Clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention stratified according to duration of pain-to-balloon time and type of myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Based on the clinical outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), this study intended to assess mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rates according to duration of pain-to-balloon (PTB) time and type of MI. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study based on the prospectively collected ORPKI registry which covers PCIs performed in Poland chosen between January 2014 and December 2017. Under assessment were 1,994 STEMI and 923 NSTEMI patients. Study endpoints included mortality and MACCE rates (in-hospital, 30-day, 12- and 36-month). Predictors of all-cause mortality in the overall group, STEMI and NSTEMI were assessed by multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis did not reveal significant differences between the STEMI and NSTEMI group for all-cause mortality or MACCE at the 36-month follow-up. While in the long PTB time group, MACCE rate was significantly greater in STEMI patients when compared to NSTEMI (p = 0.004). Among STEMI patients, the short, medium and long PTB time groups differed significantly in the rate of all-cause mortality (p = 0.006) and MACCE (p = 0.04) at 1,095 days of follow-up, which were the greatest in the long PTB time group. CONCLUSIONS: Before considering the length of PTB time, there were no statistically significant differences in mortality or MACCE frequency between the STEMI and NSTEMI group at 36-month follow-up. Longer PTB times are related to significantly greater mortality at the 36-month follow-up in the STEMI, but not in the NSTEMI group.

Comparison of FFR, iFR, and QFR assessment in patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary heart disease.

Introduction: Some patients with coronary heart disease are diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis. For further treatment, coronary angiography is performed in these patients. For intermediate lesions, obtaining coronary artery physiological data can facilitate clinical decision-making regarding revascularization. Aim: The study compared the physiological significance of coronary artery stenosis using the fractional flow reserve (FFR) method with instantaneous wave-free pressure ratio (iFR) and quantitative flow ratio (QFR) in patients qualified for aortic valve replacement. Material and methods: Data were collected on patients hospitalized in the years 2019-2020 at the 2nd Department of Cardiology, University Hospital in Krakow. Results: Twelve patients with severe aortic stenosis and borderline lesions in the coronary artery were qualified for physiological assessment. There were 6 women, whose mean age was 73.8 ±7.5 years. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 52 ±15%. The mean aortic valve area was 0.80 ±0.16 cm2. The left anterior descending artery was assessed in 12 from 13 cases (92%). In comparison to FFR, all iFR measurements were concordant with FFR. The total agreement between QFR and FFR/iFR assessment was 69%. Conclusions: Despite the controversy and uncertainty of some operators regarding the interpretation of the FFR test in patients with severe aortic stenosis, we obtained complete agreement of FFR with iFR assessment. This fact suggests that in patients with severe aortic stenosis the choice of an invasive method to assess the physiological significance of the stenosis in the coronary artery is not crucial - both iFR and FFR allow comparable results.

Annual operator volume among patients treated using percutaneous coronary interventions with rotational atherectomy and procedural outcomes: Analysis based on a large national registry.

BACKGROUND: Low operator and institutional volume are associated with poorer procedural and long-term clinical outcomes in the general population of patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). AIM: To assess the relationship between operator experience and procedural outcomes of patients treated with PCI and rotational atherectomy (RA). METHODS: Data for conducting the current analysis were obtained from the national registry of percutaneous coronary interventions (ORPKI) maintained in cooperation with the Association of Cardiovascular Interventions (AISN) of the Polish Cardiac Society. The study covers data from January 2014 to December 2020. RESULTS: During the investigated period, there were 162 active CathLabs, at which 747,033 PCI procedures were performed by 851 operators (377 RA operators [44.3%]). Of those, 5188 were PCI with RA procedures; average 30 ± 61 per site/7 years (Me: 3; Q1-Q3: 0-31); 6 ± 18 per operator/7 years (Me: 0; Q1-Q3: 0-3). Considering the number of RA procedures annually performed by individual operators during the analyzed 7 years, the first quartile totaled (Q1: < =2.57), the second (Q2: < =5.57), and the third (Q3: < =11.57), while the fourth quartile was (Q4: > 11.57). The maximum number of procedures was 39.86 annually per operator. We demonstrated, through a nonlinear relationship with annualized operator volume and risk-adjusted, that operators performing more PCI with RA per year (fourth quartile) have a lower number of the overall periprocedural complications (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: High-volume RA operators are related to lower overall periprocedural complication occurrence in patients treated with RA in comparison to low-volume operators.

