A National Assessment of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cleft Lip Repair.

PURPOSE: This study examined the impact of patient race/ethnicity on the likelihood of experiencing delays to surgery, post-operative surgical complications, and prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) following primary cleft lip (CL) repair. METHODS: Patients who underwent CL repair were identified in the 2006-2012 Kids' Inpatient Database. Primary outcomes were defined as treatment after 6-months-old, presence of any surgical complication, LOS >1 day, and total hospital charges. Multivariable analyses were performed to adjust for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics that might account for differences in outcomes. RESULTS: There were 5927 eligible patients with cleft lip: 3724 White, 279 Black, 1316 Hispanic, 277 Asian/Pacific-Islander, and 331 other race/ethnicity. Across all outcomes, there were significant unadjusted differences (p<0.001) by race/ethnicity, with White children having the lowest odds of delayed surgery, complications, and prolonged LOS, and the lowest charges. Multivariable analyses suggested that differences in baseline health status may account for much of this disparity in combination with factors such as income, insurance type, and location. Even after adjusting for co-variates, significantly increased odds of delayed surgery and higher charges remained for Hispanic and Asian/PI patients. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in the odds of delays, complications, prolonged hospital stays, and total charges among CL patients of different race/ethnicity. Advocacy efforts to ameliorate disparity in early infant health may subsequently improve equity in cleft outcomes.

Gender Differences Among Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstructive Surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gender differences exist in the training history, practice patterns, and home lives of surgeons who perform microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Medical facilities that employ surgeons who practice head and neck microvascular reconstruction in the United States. METHODS: A survey was created using the Research Electronic Data Capture Framework and was distributed via email to microvascular reconstructive surgeons. Descriptive statistics were performed using Stata software. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in training or current practice patterns between microvascular surgeons who identify as men versus those who identify as women. Women had fewer children (p = .020) and were more likely to be childless (p = .002). Whereas men were more likely to report a spouse/partner as primary caretaker, women were more likely to hire a professional caretaker or cite themselves as a primary caretaker (p < .001). Women were more likely to have finished residency (p = .015) and fellowship (p = .014) more recently and to practice in the Southeast (p = .006). Of the microvascular surgeons who reported practice setting switches, men more commonly changed positions for career advancement, whereas women were more likely to switch due to burnout (p = .002). CONCLUSION: This study found no gender-based differences in training or practice patterns. However, significant differences were identified in childbearing, family structure, geographic practice location, and motives for switching practice.

TMJ Ankylosis Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: Management With Simultaneous Midface External Distraction and Bilateral Temporomandibular Joint Replacement.

Early mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) can decrease upper airway and feeding complications in pediatric patients with micrognathia; however, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) complications like TMJ ankylosis (TMJA) may occur. TMJA can disturb pediatric patients' function and craniofacial growth, resulting in significant physical and psychosocial consequences. Additional surgical procedures may also be required, increasing the burden of care on patients and their families. CMF surgeons must discuss the potential complications of early MDO surgery with families as well as potential solutions should these problems occur. This report presents the case of a 17-year-old male with a severe craniofacial anomaly with features of Treacher-Collins syndrome (TCS) and a surgical history of tracheostomy, cleft palate repair, mandibular reconstruction with harvested costochondral grafts, and MDO with resultant bilateral TMJA and limited mouth opening. The patient Was treated with bilateral custom alloplastic TMJ replacements and simultaneous maxillary DO using a Rigid External Distraction (RED) device.

Comparative Benefits of Open versus Closed Reduction of Condylar Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Many fractures of the mandibular condylar neck are amenable to both open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and closed treatment. Clinical outcomes following these two modalities remains a topic of debate. This systematic review critically appraises the literature to compare them following these treatment options. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to test the null hypothesis of no difference in clinical outcomes in ORIF versus closed treatment of mandibular condyle fractures. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Elsevier text mining tool database, and clinicaltrials.gov trial registries were queried from 1946 to 2020. The quality of evidence was determined using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. RESULTS: Of 1507 screened articles, 14 met inclusion criteria. ORIF was favored significantly when evaluating temporomandibular joint pain [relative risk (RR), 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.7] (number needed to treat to prevent an outcome in one patient, 3; 95% CI, 2 to 6), laterotrusive movements of the mandible (mean difference, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.7 to 3.0) (standardized mean difference, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.4 to 1.3), and malocclusion (RR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4 to 0.7) (number needed to treat to prevent an outcome in one patient, 19; 95% CI, 10 to 200). However, ORIF yielded a higher incidence of postoperative infection (RR, 3.6; 95% CI, 0.9 to 13.8) and must be weighed against the understood risk of facial nerve injury. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis of high-level evidence in randomized controlled trial suggests that ORIF significantly improves functional outcomes, decreases pain, and restores occlusion and jaw symmetry. These long-term benefits must be weighed against the increased risk of postoperative infection and exposure of the facial nerve to potential injury.

