Hearing Impairment and Incident Frailty in Later Life: The Health in Men Study (HIMS).

OBJECTIVES: This study is designed to determine if hearing loss is associated with increased risk of frailty in later life. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We retrieved data of a community sample of men aged 70 years and above living in the metropolitan region of Perth, Western Australia. 3,285 participants who were free of frailty at the beginning of the study were followed for up to 17 years. Data were retrieved from the Health in Men Study (HIMS) and the Western Australian Data Linkage System (WADLS). MEASUREMENTS: Hearing loss was defined by self-report or by diagnosis recorded in the WADLS. Incident frailty was assessed using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS). RESULTS: A total of 2,348 (71.5%) men developed frailty during follow up. The adjusted hazard ratio was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.95-1.12). The majority of the participants became frail by age 90 regardless of hearing condition. The time point where half of the group become frail was delayed by 14.4 months for men without hearing loss compared with hearing impaired men. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing loss is not associated with incident frailty in men aged 70 years or older when frailty was measured by HFRS. However, this statistically non-significant result could be due to the low sensitivity of study measures. Also, we found a trend that men with hearing loss were more likely to develop frailty compared with their normal-hearing peers, suggesting a potential association between hearing loss and frailty.

A novel study on association between untreated hearing loss and cognitive functions of older adults: Baseline non-verbal cognitive assessment results.

BACKGROUND: Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) is highly prevalent in older adults, and more than two-thirds above age of 70 years suffer from ARHL. Recent studies have established a link between ARHL and cognitive impairment; however, most of the studies have used verbally loaded cognitive measures to investigate the association between ARHL and cognition. It is possible that due to hearing impairment, the elderly may experience difficulty in following verbal instructions or completing tasks that heavily rely on hearing during cognitive assessments. This may result in overestimation of cognitive impairment in such individuals. This baseline cross-sectional study investigated the associations between untreated hearing loss and a number of cognitive functions using a battery of non-verbal cognitive tests. Further, association between hearing loss and psychological status of older adults was examined. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case-controlled study. METHODS: A total of 119 participants (54 males, M=66.33±10.50 years; 65 females M=61.51±11.46 years) were recruited. All participants completed a hearing assessment, a computerised test battery of non-verbal cognitive functions and the depression, anxiety and stress scale. RESULTS: Hierarchical multiple regression analysis results revealed that hearing thresholds significantly associated with the working memory (P<0.05), paired associative learning scores (P<0.05), depression (P<0.001), and anxiety (P<0.001) and stress (P<0.001) scores. Analysis of covariance results revealed that participants with moderately-severe hearing loss performed significantly poorer in paired associative learning and working memory tasks and psychological function tests compared to those with normal hearing. CONCLUSION: Results of the current study suggest a significant relationship between ARHL and both cognition and psychological status. Our results also have some implications for using non-verbal cognitive tests to evaluate cognitive functions in post-lingually hearing impaired ageing adults, at least for those with more than moderately-severe levels of hearing loss.

Self-reported cochlear implant management skills: development and validation of the self-administered Cochlear Implant Management Skills (CIMS-self) survey.

OBJECTIVE: A self-administered device management survey was developed and validated to investigate the ability of cochlear implant recipients to self-report physical handling and care for their hearing implant device(s) and to identify factors that may influence self-reported management skills. DESIGN: Survey development and validation. A prospective convenience cohort design study. SETTING: Specialist hearing implant clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-nine post-lingually hearing impaired, adult cochlear implant recipients, at least 12 months postoperative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey test-retest reliability, responsiveness, criterion validity and sensitivity and specificity compared to clinician evaluation of device management skills. Correlations between self-reported management skills and participant demographic, audiometric, cognitive function, clinical outcomes and device factors. RESULTS: The self-administered Cochlear Implant Management Skills survey was developed, demonstrating high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.884, P < 0.001; CI 95%: 0.721-0.952), responsiveness to intervention (management skills training) [t(20) = -3.245, P = 0.004], criterion validity (ICC = 0.765, P < 0.001; CI 95%: 0.584-0.868) and sensitivity (0.89). No associations were found between self-reported management skills and participant factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a self-report survey is an effective method for the evaluation of skills required for cochlear implant device management.

A prospective study evaluating cochlear implant management skills: development and validation of the Cochlear Implant Management Skills survey.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ability of cochlear implant (CI) recipients to physically handle and care for their hearing implant device(s) and to identify factors that may influence skills. To assess device management skills, a clinical survey was developed and validated on a clinical cohort of CI recipients. DESIGN: Survey development and validation. A prospective convenience cohort design study. SETTING: Specialist hearing implant clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-nine post-lingually deafened, adult CI recipients, at least 12 months postoperative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey test-retest reliability, interobserver reliability and responsiveness. Correlations between management skills and participant demographic, audiometric, clinical outcomes and device factors. RESULTS: The Cochlear Implant Management Skills survey was developed, demonstrating high test-retest reliability (0.878), interobserver reliability (0.972) and responsiveness to intervention (skills training) [t(20) = -3.913, P = 0.001]. Cochlear Implant Management Skills survey scores range from 54.69% to 100% (mean: 83.45%, sd: 12.47). No associations were found between handling skills and participant factors. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate a range in cochlear implant device handling skills in CI recipients and offers clinicians and researchers a tool to systematically and objectively identify shortcomings in CI recipients' device handling skills.