Survival of hospital- and community-associated Enterococcus faecium following exposure to in-use concentrations of the biocide sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC).

OBJECTIVES: Hospital-associated infections with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) have increased dramatically in Denmark. A cornerstone in infection control is effective cleaning and disinfection. This study investigated the survival and resuscitation/growth of clinical isolates of E. faecium exposed to the chlorine-releasing disinfectant, sodium dichloroisocyanurate plus detergent (NaDCC Plus). METHODS: To assess biocide efficacy, we modified a method developed to characterise the dose-time-response of bacteria to antibiotics. E. faecium isolates (n = 59) were screened in 96-well plates containing 50-1400 ppm free available chlorine. Bacteria were exposed for 10 min, after which the biocide was inactivated with a neutralizer. Cells were collected by centrifugation, new broth added, and after 20-22 h, viability was recorded as growth/no growth. For a subset of strains the impact of shorter biocide exposure times were examined, as was the influence of longer incubation times. RESULTS: E. faecium survived exposure to relatively high concentrations of NaDCC Plus, average 415 ppm of free available chlorine (SD ± 78 ppm), compared to recommended in-use concentration (1000 ppm). "Outbreak" clones did not prove more tolerant to NaDCC Plus compared to other VREfm clones, hospital-associated vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium (VSEfm) or community-associated VSEfm. Shorter exposure time and extended incubation time in broth both significantly increased the concentration needed to eradicate E. faecium, with some isolates surviving higher concentrations than the recommended in-use concentration. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that if an exposure time of 10 min is not achieved, the efficacy of the disinfectant will not be sufficient.

[Possible decrease in the prevalence of nosocomial infections after the accreditation process in the region of Northern Jutland, Denmark]. / Muligt fald i prævalensen af nosokomielle infektioner efter akkrediteringsprocessen i Region Nordjylland.

All hospitals in the region of Northern Jutland, Denmark, were accredited in 2011 according to standards defined by the Danish Healthcare Quality Programme. A retrospective review was performed analysing the prevalence of nosocomial infections before and during the accreditation process. The accreditation process was associated with a decreased prevalence of selected nosocomial infections compared with results from a period immediate prior to the process. However, the findings were not statistically significant when the results were adjusted for patient-time in the hospitals.

[Urinary tract infections--occurrence, causes and prevention]. / Urinvejsinfektioner--forekomst, årsager og forebyggelse.

Urinary tract infections are frequently a result of insufficient urinary drainage. Abnormalities of the urinary tract, bladder and/or urethral dysfunction and bad voiding habits often lead to poor bladder emptying. Foreign bodies in the urinary tract increase the risk of urinary tract infections. In hospitals the primary risk factor is instrumentation of the urinary tract mainly by catheterisation. It is important to diagnose the causes of possible insufficient drainage. The use of catheterisation should be clearly indicated and documented in the patient's medical records.

Systemic contact dermatitis after oral exposure to nickel: a review with a modified meta-analysis.

Systemic contact dermatitis can be elicited experimentally in nickel-sensitive individuals by oral nickel exposure. A crucial point interpreting such experiments has been the relevance of nickel exposure from drinking water and diet. The aim of this meta-analysis study on former nickel-exposure investigations was to provide the best possible estimation of threshold values of nickel doses that may cause systemic contact dermatitis in nickel-sensitive patients. 17 relevant investigations were identified, and statistical analyses were performed in a stepwise procedure. 9 studies were included in the final dose-response analysis, which divided the studies into a homogenous middle group of 5 studies and 2 groups of 2 studies with a higher and lower response frequency, respectively, described by logistic dose-response curves shifted in parallel. On the basis of these curves, calculations were made of the doses that, theoretically, would cause systemic contact dermatitis in exposed nickel-sensitive patients. The results from the 2 most sensitive groups show that 1% of these individuals may react with systemic contact dermatitis at normal daily nickel exposure from drinking water and diet, i.e. 0.22-0.35 mg nickel.

Characterization of lymphocyte subpopulations and cytokine profiles in peripheral blood of nickel-sensitive individuals with systemic contact dermatitis after oral nickel exposure.

