A Meta-Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in 25727 Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion or Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Cervical Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate which cervical deformity correction technique between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) produces better clinical, radiographic, and operative outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis comparing studies involving ACDF and ACCF. Adult patients with either original or previously treated cervical spine deformities were included. Two independent reviewers categorized extracted data into clinical, radiographic, and operative outcomes, including complications. Clinical assessments included patient-reported outcomes; radiographic evaluations examined C2-C7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, T1-CL, C2-7 SVA, and graft stability. Surgical measures included surgery duration, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications. RESULTS: 26 studies (25727 patients) met inclusion criteria and were extracted. Of these, 14 studies (19077 patients) with low risk of bias were included in meta-analysis. ACDF and ACCF similarly improve clinical outcomes in terms of JOA and NDI, but ACDF is significantly better at achieving lower VAS neck scores. ACDF is also more advantageous for improving cervical lordosis and minimizing the incidence of graft complications. While there is no significant difference between approaches for most surgical complications, ACDF is favorable for reducing operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: While both techniques benefit cervical deformity patients, when both techniques are feasible, ACDF may be superior with respect to VAS neck scores, cervical lordosis, graft complications and certain perioperative outcomes. Further studies are recommended to address outcome variability and refine surgical approach selection.

Pedicle screw placement in the cervical vertebrae using augmented reality-head mounted displays: a cadaveric proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND: The accurate and safe positioning of cervical pedicle screws is crucial. While augmented reality (AR) use in spine surgery has previously demonstrated clinical utility in the thoracolumbar spine, its technical feasibility in the cervical spine remains less explored. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the precision and safety of AR-assisted pedicle screw placement in the cervical spine. STUDY DESIGN: In this experimental study, five cadaveric cervical spine models were instrumented from C3 to C7 by five different spine surgeons. The navigation accuracy and clinical screw accuracy were evaluated. METHODS: Post-procedural CT scans were evaluated for clinical accuracy by two independent neuroradiologists using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. Technical precision was assessed by calculating the angular trajectory (°) and linear screw tip (mm) deviations in the axial and sagittal planes from the virtual pedicle screw position as recorded by the AR-guided platform during the procedure compared to the actual pedicle screw position derived from post-procedural imaging. RESULTS: A total of forty-one pedicle screws were placed in five cervical cadavers, with each of the five surgeons navigating at least seven screws. Gertzbein-Robbins grade of A or B was achieved in 100% of cases. The mean values for tip and trajectory errors in the axial and sagittal planes between the virtual versus actual position of the screws was less than 3 mm and 30°, respectively (p<0.05). None of the cervical screws violated the cortex by more than 2 mm or displaced neurovascular structures. CONCLUSIONS: AR-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement in cadavers demonstrated clinical accuracy comparable to existing literature values for image-guided navigation methods for the cervical spine. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides technical and clinical accuracy data that supports clinical trialing of AR-assisted subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement.

Pelvic Incidence-Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch Is Not Associated with Early Reoperation for Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 2-year reoperation rates for adjacent segment disease between patients with pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch postoperatively and patients with normal PI-LL measurements. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective 1- to 2-level lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions between 2016 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Spinopelvic radiographic parameters immediately postoperation were measured, and PI-LL mismatch was determined using the age-adjusted thresholds defined in Lafage et al. After propensity score matching, early reoperation rates were compared between the PI-LL mismatch and normal PI-LL cohorts. Early reoperation was defined as symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASD) requiring reoperation within 2 years of the index surgery. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients were identified. The average age was 59 years of age, with 59.8% female. The PI-LL mismatch cohort (n = 148) was younger (57.5 vs. 63.5 years, P < 0.001) and had a higher proportion of Black patients (31.8% vs. 11.3%, P = 0.001) than the normal PI-LL cohort, respectively. A total of 100 patients in the PI-LL mismatch cohort were propensity score matched to 66 patients in the normal PI-LL cohort, resulting in no difference in age (P = 0.177), sex (P = 0.302), race (P = 0.727), or body mass index (P = 0.892). Using these matched cohorts, the rate of early reoperation for ASD was 8.0% in the PI-LL mismatch cohort and 9.1% in the normal PI-LL cohort (P = 0.805), with a mean time to reoperation of 1.28 and 1.33 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After propensity score matching, PI-LL mismatch was not associated with early reoperation for ASD in patients undergoing 1- to 2-level lumbar fusions for degenerative conditions.