Dorsal Augmentation With the Dorsal Extension Spreader Graft.

Spreader grafts traditionally are used to improve airflow through opening the internal nasal valve, as well as enhance the cosmetic appearance of the nose. The graft's versatility proves useful in surgical correction of several nasal profiles by enhancing dorsal aesthetic lines and by maintenance of the nasal pyramid at midline. The authors describe a modified spreader graft that adds an additional benefit of dorsal augmentation in patients with underprojected or saddle noses. This technique utilizes harvested septal cartilage and fixation of the graft that extends beyond the septal and upper lateral cartilage dorsal border to improve nasal dorsum height. Patients who received this operative technique by the senior author were identified and their operative courses and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Case examples are provided to illustrate indications and outcomes. This grafting technique allows for improved functionality, defined dorsal aesthetic lines, changes in nasal width, and a more balanced profile in patients with underprojected noses.

Extent of Extranodal Extension in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma is Not Independently Associated With Overall or Disease-Free Survival at a 2.0-mm Threshold.

PURPOSE: The presence of extranodal extension (ENE) conveys a poor prognosis in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC); however, there is no consensus regarding whether the histopathologic extent of ENE (e-ENE) may be a more discriminating prognostic indicator. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of minor ENE (<2.0 mm) versus major ENE (≥ 2.0 mm) on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in OSCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was designed using an electronic medical record review. Inclusion criteria included patients with OSCC and cervical node metastasis. All subjects were treated between the years 2009 and 2017 in the Michigan Medicine Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Ann Arbor, Michigan). The primary predictor variable was e-ENE, measured as the maximum distance of tumor invasion into extranodal tissue from the outer aspect of the nodal capsule. Primary outcome variables were OS and DFS. Other covariates included demographic data, tumor staging, and histopathologic data. Descriptive statistics were performed. Kaplan-Meier survival plots for OS and DFS were performed. The data were mined for an alternative threshold at which e-ENE may impact survival using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: One hundred sixty eight subjects were included (91 ENE-negative, 48 minor ENE, and 29 major ENE). Most subjects were male (62%) and the mean age was 62.9 years. Mean follow-up time was 2.97 +/- 2.76 years. There was no statistically significant difference in OS or DFS between minor and major ENE. Five-year OS for minor ENE was 30.4% versus 20.7% for major ENE (P = .28). Five-year DFS for minor ENE was 26.7% versus 18.1% for major ENE (P = .30). Five-year OS and DFS was worse for subjects with ENE-positive disease versus ENE-negative disease (OS: 26.9% vs 63.1%, hazard ratio [HR]: 2.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.77, 4.10], P < .001; DFS: 23.7% vs 59.7%, HR = 2.55, 95% CI [1.71, 3.79], P < .001). At an alternative threshold of 0.9 mm e-ENE, there was greater DFS in subjects with e-ENE 0.1-0.9 mm versus e-ENE > 0.9 (40.6% vs 18.9%, respectively) (HR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.24, 0.99], P = .047). CONCLUSION: There was no independent association between survival and e-ENE at a 2.0-mm threshold.

Outcomes in Pediatric Maxillofacial Reconstruction With Vascularized Fibular Flaps: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the complications and outcomes after maxillofacial reconstruction using the free fibular flap in the pediatric population. METHODS: A systematic review and descriptive analysis were conducted using data variables, including study characteristics; patient characteristics; postoperative complications (major and minor); surgical revision; and dental rehabilitation. RESULTS: The systematic review resulted in 1622 articles, 55 of which met inclusion criteria for this study. The 55 articles consisted of 17 case series and 38 case reports with level III/IV and level V of evidence, respectively. Of the 155 identified pediatric patients, the rate of major complications was 13.5% and minor complications was 24.5%. The most common complication was mild growth distortion (n = 7) at the recipient site. Complications at the donor site were less common. During follow-up, 29 patients (18.7%) underwent or awaited surgical revision, and 43 patients (27.7%) underwent or awaited dental rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the free fibular flap for pediatric maxillofacial reconstruction is safe and reliable. Additionally, surgical revision to correct the functional impairments resulting from primary reconstruction using the free fibular flap is relatively common.

Clinical Practice Trends and Postoperative Outcomes in Primary Cleft Rhinoplasty.

