may be misunderstood by health care professionals, especially in subjective attributes. Assessment of quality of life may contribute to better understanding between pediatricians and parents, and thus may even enhance compliance and treatment effects.

Quality of life in chronic illness: perceptions of parents and paediatricians.

AIMS: To investigate the differences in perception of quality of life between parents of chronically ill children and paediatricians at diagnosis and follow up. Quality of life was assessed using the (HUI3). METHODS: Longitudinal study (July 1999-January 2002) of 37 paediatricians and 181 parents of patients (children aged 1-17 years) with cystic fibrosis admitted for a pneumonia or patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphatic leukaemia, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, or asthma. Main outcome measure was percentage agreement on the attributes of the HUI3 between parents and paediatricians. RESULTS: Differences in perception of health and wellbeing between paediatricians and parents of children with a chronic disease were found, not only at diagnosis but also after a period of follow up. Differences were particularly clear in the subjective attributes emotion (range of agreement 28-68%) and pain/discomfort (range of agreement 11-33%). In all patient groups, at baseline and follow up, the paediatrician assessed the patient to have less pain/discomfort in comparison to the parents. Despite a prolonged patient- paediatrician relationship, differences at follow up did not decrease compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: At the onset of a chronic disease, but also after a period of follow up, quality of life of paediatric patients may be misunderstood by healthcare professionals, especially in the subjective attributes. Systematic assessment of quality of life may contribute to better understanding between physicians and parents.

Quality of life: patients and doctors don't always agree: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: In addition to traditional clinical markers, quality-of-life assessment can be helpful to estimate the well-being of patients. Discrepancies in perception of well-being between physicians and patients may interfere with the effectiveness of treatment. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to explore the (dis-)agreement in quality-of-life assessments between patients and physicians. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Data on the proportion agreement of paired observations were collected from Medline, Embase, Psychlit, and Social Abstracts. RESULTS: Of the 1,316 articles found, six met the selection criteria, four studied the proportion agreement between children and physicians, and all six the proportion agreement between parents and physicians. None examined the magnitude of over- or underestimation by physicians. The agreement was lower in the more subjective domains (0.54-0.77) in comparison to the more objective domains (0.79-0.94). CONCLUSION: Quality-of-life assessment should be integrated in clinical practice. During long-term treatment the perception of the patients' well-being by physicians and patients themselves can easily diverge from each other, resulting in misunderstandings about the treatment and its usefulness in relation to perceived quality of life, and may even become the base for noncompliance.

Neurofibromatosis type 2 diagnosed in the absence of vestibular schwannomas. A case report and guidelines for a screening protocol for children at risk.

UNLABELLED: A 5-year-old girl presented with multiple tumours of the central nervous system. As on the first MRI scan bilateral vestibular schwannomas were not detected due to their small size, she initially did not meet the criteria for neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), although her clinical symptoms were highly suggestive for the diagnosis. Using molecular studies, a mutation in the NF2 gene was found confirming the clinical suspicion at an early age and indicating the value of molecular analysis. Follow-up MRI 3 years later demonstrated bilateral vestibular schwannomas more clearly, since they had increased in size. CONCLUSION: In children, magnetic resonance imaging can be inconclusive for the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 2, since very small vestibular schwannomas may be missed. In these cases molecular studies may provide additional evidence for the diagnosis. We propose guidelines for a screening protocol for children at risk for having neurofibromatosis type 2.

Lymphedema-induced lymphangiosarcoma.

A series of eight patients with chronic lymphedema-related lymphangiosarcoma is presented. All but one case showed a typical rapid progression and fatal outcome, as has been reported in other series. In one patient the lymphangiosarcoma developed on the chest wall, the axilla and the arm where persisting lymphedema and fibrosis occurred after bilateral mastectomy and bilateral postoperative radiotherapy. In this patient an asymptomatic course and slow locoregional progression of lesions was seen. The clinical picture, the etiological considerations and the therapeutic options of the lymphedema-induced lymphangiosarcoma with regard to the literature are discussed.