The changing epidemiology of traumatic spine injuries: a trends analysis of 26 years of patients at a major level 1 trauma center in the United States.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Traumatic spinal injuries (TSI) are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization. The epidemiology of TSI varies greatly across different countries and regions and is impacted by national income levels, infrastructure, and cultural factors. Further, there may be changes over time. It is essential to investigate TSI to gain useful epidemiologic information. However, there have been no recent studies on trends for TSI in the US, despite the changing population demographics, healthcare policy, and technology. As a result, reexamination is warranted to reflect how the modern era has affected the epidemiology of US spine trauma patients and their management. PURPOSE: To determine epidemiologic trends in traumatic spine injuries over time. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective analysis; level 1 trauma center in the United States. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 21,811 patients, between the years of 1996 and 2022, who presented with traumatic spine injury. OUTCOME MEASURES: Age, sex, race, Injury Severity Score, mechanism of injury, injury diagnosis, injury level, rate of operative intervention, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, discharge disposition, in-hospital mortality. METHODS: Data was collected from our institutional trauma registry over a 26-year period. Inclusion criteria involved at least one diagnosis of vertebral fracture, spinal cord injury, spinal subluxation, or intervertebral disc injury. Exclusion criteria consisted of patients with no diagnosed spine injury or a diagnosis of strain only. A total of 21,811 patients were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics were tabulated and ordinary least squares linear regression was conducted for trends analysis. RESULTS: Regression analysis showed a significant upward trend in patient age (+13.83 years, ß=+0.65/year, p<.001), female sex (+2.7%, ß=+0.18%/year, p=.004), falls (+10.5%, ß=+0.82%/year, p<.001), subluxations (+12.8%, ß=+0.35%/year, p<.001), thoracic injuries (+1.5%, ß=+0.28%/year, p<.001), and discharges to subacute rehab (+15.9%, ß=+0.68%/year, p<.001). There was a significant downward trend in motor vehicle crashes (-7.8%, ß=-0.47%/year, p=.016), firearms injuries (-3.4%, ß=-0.19%/year, p<.001), sports/recreation injuries (-2.9%, ß=-0.18%/year, p<.001), spinal cord injuries (-11.25%, ß=-0.37%, p<.001), complete spinal cord injuries (-7.6%, ß=-0.24%/year, p<.001), and discharges to home (+4.5%, ß=-0.27%/year, p=.011). CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, the average spine trauma patient has trended toward older females. Falls represent an increasing proportion of the mechanism of injury, on a trajectory to become the most common cause. With time, there have been fewer spinal cord injuries and a lower proportion of complete injuries. At discharge, there has been a surge in the utilization of subacute rehabilitation facilities. Overall, there has been no significant change in injury severity, rate of operative intervention, length of stay, or mortality.

Superinfections of the Spine: A Single-Institution Experience.

Background/Objectives: A superinfection occurs when a new, secondary organism colonizes an existing infection. Spine infections are associated with high patient morbidity and sometimes require multiple irrigations and debridements (I&Ds). When multiple I&Ds are required, the risk of complications increases. The purpose of this study was to report our experience with spine superinfections and determine which patients are typically affected. Methods: A retrospective case series of spine superinfections and a retrospective case-control analysis were conducted. Data were collected manually from electronic medical records. Spine I&Ds were identified. Groups were created for patients who had multiple I&Ds for (1) a recurrence of the same causative organism or (2) a superinfection with a novel organism. Preoperative demographic, clinical, and microbiologic data were compared between these two outcomes. A case series of superinfections with descriptive data was constructed. Lastly, two illustrative cases were provided in a narrative format. Results: A total of 92 patients were included in this analysis. Superinfections occurred after 6 out of the 92 (7%) initial I&Ds and were responsible for 6 out of the 24 (25%) repeat I&Ds. The preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) of the patients with a superinfection were significantly lower than those in the control group (p = 0.022 and p = 0.032). Otherwise, the observed differences in the preoperative variables were not statistically different. In the six cases of superinfection, the presence of high-risk comorbidities, a history of substance abuse, or a lack of social support were commonly observed. The superinfecting organisms included Candida, Pseudomonas, Serratia, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Staphylococcus species. Conclusions: Superinfections are a devastating complication requiring reoperation after initial spine I&D. Awareness of the possibility of superinfection and common patient archetypes can be helpful for clinicians and care teams. Future work is needed to examine how to identify, help predict, and prevent spine superinfections.

