Does ROSE matter? Evaluation of final diagnostic, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, and molecular testing yields of CT-guided lung biopsies performed before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with urgent implementation of safety protocols limiting the number of on-site personnel, essentially terminated the use of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) for computed tomography (CT)--guided lung biopsies at our institution. The diminished use of ROSE during the pandemic prompted us to reevaluate the potential value of ROSE for CT-guided lung biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified all CT-guided lung biopsies from 2017 to 2022. Associations between the use of ROSE, adequate diagnostic and ancillary testing (programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing) outcomes, and other factors such as the number of passes performed and lesion size, were evaluated. RESULTS: Nine hundred twelve CT-guided lung biopsies were performed from 2017 to 2022; 171 (19%) utilized ROSE. The use of ROSE had been steadily decreasing prior to the pandemic but was essentially eliminated with the onset of the pandemic. By univariable analysis, the employment of ROSE was more likely to be associated with an adequate final diagnosis (odds ratio = 2.14, 95% confidence interval: [1.24-3.70], P = 0.006) and successful molecular testing (odds ratio = 2.16, 95% confidence interval: [1.11-4.21], P = 0.024). However, those associations were not present in multivariable analyses that incorporated the number of passes performed or lesion size. There were no differences in diagnostic adequacy or ancillary testing yields when comparing the periods 2017-2019 and 2020-2022, despite declining use of ROSE. CONCLUSIONS: If ROSE is not requested for CT-guided lung biopsies, proceduralists should err on the side of performing more, rather than fewer, passes, particularly for smaller lesions.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and the risk of maternal dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including preeclampsia, are associated with an increased risk for maternal cardiovascular disease, stroke, and chronic kidney disease. However, their association with subsequent maternal dementia or cognitive impairment is less well understood. This study aimed to review and synthesize the published literature on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and the subsequent risk for maternal dementia or cognitive impairment. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Pyschinfo, and CINAHL were searched from database inception until July 31, 2022, for observational studies of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and maternal dementia or cognitive impairment. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Selected studies included the following: a population of pregnant women, exposure to a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy of interest, and at least 1 primary outcome (dementia) or secondary outcome (cognitive impairment). Two reviewers were involved in study selection. METHODS: We followed the Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines throughout. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate the overall pooled estimates. Bias was assessed using an adapted version of the validated Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment tool. RESULTS: A total of 25 eligible studies were identified and included 2,501,673 women. Preeclampsia was associated with a significantly increased risk for vascular dementia (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-2.43), whereas no clear association was noted between preeclampsia and Alzheimer's disease (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.70), nor between preeclampsia and any (undifferentiated) dementia (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.47). However, in an analysis restricted to women aged 65 years and older, preeclampsia was associated with an increased risk for Alzheimer's disease (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-2.73) and any dementia (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.91). CONCLUSION: Women whose pregnancies were complicated by preeclampsia seem to be at a substantially increased future risk for vascular dementia. The longer-term risks among these women with regards to Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia are less clear.

Association of Health Care Work With Anxiety and Depression During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Structural Topic Modeling Study.

BACKGROUND: Stressors for health care workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic have been manifold, with high levels of depression and anxiety alongside gaps in care. Identifying the factors most tied to HCWs' psychological challenges is crucial to addressing HCWs' mental health needs effectively, now and for future large-scale events. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we used natural language processing methods to examine deidentified psychotherapy transcripts from telemedicine treatment during the initial wave of COVID-19 in the United States. Psychotherapy was delivered by licensed therapists while HCWs were managing increased clinical demands and elevated hospitalization rates, in addition to population-level social distancing measures and infection risks. Our goal was to identify specific concerns emerging in treatment for HCWs and to compare differences with matched non-HCW patients from the general population. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study with a sample of 820 HCWs and 820 non-HCW matched controls who received digitally delivered psychotherapy in 49 US states in the spring of 2020 during the first US wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Depression was measured during the initial assessment using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and anxiety was measured using the General Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire. Structural topic models (STMs) were used to determine treatment topics from deidentified transcripts from the first 3 weeks of treatment. STM effect estimators were also used to examine topic prevalence in patients with moderate to severe anxiety and depression. RESULTS: The median treatment enrollment date was April 15, 2020 (IQR March 31 to April 27, 2020) for HCWs and April 19, 2020 (IQR April 5 to April 27, 2020) for matched controls. STM analysis of deidentified transcripts identified 4 treatment topics centered on health care and 5 on mental health for HCWs. For controls, 3 STM topics on pandemic-related disruptions and 5 on mental health were identified. Several STM treatment topics were significantly associated with moderate to severe anxiety and depression, including working on the hospital unit (topic prevalence 0.035, 95% CI 0.022-0.048; P<.001), mood disturbances (prevalence 0.014, 95% CI 0.002-0.026; P=.03), and sleep disturbances (prevalence 0.016, 95% CI 0.002-0.030; P=.02). No significant associations emerged between pandemic-related topics and moderate to severe anxiety and depression for non-HCW controls. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides large-scale quantitative evidence that during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, HCWs faced unique work-related challenges and stressors associated with anxiety and depression, which required dedicated treatment efforts. The study further demonstrates how natural language processing methods have the potential to surface clinically relevant markers of distress while preserving patient privacy.