Rapid Rule-Out of Myocardial Infarction After 30 Minutes as an Alternative to 1 Hour: The RACING-MI Cohort Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether myocardial infarction can be safely ruled in or out after 30 minutes as an alternative to 1 hour. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center clinical study enrolling patients admitted to the emergency department. Patients with chest pain suggestive of myocardial infarction were eligible for inclusion. There was no walk-in to the emergency department, and patients with highly elevated out-of-hospital troponin were transferred directly to an invasive heart center. High-sensitivity troponin I was measured at admission (0 hour), 30 minutes, 1 hour, and 3 hours. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the sensitivity and negative predictive value (primary endpoints) as measures of ability to rule out myocardial infarction. Specificity and positive predictive value of myocardial infarction were used as measures for the ability to rule in myocardial infarction (secondary endpoints). RESULTS: In total, 1,003 patients qualified for analysis. Median age was 64 (interquartile range 52 to 74) years, and 42% were women. Myocardial infarction was confirmed in 9% of patients. In the validation cohort (n=503), the 0-h/30-min algorithm assigned 242 (48%) patients to rule out, 54 (11%) to rule in, and 207 (41%) to the observational zone. This resulted in a sensitivity of 100% (92.0% to 100%), negative predictive value of 100% (95% confidence interval 98.5% to 100%), specificity of 96.7% (94.7% to 98.2%), and positive predictive value of 72.2% (58.4% to 83.5%). In comparison, the 0-h/1-h algorithm performed with a sensitivity of 100% (92.0% to 100%), negative predictive value of 100% (98.5% to 100%), specificity of 97.2% (95.2% to 98.5%), and positive predictive value of 75.5% (61.7% to 86.2%). CONCLUSION: The accelerated 0-h/30-min algorithm allowed for safe rule-out of myocardial infarction 30 minutes after admission. The rule-in ability of the 0-h/30-min algorithm was comparable to that of the 0-h/1h algorithm.

Single troponin measurement to rule-out acute myocardial infarction in early presenters.

BACKGROUND: A single high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) can be used to rule-out acute myocardial infarction (MI) in patients presenting >3 hours (3 h) after chest pain onset to the emergency department. This study aimed to investigate the safety of ruling-out MI in early presenters with chest pain ≤3 h using a single hs-cTnI at admission. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients presenting with chest pain suggestive of MI. Hs-cTnI (Siemens ADVIA Centaur TNIH, Limit of detection: 2.2 ng/L) was measured at admission. Two physicians adjudicated final diagnosis. A diagnostic cut-off value <3 ng/L was used to rule-out MI. Patients were classified as early (chest pain ≤3 h) or late presenters (>3 h). RESULTS: We included 1370 patients with available admission hs-cTnI results: median (Q1-Q3) age 65 (52-74), female sex: 43%, previous MI: 22%. We confirmed MI in 118 (8.6%) patients. Overall, 470 (34%) patients were classified as early, 770 (56%) as late presenters, and 130 (9%) patients had unknown onset. When applying the diagnostic cut-off value, MI was correctly ruled-out at admission in 370 (27%) patients: 134 (29%) early presenters, 206 (27%) late presenters and 30 (23%) patients with unknown onset. This resulted in an overall negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 99.0-100%), with both 100% (97.3-100%) for early and 100% (98.2-100%) for late presenters, respectively. Sensitivity was similarly high in the two groups. CONCLUSION: MI could be safely ruled-out in all patients presenting with chest pain ≤3 h when using a single hs-cTnI value <3 ng/L as diagnostic cut-off. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03634384.

External validation of a high-sensitive troponin I algorithm for rapid evaluation of acute myocardial infarction in a Danish cohort.