Diagnosis and Management of Thoracic Myelopathy.

Thoracic myelopathy can be a challenging condition to diagnose and treat. Successful outcomes depend on early recondition of the pathology and appropriate surgical referral in cases of progressive neurologic deterioration. The thoracic cord is tethered in kyphosis by the dentate ligaments and contains a tenuous blood supply. These conditions make the thoracic cord particularly susceptible to external compression and ischemic damage. Careful preoperative planning with specific attention to the location and source of thoracic stenosis is critical to successful decompression and complication avoidance. The purpose of this discussion is to outline the common sources of thoracic myelopathy and current recommendations regarding diagnosis and management. The review concludes with an overview of the most up-to-date literature regarding clinical outcomes.

Posterior Transdural Approach for Thoracic Corpectomies in the Setting of Complex Spine Deformity Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are many surgical approaches for execution of a thoracic corpectomy. In cases of challenging deformity, traditional posterior approaches might not be sufficient to complete the resection of the vertebral body. In this technical note, we describe indications and technique for a transdural multilevel high thoracic corpectomy. METHODS: A 25-year-old man with a history of neurofibromatosis type 1 presented with instrumentation failure after a previous T1-T12 posterior spinal fusion, extensive laminectomy, and tumor resection. The patient presented with progressive back pain, had broad dural ectasia, and a progressive kyphotic rotational and anteriorly translated spinal deformity. To resect the medial-most aspect of the vertebral body, a bilateral extracavitary approach was attempted, but was found insufficient. A transdural approach was subsequently performed. A left paramedian durotomy was made, followed by generous arachnoid dissection, bilateral dentate ligament division, and T4 rootlet sacrifice to mobilize the spinal cord. A ventral durotomy was then made and the ventral dura was reflected over the spinal cord to protect it while drilling. The corpectomy was then completed. The ventral and dorsal durotomies were closed primarily and reinforced with fibrin glue and fibrin sealant patch. The corpectomy defect was filled with nonstructural autograft. RESULTS: The focal kyphosis was corrected with a combination of rod contouring, compression, and in situ bending. During the surgery, the patient had stable neuromonitoring data, and postoperatively had no neurological deficits. On follow-up until 1 year, the patient presented with no signs of cerebrospinal spinal leaks, no motor or sensory deficits, minimal incisional pain, and significantly improved posture. CONCLUSION: Complex high thoracic (T3-5) ventral pathology inaccessible via a bilateral extracavitary approach may be accessed via a transdural approach as opposed to an anterior/lateral transthoracic approach that requires mobilization of cardiovascular structures or scapula.

Utilization of Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display for the Surgical Management of Thoracolumbar Spinal Trauma.

Background and Objectives: Augmented reality head-mounted display (AR-HMD) is a novel technology that provides surgeons with a real-time CT-guided 3-dimensional recapitulation of a patient's spinal anatomy. In this case series, we explore the use of AR-HMD alongside more traditional robotic assistance in surgical spine trauma cases to determine their effect on operative costs and perioperative outcomes. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed trauma patients who underwent pedicle screw placement surgery guided by AR-HMD or robotic-assisted platforms at an academic tertiary care center between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022. Outcome distributions were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The AR cohort (n = 9) had a mean age of 66 years, BMI of 29.4 kg/m2, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 4.1, and Surgical Invasiveness Index (SII) of 8.8. In total, 77 pedicle screws were placed in this cohort. Intra-operatively, there was a mean blood loss of 378 mL, 0.78 units transfused, 398 min spent in the operating room, and a 20-day LOS. The robotic cohort (n = 13) had a mean age of 56 years, BMI of 27.1 kg/m2, CCI of 3.8, and SII of 14.2. In total, 128 pedicle screws were placed in this cohort. Intra-operatively, there was a mean blood loss of 432 mL, 0.46 units transfused units used, 331 min spent in the operating room, and a 10.4-day LOS. No significant difference was found between the two cohorts in any outcome metrics. Conclusions: Although the need to address urgent spinal conditions poses a significant challenge to the implementation of innovative technologies in spine surgery, this study represents an initial effort to show that AR-HMD can yield comparable outcomes to traditional robotic surgical techniques. Moreover, it highlights the potential for AR-HMD to be readily integrated into Level 1 trauma centers without requiring extensive modifications or adjustments.

