RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Erythemato-ceruminous otitis externa (ECOE) is frequently seen in dogs affected with an allergic skin disease, with recurrent secondary bacteria and yeast overgrowths (detected on cytological examination). OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of an ear spray containing only hydrocortisone aceponate glucocorticoid diester (HCA) to a control product (CTRL), an approved otic formulation containing prednisolone-miconazole-polymyxin combination, in dogs with ECOE. ANIMALS: In total, 97 and 104 dogs with ECOE were respectively randomly assigned to the tested ear treatment product group (HCA) or the commercially available ear treatment control product group (CTRL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dogs were treated for 7-14 days, as needed. At Day (D)0, D7, D14, D28 and D42, Otitis Index Score-3, hearing test, pruritus and pain visual analogue scales, and cytological scores were graded. The overall response to treatment also was assessed. RESULTS: All clinical parameters decreased rapidly and in a similar way without any significant difference at any time between treatment groups. A good-to-excellent response to treatment was seen in >90% of dogs of both groups as early as D14. The treatment was considered safe in all dogs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A 7- to 14-day ear topical application of HCA alone to dogs with ECOE accompanied with bacterial and/or fungal (yeast) overgrowth was safe and led to no statistical difference in improvement of clinical scores relative to the CTRL combination. Based on these results, it may be necessary to reconsider the routine use of antimicrobial drugs such as antibiotics and antifungals as a first-line treatment for ECOE that is likely to have been caused by an allergic reaction.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros , Hidrocortisona , Otitis Externa , Animales , Perros , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Hidrocortisona/efectos adversos , Hidrocortisona/análogos & derivados , Otitis Externa/tratamiento farmacológico , Otitis Externa/veterinaria , Saccharomyces cerevisiaeRESUMEN
This double-blind controlled study assessed whether reduced doses of omega interferon (rFeIFN-omega) (Virbagen Omega) could improve the clinical signs of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) over a 6-month period, in comparison with cyclosporin. Thirty-one dogs diagnosed with CAD were entered in the study. Complicating infections were treated prior to entry. Dogs received 10 injections of rFeIFN-omega (1-5 million units according to bodyweight) or placebo over 6 months, and placebo capsules or cyclosporin (5 mg/kg) once daily for 2 months and then twice weekly for 4 months in groups 1 and 2 respectively. Flea control, non-medicated shampooing and ear cleansing were performed regularly. If a bacterial infection or Malassezia overgrowth developed, it was treated with oral cephalexin or with 3% chlorhexidine shampoo respectively. Oral prednisolone was used before day 90 to relieve pruritus when required for humane reasons (1 mg/kg once daily for 7 days). The CADESI-03 and a pruritus index were evaluated on day (D) 0, D14, D35, D56, D90, D120 and D180. No significant difference was detected between the groups for the time courses of lesions or pruritus over 6 months. On D90, the proportions of dogs with > or =50% improvement of pruritus and lesion scores were 56% and 72% respectively with interferon, 75% and 75% respectively with cyclosporin. Five dogs from group 1 and two dogs from group 2 were withdrawn from the study for treatment failure. Both products were well tolerated. Treatment with rfeIFN-omega at low doses may help for the long-term management of CAD.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Interferón Tipo I/uso terapéutico , Animales , Ciclosporina/efectos adversos , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Perros , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Interferón Tipo I/administración & dosificación , Interferón Tipo I/efectos adversos , Masculino , Proteínas RecombinantesRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of in vivo and in vitro tests in the diagnosis of flea allergy dermatitis in comparison with history, clinical signs and response to flea control. Intradermal testing using four different sources of flea allergens and FcepsilonRIalpha-based immunoglobulin (Ig)E assays were performed in 15 flea-allergic dogs, 15 atopic dogs and 15 dogs infested with fleas but showing no clinical signs of skin disease. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and accuracy were calculated for all five tests and results varied greatly. Sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy were 27, 83 and 64%, respectively, for one extract (Isotec), 67, 90 and 82% for another extract (Greer), 93, 90 and 91% for flea saliva, 40, 90 and 73% for the recombinant Cte f 1 both produced by Heska Corp. and 87, 53 and 64% for a FcepsilonRIalpha-based IgE assay. These results indicate that intradermal testing with flea extracts is more accurate in the diagnosis of flea allergy dermatitis than in vitro tests. Moreover, pure flea saliva used as a reagent for intradermal testing provided the best results in terms of sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy although the Greer extract, a whole body flea extract, also allowed a good correlation between intradermal testing results and clinical approach to flea allergy dermatitis diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Dermatitis/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Perros/diagnóstico , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Pruebas Intradérmicas/veterinaria , Siphonaptera/inmunología , Animales , Dermatitis/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Perros/patología , Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Perros , Femenino , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Pruebas Intradérmicas/métodos , Masculino , Permetrina/administración & dosificación , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Dogs are the primary domestic reservoir of Leishmania infantum, the parasite responsible for most cases of human visceral leishmaniasis. A strategy for the control of leishmaniasis would be to inhibit the sand fly bite. A study was designed to measure the prevention of the sand fly attack by spraying a combination of permethrin and pyriproxyfen on dogs artificially exposed to the vector of leishmaniasis. Eight dogs were individually challenged with 100 female sand flies for 1 hour on Days -7, 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28. Four dogs were randomly assigned to a control group and four dogs were treated with topically applied permethrin/pyriproxyfen on Day 0. After each exposure, sand flies were collected, counted, and scored as fed or unfed. Efficacy of the combination for prevention of feeding was based on the number of unfed sand flies (dead or alive). The combination of permethrin/pyriproxyfen demonstrated a significant (P <.05) repellent effect against Phlebotomus perniciosus bites as soon as it was sprayed on the dogs, and its repellent efficacy lasted at least for 28 days. The combination product provided significant (P <.05) knockdown activity against challenge with sand flies for 21 days in adult dogs and 14 days in puppies. These findings indicate that adult animals in endemic areas should be sprayed with the permethrin/pyriproxyfen product at 3- to 4-week intervals, and young dogs should be sprayed at approximately 2-week intervals, to prevent sand fly attack.