Several studies have shown that oral nickel exposure can elicit systemic contact dermatitis (SCD) in nickel-sensitive individuals. The current study describes some of the immunological mechanisms underlying such nickel-allergic reactions elicited by oral exposure to nickel. Following oral exposure to graded concentrations of nickel or placebo, blood samples were taken from nickel-sensitive individuals and from non-nickel-sensitive controls. T-cell subtypes (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ and CD45RO+), expression of skin-homing receptor, cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen (CLA) and cytokine profiles [interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, interferon-gamma and tumour necrosis factor-alpha] were investigated. A definite dose-response reaction pattern to oral nickel exposure was observed among nickel-sensitive individuals. Nickel-sensitive individuals whose dermatitis flared after oral challenge with nickel showed significant decreases in fractions of CD3+ CD45RO+ CLA+ and CD8+ CD45RO+ CLA+ blood lymphocytes, suggesting migration of CD8+ 'memory' CLA+ T lymphocytes from the blood to peripheral tissues. Only those nickel-sensitive individuals who clinically reacted to oral challenge with nickel (4 mg) had elevated levels of IL-5 in the serum, indicating an activation of type 2 T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood. In conclusion, the study indicates that CD8+ CD45RO+ CLA+ T lymphocytes and T lymphocytes with a type 2 cytokine profile are involved in SCD elicited by nickel.

Release of nickel ions from stainless steel alloys used in dental braces and their patch test reactivity in nickel-sensitive individuals.

Nickel ions leached in sufficient quantities from nickel-containing alloys may induce nickel sensitization or elicit allergic contact dermatitis. Nickel-containing stainless steel alloys are generally considered safe for nickel-sensitive individuals to use. The study summarized in this paper investigated 3 parameters. First, the release of nickel was estimated in artificial saliva and sweat from 4 different stainless steel alloys frequently used in dental braces. Second, in a pilot study, oral mucosa cells harvested from 3 dental patients before and after the attachment of dental braces were analysed for possible nickel content. Third, patch test reactivity of the 4 stainless steel alloys was tested on 31 nickel-sensitive subjects. All 4 stainless steel alloys released small amounts of nickel ions into artificial saliva (<0.13 micro g/cm2/week) and artificial sweat (<0.05 micro g/cm2/week), but no measurable amounts of nickel were found in any of the oral mucosa samples. None of the 31 nickel-sensitive subjects reacted to patch testing with the 4 stainless steel alloys, indicating that these stainless steel alloys would be safe to use in direct and prolonged contact with the skin.

Decrease in nickel sensitization in a Danish schoolgirl population with ears pierced after implementation of a nickel-exposure regulation.

BACKGROUND: To reduce the skin nickel exposure of the population, the Danish Ministry of Environment issued a regulation that was implemented in 1992, and the European Union countries have recently adopted an expanded regulation. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our combined patch testing and questionnaire investigation of girls in public schools and high schools/production schools was to evaluate whether the regulation has had an impact on the prevalence of nickel sensitization. METHODS: To find a group of girls with ears pierced mainly after implementation of the nickel-exposure regulation in Denmark, girls were recruited from the fifth and sixth grade in 12 public schools (the public school group). After the public school level almost all girls from a public school population continue their education in high schools or other schools such as production schools or technical schools. Therefore, to find girls demographically similar to the public school girls but older, and with ears pierced before implementation of the regulation, girls from seven high schools and two production schools were recruited (the high school group). Four hundred and twenty-seven girls in the public school group (mean age 12.4 years, range 10-14) and 534 in the high school group (mean age 18.8 years, range 17-22) participated. All participants filled out a questionnaire concerning ear piercing, use of oral braces and former patch testing for nickel sensitivity. Three hundred and five girls (71.4%) in the public school group and 275 (51.5%) in the high school group were patch tested or had been tested previously and the results of these tests were included in the study. The relation between the frequency of nickel sensitization and the various factors that might influence the prevalence of nickel sensitization was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The investigation was conducted from March 1999 to March 2000. RESULTS: The study showed that both increasing age and having ears pierced before 1992 enhanced the prevalence of nickel sensitization. We found that 17.1% of the girls in the high school group demonstrated a positive patch test reaction to nickel. In contrast, the prevalence of nickel sensitization in the public school group was only 3.9%. Comparing girls with and without pierced ears, the prevalence of nickel sensitization was significantly higher in girls with ears pierced before, but not after, 1992 (odds ratio 3.34 and 1.20, respectively). Only in the high school group was there a tendency that wearing oral braces before ear piercing had a protective effect on nickel sensitization, but this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: As we found an effect of ear piercing before but not after 1992, this study strongly suggests that implementation of the nickel-exposure regulation in 1992 in Denmark has had the intended effect of protecting the female population from becoming allergic to nickel.