The Utility of the Validated Intraoperative Bleeding Scale in Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery: A Single-Center Prospective Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single-center study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical relevance of the validated intraoperative bleeding severity scale (VIBe) in thoracolumbar spine surgery. METHODS: Adult patients aged 18 through 88 undergoing elective decompression, instrumentation, and fusion of the thoracolumbar spine were prospectively enrolled after informed consent was provided and written consent was obtained. Validated intraoperative bleeding severity scores were recorded intraoperatively. Univariate analysis consisted of Student T-tests, Pearson's χ2 Tests, Fisher's Exact Tests, linear regression, and binary logistic regression. Multivariable regression was conducted to adjust for baseline characteristics and potential confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of N = 121 patients were enrolled and included in the analysis. After adjusting for confounders, VIBe scores were correlated with an increased likelihood of intraoperative blood transfusion (ß = 2.46, P = .012), postoperative blood transfusion (ß = 2.36, P = .015), any transfusion (ß = 2.49, P < .001), total transfusion volume (ß = 180.8, P = .020), and estimated blood loss (EBL) (ß = 409, P < .001). Validated intraoperative bleeding severity scores had no significant association with length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, 30-day emergency department visit, change in pre- to post-op hemoglobin and hematocrit, total drain output, or length of surgery. CONCLUSION: The VIBe scale is associated with perioperative transfusion rates and EBL in patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery. Overall, the VIBe scale has clinically relevant meaning in spine surgery, and shows potential utility in clinical research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Lower Extremity Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Predict Functional Outcomes in Complete Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (tCSCI) is often a debilitating injury, making early prognosis important for medical and surgical planning. Currently, the best early predictors of prognosis are physical examination, imaging studies, and patient demographics. Despite these factors, patient outcomes continue to vary significantly. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) with functional outcomes in tCSCI patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on prospectively collected data from 2 academic institutions. Patients 18 years and older who had tCSCI and underwent posterior cervical decompression and stabilization with intraoperative neuromonitoring were reviewed. The outcomes of interest were the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grade and ASIA motor score at follow-up. Outcomes measures were assessed via student t-tests, chi-squared tests, and multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were included. In complete injuries, detectable lower extremity SSEPs were associated with higher ASIA motor scores at follow-up (P = 0.002), greater increases in ASIA motor scores at follow-up (P = 0.009), and a greater likelihood of clinically important improvement in ASIA motor score (P = 0.024). Incomplete, AIS grade C injuries has higher rates of grade conversion (P = 0.019) and clinically important improvement in ASIA motor score (P = 0.010), compared to AIS grade A or B injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of lower extremity SSEP signals during initial surgical treatment of tCSCI is associated with greater improvement in ASIA motor scores postoperatively. The association is most applicable to patients with complete injury.

Biomechanical Comparison of Four- versus Six-Strand Transosseous Suture Repair for Patellar Tendon Rupture.

BACKGROUND: Surgical repair is indicated for patellar tendon ruptures that result in loss of knee extensor mechanism function. However, biomechanical studies report conflicting results when comparing transosseous suture versus suture anchor repair techniques. This discrepancy may be due to inconsistencies in experimental design as these studies use various numbers of suture strands. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to compare the ultimate load of four- versus six-strand transosseous suture repair. Secondary objectives are to compare gap formation after cyclical loading and mode of failure. METHODS: Six pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric specimen were randomly allocated to either four- or six-strand transosseous suture repair. Specimen underwent preconditioning cyclical loading and then load to failure. RESULTS: The six-strand repair had a significantly higher maximum load to failure compared with the four-strand repair (mean difference = 319.3 N [57.9%], p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in gap length after cyclical loading or at max load. There were no significant differences in mode of failure. CONCLUSION: Utilizing a six-stand transosseous patella tendon repair construct with one additional suture increases overall construct strength by over 50% compared with a four-strand construct.

Secondary Bony Defects after Soft Tissue Reconstruction in Limb-Threatening Lower Extremity Injuries: Does the Approach to Flap Elevation Matter?