Sex-related differences and rotational atherectomy: Analysis of 5 177 percutaneous coronary interventions based on a large national registry from 2014 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with rotational atherectomy (RA) have massively calcified coronary arteries and their prognosis differs between sexes. AIMS: The aim of the study was to evaluate the trends in the percentage of sexes in the subsequent years, to compare demographic characteristics between men and women, and to identify factors associated with the risk of periprocedural complications and death. METHODS: We analyzed data on 751 113 patients treated with PCI between 2014 and 2020 from the Polish National Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (ORPKI). We extracted data on 5 177 (0.7%) patients treated with RA of whom 3 552 (68.6%) were men. To determine risk factors of periprocedural complications and death, a multivariable analysis was performed. RESULTS: The proportion of PCIs involving RA increased between 2014 and 2020 (P <0.001). Almost twice as many RA procedures were performed on men (68.55%), and that proportion did not change in the following years. The female patients were older (75.2 [8.3] vs. 70.5 [9.2] years; P <0.001). When considering periprocedural complications, their overall rate (3.45% vs. 2.31%; P = 0.01) and death rate (0.68% vs. 0.17%; P = 0.006) were greater among women. Also, via multivariable analysis, female sex was found to be a risk factor for greater periprocedural mortality (P = 0.02) and overall complication rate (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients treated with RA are men and sex-related distribution was stable during the analyzed period. Female sex is a risk factor for greater periprocedural complications and mortality in patients treated with RA.

Predictors and trends of contrast use and radiation exposure in a large cohort of patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions: Chronic total occlusion analysis based on a national registry.

BACKGROUND: The aim herein, was to assess predictors and current trends of radiation exposure and total contrast amount use in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention within chronic total occlusion (CTO PCI) and non-CTO PCI. METHODS: Based on a nationwide registry (ORPKI), 535,857 patients treated with PCI between 2014 and 2018 were analysed. The study included 12,572 (2.34%) patients treated with CTO PCI. The CTO PCI and non-CTO PCI groups were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Multifactorial mixed regression models were used to assess predictors of contrast amount use and radiation exposure. RESULTS: The mean total contrast dose and radiation exposure decrease reached statistical significance in following years for the CTO PCI (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001) and non-CTO PCI groups (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Multifactorial analysis revealed that non-CTO PCI was a strong independent predictor of lower total contrast dose (estimate: -17.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -18.45 to -16.49, p < 0.001) and radiation exposure (estimate: -264.28; 95% CI: -273.75 to -254.81, p < 0.001). After PSM, it was confirmed that CTO PCI was an independent predictor of greater radiation exposure (estimate: 328.6; 95% CI: 289.1-368.1; p < 0.001) and total contrast dose (estimate: 30.5; 95% CI: 27.28-33.74; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Contrast dose and radiation exposure have decreased in previous years with regard to the CTO PCI and non-CTO PCI groups. CTO PCI was found to be an independent predictor of greater total contrast dose and radiation exposure in the overall group of patients treated with PCI.

Frequency and predictors of diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention related to stroke.

BACKGROUND: Stroke related to percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) is an infrequent complication, which can be potentially life-threatening and can lead to serious disability. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the relationship between the type of coronary procedure and incidence of stroke, as well as its predictors. METHODS: This retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected data gathered in the Polish National Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (ORPKI) between January 2014 and December 2019 and included 1177 161 coronary procedures. Among them, 650 674 patients underwent isolated diagnostic coronary angiography (DCA), and 526 487 PCI. Stroke was diagnosed in 157 patients (0.013%), of which 100 (0.015%) happened during DCA and 57 (0.011%) during PCI. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to separate predictors of stroke in patients undergoing coronary angiography and PCI. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with periprocedural stroke was higher in the group treated with isolated DCA during the analyzed time. Among predictors of stroke in patients undergoing DCA, we confirmed prior stroke (P <0.001), contrast amount (P = 0.007), femoral access (P = 0.002), unfractionated heparin use (P = 0.01), direct transport to the catheterization laboratory (P = 0.04), older age (P <0.001) and multi-vessel disease (P <0.001). While for PCI ± DCA, these were prior stroke (P <0.001), thrombolysis (P = 0.003), treatment with bivalirudin (P <0.001), and acetylsalicylic acid loading during PCI (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the large national registry, PCI ± DCA is associated with fewer risk factors and a lower rate of periprocedural strokes than isolated DCA.

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries: Score derivation for prediction based on a large national registry.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (STEMI) and obstructive coronary arteries (MI-CAD) are treated with primary percutaneous coronary interventions (pPCI), while patients with STEMI and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), usually require non-invasive therapy. The aim of the study is to design a score for predicting suspected MINOCA among an overall group of STEMI patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the Polish national registry of PCIs, we evaluated patients between 2014 and 2019, and selected 526,490 subjects treated with PCI and 650,728 treated using only coronary angiography. These subjects were chosen out of 1,177,218 patients who underwent coronary angiography. Then, we selected 124,663 individuals treated with pPCI due to STEMI and 5,695 patients with STEMI and MINOCA. The score for suspected MINOCA was created using the regression model, while the coefficients calculated for the final model were used to construct a predictive model in the form of a nomogram. RESULTS: Patients with MINOCA differ significantly from those in the MI-CAD group; they were significantly younger, less often males and demonstrated smaller burden of concomitant diseases. The model allowed to show that patients who scored more than 600 points had a 19% probability of MINOCA, while for those scoring more than 650 points, the likelihood was 71%. The other end of the MINOCA probability scale was marginal for patients who scored less than 500 points (< .2%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the created MINOCA score presented in the current publication, we are able to distinguish MINOCA from MI-CAD patients in the STEMI group.

Long-Term Prognostic Significance of High-Sensitive Troponin I Increase during Hospital Stay in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries.

Background and Objectives: A topic already widely investigated is the negative prognostic value regarding the extent of high sensitive troponin I (hs-TnI) increases among patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and obstructive coronary atherosclerosis compared to a group of patients with MI and non-obstructive coronary atherosclerosis (MINOCA). Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value concerning the extent of hs-TnI increase on clinical outcomes among patients with a MINOCA working diagnosis. Materials and Methods: We selected 337 consecutive patients admitted to hospital with a working diagnosis of MINOCA. The patients were divided in three groups according to the extent of hs-TnI increase during hospitalization (increase ≤5-times above the limit of the upper norm, >5 and ≤20-times, and >20-times). The study endpoints included all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; cerebral stroke and transient ischemic attacks, MI, coronary artery revascularization, either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting and all-cause mortality). Results: During the mean follow-up period of 516.1 ± 239.8 days, using Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis, significantly higher mortality rates were demonstrated among patients from the group with the greatest hs-TnI increase compared to the remaining groups (p = 0.01) and borderline values for MACCE (p = 0.053). Multivariable cox regression analysis did not confirm hs-TnI among factors related to increased MACCE or all-cause mortality rates. Conclusion: While a relationship between clinical outcomes and the extent of the hs-TnI increase among patients with a MINOCA working diagnosis remains, it does not seem to be not as strong as it is in patients with obstructive coronary atherosclerosis.

Effect of day- and night-time admissions on long-term clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

INTRODUCTION: It has been suggested that the time of admission during the day and night may influence the clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of day- and night­time admissions on the clinical outcomes of patients with AMI undergoing PCI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was based on the data on PCIs performed in Poland from January 2014 to December 2017, prospectively collected in the National Registry of Invasive Cardiology Procedures (ORPKI). Day hours were defined as the time interval between 7:00 am and 10:59 pm. The study endpoints included the all­cause in­hospital mortality rate and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) at 30­day,12­month, and 36­month follow­up. RESULTS: A total of 2919 patients were included in the study (2462 [84.3%] treated during the day hours). ST­segment elevation myocardial infarction (1993 [68.3%]) was the main indication for PCI. We demonstrated that the 30­day mortality rate was significantly higher in patients treated during the night hours than during the day hours (P = 0.01). Night hours were also among the independent predictors of increased 30­day mortality (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.11-2.16; P = 0.01). No significant differences were observed in in­hospital, 12­month, and 36­month mortality rates between patients treated during the night and day hours. There were no significant differences in the MACCE rates at the follow­up timepoints. CONCLUSIONS: Primary PCI for AMI is associated with increased 30­day mortality among patients treated during the night hours compared with those managed during the day hours.

Age and gender differences in clinical outcomes of patients with heavy-calcified coronary artery lesions treated percutaneously with rotational atherectomy.

BACKGROUND: Rotational atherectomy (RA) used in elderly patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) could enable revascularization or the omission of cardiac surgery. Knowledge about factors affecting the prognosis may improve the results of treatment. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the relationship of gender and age with long-term clinical outcomes expressed as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 97 consecutive patients treated with PCI and RA at the mean age of 71. The study group contained 73.2% men and 26.8% women, 36.1% of patients older than 75 and 63.9% younger than 75. The mean time of follow-up was 695.3 ±560.9 days. The rate of MACCEs (deaths, myocardial infarctions (MIs), reinterventions, coronary artery by-pass surgeries, or cerebral strokes (CSs)/transient ischemic attacks (TIAs)) in the overall group of patients was calculated at 33.7%. RESULTS: The comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves did not depict significant differences in the frequency of MACCEs for age (p = 0.36) and gender (p = 0.07). We noticed that the death rate was higher in females than in males and in patients older than 75 compared to those younger, and was statistically significant for age (p = 0.04). The rate of periprocedural complications was significantly higher among women than among men (p = 0.005) and in patients older than 75 compared to the younger ones (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Age and gender are not significantly associated with an increased rate of MACCEs during follow-up in elderly patients treated with PCI and RA.

Association between the mortality rate and operator volume in patients undergoing emergency or elective percutaneous coronary interventions.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that low operator and institutional volume may be associated with an increased risk of adverse events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AIMS: The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between operator volume and procedure- -related mortality in the emergent and elective settings. METHODS: Data were obtained from a national registry of PCIs, maintained in cooperation with the Association of Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society. Registry data for the period from January 2014 to December 2017 were collected. During the study, there were 162 active catheterization laboratories, in which a total of 456 732 PCIs were performed. RESULTS: The median number of PCIs performed in a single laboratory was 2643.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 1875-3598.5) over 4 years. The median number of PCIs performed by a single operator was 557 (IQR, 276.25-860.5) per year. We did not confirm a significant relationship between the operator volume and mortality in the overall group of patients treated with emergency and elective PCI. However, we noted a lower mortality rate for high-­volume operators (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99; P = 0.04). When the operator volume was assessed as a continuous variable, there was a trend toward significance (OR, 0.94; 95% CI; 0.88-1.0007; P = 0.052) in patients treated with emergency PCI. CONCLUSIONS: High operator volume was associated with a lower periprocedural mortality rate than low operator volume in patients undergoing PCI due to acute coronary syndromes.

Delayed Diagnosis of Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in a Young Patient with Multivessel Disease and Familial Hypercholesterolemia Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock Finally Treated with Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump as a Bridge to Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Delayed diagnosis of coronary artery disease in young patients after cardiac arrest of unknown origin could increase the risk of death in further diagnostic and therapeutic process. Familial history of premature coronary atherosclerosis and hypercholesterolemia could help in proper diagnosis and treatment. We present a case of a 29-year-old female admitted to the catheterization laboratory with cardiogenic shock and multivessel coronary artery disease treated successfully with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention and intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation as a bridge to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Impact of sex on the follow-up course and predictors of clinical outcomes in patients hospitalised due to myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries: a single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) occurs more often in women. AIM: We sought to assess the relationship between sex and clinical outcomes during follow-up in patients after MINOCA and to identify predictors of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). METHODS: The study comprised 134 patients (78 women) at the mean age of 61.6 years, who were diagnosed with MINOCA at the Department of Cardiology between January 2015 and June 2018. The mean follow-up duration was 609.5 ± 412.2 days. Pri-mary study endpoints were MACCE, which included all-cause death, myocardial infarction, reintervention, and cerebral stroke. Secondary endpoints were recurrent chest pain during follow-up and rehospitalisation for reasons other than MACCE. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis did not reveal any significant differences in the frequency of MACCE (p = 0.63) or mortality rate (p = 0.29) between men and women. There was no significant impact of sex on secondary study endpoints either. Sex was not identified as a predictor of primary or secondary study endpoints in univariate or multivariate analysis. Troponin index (risk ratio [RR] 1.002; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0005-1.0026, p = 0.004), age (RR 1.04; 95% CI 1.008-1.065, p = 0.01), serum creatinine level (RR 1.01; 95% CI 1.001-1.01, p = 0.02), hyperlipidaemia (RR 0.26; 95% CI 0.07-0.75, p = 0.01), and prior venous thromboembolic disease (RR 8.28; 95% CI 1.15-38, p = 0.04) were found to be predictors of MACCE in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Sex was not found to be significantly associated with clinical outcomes during the follow-up period in patients with MINOCA.