Mortality and morbidity trends after the first year in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Most studies of outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI) focus on the acute phase after the index event. We assessed mortality and morbidity trends after the first year in survivors of acute MI, by conducting a systematic literature review. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify epidemiological studies of long-term (>10 years) mortality and morbidity trends in individuals who had experienced an acute MI more than 1 year previously. RESULTS: Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Secular trends showed a consistent decrease in mortality and morbidity after acute MI from early to more recent study periods. The relative risk for all-cause death and cardiovascular outcomes (recurrent MI, cardiovascular death) was at least 30% higher than that in a general reference population at both 1-3 years and 3-5 years after MI. Risk factors leading to worse outcomes after MI included comorbid diabetes, hypertension and peripheral artery disease, older age, reduced renal function, and history of stroke. CONCLUSIONS: There have been consistent improvements in secular trends for long-term survival and cardiovascular outcomes after MI. However, MI survivors remain at higher risk than the general population, particularly when additional risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, or older age are present.

Systematic review of the clinical impact of dual antiplatelet therapy discontinuation after acute coronary syndromes.

AIMS: The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the consequences of dual antiplatelet therapy discontinuation on clinical outcomes after acute coronary syndromes. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed to identify studies reporting data on patients who discontinued dual antiplatelet therapy (planned or unplanned) following acute coronary syndromes and on the clinical impact of dual antiplatelet therapy discontinuation. To be included, more than 50% of the study population had to have had acute coronary syndrome as their index event or, if less than 50%, outcomes data must have been reported separately for the group with acute coronary syndromes. Thirty publications covering 29 studies were identified for inclusion. There was much heterogeneity across studies regarding the included patient populations, treatment durations and outcome definitions and ascertainments. Dual antiplatelet therapy discontinuation was most commonly based on physician decision. Twenty-six studies reported that clopidogrel was prescribed as part of dual antiplatelet therapy. Dual antiplatelet therapy duration was positively associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (seven/eight studies), cardiovascular mortality (two/two studies), non-fatal myocardial infarction (two/three studies) and stent thrombosis (five/five studies) in patients and/or patient subgroups in studies without randomised treatment designs, although such associations were not observed in the one study that randomly assigned patients to treatment (i.e. planned discontinuation). CONCLUSIONS: Results from our systematic literature review generally support the benefit of longer-term dual antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndromes; however, further research is needed to determine the optimal length of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients after acute coronary syndrome, ideally using prospective studies.

Using big data from health records from four countries to evaluate chronic disease outcomes: a study in 114 364 survivors of myocardial infarction.

AIMS: To assess the international validity of using hospital record data to compare long-term outcomes in heart attack survivors. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used samples of national, ongoing, unselected record sources to assess three outcomes: cause death; a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and all-cause death; and hospitalized bleeding. Patients aged 65 years and older entered the study 1 year following the most recent discharge for acute MI in 2002-11 [n = 54 841 (Sweden), 53 909 (USA), 4653 (England), and 961 (France)]. Across each of the four countries, we found consistent associations with 12 baseline prognostic factors and each of the three outcomes. In each country, we observed high 3-year crude cumulative risks of all-cause death (from 19.6% [England] to 30.2% [USA]); the composite of MI, stroke, or death [from 26.0% (France) to 36.2% (USA)]; and hospitalized bleeding [from 3.1% (France) to 5.3% (USA)]. After adjustments for baseline risk factors, risks were similar across all countries [relative risks (RRs) compared with Sweden not statistically significant], but higher in the USA for all-cause death [RR USA vs. Sweden, 1.14 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.26)] and hospitalized bleeding [RR USA vs. Sweden, 1.54 (1.21-1.96)]. CONCLUSION: The validity of using hospital record data is supported by the consistency of estimates across four countries of a high adjusted risk of death, further MI, and stroke in the chronic phase after MI. The possibility that adjusted risks of mortality and bleeding are higher in the USA warrants further study.