BACKGROUND: Limb-threatening lower extremity injuries often require secondary bone grafting after soft tissue reconstruction. We hypothesized that there would be fewer wound complications when performing secondary bone grafting via a remote surgical approach rather than direct flap elevation. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at a single Level 1 trauma center comparing complications after secondary bone grafting in patients who had undergone previous soft tissue reconstruction after open tibia fractures between 2006 and 2020. Comparing bone grafting via a remote surgical incision versus direct flap elevation, we evaluated wound dehiscence requiring return to the operating room as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were deep infection and delayed amputation. RESULTS: We identified 129 patients (mean age: 40 years, 82% male) with 159 secondary bone grafting procedures. Secondary bone grafting was performed via a remote surgical approach in 54% (n = 86) and direct flap elevation in 46% (n = 73) of cases. Wound dehiscence requiring return to the operating room occurred in one patient in the flap elevation group (1%) and none of the patients in the remote surgical approach. The odds of deep wound infection (OR, 1.77; p = 0.31) or amputation (OR, 1.43; p = 0.73) did not significantly differ between surgical approaches. No significant differences were found in complications between the reconstructive surgeon elevating and re-insetting the flap and the orthopaedic trauma surgeon performing the flap elevation and re-inset. CONCLUSION: Direct flap elevation for secondary bone grafting after soft tissue reconstruction for open tibia fractures did not result in more complications than bone grafting via a remote surgical approach. These findings should reassure surgeons to allow other clinical factors to influence the surgical approach for bone grafting.

Rapid Implementation of a 3-Dimensional-Printed Patient-Specific Titanium Sacrum Implant for Severe Neuropathic Spinal Arthropathy and Guide to Compassionate US Regulatory Approval.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Rapid design and production of patient-specific 3-dimensional-printed implants (3DPIs) present a novel opportunity to restore the biomechanically demanding integrity of the lumbopelvic junction. We present a unique case of a 61-year-old patient with severe neuropathic spinal arthropathy (Charcot spine) who initially underwent a T4-to-sacrum spinal fusion. Massive bone destruction led to dissociation of his upper body from his pelvis and legs. Reconstruction of the spinopelvic continuity was planned with the aid of a personalized lumbosacral 3DPI. METHOD: Using high-resolution computed tomography scans, the custom 3DPI was made using additive titanium manufacturing. The unique 3DPI consisted of (1) a sacral platform with iliac screws, (2) modular corpectomy device with rigid connection to the sacral platform, and (3) anterior plate connection with screws for proximal fixation. The procedures to obtain compassionate use Food and Drug Administration approval were followed. The patient underwent debridement of a chronically open wound before undertaking the 3-stage reconstructive procedure. The custom 3DPI and additional instrumentation were inserted as part of a salvage rebuilding procedure. RESULTS: The chronology of the rapid implementation of the personalized sacral 3DPI from decision, design, manufacturing, Food and Drug Administration approval, and surgical execution lasted 28 days. The prosthesis was positioned in the defect according to the expected anatomic planes and secured using a screw-rod system and a vascularized fibular bone strut graft. The prosthesis provided an ideal repair of the lumbosacral junction and pelvic ring by merging spinal pelvic fixation, posterior pelvic ring fixation, and anterior spinal column fixation. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of a multilevel lumbar, sacral, and sacropelvic neuropathic (Charcot) spine reconstruction using a 3DPI sacral prosthesis. As the prevalence of severe spine deformities continues to increase, adoption of 3DPIs is becoming more relevant to offer personalized treatment for complex deformities.