AIMS: An accelerated diagnostic algorithm for ruling-in or ruling-out myocardial infarction (MI) after 1 hour (1 h) has recently been derived and internally validated for the Siemens ADVIA Centaur TNIH assay. We aimed to validate the diagnostic performance of the TNIH 0 h/1 h algorithm ad modum Boeddinghaus in a Danish cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with chest pain suggestive of MI were prospectively enrolled. High-sensitive troponin I (TNIH) was measured at admission (0 h) and after 30 minutes (30 m), 1 h, and 3 hours (3 h). We externally validated the TNIH 0 h/1 h algorithm ad modum Boeddinghaus in Danish patients. Moreover, we applied the algorithm using the second TNIH measurement at 30 m instead of 1 h. We enrolled 1003 patients: median (Q1-Q3) age 64 (52-74) years, 42% female, and 23% with previous MI. Myocardial infarction was the final diagnosis in 9% of patients. Median (Q1-Q3) times from admission to 30 m and 1 h blood draw were 35 min (30-37 min) and 67 min (62-75 min), respectively. Using the 0 h and 1 h results, 468 (47%) patients were assigned to rule-out, 104 (10%) to rule-in, and 431 (43%) to the observational zone. This resulted in a negative predictive value of 100% (95% confidence interval: 99.2-100%), sensitivity of 100% (95.9-100%), positive predictive value of 79.8 (70.8-87.0%), and specificity of 97.7% (96.5-98.6%). The diagnostic performance after 30 m was similar. CONCLUSIONS: The TNIH 0 h/1 h algorithm ad modum Boeddinghaus performed excellently for rule-out of MI in a Danish cohort. The Boeddinghaus algorithm also performed excellently after only 30 m. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03634384. TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND URL: Rapid Use of High-Sensitive Cardiac Troponin I for Ruling-in and Ruling-out Acute Myocardial Infarction (RACING-MI), https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03634384.

Pulmonary vasodilation by sildenafil in acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism: a randomized explorative trial.

BACKGROUND: To investigate if acute pulmonary vasodilation by sildenafil improves right ventricular function in patients with acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: Single center, explorative trial. Patients with PE were randomized to a single oral dose of sildenafil 50 mg (n = 10) or placebo (n = 10) as add-on to conventional therapy. The time from hospital admission to study inclusion was 2.3 ± 0.7 days. Right ventricular function was evaluated immediately before and shortly after (0.5-1.5 h) randomization by right heart catheterization (RHC), trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE), and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The primary efficacy endpoint was cardiac index measured by CMR. RESULTS: Patients had acute intermediate-high risk PE verified by computed tomography pulmonary angiography, systolic blood pressure of 135 ± 18 (mean ± SD) mmHg, increased right ventricular/left ventricular ratio 1.1 ± 0.09 and increased troponin T 167 ± 144 ng/L. Sildenafil treatment did not improve cardiac index compared to baseline (0.02 ± 0.36 l/min/m2, p = 0.89) and neither did placebo (0.00 ± 0.34 l/min/m2, p = 0.97). Sildenafil lowered mean arterial blood pressure (- 19 ± 10 mmHg, p < 0.001) which was not observed in the placebo group (0 ± 9 mmHg, p = 0.97). CONCLUSION: A single oral dose of sildenafil 50 mg did not improve cardiac index but lowered systemic blood pressure in patients with acute intermediate-high risk PE. The time from PE to intervention, a small patient sample size and low pulmonary vascular resistance are limitations of this study that should be considered when interpreting the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04283240) February 2nd 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04283240?term=NCT04283240&draw=2&rank=1 .

Comparison of Acute Versus Subacute Coronary Angiography in Patients With NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the NONSTEMI Trial).

The optimal timing of coronary angiography (CAG) in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome without persisting ST-segment elevation (NST-ACS) remains undetermined. The NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction trial aimed to compare outcomes in NSTE-ACS patients randomized to acute CAG (STEMI-like approach) with patients randomized to medical therapy and subacute CAG. We randomized 496 patients with suspected NST-ACS based on symptoms and significant regional ST depressions and/or elevated point-of-care troponin T (POC-cTnT) (≥50 ng/l) to either acute CAG (<2 hours, n = 245) or subacute CAG (<72 hours, n = 251). The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death, reinfarction, and readmission with congestive heart failure within 1 year from randomization. A final acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnosis was assigned to 429 (86.5%) patients. The median time from randomization to revascularization was 1.3 hours in the acute CAG group versus 51.1 hours in the subacute CAG group (p <0.001). The composite end point occurred in 25 patients (10.2%) in the acute CAG group and 29 (11.6%) in the subacute CAG group, p = 0.62. The acute CAG group had a 1-year all-cause mortality of 5.7% compared with 5.6% in the subacute CAG group, p = 0.96. In conclusion, neither the composite end point of all-cause death, reinfarction, and readmission with congestive heart failure nor mortality differed between an acute and subacute CAG approach in NSTE-ACS patients. However, identification of NSTE-ACS patients in the prehospital phase and direct triage to an invasive center is feasible, safe and may facilitate early diagnosis and revascularization.

Rapid use of high-sensitive cardiac troponin I for ruling-in and ruling-out of acute myocardial infarction (RACING-MI): study protocol.

