[Gout: an overview of diagnostics and treatment]. / Jicht.

Gout is characterized by acute arthritis due to the deposition of urate crystals in joints in a state of hyperuricemia. Gout is a clinical diagnosis and can be confirmed with a joint aspiration to examine the synovial fluid with a polarized light microscopy. If a joint aspiration is not feasible or inconclusive, ultrasound or Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) can be considered. Pharmacological treatment of gout consists of treating acute flares with anti-inflammatory drugs and, if indicated, of urate lowering therapies (ULT). (Inter)national rheumatology guidelines recommend the use of ULT indefinite by a treat-to-target approach, but there is discussion whether (certain) patients might also be treated by a treat-to-avoid-symptoms approach. Two large Dutch trials are comparing these strategies in gout patients. Most gout patients have cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities and therefore an indication for cardiovascular risk assessment.

Effectiveness of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Combination with Various csDMARD in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data from the DREAM Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze and compare the effectiveness and drug survival in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, as measured by 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) monotherapy, TNFi + leflunomide (LEF), TNFi + sulfasalazine (SSZ), TNFi + other conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD), and TNFi + methotrexate (MTX) therapy, in daily practice. METHODS: Data were collected from the DREAM registry. Patients beginning their first TNFi treatment were included in the study: TNFi monotherapy (n = 320), TNFi + SSZ (n = 103), TNFi + LEF (n = 80), TNFi + other csDMARD (n = 99), TNFi + MTX alone (n = 919), TNFi + MTX + other csDMARD (n = 412). Treatment effectiveness was analyzed using DAS28 and HAQ-DI with linear mixed models and the TNFi drug survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression. All analyses have been corrected for confounders. RESULTS: The patients who received TNFi + MTX had significantly better DAS28 and HAQ-DI values over time (both p < 0.001) and longer TNFi drug survival than TNFi monotherapy (p < 0.001). TNFi + SSZ and TNFi + other csDMARD had significantly better DAS28 values over time (p = 0.001) and longer drug survival (p = 0.001) versus TNFi monotherapy. TNFi + LEF was not significantly better compared to monotherapy. Adding other csDMARD to the TNFi + MTX combination provided no added value. CONCLUSION: Preferably, TNFi should be prescribed together with MTX. If this is not possible, we advise the use of other csDMARD.

Serum MMP-3 level as a biomarker for monitoring and predicting response to etanercept treatment in ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether level of serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) can serve as a biomarker for monitoring and predicting response to etanercept treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Ninety-two consecutive AS outpatients with active disease who started etanercept treatment were included in this longitudinal observational study. Clinical data were collected prospectively at baseline and after 3 and 12 months of treatment. At the same timepoints, serum MMP-3 levels were measured retrospectively by ELISA. RESULTS: Since baseline serum MMP-3 levels were significantly higher in male compared to female patients with AS, data analysis was split for gender. Changes in serum MMP-3 levels after etanercept treatment correlated positively with changes in clinical assessments of disease activity and physical function in both male and female patients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis in male patients showed that baseline serum MMP-3 levels had poor accuracy (AUC < 0.7) to discriminate between Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis 20 (ASAS20) or ASAS40 responders and nonresponders after 3 or 12 months of treatment. The accuracy of change in serum MMP-3 levels from baseline to 3 months in predicting response after 3 or 12 months of treatment was poor for ASAS40 (AUC < 0.7) or moderate for ASAS20 (AUC = 0.752 and 0.744, respectively), and was not superior to the accuracy of change in the currently used objective biomarkers, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein. CONCLUSION: Although significant changes in serum MMP-3 levels were found after etanercept treatment, data analysis indicates that serum MMP-3 levels are not very useful for monitoring and predicting response to etanercept treatment in patients with AS in daily clinical practice.

A comparison of an interferon-gamma release assay and tuberculin skin test in refractory inflammatory disease patients screened for latent tuberculosis prior to the initiation of a first tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor.

Treatment with TNFα inhibitors increases risk of reactivating a latent tuberculosis\infection (LTBI). Therefore screening, prior to therapy with TNFα inhibitors, has been recommended, even in low-endemic areas such as well-developed Western Europe countries. We evaluated interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA), as opposed to tuberculin skin test (TST), for detection of LTBI in refractory inflammatory disease patients prior to the initiation of a first TNFα inhibitor. In addition, we evaluated the impact of impaired cellular immunity on IGRA. Patients starting on TNFα inhibition were screened for LTBI by TST and IGRA (Quantiferon-TB Gold). Data on tuberculosis exposure and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination were obtained. Cellular immunity was assessed by CD4(+) T lymphocyte cell count. Nine out of 56 patients (16.1%) tested positive for LTBI. A concordant positive result was present in three patients with a medical history of tuberculosis exposure. Six patients with discordant test results had either: (1) a negative TST and positive IGRA in combination with a medical history of tuberculosis exposure (n = 1) or (2) a positive TST and negative IGRA in combination with BCG vaccination (n = 3) or a medical history of tuberculosis exposure (n = 2). CD4(+) T lymphocyte cell counts were within normal limits, and no indeterminate results of IGRA were present. IGRA appears reliable for confirming TST and excluding a false positive TST (due to prior BCG vaccination) in this Dutch serie of patients. In addition, IGRA may detect one additional case of LTBI out of 56 patients that would otherwise be missed using solely TST. Immune suppression appears not to result significantly in lower CD4(+) T lymphocyte cell counts and indeterminate results of IGRA, despite systemic corticosteroid treatment in half of the patients. Confirmation in larger studies, including assessment of cost-effectiveness, is required.

Parenteral gold preparations. Efficacy and safety of therapy after switching from aurothioglucose to aurothiomalate.

OBJECTIVE: For reasons of insufficient quality of the raw material, aurothioglucose was withdrawn from the Dutch market at the end of 2001. Aurothiomalate became available as an alternative preparation. We followed a cohort of patients during the first year after switching from aurothioglucose to aurothiomalate to study efficacy and tolerability. METHODS: Patients were observed at baseline and at 3 and 12 months after switching. At each visit, data on adverse drug reactions (ADR), withdrawal, and disease activity were collected. RESULTS: In total 120 patients were included [age 63(SD 15) yrs, 68% female, 93% with rheumatoid arthritis, duration of disease 15 (SD 9) years, 82% IgM rheumatoid factor-positive, with 9 (SD 9, range 0.1-45) yrs of previous aurothioglucose therapy]. Nineteen patients (16%) reported an ADR taking aurothiomalate not previously experienced with aurothioglucose, the most frequently reported being pruritus, dermatitis/stomatitis, and chrysiasis/hyperpigmentation. Twenty-nine patients (24%) withdrew from aurothiomalate within 12 months of followup for reasons of inefficacy (14%), ADR (7%), or disease in state of remission (3%). Kaplan-Meier estimates show aurothiomalate survival rates of 78.5% after 12 months. No statistically significant differences between the disease activity indicators during followup visits compared with the baseline visit were detected for the patients continuing aurothiomalate. CONCLUSION: Within the first 12 months after switching from aurothioglucose, 24% of patients withdrew from aurothiomalate. Sixteen percent of patients reported novel ADR. For the population continuing to take aurothiomalate no clinically relevant changes in disease activity were recorded after switching.