FLOSEAL Versus SURGIFLO in Lumbar Surgery: Similar Outcomes, Different Costs in a Matched Cohort Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Flowable gelatin-based matrices with thrombin for hemostatic control are commercially available as Floseal (Baxter International Inc.) and Surgiflo (Ethicon Inc.). The objective of this study is to compare the rate of blood transfusions following the use of Floseal and Surgiflo in lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: Elective lumbar spine surgery patients between September 2019 and March 2021 were identified via CPT codes. Floseal 10 mL (N=102) and Surgiflo matrix 8 mL (N=108) cohorts excluded those younger than 18 years or those who underwent surgeries for infection, trauma, or tumor. The primary outcome was blood transfusion. Surgical complexity was controlled using the Surgical Invasiveness Index and Adult Spinal Deformity Invasiveness Score. The 1:1 propensity score matching was performed using demographic information, Surgical Invasiveness Index, Adult Spinal Deformity Invasiveness Score, and tranexamic acid use. RESULTS: A total of 77 Floseal patients were propensity score matched with 77 Surgiflo patients. There was no difference in the rate of blood transfusion (p=0.441). There was also no difference in operative time, estimated blood loss, or postoperative hemoglobin levels. The Surgiflo cohort used more units per surgery (p=0.004) and cost $102.45 more per surgery. Switching to Floseal saves $102,450 per year per 1000 surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in transfusion rates between using Floseal or Surgiflo for lumbar spine surgery. Surgiflo had higher usage per surgery and costs than Floseal.

Mechanical complications and patient-reported outcome measures associated with high pelvic incidence and persistent pelvic retroversion: the Roussouly "false type 2" profile.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper was to report mechanical complications and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with a Roussouly "false type 2" (FT2) profile. METHODS: ASD patients treated from 2004 to 2014 at a single center were identified. Inclusion criteria were pelvic incidence ≥ 60° and a minimum 2-year follow-up. FT2 was defined as a high postoperative pelvic tilt (PT), as defined by the Global Alignment and Proportion target, and thoracic kyphosis < 30°. Mechanical complications, defined as proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and/or instrumentation failure, were determined and compared. Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r) scores were compared between groups. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients (normal PT [NPT] group 49, FT2 group 46) who met the inclusion criteria were identified and studied. Most surgeries were revisions (NPT group 30 [61%], FT2 group 30 [65%]), and most were performed via a posterior-only approach (86%) (mean ± SD 9.6 ± 5 levels). Proximal junctional angles increased after surgery in both groups, without differences between groups. Neither rates of radiographic PJK (p = 0.10), revision for PJK (p = 0.45), nor revision for pseudarthrosis (p = 0.66) were different between groups. There were no differences between groups for SRS-22r domain scores or subscores. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center experience, patients with high pelvic incidence fixed with persistent lumbopelvic parameter mismatch and engaged compensatory mechanisms (Roussouly FT2) had mechanical complications and PROMs not different from those with normalized alignment parameters. Compensatory PT may be acceptable in some cases of ASD surgery.

Comparison of Outcomes in Percutaneous Fixation of Traumatic Fractures between Ankylosing Spondylitis and Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyze outcomes and complications of patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures in the setting of ankylosing spinal disorders (ASD) treated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS). METHODS: The operative logs from 2012 to 2019 from one academic, Level I trauma center were reviewed for cases of thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures in patients with ASD treated with a MIS approach. Variables were compared between patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), and advanced spondylosis. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients with ASD and concomitant thoracic or lumbar spinal fracture managed with an MIS approach were identified. A total of 11 patients were identified with AS, 21 with DISH, and 16 with advanced spondylosis. A total of 27 (56.3%) patients experienced complications. Complications differed between groups; DISH patients experienced a greater number of post-operative complications compared to AS and advanced spondylosis patients (P = .009). There was no significant difference in length of surgery, estimated blood loss, length of stay, readmission, and reoperation rates between AS and DISH patients. There were 3 mortalities unrelated to the surgery. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous stabilization of patients with ankylosing spinal disorder fractures remains a viable management method. Operative characteristics were similar between AS, DISH, and advanced spondylosis patients; however, DISH patients experienced a greater number of post-operative complications.

Risk of Avascular Necrosis with The Modified Dunn Procedure in SCFE Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

