Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMJ ; 334(7607): 1309, 2007 Jun 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17526594

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate alternative strategies for improving the uptake of benefits of a community based health insurance scheme by its poorest members. DESIGN: Prospective cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Self Employed Women's Association (SEWA) community based health insurance scheme in rural India. Participants 713 claimants at baseline (2003) and 1440 claimants two years later among scheme members in 16 rural sub-districts. INTERVENTIONS: After sales service with supportive supervision, prospective reimbursement, both packages, and neither package, randomised by sub-district. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was socioeconomic status of claimants relative to members living in the same sub-district. Secondary outcomes were enrolment rates in SEWA Insurance, mean socioeconomic status of the insured population relative to the general rural population, and rate of claim submission. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2005, the mean socioeconomic status of SEWA Insurance members (relative to the rural population of Gujarat) increased significantly. Rates of claims also increased significantly, on average by 21.6 per 1000 members (P<0.001). However, differences between the intervention groups and the standard scheme were not significant. No systematic effect of time or interventions on the socioeconomic status of claimants relative to members in the same sub-district was found. CONCLUSIONS: Neither intervention was sufficient to ensure that the poorer members in each sub-district were able to enjoy the greater share of the scheme benefits. Claim submission increased as a result of interventions that seem to have strengthened awareness of and trust in a community based health insurance scheme. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT00421629.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis por Conglomerados , Política de Salud , Humanos , India , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Salud Rural , Factores Socioeconómicos
2.
Natl Med J India ; 19(5): 274-82, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17203684

RESUMEN

We describe and analyse the experience of piloting a preferred provider system (PPS) for rural members of Vimo SEWA, a fixed-indemnity, community-based health insurance (CBHI) scheme run by the Self-Employed Women's Association (SEWA). The objectives of the PPS were (i) to facilitate access to hospitalization by providing financial benefits at the time of service utilization; (ii) to shift the burden of compiling a claim away from members and towards Vimo SEWA staff; and (iii) to direct members to inpatient facilities of acceptable quality. The PPS was launched between August and October 2004, in 8 subdistricts covering 15,000 insured. The impact of the scheme was analysed using data from a household survey of claimants and qualitative data from in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. The PPS appears to have been successful in terms of two of the three primary objectives--it has transferred much of the burden of compiling a health Insurance claim onto Vimo SEWA staff, and it has directed members to inpatient facilities with acceptable levels of technical quality (defined in terms of structural Indicators). However, even under the PPS, user fees pose a financial barrier, as the insured have to mobilize funds to cover the costs of medicines, supplies, registration fee, etc. before receipt of cash payment from Vimo SEWA. Other barriers to the success of the PPS were the geographic Inaccessibility of some of the selected hospitals, lack of awareness about the PPS among members and a variety of administrative problems. This pilot project provides useful lessons relating to strategic purchasing by CBHI schemes and, more broadly, managed care in India. In particular, the pragmatic approach taken to assessing hospitals and identifying preferred providers is likely to be useful elsewhere.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Sindicatos , Organizaciones del Seguro de Salud/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Rural/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud para Mujeres/organización & administración , Mujeres Trabajadoras , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , India , Formulario de Reclamación de Seguro , Cobertura del Seguro , Proyectos Piloto , Servicios de Salud Rural/economía , Clase Social , Servicios de Salud para Mujeres/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA