Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 36
Filtrar
1.
Heart Lung ; 68: 126-130, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38955005

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) bronchiolitis has arisen with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. There is a paucity of literature on SARS-CoV-2 bronchiolitis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our paper was to review and compare outcomes in bronchiolitis due to severe acute respiratory syndrome related coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2) and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). We also performed a subgroup analysis of two disrupted RSV seasons during the pandemic. METHODS: This was a retrospective study from a US TriNetX database from March 1, 2020-January 1, 2023. Propensity matching was utilized for confounders. RESULTS: There was a total of 3,592 patients (1,796 in each group) after propensity matching. There was an increased risk of oxygen saturation ≤95 % (RR=1.50 95 % CI 1.58-1.94, p = 0.002) and ICU admission (RR=1.44 95 % CI 1.06-1.94, p = 0.02) in those with SARS- CoV-2 but not for oxygen saturation ≤90 % (RR=1.03 95 %CI 0.75-1.42, p = 0.85) or intubation (RR=0.73 95 % CI 0.35-1.47, p = 0.37). There was a decreased risk of a patient with SARS- CoV-2 bronchiolitis being hospitalized (RR=0.65 95 % CI 0.57-0.74, p < 0.0001), respiratory rate ≥60 (RR=0.64 95 % CI 0.48-0.88, p < 0.001) or ≥70 (RR=0.64 95 % CI 0.43-0.96, p = 0.03) when compared to RSV bronchiolitis. Specifically examining SARS- CoV-2 versus RSV bronchiolitis during the delayed RSV seasons, during the first season both infections were not severe, but during the second RSV bronchiolitis season, patients infected with RSV had less risk of ICU admission compared to those infected with SARS- CoV-2. CONCLUSION: SARS- CoV-2 bronchiolitis patients appeared to have more severe outcomes since the risk of ICU admission was higher for these patients. Also, during the second delayed RSV season, SARS- CoV-2 bronchiolitis was more severe than RSV bronchiolitis.

2.
Cureus ; 16(5): e61126, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38919213

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Disturbances in potassium levels can induce ventricular arrhythmias and heighten mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study evaluates the influence of sK levels on seven-day mortality and incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in STEMI patients to further improve clinical guidelines and outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective, propensity-matched study analyzed approximately 250,000 acute STEMI patients from 55 major academic medical centers/healthcare organizations (HCOs) in the US Collaborative Network of the TriNetX database. The sK levels recorded on the day of STEMI diagnosis were categorized into four cohorts: sK ≤ 3.4 (hypokalemia), 3.5 ≤ sK ≤ 4.5 (normal-control), 4.6 ≤ sK ≤ 5.0 (high-normal), and sK ≥ 5.1 (hyperkalemia). Patient cohorts were propensity-matched using linear and logistic regression for demographics. Outcomes of seven-day mortality, ventricular tachycardia (VT), and ventricular fibrillation (VF) were compared between these cohorts and the control group. RESULTS: The analysis showed hypokalemia was linked to significantly higher seven-day mortality (7.2% vs. 4.3%; RR 1.69; p<0.001), and increased rates of VT and VF. Similarly, hyperkalemia was associated with elevated mortality (12.7% vs. 4.6%; RR 2.76; p<0.001), VT, and VF rates. High-normal sK levels showed increased mortality (7.4% vs. 4.7%; RR 1.58; p<0.001), but unchanged VT or VF rates compared to the normal sK group. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive study highlights the correlation of sK levels with death in STEMI patients, revealing a nearly doubled risk of mortality with hypokalemia and almost triples with hyperkalemia. More notably, the mortality for STEMIs is higher for high-normal vs normal sK values. Additionally, hypokalemia and hyperkalemia were found to significantly elevate VT and VF risks.

3.
Cureus ; 16(6): c182, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38868549

RESUMEN

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57472.].

4.
West J Emerg Med ; 25(3): 399-406, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801047

RESUMEN

Background: Alteplase (tPA) is the initial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Current tPA guidelines exclude patients who took direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) within the prior 48 hours. In this propensity-matched retrospective study we compared acute ischemic stroke patients treated with tPA who had received DOACs within 48 hours of thrombolysis to those not previously treated with DOACs, regarding three outcomes: mortality; intracranial hemorrhage (ICH); and need for acute blood transfusions (as a marker of significant blood loss). Methods: Using the United States cohort of 54 healthcare organizations in the TriNetx database, we identified 8,582 stroke patients treated with tPA on DOACs within 48 hours of thrombolysis and 46,703 stroke patients treated with tPA not on DOACs since January 1, 2012. We performed propensity score matching on demographic information and seven prior clinical diagnostic groups, resulting in a total of 17,164 acute stroke patients evenly matched between groups. We recorded mortality rates, frequency of ICH, and need for blood transfusions for each group over the ensuing 7- and 30-day periods. Results: Patients treated with tPA on DOACs had reduced mortality (3.3% vs 7.3%; risk ratio [RR] 0.456; P < 0.001), fewer ICHs (6.8% vs 10.1%; RR 0.678; P < 0.001), and less risk of major bleeding as measured by frequency of blood transfusions (0.5% vs 1.5%; RR 0.317; p < 0.001) at 7 days post thrombolytic, than the tPA patients not on DOACS. Findings for 30 days post-thrombolytics were similar/statistically significant with lower mortality rate (7.2% vs 13.1%; RR 0.550; P < 0.001), fewer ICHs (7.6% vs 10.8%; RR 0.705; P < 0.001), and fewer blood transfusions (0.9% vs 2.0%; RR 0.448; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Acute ischemic stroke patients treated with tPA who received DOACs within 48 hours of thrombolysis had lower mortality rates, reduced incidence of ICH, and less blood loss than those not on DOACs. Our study suggests that prior use of DOACs should not be a contraindication to thrombolysis for ischemic stroke.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrinolíticos , Puntaje de Propensión , Terapia Trombolítica , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Administración Oral , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragias Intracraneales/inducido químicamente , Hemorragias Intracraneales/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Cureus ; 16(4): e57472, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38699117

RESUMEN

Introduction With the growing acceptance of transgender individuals, the number of gender affirmation surgeries has increased. Transgender individuals face elevated depression rates, leading to an increase in suicide ideation and attempts. This study evaluates the risk of suicide or self-harm associated with gender affirmation procedures. Methods This retrospective study utilized de-identified patient data from the TriNetX (TriNetX, LLC, Cambridge, MA) database, involving 56 United States healthcare organizations and over 90 million patients. The study involved four cohorts: cohort A, adults aged 18-60 who had gender-affirming surgery and an emergency visit (N = 1,501); cohort B, control group of adults with emergency visits but no gender-affirming surgery (N = 15,608,363); and cohort C, control group of adults with emergency visits, tubal ligation or vasectomy, but no gender-affirming surgery (N = 142,093). Propensity matching was applied to cohorts A and C. Data from February 4, 2003, to February 4, 2023, were analyzed to examine suicide attempts, death, self-harm, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) within five years of the index event. A secondary analysis involving a control group with pharyngitis, referred to as cohort D, was conducted to validate the results from cohort C. Results Individuals who underwent gender-affirming surgery had a 12.12-fold higher suicide attempt risk than those who did not (3.47% vs. 0.29%, RR 95% CI 9.20-15.96, p < 0.0001). Compared to the tubal ligation/vasectomy controls, the risk was 5.03-fold higher before propensity matching and remained significant at 4.71-fold after matching (3.50% vs. 0.74%, RR 95% CI 2.46-9.024, p < 0.0001) for the gender affirmation patients with similar results with the pharyngitis controls. Conclusion Gender-affirming surgery is significantly associated with elevated suicide attempt risks, underlining the necessity for comprehensive post-procedure psychiatric support.

6.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 4(5): e13053, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37886717

RESUMEN

Objectives: The emergence of COVID-19 has revealed its association with croup. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of COVID-19 related croup to non-COVID-19 related croup during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This retrospective propensity matched study used data from 2020-2023 in the United States Cohort of the TriNetX database that includes 56 major health care organizations. The analysis compared the outcomes of 2 cohorts of patients between 2 months and 7 years of age: Cohort A had croup and a positive test for COVID-19 and Cohort B had croup without a positive COVID-19 test, both within 1 week before or after presentation with croup. Outcomes were death, admission to the hospital, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, respiratory rate >60, and oxygen saturation <90 within 7 days after the diagnosis of croup. Results: There were 2590 patients with COVID-19 related croup and 103,439 patients with non-COVID-19 croup. The final propensity matched cohort included 5180 patients evenly divided between groups. When both groups were compared based on outcomes after matching, there was twice the risk of the patient being admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 croup (risk ratio [RR] = 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.59-2.84; P < 0.001). Those with COVID-19 related croup had significantly increased risk of being admitted to the ICU (RR = 4.90; 95% CI 3.11-7.73; P < 0.001). The patients with COVID-19 related croup were more likely to have a respiratory rate ≥60 (RR = 2.00; 95% CI 1.18-3.37; P = 0.008) and oxygen saturation ≤90% (RR = 2.12; 95% CI 1.21-3.70; P = 0.007). There were no deaths in the final cohorts. There were no worse outcomes in the Omicron COVID-19 related croup group. Conclusions: The patients with COVID-19 related croup exhibited more severe disease manifestations. These children were more likely to be admitted to the hospital/ICU and had more significant respiratory distress.

7.
Ann Emerg Med ; 82(6): 720-728, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37178103

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase has been the foundation of initial treatment of acute ischemic stroke for several decades. Tenecteplase is a thrombolytic agent that offers logistical advantages in cost and administration relative to alteplase. There is evidence that tenecteplase has at least similar efficacy and safety outcomes compared with alteplase for stroke. In this study, we compared tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute stroke in a large retrospective US database (TriNetX) regarding the following 3 outcomes: (1) mortality, (2) intracranial hemorrhage, and (3) the need for acute blood transfusions. METHODS: In this retrospective study using the US cohort of 54 academic medical centers/health care organizations in the TriNetX database, we identified 3,432 patients treated with tenecteplase and 55,894 patients treated with alteplase for stroke after January 1, 2012. Propensity score matching was performed on basic demographic information and 7 previous clinical diagnostic groups, resulting in a total of 6,864 patients with acute stroke evenly matched between groups. Mortality rates, the frequency of intracranial hemorrhage, and blood transfusions (as a marker of significant blood loss) were recorded for each group over the ensuing 7- and 30-day periods. Secondary subgroup analyses were conducted on a cohort treated from 2021 to 2022 in an attempt to determine whether temporal differences in acute ischemic stroke treatment would alter the results. RESULTS: Patients treated with tenecteplase had a significantly lower mortality rate (8.2% versus 9.8%; risk ratio [RR], 0.832) and lower risk of major bleeding as measured by the frequency of blood transfusions (0.3% versus 1.4%; RR, 0.207) than alteplase at 30 days after thrombolysis for stroke. In the larger 10-year data set of patients with stroke treated after January 1, 2012, patients receiving tenecteplase were not found to have a statistically different incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (3.5% versus 3.0%; RR, 1.185) at 30 days after the administration of the thrombolytic agents in patients. However, a subgroup analysis of 2,216 evenly matched patients with stroke treated from 2021 to 2022 demonstrated notably better survival and statistically lower rates of intracranial hemorrhage than the alteplase group. CONCLUSION: In our large retrospective multicenter study using real-world evidence from large health care organizations, tenecteplase for the treatment of acute stroke demonstrated a lower mortality rate, decreased intracranial hemorrhage, and less significant blood loss. The favorable mortality and safety profiles observed in this large study, taken together with previous randomized controlled trial data and operational advantages in rapid dosing and cost-effectiveness, all support the preferential use of tenecteplase in patients with ischemic stroke.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/efectos adversos , Tenecteplasa/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Isquemia Encefálica/inducido químicamente , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Hemorragias Intracraneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragias Intracraneales/inducido químicamente , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Cureus ; 15(12): e50170, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38186548

RESUMEN

Introduction Acute aortic dissection (AAD) represents a significant diagnostic challenge with a high mortality rate if not treated promptly. This challenge arises from the diverse clinical presentations of AAD, and its symptom overlap with other medical conditions. Although both helical CT and transesophageal echocardiography are reliable diagnostic tools for AAD, they are not feasible for every suspected case. Furthermore, limited research on D-dimer's utility in ruling out AAD has been conducted due to the condition's rarity. Methods This study utilizes the TriNetX database (https://trinetx.com/), encompassing data from 54 healthcare organizations across the United States over the past two decades from 85 million patients. The objective is to evaluate the sensitivity of an elevated D-dimer level in diagnosing AAD across a much larger patient cohort than previously studied. Results Retrospectively analyzing this dataset, there were 1,319 patients identified with a confirmed AAD who had undergone D-dimer testing within a day of diagnosis. Of these, 1,252 patients exhibited D-dimer levels exceeding 400 ng/ml while 1,227 had levels surpassing 500 ng/ml. Notably, a D-dimer cutoff of 400 ng/ml demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.949 while a 500 ng/ml cutoff yielded a sensitivity of 0.930. Conclusion This large retrospective cohort study demonstrates that a blood D-dimer level is highly sensitive in assaying for AAD. The D-dimer levels analyzed showed a remarkable sensitivity in ruling out AAD, avoiding the need for more invasive testing in low-risk patients.

9.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 2(1): e12355, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33532756

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of novice emergency physician-performed point-of-care ultrasound diagnosis of papilledema using optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) against ophthalmologist-performed dilated fundoscopy. This observational study retrospectively analyzed results of ultrasound-measured ONSD of emergency department (ED) patients with suspected intracranial hypertension from a period spanning June 2014 to October 2017. METHODS: This study concerns a population of ED patients at a large, tertiary-care urban academic medical center from June 2014 to October 2017 over the age of 18 years with primary vision complaints evaluated for papilledema both by an emergency physician-performed ultrasound and an ophthalmologist-performed fundoscopic examination during their ED stay. Sensitivity and specificity of emergency physician-performed ultrasound measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in the diagnosis of papilledema were primary outcomes for this study. RESULTS: A total of 206 individual patients (male 49%, female 51%; median age 45 years) were included in the study with a total of 212 patient encounters. Calculated sensitivity for the ocular ultrasound examination performed by emergency physicians to diagnose papilledema was 46.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.5% to 61.7%), and specificity was 87.0% (95% CI, 82.8% to 90.5%). Positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated to be 35.4% (95% CI, 23.9% to 48.2%) and 91.5% (95% CI, 87.8% to 94.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic measurement of ONSD by emergency physicians has low sensitivity but high specificity for detection of papilledema compared to ophthalmologist-conducted fundoscopy.

10.
HCA Healthc J Med ; 2(4): 289-295, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37424843

RESUMEN

Background: Car safety ratings are routinely utilized in making automobile purchase decisions. These 1- to 5-star ratings are based on crash test data comparing vehicles of similar type, size and weight. Objectives: We hypothesized that car safety ratings are less important than vehicle factors such as vehicle type and weight in predicting outcomes of head-on crashes. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on severe head-on motor vehicle crashes entered into the FARS (Fatality Analysis Reporting System) database between 1995 and 2010. This database includes all US motor vehicle crashes that resulted in a death within 30 days of the accident. Outcomes of SUV versus passenger car and passenger car versus passenger car head-on crashes were compared by safety rating. Exclusion criteria was added to eliminate collisions with insufficient information or unbelted passengers. The paired crash results were entered into a logistic regression model with driver death as the outcome of interest. Results: The database contained 83,251 vehicles of any type that were involved in head-on crashes. In head-on crashes where the passenger car front driver crash rating was superior to the SUV's, the odds of death were 4.52 times higher for the driver of the passenger car (95% CI: 3.06-6.66). Ignoring crash ratings, the odds of death were 7.64 times higher for the passenger car driver (95% CI: 5.59-10.44). In passenger car versus passenger car head-on crashes, a lower car safety rating was associated with a 1.28 times higher odds of death (95% CI: 1.05-1.57). In passenger car vs. passenger car head-on crashes, each one point lower car safety rating resulted in a 1.22 times higher odds of death (95% CI: 1.03-1.44). Conclusion: Vehicle type (passenger car versus SUV) is a much more important predictor of death than crash safety ratings in SUV versus passenger car head-on crashes.

11.
HCA Healthc J Med ; 2(5): 355-359, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37425125

RESUMEN

Background: The use of physician satisfaction scores to evaluate emergency medicine physicians' performance and compensation is controversial. Prior studies have shown that the clinical environment may influence scores. This study compared satisfaction scores for the same physician at different emergency departments (ED). Differences in their individual score may indicate the ED environment could be as important as the physician's interaction. Methods: Press Ganey satisfaction scores were obtained for physicians at three EDs-Grand Strand, South Strand and North Strand-between July 2018 and June 2019. Included physicians worked at all 3 facilities and had at least 6 patient satisfaction surveys at each site. The Press Ganey scale ranges from 1-5, with 1 as "very poor" and 5 as "very good". Using top-box methodology, the total physician score was generated from the average of 4 questions: courtesy, keeping patients informed, patient comfort and listening. We utilized descriptive statistics to compare scores for all physicians at each of the 3 sites. In addition, each physician's top box scores were averaged by site for analysis (two-way ANOVA) to determine if individual physician scores varied in different EDs. Results: Fourteen physicians met inclusion criteria. Physicians at the main ED had an average total score of 73.37 ± 6.08 (SD) versus 76.5 ± 8.87 and 85.09 ± 7.75 at the 2 free standing EDs. Two-way ANOVA showed that the Press Ganey scores were significantly different for individual physicians between the newer free-standing ED and either the main ED or the other free-standing ED, p<0.001 and p=0.014, respectively. The observed difference between the main ED and the older free-standing ED was not statistically significant, p=0.111. When applying the same analysis to the 4 individual physician questions, the significant differences or trends persisted. Conclusion: Physician satisfaction scores demonstrated a significant variance depending on where they practiced. The highest patient satisfaction scores were received at the newest of the 3 facilities with individual rooms. The findings suggest that Press Ganey scores may not be reliable when comparing patient satisfaction scores for providers who practice in different EDs.

12.
HCA Healthc J Med ; 2(3): 229-236, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37427001

RESUMEN

Background: The coronavirus infection (COVID-19), also known as the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), caused significant illness and a worldwide pandemic beginning in 2020. Early case reports showed common patient characteristics, clinical variables and laboratory values in these patients. We compared a large population of American COVID-19 patients to see if they had similar findings to these smaller reports. In addition, we examined our population to identify any differences between mild or severe COVID-19 infections. Methods: We retrospectively accessed a de-identified, multi-hospital database managed by HCA Healthcare to identify all adult emergency department (ED) patients that were tested for COVID-19 from January 1st, 2020-April 30th, 2020. We collected clinical variables, comorbidities and laboratory values to identify any differences in those with or without a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: We identified 44,807 patients who were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Of those patients, 6,158 were positive for COVID-19. Male patients were more likely to test positive than female ones (15.0% vs. 12.6%, p < 0.001). The most frequently positive tests occurred in age groups 40-49, 50-59 and 60-69 (16.9%, 15.3% and 14.1% respectively). Both African Americans (20.2%) and Hispanics (20.8%) were more likely to test positive than Caucasians (8.3%, p < 0.001). Hypertension and diabetes were more common in those with positive tests, and multiple laboratory biomarkers showed significant differences in severe infections. Conclusions: This broad cohort of American COVID-19 patients showed similar trends in gender, age groups and race/ethnicity as previously reported. Severe COVID-19 disease was also associated with many positive laboratory biomarkers.

14.
Am J Emerg Med ; 45: 317-323, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33059984

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the combination of skin tapes and tissue adhesive is superior to either method alone for laceration repair. METHODS: This was a prospective, longitudinal experiment on six anesthetized swine. Thirty-six full-thickness linear wounds were created using a metal template, then closed using one of three methods: skin tapes over benzoin, tissue adhesive, or a combination of both. The study was done in two parts. Group 1 (immediate excision) animals were euthanized at day zero for skin excision and tensile strength testing following wound repair. Group 2 (delayed excision) had initial wound repair; animals were euthanized at day 35 for skin excision and tensile strength testing. RESULTS: In Group 1, the combination of skin tapes and tissue adhesive provided the strongest immediate wound closure. Average mean force for disruption immediately after wound repair was 19.9 lbs. for the tapes and tissue adhesive group compared to 9.6 lbs. for adhesive alone and 8.9 lbs. for tapes alone. The difference in mean force for combination repair vs. tapes alone was 10.3 lbs. (95% CI 4.1, 16.7), and combination vs. adhesive alone was 10.9 lbs. (95% CI 4.7, 17.3). In Group 2, the mean force required for laceration disruption for those repaired with both tape and tissue adhesive was 188.9 lbs. The mean force until wound disruption for tape only was 165.6 lbs., and the mean force until wound disruption for tissue adhesive alone was 118.9 lbs. The difference in mean force required for wound disruption for those repaired with adhesive alone vs. combination repair is 66.5 lbs. (95% CI 21.2, 111.9). The difference in mean force required for wound disruption between the other two groups was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the combination of skin tapes and tissue adhesive provides superior immediate wound closure strength to either of these methods alone in a porcine model.


Asunto(s)
Laceraciones/terapia , Cinta Quirúrgica , Adhesivos Tisulares , Técnicas de Cierre de Heridas , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Prospectivos , Porcinos , Resistencia a la Tracción , Cicatrización de Heridas
15.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 1(6): 1413-1417, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33230508

RESUMEN

Background and Hypothesis: The authors investigate whether there is a difference in Press Ganey (PG; patient satisfaction scores) scores for the emergency physicians before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak at a regional group of emergency departments in the southeastern United States. The authors hypothesize that decreases in emergency department volume, less emergency department boarding of admissions, reduced use of hallway beds, and favorable attitudes toward emergency physicians during the COVID-19 outbreak may influence patient satisfaction scores measured in the Press Ganey surveys. Study Design and Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of PG scores obtained over the prior 7 months at 8 larger teaching hospitals in the Southeast region (Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina). Averaged physician PG Scores and their 4 components-courtesy, time to listen, informative regarding treatment, concern for comfort-were collected. The authors evaluated the overall physician PG ratings for March through May 2020 (COVID outbreak) vs the prior 4 months. Overall emergency physician scores, using top box methodology of percent highest response, were averaged from 4 questions regarding the emergency physician's care. Results: There were 6272 patient satisfaction surveys returned in the 7-month study period; 4003 responses during the pre-COVID months (November 2019-February 2020) and 2296 during the COVID months (March through May 2020). Results showed that in the "pre-COVID time" the PG surveys scored in the 17% of all PGs in the country (63.9% "top-box" or highest rating score) as compared to scoring in the 34% of all PGs (68.1% "top-box") during "COVID time." These data were statistically significant using a chi-square analysis with P < 0.001. Conclusions: Emergency physician patient satisfaction scores, as represented by the PG score, were significantly higher during the COVID months, in comparison to the pre-COVID months, for 8 teaching hospitals in the Southeast region of the United States.

16.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 1(5): 871-875, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33145534

RESUMEN

The early history of ultrasound in emergency medicine has remained for the most part undocumented up to this time. This piece represents personal recollections of the evolution of point-of-care ultrasound from its origins in the late 1980s in the United States. A description of ultrasound equipment, resistance to widespread implementation, the evolution of training, and fellowship programs with subsequent publications and committee developments are examined in detail. Special attention to the advancement of trauma ultrasound is also examined from the viewpoint of an early adopter. The purpose of this manuscript is to recognize the persistence and dedication of some of the early founders of emergency ultrasound, thus gaining a deeper appreciation for the scope of practice and meaningful use that emergency physicians are now using on a daily basis.

17.
J Emerg Med ; 58(5): 741-748, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32229136

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies show that myocardial infarctions (MIs) occur most frequently in the morning. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that there no longer is a morning predominance of MI, and that the timing of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) vs. non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) presentation differs. METHODS: We reviewed MI, STEMI, and NSTEMI patients (2013-2017) from a multiple-hospital system, identified by diagnostic codes. Daily emergency department arrival times were categorized into variable time intervals for count and proportional analysis, then examined for differences. RESULTS: There were 18,663 MI patients from 12 hospitals included in the analysis. Most MIs occurred between 12:00 pm and 5:59 pm (35.7%), and least between 12:00 am-5:59 am (16.3%). After subdividing all MIs into STEMIs and NSTEMIs, both groups continued to have the greatest presentation between 12:00 pm and 5:59 pm (33.1% and 36.0%, respectively). STEMIs (17.2%) and NSTEMIs (16.2%) were least frequent between 12:00 am and 5:59 am. We found the second most common presentation time for MIs was in the 6 pm-11:59 pm time period, which held true for both subtypes (MI 26.7%, STEMI 26.4%, NSTEMI 26.7%). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a potential shift in the circadian pattern of MI, revealing an afternoon predominance for both STEMI and NSTEMI subtypes.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/epidemiología
18.
HCA Healthc J Med ; 1(3): 169-177, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37424716

RESUMEN

Background: Severe sepsis is a major cause of mortality in patients evaluated in the Emergency Department (ED). Early initiation of antibiotic therapy and IV fluids in the ED is associated with improved outcomes. We investigated whether early administration of antibiotics in the prehospital setting improves outcomes in these patients with sepsis. Methods: This is a retrospective study comparing outcomes of patients meeting sepsis criteria in the field by EMS, who were treated with IV fluids and antibiotics. Their outcomes were compared with controls where fluids were administered prehospital and antibiotics were initiated in the ED. We compared morbidity and mortality between these groups. Results: Early antibiotics and fluids were demonstrated to show significant improvement in outcomes in the patients meeting sepsis criteria treated in the pre-hospital setting. The average age for sepsis patients receiving antibiotics in the prehospital setting was statistically higher than that for patients in the historical control group, 73.23 years and 67.67, respectively (p < 0.036), and there was no statistically significant difference of Charlson Comorbidity Index between the groups (p two-tail = 0.28). Average intensive care unit length of stay was 2.51 days in the in the prehospital group and 5.18 days in the historical controls, and the prehospital group received fewer blood products than the historical controls (p = 0.0003). Conclusions: Early IV administration of antibiotics in the field significantly improves outcome in EMS patients who meet sepsis criteria based on a modified qSOFA score.

19.
South Med J ; 110(7): 441-444, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28679010

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In 2014, 726 bicyclists were killed and an additional 50,000 were injured in crashes with motor vehicles. The number of cyclists in the United States is increasing, and as a result there has been a call for more bike lanes. We examined the difference in the severity of injury of bicyclists involved in motor vehicle crashes when riding in the traffic lane compared with riding in a bike lane or on a paved shoulder. We also controlled for other safety factors, including alcohol use, travel speed, posted speed, helmet usage, and lighting conditions to determine their impact on bicyclist safety. METHODS: Single-year National Automotive Sampling System-General Estimates System files were used to analyze data regarding the bike lanes, and multiyear data were used to analyze the additional factors. Univariate and multiple regression analyses controlling for confounders were performed on the data. RESULTS: When adjusting for speed limit, alcohol use by driver, weather conditions, time of day, and helmet use, the cyclist's position had no significant effect on the severity of injury (P = 0.57). The severity of injury was significantly greater when the driver or bicyclist had been drinking alcohol (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.003, respectively). Bicyclists were more severely injured when vehicles moved at greater speeds and the posted speed limit was higher (P < 0.0001 for both). Also, injury severity was found to be significantly higher when lighting conditions were "dark" (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that simply having a dedicated space for bicyclists, such as a bike lane or a paved shoulder, does not reduce the severity of injuries sustained when a crash with a motor vehicle takes place. Cyclist safety could be improved by implementing changes that affect vehicle speed, alcohol use by drivers, and lighting conditions. Moreover, emergency physicians should be aware that when they receive a report of a cyclist being struck by a car in a bike lane, they should prepare to treat injuries of severity similar to those received by a bicyclist hit by a vehicle in traffic.


Asunto(s)
Aceleración , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Intoxicación Alcohólica/epidemiología , Ciclismo/lesiones , Planificación Ambiental , Dispositivos de Protección de la Cabeza/estadística & datos numéricos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Iluminación , Seguridad , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Intoxicación Alcohólica/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos , Heridas y Lesiones/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...