Introduction: The European Society of Cardiology has suggested an accelerated algorithm for ruling-in and ruling-out myocardial infarction (MI) with high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) measured at admission (0 hour) and after 1 hour (1 hour) as an alternative to standard measurements at 0 hour and 3 hours. However, the 0 hour/1 hour algorithm has only been tested in a limited amount of patient cohorts and not for all hs-cTn assays. Moreover, it is unknown if MI can be ruled-out faster than 1 hour. In this single-centre, clinical trial, we will investigate whether MI safely can be ruled-in or ruled-out after 30 min and 1 hour. Methods and analysis: Patients with chest pain suggestive of MI admitted to the emergency department will be subjected to hs-cTn measurements at the following time points: 0 hour, 30 min, 1 hour and 3 hours. Chest pain characteristics will be recorded. In total, 1000 patients with all four blood samples will be included. The diagnostic algorithms will be derived based on the first 500 patients and validated in the subsequent 500 patients. The primary endpoint is the negative predictive value of the 0 hour/30 min and the 0 hour/1 hour algorithms. Secondary endpoints include positive predictive value, sensitivity and specificity. Results will be compared with the standard 0 hour/3 hour algorithm. Ethics and dissemination: Oral and written informed consent will be obtained from all patients. The trial is approved by The Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics and the Danish Data Protection Agency. Data will be disseminated and submitted to peer-reviewed scientific journals and meetings irrespective of study outcome. Trial registration number: NCT03634384.

Editor's Choice-Acute versus subacute angiography in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction - the NONSTEMI trial phase I.

BACKGROUND: The 2015 European Society of Cardiology non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) guidelines recommend angiography within 24 h in high-risk patients with NSTEMI. An organized STEMI-like approach with pre-hospital or immediate in-hospital triage for acute coronary angiography (CAG) may be of therapeutic benefit but it remains unknown whether the patients can be properly diagnosed in the pre-hospital setting. We aim to evaluate whether it is feasible to diagnose patients with NSTEMI in the pre-hospital phase or immediately upon admission. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 250 patients to either acute or subacute CAG (i.e. <72 h of admission). Pre-hospital electrocardiogram acquisition and point-of-care troponin-T measurement ensured that 148 (59%) patients were identified already in the ambulance, whereas the remaining 102 (41%) patients were identified immediately after hospital admission. An acute coronary syndrome was verified in 215 (86%) and NSTEMI in 159 (64%) patients. The CAG rate was significantly higher in the acute CAG group (98% vs. 87%, p<0.001). A culprit lesion was identified in 74% and 64% of the patients underwent coronary revascularization: acute CAG group: 53% percutaneous coronary intervention, 5% hybrid, 7% coronary artery bypass grafting; conventional treatment: 48% percutaneous coronary intervention, 2% hybrid, 14% coronary artery bypass grafting, p=0.32. In patients randomized to acute CAG, time from randomization to CAG was 1.1 h; in patients randomized to subacute CAG it was two days. Time from randomization to initial revascularization was 1.3 h versus 2.4 days, and the median hospital stay was 4.0 days versus 4.5 days. Among patients randomized to subacute CAG, 17% crossed over to acute CAG and 5% developed STEMI before catheterization. CONCLUSION: Diagnosing NSTEMI patients in the pre-hospital phase or immediately upon hospital admission is feasible. Acute CAG may impact the mode of revascularization and is associated with earlier revascularization and shorter hospital stay. The clinical benefit of acute CAG in NSTEMI patients remains to be clarified.

Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs. non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: observations from an unselected cohort.

AIMS: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is categorized, according to the presenting electrocardiogram, into non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), or bundle branch block myocardial infarction (BBBMI). Data on the prognostic significance of these categories mainly originate from voluntary based registries or large-scale clinical trials and may be hampered by selection and information bias. The aim of this historical cohort study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of different categories of AMI in an unselected cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 1 November 1999 to 31 October 2001, patient records were reviewed from all admissions to hospitals serving a study region with 139,000 inhabitants. An Endpoint Committee determined whether patients fulfilled the European Society of Cardiology criteria of AMI. A total of 654 patients with AMI were identified. The proportion having non-STEMI, STEMI, and BBBMI was 54, 39 and 6%, and the associated 1 year mortality was 31, 21, and 55%, respectively (log rank 54, P<0.001). The more favourable outcome observed in patients with STEMI remained significant according to multivariable analysis (P=0.044). CONCLUSION: In an unselected cohort of patients admitted with AMI, the mortality was considerably higher than expected from voluntary-based registries and large-scale clinical trials. The most favourable outcome is observed in patients with STEMI.