In situ stabilization is a widely accepted treatment for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) despite risks of avascular necrosis (AVN) and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The modified Dunn procedure with surgical hip dislocation attempts to maintain epiphyseal perfusion and allows anatomic epiphyseal repositioning, theoretically reducing AVN and FAI risks. We systematically evaluated the literature, elucidating overall and stability-stratified rates of AVN following the modified Dunn procedure, and revision rates in non-AVN patients. Using Ovid and MEDLINE (PubMed), studies involving the modified Dunn procedure were evaluated for age, stability, preoperative slip (Southwick) angle, ROM at follow-up, outcome metrics, and revisions. Utilizing a random effect model of proportions, we determined overall and stability-stratified AVN rates, and revision rates in patients without AVN.673 patients (688 SCFEs) who underwent modified Dunn procedure were included. Overall AVN rate was 14.3% with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of 9.3 to 20.2%. AVN rate in stable slips was 10.9% (95% CI: 6.0 to 17.1%) and 19.9% (95% CI: 12.8% to 28.1%) in unstable slips. Revision rate in non-AVN patients was 13.3% (95% CI: 8.3% to 19.2%). Fixation failures occurred following K-wire or small-caliber (<6.5 mm) screw fixation. Overall mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) was excellent (>90 points). Mean HHS was 98.9 points (range of means: 86 to 99 points) in stable cases, and 90.5 points (range of means: 73 to 98 points) in unstable cases. Patients undergoing modified Dunn procedure had excellent clinical outcomes and low incidences of AVN. Further studies are needed to determine if modified Dunn osteotomy with surgical hip dislocation is a viable alternative to in situ pinning for treatment of severe SCFE.

Multiplier Method for Predicting the Sitting Height Growth at Maturity: A Database Analysis.

This study aims to develop multipliers for the spine and sitting height to predict sitting height at maturity. With the aid of longitudinal and cross-sectional clinical databases, we divided the total sitting height, cervical, thoracic, and lumbar lengths at skeletal maturity by these same four factors at each age for each percentile given. A series of comparisons were then carried out between the multipliers as well as the percentiles and the varied racial and ethnic groups within them. Regarding sitting height, there was little variability and correlated with the multipliers calculated for the thoracic and lumbar spine. The multiplier method has demonstrated accuracy that is not influenced by generation, percentile, race, and ethnicity. This multiplier can be used to anticipate mature sitting height, the heights of the thoracic, cervical, and lumbar spine, as well as the lack of spinal growth after spinal fusion surgery in skeletally immature individuals.

Similar Accuracy of Surgical Plans After Initial In-Person and Telemedicine Evaluation of Spine Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare accuracy of surgical plans generated from in-person and telemedicine evaluations and assess the reasons for surgical plan changes between initial evaluation and surgery. The secondary objective was to assess the effect of changes in surgical planning on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients who were evaluated as new patients by orthopaedic spine faculty between 2019 and 2021 were divided by appointment type: telemedicine (n = 39) and in-person (n = 92). Patients were included if the surgeon documented a definitive surgical plan at the initial visit. The primary outcome was change in surgical plan from initial assessment to actual procedure performed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the accuracy of initial surgical plans between the telemedicine and in-person cohorts (79.5% vs. 82.6%, P = 0.673). The most common modification in the surgical plan (79%) was change in the number of operated levels, of which 18 of 19 patients had 1 added operated level. Less common reasons were change in approach (13%) and change in procedure (8%). Patients with changes to their surgical plan experienced longer length of stay (3.1 vs. 2.0 days, P = 0.027) than patients with consistent surgical plans. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine and in-person evaluations generated similarly accurate surgical plans. Changes to the initial surgical plans most often involved adding operative levels. Our findings show that telemedicine visits are an acceptable option for preoperative assessment to generate surgical plans; however, further research is needed.

Postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation for treatment of unstable pathologic neoplastic fractures.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Case Series. OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive techniques have emerged as a useful tool in the treatment of neoplastic spine pathology due to decrease in surgical morbidity and earlier adjuvant treatment. The objective of this study was to analyze outcomes and complications in a cohort of unstable, symptomatic pathologic fractures treated with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients with spinal stabilization for unstable pathologic neoplastic fractures between 2007 and 2017. Patients who underwent PPSF through a minimally invasive approach were included. Surgical indications included intractable pain, mechanical instability, and neurologic compromise with radiologic visualization of the lesion. RESULTS: 20 patients with mean Tomita Score of 6.3 ± 2.1 points [95% CI, 5.3-7.2] were treated with constructs that spanned a mean of 4.7 ± 1.4 [95% CI, 4.0-5.3] instrumented levels. 10 (50%) patients were augmented with vertebroplasty. Majority of patients (65%) had no complications during their hospital stay and were discharged home (60%). Four patients received reoperation: two extracavitary corpectomies, one pathologic fracture at a different level, and one adjacent segment disease. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive PPSF is a safe and effective option when treating unstable neoplastic fractures and may be a viable alternative to the traditional open approach in select cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.