PURPOSE: Optimal correction of the cleft nasal deformity remains challenging. The purpose of this study was to examine the practice patterns and postoperative course of patients undergoing cleft lip repair with rhinoplasty compared to those who have primary lip repair without rhinoplasty. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on the Kids' Inpatient Database. Data were collected from January 2000 to December 2011 and included infants aged 12 months and younger who underwent cleft lip repair. The predictor variable was the addition of rhinoplasty at primary cleft lip repair. Primary outcome variables included hospital setting, year, and admission cost, while secondary outcome variables included length of stay and postoperative complication rate. Independent t-tests and chi-squared tests were performed. Continuous variables were analyzed by multiple linear regression models. RESULTS: The study sample included 4559 infants with 1422 (31.2%) who underwent primary cleft rhinoplasty. Over time, there was a significant increase in the proportion of cleft lip repairs accompanied by a rhinoplasty (p < .01). A greater proportion of patients with unilateral cleft lips received simultaneous rhinoplasty with their lip repairs (33.8 vs 26.0%, p < .01). This cohort had a significantly shorter length of stay (1.6 vs 2.8 days, p < .01) when compared to children that underwent cleft lip repair alone. CONCLUSIONS: Performing primary cleft rhinoplasty is becoming more common among cleft surgeons. Considering comparable costs and complication rates, a rhinoplasty should be considered during the surgical treatment planning of patients with cleft nasal deformities.

Major Complications and Associated Risk Factors for Osseous Genioplasty With Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: An American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis.

PURPOSE: Patients with significant dentofacial deformities undergoing aesthetic and functional orthognathic surgery may often require genioplasty to advance the position of the pogonion relative to B point. No study to date has evaluated nationally registered data pertaining to addition of osseous genioplasty to bimaxillary orthognathic surgery and its associated clinical outcomes. METHODS: Data was extracted from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2010 to 2018 using current procedural terminology codes pertaining to Le Fort I osteotomy (LF), bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO), and osseous genioplasty (G) and divided into 2 cohorts: bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with and without osseous genioplasty. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes inherently recorded within National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were identified and recorded. Chi-squared analysis and unpaired 2-tail t tests were performed between the cohorts and their respective outcomes to determine significant relationships with significance set as P < 0.05. RESULTS: There were 373 patients double- or triple-jaw patients identified from the years 2010 to 2018. The most common recorded indication for LF/BSSO was maxillary hypoplasia (27.3%) and mandibular hypoplasia (6.8%). The most common indications for LF/BSSO/G were maxillary hypoplasia (16.1%) and maxillary asymmetry (16.1%). In comparison to LF/BBSO only, LF/BSSO/GP was not associated with any differences in the rate of surgical (0.0% versus 0.31%, P = 0.72) or medical complications (0.0% versus 0.63%, P = 0.60), in addition to unplanned readmissions (0.0% versus 1.56% versus P = 0.41) or reoperations (0.0% versus 1.25%, P = 0.46). However, osseous genioplasty addition was associated with increased overall operating time (271.77 versus 231.75 minutes, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Osseous genioplasty does not alter short-term, 30-day complication rate when performed with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. As reoperation rates remained relatively unchanged, it can be inferred that immediate adverse events or patient dissatisfaction were not apparent within 30 days. Although mean operating time is slightly longer, cardiopulmonary resuscitation without medical comorbidity was achieved at the conclusion of the procedure.

Comparing Load-Sharing Miniplate and Load-Bearing Plate Fixation in Atrophic Edentulous Mandibular Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To critically examine reported data to compare patient outcomes between load-sharing and load-bearing plate fixation for edentulous mandibular fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were designed to test the null hypothesis of no difference in postoperative outcomes between load-sharing and load-bearing plate fixation in atrophic, edentulous mandibular fractures. The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Elsevier text mining tool database, and clinicaltrials.gov trial registries were queried up until July 2016. The quality of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. RESULTS: A total of 1212 studies were screened for inclusion of which we included 1 high-quality Cochrane review, 6 narrative reviews, and 21 publications of case reports and case series. Overall, the quality of evidence was low. No difference was found between load-bearing and load-sharing fixation in functional recovery, nonunion, or infection. An uncontrolled case series portrayed complete functional and morphological restoration in 96.9% of patients (83.2-99.5; 95% confidence interval) in load-bearing osteosynthesis while another demonstrated the same outcome in only 40.0% of patients (17.5-65.0; 95% confidence interval). CONCLUSIONS: The authors did not find a statistically significant difference between load-bearing and load-sharing plate fixation in edentulous atrophic mandibular fracture patients; although this finding may be influenced by type 2 statistical error. Surgeons should continue to use their best clinical judgment in deciding on treatment approach for these challenging fractures. Future studies with higher level evidence are necessary to guide optimal fracture management.